community dwelling

社区住宅
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解脆弱的危险因素,社区老年人的功能下降和不良医疗结果的发生率对于规划人口层面的健康和社会护理服务很重要.我们检查了与一年制度化风险相关的变量,西澳大利亚州社区老年护理评估小组(ACAT)在自己家中评估患者的住院和死亡情况.使用临床虚弱量表(CFS)和社区筛查风险工具(RISC)测量虚弱和风险,分别。从曲线下面积(AUC)测量预测准确性。来自417名患者的数据,中位数82±10年,包括在内。在12个月的随访中,22.5%(n=94)被制度化,44.6%(n=186)至少住院一次,9.8%(n=41)死亡。虚弱是常见的,中位CFS评分6/9±1,与制度化显着相关(p=0.001),住院(p=0.007)和死亡(p<0.001)。在RISC上测量的日常生活活动(ADL)受损与接受长期护理(r=0.51)具有中度相关性,并显着预测了住院(p<0.001)和死亡(p=0.01)。RISC的制度化准确度最高(AUC0.76)。CFS和RISC对死亡率有相当好的准确性(AUC分别为0.69和0.74),但都不能准确预测住院。西澳大利亚州ACAT对社区居住的老年患者进行的家庭评估显示,身体虚弱程度很高,ADL损害和事件不良结果,这表明对这些患者的预期护理计划势在必行。
    Understanding risk factors for frailty, functional decline and incidence of adverse healthcare outcomes amongst community-dwelling older adults is important to plan population-level health and social care services. We examined variables associated with one-year risk of institutionalisation, hospitalisation and death among patients assessed in their own home by a community-based Aged Care Assessment Team (ACAT) in Western Australia. Frailty and risk were measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC), respectively. Predictive accuracy was measured from the area under the curve (AUC). Data from 417 patients, median 82 ± 10 years, were included. At 12-month follow-up, 22.5% (n = 94) were institutionalised, 44.6% (n = 186) were hospitalised at least once and 9.8% (n = 41) had died. Frailty was common, median CFS score 6/9 ± 1, and significantly associated with institutionalisation (p = 0.001), hospitalisation (p = 0.007) and death (p < 0.001). Impaired activities of daily living (ADL) measured on the RISC had moderate correlation with admission to long-term care (r = 0.51) and significantly predicted institutionalisation (p < 0.001) and death (p = 0.01). The RISC had the highest accuracy for institutionalisation (AUC 0.76). The CFS and RISC had fair to good accuracy for mortality (AUC of 0.69 and 0.74, respectively), but neither accurately predicted hospitalisation. Home assessment of community-dwelling older patients by an ACAT in Western Australia revealed high levels of frailty, ADL impairment and incident adverse outcomes, suggesting that anticipatory care planning is imperative for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:评估糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),血压,自我效能感,以及对社区居住的糖尿病患者使用远程医疗服务的生活质量效率。
    方法:Cochrane图书馆,WebofScience,PsycINFO,PubMed,EMBASE,CINAHL,和Scopus数据库从成立日期到2023年6月22日进行了系统搜索。两名评估人员独立选择并评估了符合条件的研究。在PROSPERO中注册了协议。
    结果:对包括3586名受试者的17项研究的分析显示,远程护理显著改善了糖尿病患者的管理。与对照组相比,干预护理对HbA1c有显著益处(MD=-0.30,95%CI=-0.44--0.17,16项研究),收缩压(MD=-2.45,95%CI=-4.53--0.36,P=0.02),自我效能(MD=0.36,95%CI=0.04-0.67,P=0.03)和生活质量(MD=0.37,95%CI=0.05-0.70,P=0.02)。然而,舒张压(MD=-1.37,95%CI=-3.34--0.61,P=0.17)未发现显着影响。
    结论:远程医疗对改善社区糖尿病患者的自我管理是有效的,提出了实现自我管理的有效手段。
    To evaluate the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure, self-efficacy, and quality of life efficacy of using telecare services for community-dwelling people with diabetes.
    Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were systematically searched from their inception dates to June 22, 2023. Two evaluators independently selected and evaluated eligible studies. A protocol was registered in PROSPERO.
    An analysis of 17 studies that included 3586 subjects showed that telecare significantly improved the management of patients with diabetes. Compared to controls, intervention care had significant benefits regarding HbA1c (MD = -0.30, 95 % CI = -0.44 - -0.17, 16 studies), systolic blood pressure (MD = -2.45, 95 % CI = -4.53 - -0.36, P = 0.02), self-efficacy (MD = 0.36, 95 % CI = 0.04 - 0.67, P = 0.03) and quality of life (MD = 0.37, 95 % CI = 0.05 - 0.70, P = 0.02). However, diastolic blood pressure (MD = -1.37, 95 % CI = -3.34 - -0.61, P = 0.17) was not found to be significantly affected.
    Telecare is effective in improving self-management among community-dwelling people with diabetes, suggesting an effective means for them to achieve self-management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇观点文章,代表作者的意见,讨论了开发面向患者的脆弱网站的障碍和潜在的解决方案。面向患者的脆弱网站是一个健康资源,居住在社区的老年人可以导航并回答一系列与健康相关的问题,以获得脆弱评分和健康摘要。然后,这些信息可以与医疗保健专业人员共享,以帮助了解急性疾病之前的健康状况。以及筛查和识别老年人的身体虚弱。我们的观点来自两次讨论会议,包括护理人员和护理提供者,以及居住在社区的老年人。我们发现,以患者为导向的脆弱网站的障碍包括,但不限于,它对虚弱的人固有的限制性,对数据隐私的担忧,时间承诺的担忧,以及对健康和生活方式资源的需求以及评估摘要。对于每个障碍,我们讨论潜在的解决方案和对这些解决方案的警告,包括护理人员的援助,将网站托管在受信任的来源上,减少需要回答的健康问题的数量,并为每个用户的响应提供量身定制的资源,分别。除了筛查和识别虚弱的老年人,一个以病人为导向的虚弱网站将有助于促进非虚弱成年人的健康衰老,鼓励老化,支持实时监控,并实现个性化和预防性护理。
    UNASSIGNED: This viewpoint article, which represents the opinions of the authors, discusses the barriers to developing a patient-oriented frailty website and potential solutions. A patient-oriented frailty website is a health resource where community-dwelling older adults can navigate to and answer a series of health-related questions to receive a frailty score and health summary. This information could then be shared with health care professionals to help with the understanding of health status prior to acute illness, as well as to screen and identify older adult individuals for frailty. Our viewpoints were drawn from 2 discussion sessions that included caregivers and care providers, as well as community-dwelling older adults. We found that barriers to a patient-oriented frailty website include, but are not limited to, its inherent restrictiveness to frail persons, concerns over data privacy, time commitment worries, and the need for health and lifestyle resources in addition to an assessment summary. For each barrier, we discuss potential solutions and caveats to those solutions, including assistance from caregivers, hosting the website on a trusted source, reducing the number of health questions that need to be answered, and providing resources tailored to each users\' responses, respectively. In addition to screening and identifying frail older adults, a patient-oriented frailty website will help promote healthy aging in nonfrail adults, encourage aging in place, support real-time monitoring, and enable personalized and preventative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:预期寿命的增加带来了老年综合征的增加,特别是脆弱。文献表明,锻炼是预防,甚至倒车,社区居住人口的脆弱。主要目的是证明基于多组分锻炼的干预如何改善社区居民的脆弱和脆弱。(2)方法:一项针对老年振兴的多组分运动计划的前瞻性观察性研究,65岁以上的人持有BarthelIndex分数等于,或超越,90.这个项目开发了30周,一周三次,在每次持续45-50分钟的会议中。身体虚弱水平由短物理性能电池记录,FRAIL问卷筛选工具,并在节目开始时计时“Up&Go”,30周后(在节目结束时),并在未接受培训的13周之后;(3)结果:360名参与者完成了该计划;在该计划开始之前,生活在城市地区的老年妇女中发现了更大的虚弱风险,脂肪百分比更高,更多的基线病理,和更广泛的基线药物使用。此外,在训练期间和无体力活动期间均观察到异质性结果。然而,随着时间的推移,它们是一致的,并在训练后显示出改进。它们显示出TUG和SPPB之间的良好相关性;(4)结论:为期30周的多组分锻炼计划可改善社区居民的虚弱和虚弱前状态,而没有功能下降。然而,在用于测量训练期间和不活动期间的脆弱的各种工具中,缺乏同质性是明显的。
    (1) Background: The increasing life expectancy brings an increase in geriatric syndromes, specifically frailty. The literature shows that exercise is a key to preventing, or even reversing, frailty in community-dwelling populations. The main objective is to demonstrate how an intervention based on multicomponent exercise produces an improvement in frailty and pre-frailty in a community-dwelling population. (2) Methods: a prospective observational study of a multicomponent exercise program for geriatric revitalization with people aged over 65 holding Barthel Index scores equal to, or beyond, 90. The program was developed over 30 weeks, three times a week, in sessions lasting 45-50 min each. Frailty levels were registered by the Short Physical Performance Battery, FRAIL Questionnaire Screening Tool, and Timed \"Up & Go\" at the beginning of the program, 30 weeks later (at the end of the program), and following 13 weeks without training; (3) Results: 360 participants completed the program; a greater risk of frailty was found before the program started among older women living in urban areas, with a more elevated fat percentage, more baseline pathologies, and wider baseline medication use. Furthermore, heterogeneous results were observed both in training periods and in periods without physical activity. However, they are consistent over time and show improvement after training. They show a good correlation between TUG and SPPB; (4) Conclusions: A thirty-week multicomponent exercise program improves frailty and pre-frailty status in a community-dwelling population with no functional decline. Nevertheless, a lack of homogeneity is evident among the various tools used for measuring frailty over training periods and inactivity periods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字健康工具可以支持行为改变,并允许干预措施以最小的成本进行扩展。保持营养(KOKU-Nut)是免费的,基于平板电脑的应用程序,专注于根据英国指南增加体力活动和改善老年人的饮食摄入量。这项干预措施的目标是一个重要的研究领域,该研究领域被詹姆斯·林德联盟报告为营养不良问题设定优先伙伴关系。
    目的:本研究旨在评估在社区居住的老年人中使用数字健康工具KOKU-Nut的可行性,以指导未来的随机对照试验。次要目标是确定可接受性,可用性,初步效果大小,以及研究和干预的安全性(KOKU-Nut)。
    方法:这是一项可行性随机对照试验。我们计划使用目的抽样招募36名社区居住的老年人。参与者将以1:1的比例随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组将被要求每周3次与KOKU-Nut接触,持续12周。对照组的参与者将获得宣传健康生活方式的传单。所有研究参与者将在基线和12周结束时完成问卷。参与者的样本将被要求参加可选的面试。该研究将收集一系列数据,包括人体测量学(身高和体重),饮食摄入量(3天食物日记),身体功能(握力和5次坐立),感知生活质量(EQ-5D),可用性(系统可用性规模),和安全性(不良事件)。
    结果:数据收集于2024年3月开始,结果将于2025年1月发布。可行性将根据参与者自我报告参与干预的情况来确定。以及征聘和保留率,并将进行描述性总结。我们还将考虑缺失数据的数量,并评估结果与小组分配的关系。可接受性将使用修改后的治疗评估清单和一对一的半结构化访谈来衡量。面试记录将使用NVivo(版本12;QSRInternational)软件进行分析,使用框架分析来了解招聘过程中的任何障碍,评估措施的适宜性,以及干预和研究设计的可接受性。
    结论:该研究与医学研究委员会制定的指南一致,该指南通过使用定性和定量研究来研究干预的障碍并确定招募和保留方面的潜在挑战,从而制定复杂的干预措施。我们预计这些结果将为未来提供动力的随机对照设计试验的发展提供信息,以测试KOKU-Nut的真正有效性。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05943366;https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05943366.
    PRR1-10.2196/50922。
    Digital health tools can support behavior change and allow interventions to be scalable at a minimal cost. Keep-on-Keep-up Nutrition (KOKU-Nut) is a free, tablet-based app that focuses on increasing physical activity and improving the dietary intake of older adults based on UK guidelines. The intervention targets an important research area identified as a research priority reported by the James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership for malnutrition.
    This study aims to assess the feasibility of using the digital health tool KOKU-Nut among community-dwelling older adults to inform a future randomized controlled trial. The secondary aims are to determine the acceptability, usability, preliminary effect sizes, and safety of the study and the intervention (KOKU-Nut).
    This is a feasibility randomized controlled trial. We plan to recruit a total of 36 community-dwelling older adults using purposive sampling. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either the intervention or the control group. The intervention group will be asked to engage with KOKU-Nut 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Participants in the control group will receive a leaflet promoting a healthy lifestyle. All study participants will complete questionnaires at baseline and the end of the 12 weeks. A sample of participants will be asked to participate in an optional interview. The study will collect a range of data including anthropometry (height and weight), dietary intake (3-day food diary), physical function (grip strength and 5-times sit-to-stand), perceived quality of life (EQ-5D), usability (System Usability Scale), and safety (adverse events).
    Data collection commenced in March 2024, and the results will be ready for publication by January 2025. Feasibility will be determined on the basis of participants\' self-reported engagement with the intervention, and recruitment and retention rates and will be summarized descriptively. We will also consider the amount of missing data and assess how outcomes are related to group assignment. Acceptability will be measured using the modified treatment evaluation inventory and one-to-one semistructured interviews. Transcripts from the interviews will be analyzed using NVivo (version 12; QSR International) software using framework analysis to understand any barriers to the recruitment process, the suitability of the assessment measures, and the acceptability of the intervention and study design.
    The study aligns with guidelines developed by the Medical Research Council for developing a complex intervention by using qualitative and quantitative research to examine the barriers of the intervention and identify potential challenges around recruitment and retention. We anticipate that these results will inform the development of a future powered randomized controlled design trial to test the true effectiveness of KOKU-Nut.
    ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05943366; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05943366.
    PRR1-10.2196/50922.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:在社区环境中,药物的可预防危害对患者安全构成重大威胁,尤其是在使用多种处方药的门诊老年人中。患者可以通过在决策中发挥积极作用与初级保健专业人员合作,学习药物自我管理的基础知识,与社区资源合作。
    目的:本研究旨在评估一套重新设计初级保健服务的患者伙伴关系工具的影响,以鼓励和授权患者更有效地利用这些服务来提高用药安全性。
    方法:该研究是非随机的,由1个私人家庭医学诊所和2个公共安全网初级保健诊所组成的横断面阶梯式楔形集群对照试验。存在2个干预序列,每个序列具有1个簇,以及1个对照序列,具有1个簇。在6个为期6周的诊所访问结束后,将立即进行横断面调查,在干预实施期间没有数据收集的过渡期。要调查的访问次数将因时期和集群而异。我们计划在405次访视期间招募患者和专业人员进行调查。在实验阶段,将使用两个伙伴关系工具和相关的诊所流程更改进行访问:(1)诊所工作人员在见到提供者之前向相关患者提供1页的访问准备指南,旨在改善沟通和共同决策,和(2)一个简短的教育视频库,诊所工作人员鼓励患者观看药物安全。在控制期间,访问将在通常的情况下进行。主要结果将是患者在药物使用中的自我效能。次要结果是与药物相关的问题,例如初级保健提供者确定的重复治疗以及访问期间的协作工作评估。
    结果:该研究于2019年9月获得资助。数据收集始于2023年4月,并于2023年12月结束。在此期间收集了405次初级保健的数据。截至2024年2月15日,计算了初始描述性统计数据。完整的数据分析预计将在2024年夏季完成并发布。
    结论:本研究将评估初级保健中患者伙伴关系工具和相关流程变化对药物使用自我效能和药物相关问题的影响。该研究能够确定在初级保健就诊中可能从患者参与工具中受益最大的患者类型。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05880368;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05880368。
    DERR1-10.2196/57878。
    BACKGROUND: Preventable harms from medications are significant threats to patient safety in community settings, especially among ambulatory older adults on multiple prescription medications. Patients may partner with primary care professionals by taking on active roles in decisions, learning the basics of medication self-management, and working with community resources.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of a set of patient partnership tools that redesign primary care encounters to encourage and empower patients to make more effective use of those encounters to improve medication safety.
    METHODS: The study is a nonrandomized, cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster-controlled trial with 1 private family medicine clinic and 2 public safety-net primary care clinics each composing their own cluster. There are 2 intervention sequences with 1 cluster per sequence and 1 control sequence with 1 cluster. Cross-sectional surveys will be taken immediately at the conclusion of visits to the clinics during 6 time periods of 6 weeks each, with a transition period of no data collection during intervention implementation. The number of visits to be surveyed will vary by period and cluster. We plan to recruit patients and professionals for surveys during 405 visits. In the experimental periods, visits will be conducted with two partnership tools and associated clinic process changes: (1) a 1-page visit preparation guide given to relevant patients by clinic staff before seeing the provider, with the intention to improve communication and shared decision-making, and (2) a library of short educational videos that clinic staff encourage patients to watch on medication safety. In the control periods, visits will be conducted with usual care. The primary outcome will be patients\' self-efficacy in medication use. The secondary outcomes are medication-related issues such as duplicate therapies identified by primary care providers and assessment of collaborative work during visits.
    RESULTS: The study was funded in September 2019. Data collection started in April 2023 and ended in December 2023. Data was collected for 405 primary care encounters during that period. As of February 15, 2024, initial descriptive statistics were calculated. Full data analysis is expected to be completed and published in the summer of 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study will assess the impact of patient partnership tools and associated process changes in primary care on medication use self-efficacy and medication-related issues. The study is powered to identify types of patients who may benefit most from patient engagement tools in primary care visits.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05880368; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05880368.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/57878.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:补充β-羟基β-甲基丁酸酯(HMB)似乎可有效保护老年人的肌肉。然而,尚未在慢性病患者中研究内源性HMB与虚弱之间的关联.
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨2型糖尿病(T2DM)老年人内源性HMB水平与虚弱状态之间是否存在关联。
    方法:数据来自托莱多健康老龄化研究,社区居住年龄(65岁以上)队列。根据针对我们的人群标准化的脆弱表型(FP)和脆弱特征量表12(FTS12),在基线和平均2.99年时评估脆弱。使用三个嵌套的多变量逻辑回归评估HMB水平与虚弱之间的关联,并按性别进行分段。葡萄糖,HMB和葡萄糖相互作用,年龄和身体成分被用作协变量。
    结果:255名参与者(平均年龄75.3岁,52.94%的男性)被包括在内。HMB水平显示出与脆弱的横截面负相关,当包括相互作用项HMB*葡萄糖时,它被修改,仅在FTS12中保持显著[OR(95%CI):0.436(0.253,0.751),p值0.003]。HMB内源性水平与FTS12之间的关联似乎与性别无关,其中在调整协变量后保持了关联。然而,似乎有葡萄糖水平的阈值,以上,HMB的保护作用丧失:整个样本按性别调整为145.4mg/dl,男性和女性为149.6mg/dl和138.9mg/dl,分别。未发现内源性HMB水平与事故虚弱相关。
    结论:横断面分析显示,通过FTS12评估,T2DM老年人的内源性HMB水平与虚弱呈负相关。发现这种关联取决于循环的空腹葡萄糖水平。
    BACKGROUND: Supplementation with β-hydroxy β-methyl butyrate (HMB) appears to be effective in preserving muscle in older adults. However, the association between endogenously produced HMB with frailty has not been studied in people with chronic disease.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to explore whether an association exists between endogenous HMB levels and frailty status in older adults with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
    METHODS: Data were taken from the Toledo Study of Healthy Ageing, a community-dwelling aged (65 years+) cohort. Frailty was assessed at baseline and at 2.99 median years according to the Frailty Phenotype (FP) standardized to our population and the Frailty Trait Scale 12 (FTS12). The associations between HMB levels and frailty were assessed using three nested multivariate logistic regressions and segmented by sex. Glucose, HMB and glucose interaction, age and body composition were used as covariables.
    RESULTS: 255 participants (mean age 75.3 years, 52.94% men) were included. HMB levels showed an inverse cross-sectional association with frailty, which was modified when the interaction term HMB*glucose was included, remaining significant only for FTS12 [OR (95% CI): 0.436 (0.253, 0.751), p-value 0.003]. The association between HMB endogenous levels and FTS12 appears to be independent of sex, in which the association was maintained after adjusting for the covariates. However, there appears to be threshold points for glucose levels, above which the protective effect of HMB is lost: 145.4 mg/dl adjusted by gender for the whole sample and 149.6 mg/dl and 138.9 mg/dl for men and women, respectively. Endogenous HMB levels were not found to be associated with incident frailty.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional analysis revealed that endogenous HMB levels were inversely associated with frailty as assessed by the FTS12 in older people with T2DM. This association was found to be dependent on circulating fasted glucose levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有严重痴呆症的老年人在疗养院和急性护理环境中受到身体束缚的风险增加,但是在家里照顾的人中,对克制的使用知之甚少。这项研究探讨了在社区居住的重度痴呆症老年人中,护理人员报告的约束使用情况。
    方法:使用来自215名家庭护理人员的横截面数据,我们描述了居住在家中的重度痴呆老年人的限制使用情况.然后,我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与限制使用相关的因素。
    结果:近一半(47%)的看护者报告了曾受到约束的老年人。大多数报告使用约束的护理人员建议出于安全原因,例如预防跌倒(68%),游荡(30%),和拔除导管或饲管(29%);44%表示医生或其他医疗保健提供者参与了限制的决定。喂食管(OR=4.16,95%CI:1.27-13.59)和身体侵略性激动行为(OR=1.93,95%CI:1.09-3.40)与重度痴呆的老年人使用克制的几率更高。从朋友那里获得强烈情感支持的看护者(OR=0.45,95%CI:0.21-0.95)在向他人担任看护者时报告使用克制的可能性较小(OR=2.77,95%CI:1.36-5.63)增加了使用克制的几率。
    结论:限制使用的普遍性令人担忧,并表明缺乏对护理人员和医疗保健提供者的循证指导和支持,以防止在家治疗的重度痴呆老年人使用限制。
    BACKGROUND: Older adults with severe dementia are at increased risk of being physically restrained in nursing homes and acute care settings, but little is known about restraint use among those cared for at home. This study explores caregiver-reported use of restraints among community-dwelling older adults with severe dementia.
    METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from 215 family caregivers, we describe restraint use among older adults with severe dementia living at home. We then use multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with restraint use.
    RESULTS: Nearly half (47%) of caregivers reported on older adults who had been subject to restraints. Most caregivers reporting restraint use suggested safety reasons, such as prevention of falls (68%), wandering (30%), and removal of catheters or feeding tubes (29%); and 44% indicated doctors or other health care providers were involved in the decision to restrain. Feeding tubes (OR = 4.16, 95% CI: 1.27-13.59) and physically aggressive agitation behaviors (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.09-3.40) were associated with higher odds of restraint use among older adults with severe dementia. Caregivers who received strong emotional support from friends (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.95) were less likely to report restraint use while serving as a caregiver to others (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.36-5.63) increased the odds of restraint use.
    CONCLUSIONS: The pervasiveness of restraint use is concerning and suggests a lack of evidence-based guidance and support for both caregivers and healthcare providers to prevent restraint use among older adults with severe dementia cared for at home.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:易受伤害的老年人有很高的发病和死亡风险。有规律的身体活动(PA)可以对该特定目标群体的健康和与健康相关的行为产生积极影响。然而,基于社区的PA促进干预措施对弱势老年人的影响和可行性的证据仍然有限.
    目标:BeTaSen(Bewegungs-TandemsindenLebensweltenChemnitzerSeniorinnenundSenioren:einBeitragzurkommunmitalenGesundheitsförderung)研究旨在评估(1)的影响以及(2)的可行性,接受,以及12个月低阈值PA干预计划对社区居住的脆弱老年人的有用性。
    方法:对于我们基于人群的前瞻性观察队列研究,将招募开姆尼茨(德国)地区120名易受伤害的老年人(75岁或以上)参加(1)每周一次与经过培训的指导员举行的社区低门槛PA会议(活动tandems)和(2)每月一次由经过培训的运动指导员主持的运动会议.在干预中,将鼓励参与者独立执行PA。参与者将完成评估,其中将包括问卷以及对他们身体的客观测量,认知,和3个不同时间点的社会心理健康(基线,开始后6个月,和干预结束后6个月)。此外,将执行过程评估,包括问卷调查和定性访谈,涉及参与者,导师,和市政项目合作伙伴代表。
    结果:BeTaSen项目进程于2021年10月开始,并于2022年8月开始在开姆尼茨市的第一个社区进行数据收集和干预。在提交手稿时,共招募了86名参与者。纵向结果预计到2025年。
    结论:这项研究的结果将提供以下方面的见解:(1)脆弱的老年人的PA行为以及PA干预措施对健康相关结果的影响,例如认知,物理,和社会心理健康,(2)基于社区的PA干预措施的可行和有用的组成部分。因此,这项试点研究有助于未来的建议,并为进一步的研究提供了基础,例如在社区环境中开发可行和可持续的针对特定目标群体的干预措施。
    DERR1-10.2196/51462。
    BACKGROUND: Vulnerable older adults have a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Regular physical activity (PA) can have a positive effect on the health and health-related behavior of this specific target group. However, evidence of the impact and feasibility of community-based PA promotion interventions for vulnerable older adults is still limited.
    OBJECTIVE: The BeTaSen (Bewegungs-Tandems in den Lebenswelten Chemnitzer Seniorinnen und Senioren: ein Beitrag zur kommunalen Gesundheitsförderung) study aims to evaluate the (1) impact as well as the (2) feasibility, acceptance, and usefulness of a 12-month low-threshold PA intervention program for community-dwelling vulnerable older adults.
    METHODS: For our population-based prospective observational cohort study, a total of 120 vulnerable older adults (aged 75 years or older) in the area of Chemnitz (Germany) will be recruited to participate in (1) weekly neighborhood-based low-threshold PA meetings with trained mentors (activity tandems) and (2) monthly exercise meetings led by trained exercise instructors. Within the intervention, participants will be encouraged to perform the PA independently. Participants will complete assessments, which will include questionnaires as well as objective measurements of their physical, cognitive, and psychosocial health at 3 different time points (baseline, 6 months after the start, and 6 months after the end of the intervention). Additionally, a process evaluation will be performed, including questionnaires and qualitative interviews, involving the participants, mentors, and municipal project partner representatives.
    RESULTS: The BeTaSen project process began in October 2021, with the start of data collection and intervention in August 2022 in the first neighborhoods of the city of Chemnitz. A total of 86 participants were recruited at the time of submission of the manuscript. Longitudinal results are expected by 2025.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study\'s results will provide insights on (1) the PA behavior of vulnerable older adults as well as the impact of PA interventions on health-related outcomes such as cognitive, physical, and psychosocial health, and (2) the feasible and useful components of community-based PA interventions. Thus, this pilot study contributes to future recommendations and provides a basis for further research, such as the development of feasible and sustainable target group-specific interventions in community settings.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/51462.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    爱尔兰的老年人因药物不良事件(ADE)的风险增加,在某种程度上,增加复方率。减少社区居住老年人ADE(CDOA)的干预措施取得了有限的成功,因此,需要新的方法。现实主义者的审查使用不同的镜头来检查为什么以及如何干预应该起作用,而不是如果,他们工作。快速现实主义审查(RRR)是一个更集中和加速的版本。本RRR的目的是确定和检查在GP设置中与减少CDOA中的ADE相关的结果中发挥作用的背景和机制,这可以为爱尔兰的干预措施的发展提供信息。
    开发了六种候选理论(CT),根据该领域的知识和最近的文献,与预计干预措施如何发挥作用有关。这些形成了搜索策略。回顾了633篇摘要的80篇全文,其中包括27个。Snowballing又增加了五篇文章,相关政策文件增加到45份。使用NVivo软件在迭代开发的子主题下提取与理论相关的数据。
    在六种理论中,三个理论,与全科医生参与干预有关,健康政策文件对老年人的相关性,和共同决策,提供了指导未来干预措施的数据,以减少爱尔兰环境中CDOA的ADE。两种理论的数据不足,第三个被拒绝,因为爱尔兰环境中现有的障碍使其使用不切实际。
    为了提高基于爱尔兰GP的干预措施的成功率,以减少CDOA的ADE,干预措施必须具有相关性并易于在实践中应用,得到国家政策的支持,并有足够的资源。未来的研究需要在新开发的干预措施中检验我们的理论。
    UNASSIGNED: Older adults in Ireland are at increased risk of adverse drug events (ADE) due, in part, to increasing rates of polypharmacy. Interventions to reduce ADE in community dwelling older adults (CDOA) have had limited success, therefore, new approaches are required.A realist review uses a different lens to examine why and how interventions were supposed to work rather than if, they worked. A rapid realist review (RRR) is a more focused and accelerated version.The aim of this RRR is to identify and examine the contexts and mechanisms that play a role in the outcomes relevant to reducing ADE in CDOA in the GP setting that could inform the development of interventions in Ireland.
    UNASSIGNED: Six candidate theories (CT) were developed, based on knowledge of the field and recent literature, in relation to how interventions are expected to work. These formed the search strategy. Eighty full texts from 633 abstracts were reviewed, of which 27 were included. Snowballing added a further five articles, relevant policy documents increased the total number to 45. Data were extracted relevant to the theories under iteratively developed sub-themes using NVivo software.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the six theories, three theories, relating to GP engagement in interventions, relevance of health policy documents for older adults, and shared decision-making, provided data to guide future interventions to reduce ADEs for CDOA in an Irish setting. There was insufficient data for two theories, a third was rejected as existing barriers in the Irish setting made it impractical to use.
    UNASSIGNED: To improve the success of Irish GP based interventions to reduce ADEs for CDOA, interventions must be relevant and easily applied in practice, supported by national policy and be adequately resourced. Future research is required to test our theories within a newly developed intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号