Cavitary lung lesions pose a formidable diagnostic challenge due to their multifaceted etiologies. While tuberculosis and other prevalent pathogens typically dominate discussions, instances of community-acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) pneumonia leading to cavitation in immunocompetent individuals remain exceptionally rare. Herein, we present a compelling case of such pneumonia in a 61-year-old man with a past medical history of hypertension and coronary artery disease who presented with cough, chest pain, and subjective fever. Chest imaging revealed cavitary lung lesions, which is atypical for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Initial workup excluded common CAP pathogens, following which bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) definitively diagnosed P. aeruginosa, prompting targeted antibiotic therapy. Treatment led to clinical and radiographic improvement. P. aeruginosa rarely causes CAP, especially in immunocompetent patients, and cavitary lesions further complicate diagnosis. This case highlights the importance of considering P. aeruginosa in CAP with unusual features and emphasizes the utility of bronchoscopy with BAL for diagnosis and guiding management.

This systematic review aimed to consolidate findings on the etiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among Indian adults. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines 2020 and conducted a comprehensive search across databases including PubMed, Scopus-Elsevier, and hand-searched reference lists using key terms such as \"Community-Acquired Pneumonia,\" \"CAP,\" \"Indian,\" and \"adults.\" Articles published between January 2010 and January 2024 were included, with exclusions for studies involving pediatric populations, non-Indian patients, or those published before 2010. From an initial pool of 344 articles, duplicates were removed and titles and abstracts were screened, resulting in nine studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The analysis of pooled data comprising 1,643 Indian adult participants revealed the following pathogen distribution: Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common organism, accounting for 33% of the cases. This was followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae at 23%, Staphylococcus aureus at 10%, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila each at 7%, and Chlamydia pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa each at 4%. Notably, the review highlights a rising incidence of K. pneumoniae in CAP cases, which is a significant concern and should be considered when treating CAP patients in India. The findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive diagnostic testing, including advanced methods such as bronchoalveolar lavage, urinary antigen tests, serology for atypical pathogens, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, to improve diagnostic yield and guide targeted antibiotic therapy. This review underscores the need for updated empirical treatment guidelines that account for dominant pathogens. Future research should focus on employing advanced diagnostic methods to enhance understanding of CAP etiology.

UNASSIGNED: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major health concern in the United States (US), with its incidence, severity, and outcomes influenced by social determinants of health, including socioeconomic status. The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status, as measured by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), on CAP-related admissions remains understudied in the literature.
UNASSIGNED: To determine the independent association between DCI and CAP-related admissions in Maryland.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective study using the Maryland State Inpatient Database (SID) to collate data on CAP-related admissions from January 2018 to December 2020. The study included adults aged 18-85 years. We explored the independent association between community-level economic deprivation based on DCI quintiles and CAP-related admissions, adjusting for significant covariates.
UNASSIGNED: In the study period, 61,467 cases of CAP-related admissions were identified. The patients were predominantly White (49.7%) and female (52.4%), with 48.6% being over 65 years old. A substantive association was found between the DCI and CAP-related admissions. Compared to prosperous neighborhoods, patients living in economically deprived communities had 43% increased odds of CAP-related admissions.
UNASSIGNED: Residents of the poorest neighborhoods in Maryland have the highest risk of CAP-related admissions, emphasizing the need to develop effective public health strategies beneficial to the at-risk patient population.

BACKGROUND:  Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an acute lung infection affecting the alveoli in individuals who have not had recent exposure to healthcare settings. It is characterized by newly detected pulmonary infiltration on a chest X-ray or computed tomography scan, accompanied by at least two of the following symptoms: a new or worsening cough, shortness of breath, increased sputum production, fever or hypothermia, pleuritic chest pain, hypoxia, confusion, or an abnormal WBC count (either leukopenia or leukocytosis). It is a major contributor to global mortality and morbidity, especially in elderly populations. This study aims to investigate the etiology of CAP in our region and analyze the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with CAP.
METHODS:  This prospective, hospital-based study was conducted at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, a 2,011-bed multispecialty hospital. The study included 100 patients over 18 years old, diagnosed with CAP, and hospitalized between January 2023 and January 2024. All patients underwent a thorough clinical assessment, and sputum cultures were collected on the day of admission. Patients under 18 years old, those who had been hospitalized within the preceding two weeks, individuals with pneumonia caused by tuberculosis or aspiration pneumonia, patients with compromised immune systems, and pregnant women were excluded.
RESULTS:  The study included 100 patients with a mean age of 53.13 years (±18.31). The most common age group was 59-68 years, which included 25 (25%) cases, followed by the 69-78 year age group with 18 (18%) cases and the 18-28 year age group with 15 (15%) cases. The majority were male, with 61 (61%) cases. Common symptoms included fever in 78 cases (78%), chest pain in 69 cases (69%), dyspnea in 65 cases (65%), and cough in 51 cases (51%). Sputum cultures showed growth in 65 cases (65%), with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most prevalent pathogen in 28 cases (43%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae in 18 cases (28%). Together, these two pathogens accounted for 46 out of 65 positive samples (70%).
CONCLUSIONS:  This study highlights the clinical profile and rising etiology of K. pneumoniae in CAP in adults in Western India, particularly in the elderly. These findings underscore the need for periodic updates on CAP etiology to inform empirical treatment strategies effectively. Future research should use advanced diagnostics and diverse samples to refine CAP management, with continuous monitoring to update treatment protocols.

In most countries, antibiotics for oral administration are put on the market in fixed packages. When there is no exact unit dispensing of antimicrobials, drug pack size may influence prescribers\' choice of treatment duration. The aim of this study was to investigate the accordance of approved antibiotic packages with national guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). For the purpose of this study, criteria were developed to determine the accordance of approved antibiotic packages for treating CAP (criteria), which are based on recommendations from national guidelines for treating CAP. Subsequently, the accordance of approved antibiotic packages with the number of antibiotic doses resulting from the specified criteria was determined. Of 39 identified therapeutic option-package size combinations, 11 were found to be matched (28.2%), meaning there were no leftover medication units after completing therapy, and 28 were mismatched combinations (71.8%), indicating that there were excess doses of antibiotics remaining at the end of therapy. The results of this research showed a significant non-accordance of the approved antibiotic packages with the national guidelines for the treatment of CAP and, consequently, the creation of a large amount of residues of unit doses of antibiotics in the community.

Cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam are antimicrobials recommended by IDSA/ATS guidelines for the empirical management of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Concerns have been raised about which should be used in clinical practice. This study aims to compare the effect of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill CAP patients through a targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). A total of 2026 ICU-admitted patients with CAP were included. Among them, (47%) presented respiratory failure, and (27%) developed septic shock. A total of (68%) received cefepime and (32%) piperacillin/tazobactam-based treatment. After running the TMLE, we found that cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam-based treatments have comparable 28-day, hospital, and ICU mortality. Additionally, age, PTT, serum potassium and temperature were associated with preferring cefepime over piperacillin/tazobactam (OR 1.14 95% CI [1.01-1.27], p = 0.03), (OR 1.14 95% CI [1.03-1.26], p = 0.009), (OR 1.1 95% CI [1.01-1.22], p = 0.039) and (OR 1.13 95% CI [1.03-1.24], p = 0.014)]. Our study found a similar mortality rate among ICU-admitted CAP patients treated with cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam. Clinicians may consider factors such as availability and safety profiles when making treatment decisions.

UNASSIGNED: Recent studies have found that S100 serum calcium-binding protein A12 (S100A12) has important significance in the expression of acute infectious diseases, and has high clinical application value in the differential diagnosis, prognosis and other aspects of acute infectious diseases. The accuracy of modified early warning score (MEWS) in evaluating the disease risk level of critically ill patients is comparable to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II).
UNASSIGNED: Based on MEWS, 108 adult community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients were divided into the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups. The differences in invasive mechanical ventilation rate and mortality rate among each group were compared, and the differences of S100A12 in different levels of MEWS scores were compared through one-way analysis of variance. According to the prognosis after 30 days, the patients were divided into the death group and the survival group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to study the influencing and independent factors of 30-day death in CAP patients. The sensitivity and specificity of S100A12, procalcitonin (PCT), and MEWS scores in predicting the 30-day death in CAP patients were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, as well as the area under each indicator curve.
UNASSIGNED: The serum S100A12 concentration increased with the increase in the MEWS stratification, and the mechanical ventilation and mortality rates also increased significantly. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the factors influencing mortality in adult CAP patients after 30 days. The receiver-operating characteristics curve was used to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curves of serum S100A12, PCT, and MEWS in predicting mortality in CAP patients after 30 days.
UNASSIGNED: The serum S100A12, PCT, and MEWS can effectively predict the mortality risk in adult CAP patients after 30 days. Serum S100A12 combined with MEWS has a high clinical application value in evaluating the severity and prognosis of adult CAP.

(1) Background: Pneumonia stands as a prevalent infectious disease globally, contributing significantly to mortality and morbidity rates. In Taiwan, pneumonia ranks as the third leading cause of death, particularly affecting the elderly population (92%). This study aims to investigate factors associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among elderly individuals receiving home-based care. (2) Methods: Conducted between January 2018 and December 2019, this retrospective study involved a medical chart review of elderly patients under home-based care. A multiple logistic regression model was employed to identify factors associated with CAP in this demographic. (3) Results: Analysis encompassed 220 elderly patients with an average age of 82.0 ± 1.1 years. Eighty-five patients (38.6%) were hospitalized for CAP. Predominant diagnoses included cancer (32.3%), stroke (24.5%), and dementia (23.6%). Significant predictors of CAP for elderly patients under home-based care included male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 4.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95-8.60, p < 0.001), presence of a nasogastric (NG) tube (OR = 8.85, 95% CI: 3.64-21.56, p < 0.001), and a borderline negative association with the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.13-1.02, p = 0.0546). End-of-life care indicators for these patients with CAP included an increased number of hospital admission days in the last month of life (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08-1.18, p < 0.001) and a higher likelihood of hospital death (OR = 3.59, 95% CI: 1.51-8.55, p = 0.004). (4) Conclusions: In the current study, significant predictors of CAP among elderly patients receiving home-based care included the presence of an NG tube and male gender, while the use of PPIs was borderline inversely associated with the risk of CAP. Notably, more admission days in the last month of life and death in the hospital were found to be associated with end-of-life care for this group.

The impact of bacterial pneumonia on patients with COVID-19 infection remains unclear. This prospective observational monocentric cohort study aims to determine the incidence of bacterial community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia (CAP and HAP) and its effect on mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at University Hospital Olomouc between 1 November 2020 and 31 December 2022. The secondary objectives of this study include identifying the bacterial etiology of CAP and HAP and exploring the capabilities of diagnostic tools, with a focus on inflammatory biomarkers. Data were collected from the electronic information hospital system, encompassing biomarkers, microbiological findings, and daily visit records, and subsequently evaluated by ICU physicians and clinical microbiologists. Out of 171 patients suffering from critical COVID-19, 46 (27%) had CAP, while 78 (46%) developed HAP. Critically ill COVID-19 patients who experienced bacterial CAP and HAP exhibited higher mortality compared to COVID-19 patients without any bacterial infection, with rates of 38% and 56% versus 11%, respectively. In CAP, the most frequent causative agents were chlamydophila and mycoplasma; Enterobacterales, which were multidrug-resistant in 71% of cases; Gram-negative non-fermenting rods; and Staphylococcus aureus. Notably, no strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae were detected, and only a single strain each of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis was isolated. The most frequent etiologic agents causing HAP were Enterobacterales and Gram-negative non-fermenting rods. Based on the presented results, commonly used biochemical markers demonstrated poor predictive and diagnostic accuracy. To confirm the diagnosis of bacterial CAP in our patient cohort, it was necessary to assess the initial values of inflammatory markers (particularly procalcitonin), consider clinical signs indicative of bacterial infection, and/or rely on positive microbiological findings. For HAP diagnostics, it was appropriate to conduct regular detailed clinical examinations (with a focus on evaluating respiratory functions) and closely monitor the dynamics of inflammatory markers (preferably Interleukin-6).

Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) is a bacterial species often associated with the occurrence of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). CAP refers to a specific kind of pneumonia that occurs in individuals who acquire the infection outside of a healthcare setting. It represents the leading cause of both death and morbidity on a global scale. Moreover, the declaration of S. pneumoniae as one of the 12 leading pathogens was made by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017. Antibiotics like β-lactams, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones are the primary classes of antimicrobial medicines used for the treatment of S. pneumoniae infections. Nevertheless, the efficacy of these antibiotics is diminishing as a result of the establishment of resistance in S. pneumoniae against these antimicrobial agents. In 2019, the WHO declared that antibiotic resistance was among the top 10 hazards to worldwide health. It is believed that penicillin-binding protein genetic alteration causes β-lactam antibiotic resistance. Ribosomal target site alterations and active efflux pumps cause macrolide resistance. Numerous factors, including the accumulation of mutations, enhanced efflux mechanisms, and plasmid gene acquisition, cause fluoroquinolone resistance. Furthermore, despite the advancements in pneumococcal vaccinations and artificial intelligence (AI), it is not feasible for individuals to rely on them indefinitely. The ongoing development of AI for combating antimicrobial resistance necessitates more research and development efforts. A few strategies can be performed to curb this resistance issue, including providing educational initiatives and guidelines, conducting surveillance, and establishing new antibiotics targeting another part of the bacteria. Hence, understanding the resistance mechanism of S. pneumoniae may aid researchers in developing a more efficacious antibiotic in future endeavors.