conventional microbiological tests

常规微生物试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)是一种无偏快速检测病原体的方法。本研究纳入了济宁医学院附属医院收治的145例疑似重症肺炎患者。这项研究主要旨在确定使用支气管肺泡灌洗液样品检测病原体的mNGS和常规微生物测试(CMT)的诊断性能。我们的研究结果表明,mNGS表现出明显更高的灵敏度(97.54%vs28.68%,P<0.001),巧合(90.34%对35.17%,P<0.001),和阴性预测值(80.00%vs13.21%,P<0.001),但特异性低于CMT(52.17%vs87.5%,P<0.001)。肺炎链球菌作为最常见的病原菌所占比例最大(22.90%,30/131)在这项研究中。除了细菌,真菌,和病毒,mNGS可以检测到多种非典型病原体,如结核分枝杆菌和非结核性。混合感染在重症肺炎患者中很常见,细菌-真菌-病毒-非典型病原体是最复杂的感染。在根据mNGS和CMT调整抗生素后,139例(95.86%,139/145)患者。我们的数据表明,mNGS在诊断呼吸道感染方面具有显著优势,尤其是非典型病原体和真菌感染。病原体检测及时、全面,有助于及时准确地调整抗生素治疗,改善患者预后并降低死亡率。IMPORTANCEMetagenomic使用支气管肺泡灌洗液的下一代测序可以为呼吸道感染提供更全面,更准确的病原体,尤其是考虑入院前使用经验性抗生素或复杂的临床表现时。该技术有望在未来抗菌药物的精准应用中发挥重要作用。
    Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is an unbiased and rapid method for detecting pathogens. This study enrolled 145 suspected severe pneumonia patients who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University. This study primarily aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples for detecting pathogens. Our findings indicated that mNGS performed significantly higher sensitivity (97.54% vs 28.68%, P < 0.001), coincidence (90.34% vs 35.17%, P < 0.001), and negative predictive value (80.00% vs 13.21%, P < 0.001) but performed lower specificity than CMTs (52.17% vs 87.5%, P < 0.001). Streptococcus pneumoniae as the most common bacterial pathogen had the largest proportion (22.90%, 30/131) in this study. In addition to bacteria, fungi, and virus, mNGS can detect a variety of atypical pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non-tuberculous. Mixed infections were common in patients with severe pneumonia, and bacterial-fungal-viral-atypical pathogens were the most complicated infection. After adjustments of antibiotics based on mNGS and CMTs, the clinical manifestation improved in 139 (95.86%, 139/145) patients. Our data demonstrated that mNGS had significant advantage in diagnosing respiratory tract infections, especially atypical pathogens and fungal infections. Pathogens were detected timely and comprehensively, contributing to the adjustments of antibiotic treatments timely and accurately, improving patient prognosis and decreasing mortality potentially.IMPORTANCEMetagenomic next-generation sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid can provide more comprehensive and accurate pathogens for respiratory tract infections, especially when considering the previous usage of empirical antibiotics before admission or complicated clinical presentation. This technology is expected to play an important role in the precise application of antimicrobial drugs in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    靶向下一代测序(tNGS)已成为一种快速诊断技术,用于识别导致肺部感染的多种病原体。
    从不能或不愿意进行支气管肺泡灌洗的患者收集痰样本。对这些样本进行tNGS分析以诊断肺部感染。对临床资料进行回顾性分析,并将tNGS的临床疗效与常规微生物学试验(CMTs)进行比较。
    这项研究包括209名确诊为肺部感染的儿童和成人患者。tNGS检测到45种潜在病原体,而CMT鉴定出23种病原体。tNGS和CMT之间的总体微生物检出率显着不同(96.7%与36.8%,p<0.001)。在tNGS和CMT结果一致阳性的76例患者中,86.8%(66/76)表现出完全或部分同意。对于高致病性和稀有/非定殖微生物,tNGS,结合全面的临床审查,21例直接指导病原学诊断和抗生素治疗。这包括结核分枝杆菌复合体引起的感染,某些非典型病原体,曲霉菌,和非结核分枝杆菌.在登记人口中,38.8%(81/209)的患者根据tNGS结果调整治疗。此外,tNGS研究结果揭示了儿童和成人之间病原体分布的年龄特异性异质性。
    CMT通常无法满足肺部感染的诊断需求。这项研究强调了无法或不会接受支气管肺泡灌洗的患者的痰液样本的tNGS如何对潜在病原体产生有价值的见解。从而增强特定病例中肺部感染的诊断。
    UNASSIGNED: Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) has emerged as a rapid diagnostic technology for identifying a wide spectrum of pathogens responsible for pulmonary infections.
    UNASSIGNED: Sputum samples were collected from patients unable or unwilling to undergo bronchoalveolar lavage. These samples underwent tNGS analysis to diagnose pulmonary infections. Retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data, and the clinical efficacy of tNGS was compared to conventional microbiological tests (CMTs).
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 209 pediatric and adult patients with confirmed pulmonary infections. tNGS detected 45 potential pathogens, whereas CMTs identified 23 pathogens. The overall microbial detection rate significantly differed between tNGS and CMTs (96.7% vs. 36.8%, p < 0.001). Among the 76 patients with concordant positive results from tNGS and CMTs, 86.8% (66/76) exhibited full or partial agreement. For highly pathogenic and rare/noncolonized microorganisms, tNGS, combined with comprehensive clinical review, directly guided pathogenic diagnosis and antibiotic treatment in 21 patients. This included infections caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, certain atypical pathogens, Aspergillus, and nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Among the enrolled population, 38.8% (81/209) of patients adjusted their treatment based on tNGS results. Furthermore, tNGS findings unveiled age-specific heterogeneity in pathogen distribution between children and adults.
    UNASSIGNED: CMTs often fall short in meeting the diagnostic needs of pulmonary infections. This study highlights how tNGS of sputum samples from patients who cannot or will not undergo bronchoalveolar lavage yield valuable insights into potential pathogens, thereby enhancing the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in specific cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)被广泛用作比常规测试更有前途的技术。然而,其在支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)样本中用于区分非重症肺炎和重症肺炎的临床应用尚未得到很好的证实.因此,这项研究旨在调查mNGS对100名疑似肺炎个体的BALF样本的诊断性能,并将其与BALF样本的常规微生物测试(CMT)和最终临床诊断进行比较。27例非重症肺炎和73例重症肺炎患者最终得到临床诊断。在100个案例中,mNGS和培养物的诊断表现有显著差异;65例样本类型相同,其中25例仅通过mNGS诊断为阳性(38.46%),1例仅通过培养诊断为阳性(1.54%)。此外,mNGS和培养均为阳性的24例(36.92%),mNGS和培养均为阴性的15例(23.08%)。在35个案例中,35例中有28例被mNGS诊断为阳性,而间接免疫荧光法(IIFT)诊断为阳性的35例中只有4例。此外,在不考虑既往抗生素暴露的病例中,mNGS的阳性率高于培养物.发现重症肺炎患者的混合病原体比非重症肺炎患者明显更普遍。重要的是,在38例仅由mNGS诊断的病例中,25名患者在医生根据mNGS结果改变治疗后经历了改善的结果。总之,结果表明,BALF的mNGS是检测重症肺炎混合病原体的潜在有效工具。
    Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely used as a more promising technology than conventional tests. However, its clinical utility in the context of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples for discriminating between non-severe and severe pneumonia is not well established. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of mNGS on BALF samples from 100 individuals suspected of pneumonia, and compared it with conventional microbiological tests (CMT) of BALF samples and the final clinical diagnosis. Twenty-seven cases of non-severe pneumonia and 73 cases of severe pneumonia patients were finally clinically diagnosed. Among 100 cases, diagnostic performance of mNGS and culture showed a significant difference; 65 cases had the same sample types, of which 25 cases were diagnosed as positive by mNGS only (38.46%) and 1 was diagnosed as positive by culture only (1.54%). Moreover, 24 cases were diagnosed positive in both mNGS and culture (36.92%) and 15 cases tested negative in both mNGS and culture (23.08%). Among 35 cases, 28 out of 35 cases were diagnosed as positive by mNGS, while only 4 out of 35 cases were diagnosed as positive by the indirect immunofluorescence method (IIFT). In addition, the positive rate of mNGS was higher than that of culture in cases regardless of prior antibiotic exposure. Mixed pathogens were found to be significantly more prevalent in severe pneumonia patients than in non-severe pneumonia patients. Importantly, among 38 cases who were diagnosed solely by mNGS, 25 patients experienced an improved outcome after physicians changed the therapy according to the mNGS results. In conclusion, the results showed that mNGS of BALF represents a potentially effective tool for detection of mixed pathogens in severe pneumonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    免疫抑制使异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)受者容易感染。及时准确地识别病原体对于优化治疗策略至关重要。这项多中心回顾性研究旨在评估宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在高热allo-HSCT接受者中检测致病病原体的能力,并检查其与常规微生物学测试(CMT)的一致性。
    我们对在allo-HSCT期间从153例疑似感染患者获得的样本进行了mNGS和CMT。根据取样时的中性粒细胞减少状态对患者进行分组。
    mNGS测试比CMT更敏感(81.1%vs.53.6%,P<0.001)用于诊断临床可疑感染,尤其是在非中性粒细胞减少症队列中。mNGS可以比细菌更好地检测真菌和病毒,具有比CMT更高的灵敏度。57.4%(35/61)的高热事件诊断为免疫事件,mNGS结果为阴性。33.5%(48/143)的CMT结果为阴性(P=0.002)。基于mNGS的靶向抗感染策略的治疗成功率明显高于经验性抗生素(85%vs.56.5%,P=0.004)。
    在识别临床相关病原体方面,mNGS测试优于CMT,并为allo-HSCT受者的抗感染策略提供了有价值的信息。此外,mNGS结果阴性的患者应注意免疫事件。
    Immunosuppression predisposes allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients to infection. Prompt and accurate identification of pathogens is crucial to optimize treatment strategies. This multi-center retrospective study aimed to assess the ability of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) to detect causative pathogens in febrile allo-HSCT recipients and examined its concordance with conventional microbiological tests (CMT).
    We performed mNGS and CMT on samples obtained from 153 patients with suspected infection during allo-HSCT. Patients were grouped based on their neutropenic status at the time of sampling.
    The mNGS test was more sensitive than CMT (81.1% vs. 53.6%, P<0.001) for diagnosing clinically suspected infection, especially in the non-neutropenia cohort. mNGS could detect fungi and viruses better than bacteria, with a higher sensitivity than CMT. Immune events were diagnosed in 57.4% (35/61) of the febrile events with negative mNGS results, and 33.5% (48/143) with negative CMT results (P=0.002). The treatment success rate of the targeted anti-infection strategy was significantly higher when based on mNGS than on empirical antibiotics (85% vs. 56.5%, P=0.004).
    The mNGS test is superior to CMT for identifying clinically relevant pathogens, and provides valuable information for anti-infection strategies in allo-HSCT recipients. Additionally, attention should be paid to immune events in patients with negative mNGS results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:评估宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在疑似多致病性肺炎的HIV感染患者支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)的实际临床应用的价值和挑战。
    UNASSIGNED:招募了57名经同意接受支气管镜检查的疑似混合肺炎的HIV感染患者,并回顾性审查了mNGS和BALF的常规微生物测试(CMT)的结果。2020年7月至2022年6月。
    UNASSIGNED:54例患者被诊断为肺炎,其中49例患者有明确的病原体,5例患者有可能的病原体。在疑似肺部感染的HIV感染患者中,mNGS对真菌检测的诊断准确性高于CMT。mNGS诊断HIV感染患者肺炎的敏感性明显高于CMT(79.6%vs61.1%;P<0.05)。混合感染患者入院前CD4T细胞计数较低,症状持续时间较单一感染患者高。mNGS对混合感染的检出率明显高于CMT,并且mNGS可以识别出更多的共病原体。观察到的最常见的混合感染模式是真菌-病毒(11/29,37.9%),其次是真菌-病毒-细菌(6/29,20.7%)合并感染HIV感染的多致病性肺炎患者。
    UNASSIGNED:mNGS提高了病原体的检出率,并在识别HIV感染患者的多致病性肺炎方面表现出优势。对于CD4T细胞计数低且症状持续时间长的HIV感染患者,建议早期进行支气管镜检查和mNGS。观察到的最常见的混合感染模式是真菌-病毒,其次是真菌-病毒-细菌共同感染HIV感染的多致病性肺炎患者。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the value and challenges of real-world clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in HIV-infected patients with suspected multi-pathogenic pneumonia.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-seven HIV-infected patients with suspected mixed pneumonia who were agreed to undergo the bronchoscopy were recruited and retrospectively reviewed the results of mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) of BALF from July 2020 to June 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: 54 patients were diagnosed with pneumonia including 49 patients with definite pathogens and five patients with probable pathogens. mNGS exhibited a higher diagnostic accuracy for fungal detection than CMTs in HIV-infected patients with suspected pulmonary infection. The sensitivity of mNGS in diagnosis of pneumonia in HIV-infected patients was much higher than that of CMTs (79.6% vs 61.1%; P < 0.05). Patients with mixed infection had lower CD4 T-cell count and higher symptom duration before admitting to the hospital than those with single infection. The detection rate of mNGS for mixed infection was significantly higher than that of CMTs and more co-pathogens could be identified by mNGS. The most common pattern of mixed infection observed was fungi-virus (11/29, 37.9%), followed by fungi-virus-bacteria (6/29, 20.7%) coinfection in HIV-infected patients with multi-pathogenic pneumonia.
    UNASSIGNED: mNGS improved the pathogens detection rate and exhibited advantages in identifying multi-pathogenic pneumonia in HIV-infected patients. Early performance of bronchoscopy and mNGS are recommended in HIV-infected patients with low CD4 T cell counts and long duration of symptoms. The most common pattern of mixed infection observed was fungi-virus, followed by fungi-virus-bacteria coinfection in HIV infected patients with multi-pathogenic pneumonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)已被广泛研究,由于其能够一次检测样品中的所有微生物遗传信息,并且不依赖于传统培养。然而,mNGS在临床病原体诊断中的应用仍具有挑战性.
    UNASSIGNED:从2019年12月到2021年3月,包括支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAFL)在内的134个标本,血,痰,脑脊液(CSF),胆汁,胸腔积液,脓液,在秦皇岛市第一医院不断收集,他们的回顾性诊断分为感染性疾病(128,95.5%)和非感染性疾病(6,4.5%)。将mNGS的病原体检测性能与常规微生物测试(CMT)和培养方法进行了比较。此外,对常见耐药鲍曼不动杆菌的耐药基因(ARGs)和进化关系进行分析。
    UNASSIGNED:与CMT和培养方法相比,mNGS在病原体检测中显示出更高的灵敏度(分别为74.2%对57.8%;P<0.001和66.3%对31.7%;P<0.001)。重要的是,对于仅MNGS阳性的情况,18例(35%)导致诊断修改,7例(23%)证实了临床诊断。在mNGS和培养中均检测到鲍曼不动杆菌的17例病例中,ade基因是最常检测到的ARGs(来自13例),其次是sul2和APH(3'')-Ib(均来自12例)。在这些ARGs和相关表型之间观察到高度一致性(ADE基因为100%,sul2和APH(3“)-Ib)为91.6%。鲍曼不动杆菌菌株分为三组,大多数都聚集得很好。这表明这些菌株可能是流行菌株。
    未经批准:在我们的研究中,mNGS比CMT和培养方法具有更高的灵敏度。鲍曼不动杆菌的ARGs频率和聚类分析结果对抗感染治疗具有重要意义。
    UNASSIGNED: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been widely studied, due to its ability of detecting all the microbial genetic information unbiasedly in a sample at one time and not relying on traditional culture. However, the application of mNGS in the diagnosis of clinical pathogens remains challenging.
    UNASSIGNED: From December 2019 to March 2021, 134 specimens including Broncho alveolar lavage fluid (BAFL), blood, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), bile, pleural fluid, pus, were continuously collected in The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, and their retrospective diagnoses were classified into infectious disease (128, 95.5%) and noninfectious disease (6, 4.5%). The pathogen-detection performance of mNGS was compared with conventional microbiological tests (CMT) and culture method. In addition, the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and evolutionary relationship of common drug-resistant A. baumannii were also analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with CMT and culture methods, mNGS showed higher sensitivity in pathogen detection (74.2% vs 57.8%; P < 0.001 and 66.3% vs 31.7%; P < 0.001, respectively). Importantly, for cases that mNGS-positive only, 18 (35%) cases result in diagnosis modification, and 7 (23%) cases confirmed the clinical diagnosis. In 17 cases that A. baumannii were both detected in mNGS and culture, ade genes were the most frequently detected ARGs (from 13 cases), followed by sul2 and APH(3\")-Ib (both from 12 cases). High consistency was observed among these ARGs and the related phenotype (100% for ade genes, 91.6% for sul2 and APH(3\")-Ib). A. baumannii strains were classified into three groups, and most were well-clustered. It suggested those strains may be the epidemic strains.
    UNASSIGNED: In our study, mNGS had a higher sensitivity than CMT and culture method. And the result of ARGs frequency and cluster analysis of A. baumannii was of great significance to the anti-infective therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与常规微生物学试验(CMT)相比,评估支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在免疫功能低下患者中对疑似肺炎的诊断价值。
    方法:对69例疑似肺炎的免疫功能低下患者同时接受BALF的CMT和mNGS进行回顾性分析。比较CMT和mNGS的诊断价值,以临床综合诊断为参考标准。
    结果:60例患者被诊断为肺炎,其中52例具有确定的病原体,8例具有可能的病原体。以复合参考标准为黄金标准,通过CMT鉴定出42种病原体,包括9种细菌,17种真菌,8病毒,6结核分枝杆菌,并通过BALF培养检测到2例军团菌和19例(45%)。至于mNGS,它确定了76种病原体,包括20种细菌,31种真菌,14病毒,5结核分枝杆菌,四个军团菌和两个披肩衣原体.mNGS对病原体的总体检出率高于CMT。然而,mNGS和CMT对细菌和病毒感染的诊断准确率相当.mNGS对真菌检测的诊断准确率高于CMT(78%vs.57%,P<0.05),这主要是因为肺孢子虫肺炎(PJP)患者mNGS的敏感性高(100%vs.28%,P<0.05)。19例患者被确定为肺部合并感染,mNGS检测比CMT在共感染中具有更高的检出率和更宽的病原体检测谱。此外,jirovecii肺孢子虫是共同感染中最常见的病原体,mNGS鉴定出的PJP的共同病原体比CMT多得多。
    结论:BALF的mNGS提高了病原体的微生物检出率,在免疫功能低下患者中检测PJP和鉴定合并感染方面具有显著优势。
    BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in immunocompromised patients for the diagnosis of suspected pneumonia in comparison with that of conventional microbiological tests (CMTs).
    METHODS: Sixty-nine immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia received both CMTs and mNGS of BALF were analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic value was compared between CMTs and mNGS, using the clinical composite diagnosis as the reference standard.
    RESULTS: Sixty patients were diagnosed of pneumonia including fifty-two patients with identified pathogens and eight patients with probable pathogens. Taking the composite reference standard as a gold standard, 42 pathogens were identified by CMTs including nine bacteria, 17 fungi, 8 virus, 6 Mycobacterium Tuberculosis, and two Legionella and 19(45%) of which were detected by BALF culture. As for mNGS, it identified 76 pathogens including 20 bacteria, 31 fungi, 14 virus, 5 Mycobacterium Tuberculosis, four Legionella and two Chlamydia psittaci. The overall detection rate of mNGS for pathogens were higher than that of CMTs. However, a comparable diagnostic accuracy of mNGS and CMTs were found for bacterial and viral infections. mNGS exhibited a higher diagnostic accuracy for fungal detection than CMTs (78% vs. 57%, P < 0.05), which mainly because of the high sensitivity of mNGS in patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) (100% vs. 28%, P < 0.05). Nineteen patients were identified as pulmonary co-infection, mNGS test showed a higher detection rate and broader spectrum for pathogen detection than that of CMTs in co-infection. Moreover, Pneumocystis jirovecii was the most common pathogen in co-infection and mNGS have identified much more co-pathogens of PJP than CMTs.
    CONCLUSIONS: mNGS of BALF improved the microbial detection rate of pathogens and exhibited remarkable advantages in detecting PJP and identifying co-infection in immunocompromised patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Infections are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PID). Timely and accurate microbiological diagnosis is particularly important in these patients. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been used for pathogen detection recently. However, few reports describe the use of mNGS for pathogen identification in patients with PID.
    To evaluate the utility of mNGS for detecting pathogens in patients with PID, and to compare it with conventional microbiological tests (CMT).
    This single center retrospective study investigated the diagnostic performance of mNGS for pathogens detection in PID patients and compared it with CMT. Sixteen PID patients with suspected infection were enrolled, and medical records were analyzed to extract detailed clinical characteristics such as gene variation, immune status, microbial distribution, time-consuming of mNGS and CMT, treatment, and outcomes.
    mNGS identified pathogenic microbe in 93.75% samples, compared to 31.25% for culture and 68.75% for conventional methods, and detected an extra 18 pathogenic microorganisms including rare opportunistic pathogens and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Pathogen identification by mNGS required 48 hours, compared with bacterial culture for 3-7 days and even longer for fungus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture.
    mNGS has marked advantages over conventional methods for pathogenic diagnosis, particularly opportunistic pathogens and mixed infections, in patients with PID. This method might enable clinicians to make more timely and targeted therapeutic decisions, thereby improving the prognosis of these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号