Objective: To investigate the value of myocardium scar area in predicting adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Methods: The first part of this study was a retrospective study. Patients diagnosed with ICM and undergoing CABG surgery at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2017 to December 2022 were enrolled as the discovery cohort. All patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance-late gadolinium enhancement (CMR-LGE) before surgery. According to the occurrence of postoperative MACEs, the patients were divided into MACEs group and MACEs-free group. Preoperative clinical and imaging data, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected and compared between the two groups. The primary endpoint was postoperative MACEs. Univariate and multifactor regression analyses were used to analyze the risk factors for MACEs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the predictive efficacy and optimal cut-off value of myocardial scar area for endpoint events. The second part of this study was a prospective study. Patients with ICM who received CABG at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2023 to June 2023 were enrolled as a validation cohort, and were divided into MACEs group and MACEs-free group according to whether MACEs occurred after surgery. Preoperative clinical and imaging data, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected and compared between the two groups. Verify the reliability of the cut-off value obtained by ROC curve in the validation cohort. Results: A total of 120 patients with ICM (30 patients in MACEs group and 90 patients in MACEs-free group), aged (61.6±8.7) years, including 93 males, were included in the discovery cohort. A total of 22 ICM patients (5 patients in MACEs group and 17 patients in MACEs-free group), aged (59.5±8.2) years, including 18 males, were included in the validation cohort. Multivariate Cox regression showed that myocardial scar area (HR=1.258, 95%CI 1.096-1.444, P=0.001) was an independent risk factor for the primary endpoint event. The area under ROC curve of myocardial scar area for predicting postoperative MACEs was 0.90 (95%CI 0.83-0.95), and myocardial scar area≥36.0% was the optimal cut-off value for predicting postoperative MACEs, and its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 96.7%, 72.2% and 78.3%, respectively. In the validation cohort, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of myocardial scar area in predicting postoperative MACEs in patients with ICM after CABG were 80.0%, 82.4% and 81.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Myocardial scar area is an independent risk factor for MACEs after CABG in patients with ICM, and myocardial scar area≥36.0% is the optimal cut-off value for predicting MACEs after CABG. Myocardial scar area can help to identify patients at high risk of surgery and provide a basis for risk stratification of patients.
目的： 探讨心肌瘢痕面积预测缺血性心肌病患者冠状动脉旁路移植（CABG）术后发生不良心血管事件（MACEs）的价值。 方法： 本研究第1部分为回顾性研究，入选2017年1月至2022年12月在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院诊断为缺血性心肌病并接受CABG手术治疗的患者作为发现队列，入选患者术前均行心脏磁共振-延迟钆强化检查，根据术后是否发生MACEs分为MACEs组和无MACEs组。收集并比较两组患者术前临床及影像资料、术中及术后相关资料。主要终点为术后发生MACEs。采用单因素和多因素回归分析影响缺血性心肌病患者CABG术后发生MACEs的相关危险因素，构建受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线，评估心肌瘢痕面积对终点事件的预测效能和最佳临界值。本研究第2部分为前瞻性研究，入选2023年1至6月在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院接受CABG的缺血性心肌病患者作为验证队列，根据术后是否发生MACEs分为MACEs组和无MACEs组，收集并比较两组患者术前临床及影像资料、术中及术后相关资料。在验证队列中验证ROC曲线获得界值的可靠性。 结果： 发现队列共纳入120例缺血性心肌病患者（MACEs组30例，无MACEs组90例），年龄（61.6±8.7）岁，男性93例。验证队列共纳入22例缺血性心肌病患者（MACEs组5例，无MACEs组17例），年龄（59.5±8.2）岁，男性18例。多因素Cox回归示心肌瘢痕面积（HR=1.258，95%CI：1.096~1.444，P=0.001）是主要终点事件的独立危险因素。心肌瘢痕面积预测术后发生MACEs的ROC曲线下面积为0.90（95%CI：0.83~0.95），心肌瘢痕面积≥36.0%是预测术后发生MACEs的最佳临界值，其敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为96.7%、72.2%和78.3%。在验证队列中，心肌瘢痕面积预测缺血性心肌病患者CABG术后发生MACEs的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为 80.0%，82.4%和81.8%。 结论： 心肌瘢痕面积是缺血性心肌病患者CABG术后是否发生MACEs的独立危险因素，心肌瘢痕面积≥36.0%是预测CABG术后是否发生MACEs的最佳临界值。该指标有助于识别手术高危患者，为患者危险分层提供依据。.

Myocardial revascularization in coronary artery disease via percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery effectively relieves symptoms, significantly improves prognosis and quality of life when combined with guideline-directed medical therapy. Hybrid coronary revascularization is a promising alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG in selected patients and is defined as a planned and/or intended combination of consecutive CABG surgery using at least 1 internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending (LAD), and catheter-based coronary intervention to the non-LAD vessels for the treatment of multivessel disease. The main indications for hybrid coronary revascularization are (i) to achieve complete revascularization in patients who cannot undergo conventional CABG, (ii) to treat patients with acute coronary syndromes and multivessel disease with a non-LAD vessel as the culprit lesion that needs revascularization and (iii) in highly select patients with multivessel disease with complex LAD lesions and simple percutaneous coronary intervention targets for all other vessels. Hybrid coronary revascularization patients receive a left internal mammary artery graft to the LAD artery through a minimal incision along with percutaneous coronary intervention to the remaining diseased coronary vessels using latest generation drug-eluting stents. A collaborative environment with a dedicated heart team is the optimal platform to perform such interventions, which aim to improve the quality and outcome of myocardial revascularization. This position paper analyses the rationale of hybrid coronary revascularization and the currently available evidence on the various techniques and delves into the sequence of the interventions and pharmacological management during and after the procedure.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major global health concern. However, the optimum timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in AMI patients remains controversial. This study investigated the optimal timing of CABG and its impact on postoperative outcomes. We hypothesized that determining the optimal timing of CABG could positively impact postoperative outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective analysis of the National Health Insurance Service of Korea database, focusing on 1 705 843 adult AMI patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2018 who underwent CABG within 1 year of diagnosis. Patients were categorized based on CABG timing. Primary endpoints included cohort identification and the time interval from AMI diagnosis to CABG. Secondary endpoints encompassed major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and the impact of postoperative medications.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 20 172 underwent CABG. Surgery within 24 h of AMI diagnosis demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, reducing cardiac death, myocardial infarction recurrence, and target vessel revascularization. Delayed CABG within 3 days also outperformed surgery within 1-2 days post-AMI. Additionally, postoperative aspirin use was associated with improved MACCE outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: CABG within 24 h of AMI diagnosis was associated with significantly minimized myocardial injury, emphasizing the critical role of rapid revascularization. Delayed CABG within 3 days related to better outcomes compared with that of surgery within 1-2 days. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing CABG timing in AMI patients, consequentially reducing morbidity and mortality.

Experience with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) following stent deployment in saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions is limited. We present 2 cases of percutaneous intervention in SVG in which acute stent underexpansion was successfully managed with IVL. In the first case, recalcitrant plaque required prestent deployment IVL, with intracoronary imaging showing persistent calcification. Additional poststent deployment IVL facilitated full expansion and successful stent delivery. In the second case, predilation with semicompliant balloons appeared angiographically effective, but stent deployment showed acute underexpansion. Postdilation with noncompliant balloons and ultimately IVL allowed full expansion and successful stent delivery. These are the first reported cases of IVL use immediately after stent deployment in SVG to treat underexpansion due to recalcitrant calcification.

OBJECTIVE: There is scarce evidence on the hemodynamic stability of remimazolam during anesthetic induction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study aims to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
METHODS: Randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: Tertiary teaching hospital.
METHODS: Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG.
METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to received either remimazolam (n = 50) or propofol (n = 50) for anesthetic induction. The remimazolam group received an initial infusion at 6 mg/kg/h, which was later adjusted to 1-2 mg/kg/h to maintain a bispectral index of 40-60 after loss of consciousness. In the propofol group, a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of propofol was administered, followed by 1-1.5% sevoflurane inhalation as needed to achieve the target bispectral index.
METHODS: The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) below the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the first 10 min after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for MAP <65 mmHg and the requirement for vasopressors.
RESULTS: The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly lower AUC under the baseline MAP compared to the propofol group (mean [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg·min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg·min; mean difference [95% confidence interval], 50.8 [10.4-91.2] mmHg·min; P = 0.014). Additionally, the remimazolam group had a reduced AUC for MAP <65 mmHg (7.3 [10.3] mmHg·min vs. 13.9 [14.9] mmHg·min; P = 0.007) and a lower frequency of vasopressor use compared to the propofol group (60% vs. 88%, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam may offer improved hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in patients undergoing CABG, suggesting its potential advantage over propofol for patients with significant coronary artery disease in terms of hemodynamic stability.

During coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the surgical procedure, particularly the manipulation of the major arteries of the heart, induces a significant inflammatory state that may compromise platelet function to the extent that platelet transfusion is required. Given stored platelets as a major source of biological mediators, this study investigates the effects of platelet transfusion on the major pro-aggregatory, pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory markers of platelets. Platelets from 20 patients, 10 who received platelet transfusion and 10 without, were subjected to flow cytometery where P-selectin and CD40 ligand (CD40L) expressions and PAC-1 binding (activation-specific anti GPIIb/GPIIIa antibody) analysed at five-time points of 24 h before surgery, immediately, 2 h, 24 h and 1 week after surgery. Analysis of intra-platelet transforming growth factor-beta-1 (TGF-β1) was also conducted using western blotting. Patients with platelet transfusion showed increased levels of P-selectin, CD40L and intra-platelet TGF-β1 2-h after surgery compared to those without transfusion (p < 0.05). PAC-1 binding was increased 24 h after surgery in transfused patients (p < 0.05). Given the significant post-transfusion elevation of platelet TGF-β1, P-sel/CD40L reduction in transfused patients a week after was of much interest. This study showed for the first time the significant effects of platelet transfusion on the pro-inflammatory, pro-aggeregatory and immunomodulatory state of platelets in CABG patients, which manifested with immediate, midterm and delayed consequences. While the increased pro-inflammatory conditions manifested as an immediate effect of platelet transfusion, the pro-aggregatory circumstances emerged 24 h post-transfusion. A week after surgery, attenuations of pro-inflammatory markers of platelets in transfused patients were shown, which might be due to the immunomodulatory effects of TGF-β1.

BACKGROUND: Severe pain occurs after cardiac surgery in the sternum and chest tubes sites. Although analgesia targeting the sternum is often prioritized, the analgesia of the drain site is sometimes overlooked. This study of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) aimed to provide optimized analgesia for both the sternum and the chest tubes area by combining parasternal block (PSB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB).
METHODS: Ethics committee approval (E.Kurul-E2-24-6176, 07/02/2024) was received for the study. Then, the trial was registered on www.
RESULTS: gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ) under the identifier NCT05427955 on 17/03/2024. Twenty patients between the ages of 18-80, with ASA physical status classification II-III, undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting CABG with sternotomy, were included. While the patients were under general anesthesia, PSB was performed through the second and fourth intercostal spaces, and SAPB was performed over the sixth rib. The primary outcome was VAS (Visual Analog Scale) during the first 12 h after extubation. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative remifentanil consumption and block-related side effects.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 64 years. Five patients were female, and 15 were male. For the sternum area, only one patient had resting VAS scores of 4, while the VAS scores for resting for the other patients were below 4. For chest tubes area, only two patients had resting VAS scores of 4 or above, while the resting VAS scores for the other patients were below 4. The patients\' intraoperative remifentanil consumption averaged 2.05 mg. No side effects related to analgesic protocol were observed in any of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study where PSB and SAPB were combined in patients undergoing CABG, effective analgesia was achieved for the sternum and chest tubes area.

Inflammation may contribute to postoperative cardiac complications and ketorolac, an anti-inflammatory agent inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX), shows promise in enhancing cardiac graft patency by suppressing endothelial cell proliferation in animal studies. However, the safety of postoperative ketorolac use remains controversial. This study investigates the association between early ketorolac application and complications following cardiac surgery. Data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database fueled this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome is a composite of mortality, pulmonary insufficiency, severe acute kidney injury (AKI), hemorrhage or hematoma, infection, cardiogenic shock, and cerebrovascular infarction postcardiac surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:1 match, caliper 0.2), multivariate logistic regression, interaction stratification analysis, pairwise algorithmic, and overlap weight model analyses were employed. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7143 patients who underwent valvular surgery or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were included. PSM created a balanced cohort of 3270 individuals (1635 in the ketorolac group). The matched cohort exhibited an 8.1% overall rate of postoperative complications, with a lower composite outcome rate in patients receiving ketorolac within 48 h of surgery compared with those without (PSM, OR 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54-0.90]). Consistent associations were observed in total cohort analyses, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses. Early ketorolac use within 48 h post-CABG or valvular procedures in adults is independently associated with a lower incidence of composite postoperative adverse events. Prospective trials are warranted to assess causality.

BACKGROUND: New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, increasing the risk of embolism and stroke. There is a lack of information on the use of anticoagulants in this context. The choice between Warfarin and Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) also is not well-established. This randomized study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of Warfarin and Rivaroxaban in preventing thrombotic events in POAF patients after isolated CABG.
METHODS: A total of 66 patients were randomized parallelly with 1:1 allocation to receive either Rivaroxaban (n = 34) or Warfarin (n = 32). Major bleeding events within 30 days after discharge were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included minor bleeding events and thrombotic episodes. Clinical characteristics, medication regimens, and left atrial diameter were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using appropriate tests.
RESULTS: No thrombotic episodes were observed in either treatment arm. No major bleeding events occurred in either group. Four minor bleeding events were reported, with no significant difference between the treatment groups (P = 0.6). Patients with atrial fibrillation had significantly larger left atrial diameters compared to those with normal sinus rhythm (40.5 vs. 37.8 mm, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that Warfarin and Rivaroxaban are both safe and effective for preventing thrombotic episodes in POAF patients after isolated CABG. No significant differences in major bleeding events were observed between the two anticoagulants. These findings may support the preference for DOACs like Rivaroxaban due to their convenience and easier maintenance.
BACKGROUND: Number IRCT20200304046696N1, Date 18/03/2020 https//irct.behdasht.gov.ir/ .

BACKGROUND: Several factors intervene in the evolution of the characteristics of Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), such as demographic changes, surgical technique, and perioperative care. Our objective was to analyze the evolution of the characteristics of coronary artery disease in patients treated with CABG and its immediate results.
METHODS: In an analytical study, we analyzed a cohort of patients with isolated CABG from January 2006 to December 2008 and from January 2016 to December 2018 in Hospital Clínico Regional Concepción, Chile. After the ethics committee\'s approval, we reviewed the database and surgical protocols. We used Chi-square and U Mann Whitney tests for statistical analysis (SPSSv25®), considering significant p < 0,05.
RESULTS: We analyzed 1,400 isolated CABG, 658 from the first period and 742 from the second, with a mean age of 62.0 ± 8.7 and 64.6 ± 9.3 respectively (p < 0.001). The subgroup with ventricular dysfunction in the second period showed a significant increase in diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and severe ventricular dysfunction. The second group decreased off-pump surgery and increased the use of ≥ 2 arterial grafts (p < 0.05). The Additive EuroSCORE I increased from 3.6 ± 2.5 to 4.4 ± 2.7 (p = 0.001). High-risk subgroup: 137 (20.8%) to 236 (31.8%), p < 0.001. Mortality of 13 (1.98%) and 16 (2.2%) in the first and second group respectively, p = 0.813.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant increase in the estimated surgical risk; however, mortality remained unchanged. The increase in surgical risk is consistent with the increase in mean age and prevalence of comorbidities, as well as the increase in severe ventricular dysfunction in the group ofpatients with ventricular dysfunction and recent AMI in the second period.