背景:COVID-19大流行极大地改变了工作和协作的格局,影响设计研究方法和技术。共同设计方法受到大流行的负面影响和积极影响,促使需要调查和了解这些影响的程度,变化,和适应,特别是在卫生部门。尽管大流行给开展共同设计和相关项目带来了挑战,它还鼓励重新评估共同设计实践,导致创新的解决方案和技术。设计师和研究人员已经探索了吸引利益相关者和最终用户的替代方法,利用数字研讨会和参与性数字平台。这些适应有可能增强包容性,允许更广泛的个人通过共同设计贡献他们的观点和见解,从而为医疗保健变革做出贡献。
目的:本研究旨在探讨大流行对共同设计和相关实践的影响,专注于已经获得的医疗保健共同设计实践,适应,或增强,特别关注公平问题,多样性,和包容。
方法:该研究使用现实主义的综合方法来确定和分析大流行对健康共同设计方法的影响,利用一系列来源,包括第一人称体验,灰色文学,和学术文学。将参与卫生共同设计实践社区,以支持这一过程。
结果:通过检查专业人士的经验和见解,从业者,以及积极参与共同设计并驾驭大流行挑战和机遇的社区,我们可以对策略有更深入的了解,工具,以及在大流行期间促进有效共同设计的技术,有助于建设抗灾能力和能力,共同设计在大流行之后的卫生。
结论:通过让社区伙伴参与,实践社区(研究),和设计从业者,我们希望更接近实践,通过现实主义过程进行能力建设,从而能够快速采用和完善出现的新技术或见解。最终,这项研究将有助于共同设计方法的进步,并为健康领域共同设计的未来提供信息。
■DERR1-10.2196/58318。
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly transformed the landscape of work and collaboration, impacting design research methodologies and techniques. Co-design approaches have been both negatively and positively affected by the pandemic, prompting a need to investigate and understand the extent of these impacts, changes, and adaptations, specifically in the health sector. Despite the challenges that the pandemic imposed on conducting co-design and related projects, it also encouraged a re-evaluation of co-design practices, leading to innovative solutions and techniques. Designers and researchers have explored alternative ways to engage stakeholders and end users, leveraging digital workshops and participatory digital platforms. These adaptations have the potential to enhance inclusivity, allowing for a wider range of individuals to contribute their perspectives and insights through co-design and thus contribute to healthcare change.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the impacts of the pandemic on co-design and related practices, focusing on co-design practices in healthcare that have been gained, adapted, or enhanced, with a specific focus on issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion.
METHODS: The study uses a realist synthesis methodology to identify and analyze the effects of the pandemic on co-design approaches in health, drawing on a range of sources including first-person experiences, gray literature, and academic literature. A community of practice in co-design in health will be engaged to support this process.
RESULTS: By examining the experiences and insights of professionals, practitioners, and communities who were actively involved in co-design and have navigated the challenges and opportunities of the pandemic, we can gain a deeper understanding of the strategies, tools, and techniques that have facilitated effective co-design during the pandemic, contributing to building resilience and capacity in co-design in health beyond the pandemic.
CONCLUSIONS: By involving community partners, community of practice (research), and design practitioners, we expect closer proximity to practice with capacity building occurring through the realist process, thus enabling rapid adoption and refinement of new techniques or insights that emerge. Ultimately, this research will contribute to the advancement of co-design methodologies and inform the future of co-design in health.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/58318.