背景:院前延误是中风治疗延误的主要原因,行为意图被认为是行为的最直接预测因子。因此,为了有效减少中风的院前延误,有必要进一步了解卒中院前延迟意向(SPDBI)与其社会心理影响因素之间的关系,即人格特质,社会支持和应对方式。
目的:本研究旨在研究人格特质之间的关系,应对方式,社会支持,和SPDBI。
方法:横截面,向845名居民发放了自编问卷。问卷的内容包括人口统计信息,“中风120”的知识,十项个性盘点-中文版,简化的应对方式问卷,领悟社会支持量表和SPDBI量表。采用路径分析探讨SPDBI与其心理社会影响因素之间的关系。
结果:最终路径模型显示出与数据的良好拟合(χ2/df=2.981,RMSEA=0.048,GFI=0.936,CFI=0.941)。外向性(β=0.106),积极应对(β=-0.110),消极应对(β=0.150)和“卒中120”知识(β=-0.152)仅对SPDBI有直接影响。虽然同意(β=0.113),开放性(β=-0.121)和社会支持(β=-0.118)对SPDBI有直接影响,通过积极应对,他们对SPDBI也有间接影响(β=-0.009;-0.022;-0.049)。
结论:充分的社会支持和积极应对健康威胁可能会降低居民的SPDBI。同时,减少SPDBI的干预措施应考虑人格差异.
BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital delay is the major cause of stroke treatment delay, and behavioral intention is considered to be the most direct predictor of behavior. Therefore, to effectively reduce stroke pre-hospital delay, it is essential to further understand the relationship between stroke pre-hospital delay intention (SPDBI) and its social-psychological influencing factors, namely personality traits, social support and coping style.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims at examining the relationships among personality traits, coping style, social support, and SPDBI.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 845 residents. The content of the questionnaire included demographic information, the knowledge of \"Stroke 120\", Ten-Item Personality Inventory-Chinese version, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Perceived Social Support Scale and SPDBI Scale. Path analysis was used to investigate the relationship among SPDBI and its psychosocial influencing factors.
RESULTS: The final path model showed a good fit to the data (χ2/df = 2.981, RMSEA = 0.048, GFI = 0.936, CFI = 0.941). Extroversion (β = 0.106), positive coping (β = -0.110), negative coping (β = 0.150) and the knowledge of \"Stroke 120\" (β = -0.152) had only direct effects on SPDBI. While agreeableness (β = 0.113), openness (β = -0.121) and social support (β = -0.118) had direct effects on SPDBI, they also had indirect effects (β = -0.009; -0.022; -0.049) on SPDBI though positive coping.
CONCLUSIONS: Adequate social support and positive coping of health threat may reduce residents\' SPDBI. Meanwhile, the interventions to reduce SPDBI should take personality differences into consideration.