目的:比较室间隔缩小治疗(SRT)后出现左心室流出道(LVOT)残留或复发的梗阻性肥厚型心肌病患者行室间隔肌切除术的早期和晚期结果。
方法:从1989年1月至2022年3月,145例患者在SRT后接受了间隔肌切除术,以治疗残留的LVOT梗阻;72例患者先前进行了酒精间隔消融(ASA),73人先前进行了手术间隔肌切除术(SM)。基线患者特征,超声心动图参数,比较两组的手术结果。
结果:既往有ASA的患者更可能是男性(50.0%vs30.1%;P=0.015),年龄较大(中位年龄57.5岁vs.48.3年;P<0.001),并且具有更大的体重指数(32.7kg/m2vs。30.0kg/m2;P=0.011)。通过间隔肌切除术重复SRT后,术后完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)的发生率无显著差异,需要永久性起搏器,两组之间(8.3%vs.2.7%;P=0.151)。1例(0.7%)患者在手术后30天内死亡。平均随访7.5年(IQR3.0-13.8),有20人死亡。Kaplan-Meier5-,10-,15年生存率为100%,91%,先前的SM组为76%,93%,81%,先前的ASA组为64%(P=0.207)。
结论:对于先前有ASA的患者中残留或复发性LVOT梗阻的间隔肌切除术是安全的,术后CHB的发生率低。先前ASA患者的手术结果和晚期生存率令人满意,与接受重复肌切除术的患者相当。
OBJECTIVE: To compare early and late outcomes of septal myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who presented with residual or recurrent left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction after previous septal-reduction therapy (SRT).
METHODS: From January 1989 to March 2022, 145 patients underwent reintervention by septal myectomy for residual LVOT obstruction after previous SRT; 72 patients had previous alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and 73 had previous surgical septal myectomy. Baseline patient characteristics, echocardiographic parameters, and surgical outcomes were compared between these 2 groups.
RESULTS: Patients who had previous ASA were more likely to be male (50.0% vs 30.1%; P = .015), be older (median age 57.5 years vs 48.3 years; P < .001), and have a greater body mass index (32.7 kg/m2 vs 30.0 kg/m2; P = .011). After repeat SRT by septal myectomy, there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complete heart block, necessitating permanent pacemaker, between the 2 groups (8.3% vs 2.7%; P = .151). One (0.7%) patient died within 30 days of surgery. Over a median follow-up of 7.5 years (interquartile range, 3.0-13.8), there were 20 deaths. Kaplan-Meier 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 100%, 91%, and 76% for the previous septal myectomy group, and 93%, 81%, and 64% for the previous ASA group (P = .207).
CONCLUSIONS: Septal myectomy for residual or recurrent LVOT obstruction in patients who had previous ASA is safe, with an acceptably low rate of postoperative complete heart block. Surgical outcomes and late survival rates in patients with complete heart block ASA were satisfactory and comparable with patients who underwent repeat myectomy.