Being an uncommon and challenging disorder, acute aortic dissection (AAD) can have fatal outcomes in the event of missed diagnosis or treatment delay. AAD could easily be misdiagnosed, as symptoms usually mimic other common clinical syndromes showing up in Accident and Emergency (A&E), including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pericarditis, pulmonary embolism, acute abdomen, musculoskeletal pain, as well as presenting as heart failure, stroke, syncope, and absent peripheral pulses. We present a case of a 77-year-old female who presented to the medical decision unit with acute-onset chest, back, and abdominal pain that occurred on standing for six hours She was thought initially to have acute coronary syndrome based on electrocardiography (ECG) changes, troponin, a normal chest X-ray, and no blood pressure discrepancies in upper extremities. Due to worsening abdominal pain and a previous history of a perforated diverticulum, contrast computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen was arranged and this showed acute type B aortic dissection. By the time the CT was performed, the patient had been in hospital for 16 hours, almost 22 hours from the onset of pain.

The most common presenting symptoms of colovesical fistulae (CVF) are pneumaturia and fecaluria. The most important aspect remains not only to investigate the aetiology, and the degree of both severity and complexity, but also the subsequent influence of this on overall management. In a younger population, management usually consists of curative surgery. However, this may not be possible in older patients where surgical candidacy is a genuine concern and a clinical challenge arises relating to pursuing a conservative strategy. We attempted to briefly outline how two patients were managed with a similar non-surgical approach due to frailty. These cases attempt to highlight the importance of multi-disciplinary specialty input, with a view to optimising patient care.