combination drug therapy

联合药物治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管在癌症治疗方面取得了进展,由于缺乏有效的治疗方法,胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)仍然具有很高的致命性.我们之前的研究表明,木犀草素(Lut),一种类黄酮,抑制胰腺癌的发生并降低二氢嘧啶脱氢酶(DPYD)的表达,一种降解嘧啶如5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的酶,在PDAC中。在这项研究中,我们研究了DPYD的作用,并评估了5-FU与Lut联合应用在PDAC中的治疗潜力.
    结果:过表达DPYD的PDAC细胞增殖增加,和侵入性,增加了对5-FU的抵抗力。与对照异种移植肿瘤相比,过表达DPYD的PDAC细胞的异种移植肿瘤也表现出增强的生长和侵袭。对DPYD过表达的PDAC异种移植肿瘤的RNA-seq分析揭示了与金属肽酶活性相关的基因-MMP9和MEP1A的上调。此外,PDAC中MEP1A的过表达与侵袭有关。接下来,我们研究了卢特的综合效应,DPYD抑制器,和5-FU对DPYD过表达的异种移植肿瘤和Pdx1-Cre的PDAC;LSL-KrasG12D/+;Trp53flox/flox(KPPC)小鼠。单次施用5-FU和Lut均未显示出明显的抑制作用;然而,5-FU和Lut的联合给药在异种移植肿瘤和KPPC模型中均显示出显着的肿瘤抑制作用。
    结论:我们已经阐明DPYD表达有助于增殖,侵入性,和5-FU电阻,在PDAC中。Lut和5-FU的联合疗法具有增强抗PDAC功效的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the treatment of cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains highly lethal due to the lack of effective therapies. Our previous study showed that Luteolin (Lut), a flavonoid, suppressed pancreatocarcinogenesis and reduced the expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), an enzyme that degrades pyrimidines such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in PDACs. In this study, we investigated the role of DPYD and evaluated the therapeutic potential of combining 5-FU with Lut in PDACs.
    RESULTS: PDAC cells overexpressing DPYD showed increased proliferation, and invasiveness, adding to the resistance to 5-FU. The xenograft tumors of DPYD-overexpressing PDAC cells also exhibit enhanced growth and invasion compared to the control xenograft tumors. RNA-seq analysis of the DPYD-overexpressing PDAC xenograft tumors revealed an upregulation of genes associated with metallopeptidase activity-MMP9 and MEP1A. Furthermore, the overexpression of MEP1A in PDAC was associated with invasion. Next, we investigated the combined effects of Lut, a DPYD suppressor, and 5-FU on DPYD-overexpressing xenograft tumors and PDAC of Pdx1-Cre; LSL-KrasG12D/+; Trp53flox/flox(KPPC) mice. Neither single administration of 5-FU nor Lut showed significant inhibitory effects; however, the combined administration of 5-FU and Lut exhibited a significant tumor-suppressive effect in both the xenograft tumors and KPPC models.
    CONCLUSIONS: We have elucidated that DPYD expression contributes to proliferation, invasiveness, and 5-FU resistance, in PDACs. The combination therapy of Lut and 5-FU holds the potential for enhanced efficacy against PDACs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    联合H1抗组胺药(AHs)治疗荨麻疹的疗效和安全性目前尚不清楚。本范围审查旨在全面概述截至2023年5月H1AH组合在荨麻疹管理中的有效性和安全性的证据。搜索包含PubMed等数据库,WebofScience,Cochrane中央受控试验登记册,和中国生物医药数据库。纳入标准包括随机对照试验(RCT),非随机试验(NRT),病例报告,以荨麻疹治疗为重点的病例系列。最初筛选12,887项研究,本综述最终选择了109项研究,涉及11,435例患者.这些研究记录了11种荨麻疹的43种不同的组合治疗。与单一疗法相比,在94项报告治疗疗效的研究中,联合治疗表现出优异的疗效.关于药物不良反应(ADR),67项研究披露了ADR发生率,联合治疗在32项研究中显示较低的ADR发生率。此外,7项研究报告了联合治疗和单一治疗AHs的ADR发生率相似。常见的不良反应包括嗜睡等症状,恶心,疲劳,口干,头晕,头痛,虽然较不常见的副作用包括低血压,中耳炎,多尿,鼻漏,肝功能异常,和皮疹。治疗组的不良反应发生率为0%至21%,对照组从0.5%到75%。重要的是,患者通常对这些ADR耐受良好,停止治疗后症状消失。研究结果表明,与单一疗法相比,在荨麻疹治疗的背景下,联合AHs可提高疗效并降低安全风险。这些结果主张将联合治疗视为临床实践中的可行选择。尤其是慢性荨麻疹病例。尽管如此,建议谨慎,治疗期间密切监测潜在的不良反应至关重要。
    The efficacy and safety of combining H1 antihistamines (AHs) for treating urticaria are currently unclear. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of H1 AH combinations in the management of urticaria up to May 2023. The search encompassed databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the China Biological Medicine Database. The inclusion criteria comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised trials (NRTs), case reports, and case series focusing on urticaria treatment. Initially screening 12,887 studies, this review ultimately selected 109 studies involving 11,435 patients. These studies documented 43 different combination treatments across 11 types of urticaria. In comparison to monotherapy, combination therapy exhibited superior efficacy in 94 studies that reported treatment efficacy. Regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs), 67 studies disclosed ADR incidences, with combination therapy showing lower ADR rates in 32 studies. Additionally, 7 studies reported similar ADR rates between combination therapy and monotherapy with AHs. Common ADRs included symptoms such as drowsiness, nausea, fatigue, dry mouth, dizziness, and headache, while less frequent side effects encompassed hypotension, otitis media, polyuria, rhinorrhoea, abnormal liver function, and rash. ADR rates ranged from 0% to 21% in the treatment group, and from 0.5% to 75% in the control group. Importantly, patients generally tolerated these ADRs well, with symptoms resolving upon discontinuation of treatment. The study\'s findings suggest that combining AHs leads to enhanced efficacy and reduced safety risks compared to monotherapy in the context of urticaria treatment. These results advocate for considering combination therapy as a viable option in clinical practice, especially for chronic urticaria cases. Nonetheless, caution is advised, and close monitoring for potential ADRs is crucial during treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ELEVATE(研究410;NCT03288129)是第一个前瞻性的,多中心,开放标签,美国≥4岁局灶性发作性癫痫发作或全身性强直阵挛性癫痫发作患者的潘帕奈作为单药或首次辅助治疗的IV期研究。这项研究包括筛查,滴定(≤13周),维护(39周),和随访(4周)期间。在滴定期间,以2mg/天的剂量开始,并在第3周向上滴定至4mg/天。根据反应和耐受性,可选择的向上滴定至最大12mg/天。主要终点是保留率;其他终点包括无癫痫发作率,50%的反应率,以及因治疗引起的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率。在基线,10例(18.5%)患者被分配到单药治疗组,44例(81.5%)患者被分配到第一辅助治疗组。然而,由于在治疗的第一天增加了抗癫痫药物和perampanel,1例患者被排除在单药治疗亚组分析之外.平均perampanel暴露持续时间为39.8周,32例(59.3%)患者完成了研究。12个月(或研究完成)时的保留率为63.0%(单药治疗,77.8%;首次辅助治疗,59.1%)。维持期癫痫发作自由度为32.7%(单药治疗,44.4%;首次辅助治疗,29.5%),50%的应答率为78.7%(单药治疗,85.7%;首次辅助治疗,76.9%)。88.9%(n=48/54)和7.4%(n=4/54)的患者报告了TEAE和严重TEAE,分别。总的来说,perampanel作为单药治疗或首次辅助治疗的有效性和安全性支持使用perampanel作为癫痫的早期一线治疗.
    ELEVATE (Study 410; NCT03288129) is the first prospective, multicenter, open-label, Phase IV study of perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 4 years with focal-onset seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the United States. The study included Screening, Titration (≤ 13 weeks), Maintenance (39 weeks), and Follow-up (4 weeks) Periods. During Titration, perampanel was initiated at 2 mg/day and up-titrated to 4 mg/day at Week 3. Depending on response and tolerability, optional up-titrations to a maximum of 12 mg/day occurred. The primary endpoint was retention rate; additional endpoints included seizure-freedom rate, 50% responder rate, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). At baseline, 10 (18.5%) patients were assigned to the monotherapy group and 44 (81.5%) patients to the first adjunctive therapy group. However, due to the addition of an anti-seizure medication along with perampanel on the first day of treatment, one patient was excluded from the monotherapy subgroup analyses. The mean perampanel exposure duration was 39.8 weeks and 32 (59.3%) patients completed the study. Retention rate at 12 months (or study completion) was 63.0% (monotherapy, 77.8%; first adjunctive therapy, 59.1%). Seizure-freedom rate during the Maintenance Period was 32.7% (monotherapy, 44.4%; first adjunctive therapy, 29.5%) and the 50% responder rate was 78.7% (monotherapy, 85.7%; first adjunctive therapy, 76.9%). TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported by 88.9% (n = 48/54) and 7.4% (n = 4/54) of patients, respectively. Overall, the efficacy and safety of perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy support the use of perampanel as early-line treatment for epilepsy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大约五分之一的大麻使用者,最常用的非法物质,有大麻使用障碍(CUD)。精神病和自杀在这些患者中更为常见,据报告,残疾调整寿命年为69万。CUD的药物治疗是未满足的公共卫生需求,因为目前的循证疗法疗效有限。
    在解释了CUD的病理生理学之后,我们根据作用机制对从随机对照试验中获得的新兴药物干预对其治疗的影响进行了综述.优于控制大麻二酚,加巴喷丁,加兰他敏,纳比隆加唑吡坦,纳比肟,纳曲酮,PF-04457845,喹硫平,伐尼克林,通过大麻素观察到托吡酯,谷氨酸能,γ-氨基丁酸能,血清素能,去甲肾上腺素能,多巴胺能,opiopideric,和胆碱能系统。据报道,所有药物都是安全和可耐受的。
    在心理治疗中增加药物治疗是CUD的最佳治疗方法。药物开发是增加心理治疗的主要路径,但是时间和成本建议重新利用和重新定位现有的药物。考虑到样本量,后续行动,和效果大小,使用客观工具的进一步研究是必要的。CUD治疗的前景广阔。
    UNASSIGNED: About one-fifth of cannabis users, the most commonly used illicit substance, have cannabis use disorder (CUD). Psychiatric disorders and suicide are more common in these patients, and the disability-adjusted life years were reported to be 0.69 million. Pharmacotherapy for CUD is an unmet public health need, as current evidence-based therapies have limited efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: After explaining the pathophysiology of CUD, the effects of emerging pharmacological interventions in its treatment obtained from randomized controlled trials were reviewed in light of mechanisms of action. Superiority over control of cannabidiol, gabapentin, galantamine, nabilone plus zolpidem, nabiximols, naltrexone, PF-04457845, quetiapine, varenicline, and topiramate were observed through the cannabinoid, glutamatergic, γ-aminobutyric acidergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, dopaminergic, opioidergic, and cholinergic systems. All medications were reported to be safe and tolerable.
    UNASSIGNED: Adding pharmacotherapy to psychotherapy is the optimal treatment for CUD on a case-by-case basis. Drug development to add to psychotherapy is the main path, but time and cost suggest repurposing and repositioning existing drugs. Considering sample size, follow-up, and effect size, further studies using objective tools are necessary. The future of CUD treatment is promising.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究验证了以下假设:基于表皮生长因子(EGF)和生长激素释放六肽(GHRP6)的神经保护性联合治疗对急性缺血性卒中患者可能是安全的,承认高达30%的严重不良事件(SAE)与已证实的因果关系。
    一个多中心,随机化,开放标签,控制,对平行组进行I-II期临床试验(2017年7月至2018年1月).年龄为18-80岁的计算机断层扫描证实的缺血性中风且症状发作后不到12小时的患者被随机分配到研究组I(静脉内75μgrEGF+3.5mgGHRP6,n=10),II(75μgrEGF+5mgGHRP6静脉注射,n=10),或III(标准护理控制,n=16)。给予BID联合治疗7天。主要终点是6个月以上的安全性。次要终点包括神经(NIHSS)和功能[Barthel指数和改良Rankin量表(mRS)]结果。
    研究人群的平均年龄为66±11岁,21名男性(58.3%),基线中位NIHSS评分为9分(95%CI:8-11),平均治疗时间为7.3±2.8h。分析是在意向治疗的基础上进行的。对照组16例患者中有9例(56.2%)出现SAE,第一组10例患者中有3例(30%)(比值比(OR):0.33;95%CI:0.06-1.78),II组10例患者中有2例(20%)(OR:0.19;95%CI:0.03~1.22);I组1例患者中只有2例事件归因于干预治疗.每组对研究假设的依从性大于0.90。用EGF+GHRP6治疗的患者在90和180天有良好的神经和功能进化,NIHSS的推论分析证明了这一点,Barthel,和mRS,以及它们的中等到强效应大小。6个月时,比例分析表明,联合治疗的患者生存率较高.包括合并治疗组和效用加权mRS的辅助分析也显示了这种联合治疗的益处。
    EGF+GHRP6治疗是安全的。这项研究中治疗的功能益处支持了III期研究。
    古巴临床试验公共登记处的RPCEC00000214,唯一标识符:IG/CIGB-845I/IC/1601。
    UNASSIGNED: This study tested the hypothesis that a neuroprotective combined therapy based on epidermal growth factor (EGF) and growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP6) could be safe for acute ischemic stroke patients, admitting up to 30% of serious adverse events (SAE) with proven causality.
    UNASSIGNED: A multi-centric, randomized, open-label, controlled, phase I-II clinical trial with parallel groups was conducted (July 2017 to January 2018). Patients aged 18-80 years with a computed tomography-confirmed ischemic stroke and less than 12 h from the onset of symptoms were randomly assigned to the study groups I (75 μg rEGF + 3.5 mg GHRP6 i.v., n=10), II (75 μg rEGF + 5 mg GHRP6 i.v., n=10), or III (standard care control, n=16). Combined therapy was given BID for 7 days. The primary endpoint was safety over 6 months. Secondary endpoints included neurological (NIHSS) and functional [Barthel index and modified Rankin scale (mRS)] outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: The study population had a mean age of 66 ± 11 years, with 21 men (58.3%), a baseline median NIHSS score of 9 (95% CI: 8-11), and a mean time to treatment of 7.3 ± 2.8 h. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. SAEs were reported in 9 of 16 (56.2%) patients in the control group, 3 of 10 (30%) patients in Group I (odds ratio (OR): 0.33; 95% CI: 0.06-1.78), and 2 of 10 (20%) patients in Group II (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.03-1.22); only two events in one patient in Group I were attributed to the intervention treatment. Compliance with the study hypothesis was greater than 0.90 in each group. Patients treated with EGF + GHRP6 had a favorable neurological and functional evolution at both 90 and 180 days, as evidenced by the inferential analysis of NIHSS, Barthel, and mRS and by their moderate to strong effect size. At 6 months, proportion analysis evidenced a higher survival rate for patients treated with the combined therapy. Ancillary analysis including merged treated groups and utility-weighted mRS also showed a benefit of this combined therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: EGF + GHRP6 therapy was safe. The functional benefits of treatment in this study supported a Phase III study.
    UNASSIGNED: RPCEC00000214 of the Cuban Public Registry of Clinical Trials, Unique identifier: IG/CIGB-845I/IC/1601.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可卡因破坏多巴胺(DA)和κ阿片受体(KOR)系统活性,长期接触可减少可卡因对DA摄取的抑制作用,并增加KOR系统的功能。单一治疗疗法对于可卡因使用障碍尚未成功;因此,这项研究的重点是针对多巴胺转运体(DAT)和KOR的联合治疗。SpragueDawley大鼠自行服用5天可卡因(1.5mg/kg/inf,最大40inf/天,FR1),然后按照渐进比例(PR)时间表(0.19mg/kg/输注)进行14天。然后使用PR检查单独和联合给药苯那嗪和nBNI的行为效果。此外,然后使用离体快速扫描循环伏安法来评估治疗前后伏核中DA和KOR系统活性的变化。长期服用苯甲参嗪以及苯甲参嗪和nBNI的组合-而不是单独使用nBNI-显着降低了PR断点。此外,苯甲拉嗪和nBNI的组合部分逆转了可卡因诱导的KOR和DA系统的神经失调,表明串联靶向DA和KOR系统的治疗益处。这些数据突出了DAT和KOR作为双细胞靶标以降低施用可卡因的动机和逆转可卡因诱导的DA系统改变的潜在益处。
    Cocaine disrupts dopamine (DA) and kappa opioid receptor (KOR) system activity, with long-term exposure reducing inhibiton of DA uptake by cocaine and increasing KOR system function. Single treatment therapies have not been successful for cocaine use disorder; therefore, this study focuses on a combination therapy targeting the dopamine transporter (DAT) and KOR. Sprague Dawley rats self-administered 5 days of cocaine (1.5 mg/kg/inf, max 40 inf/day, FR1), followed by 14 days on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule (0.19 mg/kg/infusion). Behavioral effects of individual and combined administration of phenmetrazine and nBNI were then examined using PR. Additionally, ex vivo fast scan cyclic voltammetry was then used to assess alterations in DA and KOR system activity in the nucleus accumbens before and after treatments. Chronic administration of phenmetrazine as well as the combination of phenmetrazine and nBNI-but not nBNI alone-significantly reduced PR breakpoints. In addition, the combination of phenmetrazine and nBNI partially reversed cocaine-induced neurodysregulations of the KOR and DA systems, indicating therapeutic benefits of targeting the DA and KOR systems in tandem. These data highlight the potential benefits of the DAT and KOR as dual-cellular targets to reduce motivation to administer cocaine and reverse cocaine-induced alterations of the DA system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鉴于肺癌治疗的众多不良反应,迫切需要对无毒药物进行更多研究。姜黄素(CUR)和黄连素(BBR)通过控制多药耐药泵(MDR1)的表达来对抗耐药性。令人着迷的是,联合使用这些药物可提高预防肺癌的有效性。它们的溶解度低,稳定性差,然而,限制其治疗效果。由于水不溶性药物的生物利用度和包封效果的提高,基于表面活性剂的纳米囊泡最近受到了广泛的关注。目前的研究试图阐明通过草药纳米药物预防多药耐药蛋白1的联合药物治疗:促进肺癌细胞凋亡。评估了具有不同疏水尾部的几种吐温(20、60和80)类型对BBR/CUR-TNV的影响。此外,评估了BBR/CUR-TNV联合治疗的MDR1活性和凋亡率。TNV的包封效力受吐温类型的影响。用吐温60制成的TNV,胆固醇,和PEG(47.5:47.5:5),获得了更多的包封效果。通过将CUR与BBR相结合,特别是当在TNV中给予时,细胞凋亡增加。此外,当CUR和BBR联合给药时,它们显着降低了MDR1发展的风险。目前的工作表明,通过基于吐温的纳米囊泡将黄连素和姜黄素作为联合药物治疗可能是一种潜在的肺癌治疗方法。
    Given the numerous adverse effects of lung cancer treatment, more research on non-toxic medications is urgently needed. Curcumin (CUR) and berberine (BBR) combat drug resistance by controlling the expression of multidrug resistant pump (MDR1). Fascinatingly, combining these medications increases the effectiveness of preventing lung cancer. Their low solubility and poor stability, however, restrict their therapeutic efficacy. Because of the improved bioavailability and increased encapsulation effectiveness of water-insoluble medicines, surfactant-based nanovesicles have recently received a great deal of attention. The current study sought to elucidate the Combination drug therapy by herbal nanomedicine prevent multidrug resistance protein 1: promote apoptosis in Lung Carcinoma. The impact of several tween (20, 60, and 80) types with varied hydrophobic tails on BBR/CUR-TNV was evaluated. Additionally, the MDR1 activity and apoptosis rate of the BBR/CUR-TNV combination therapy were assessed. The encapsulation effectiveness of TNV was affected by the type of tween. With the TNV made from tween 60, cholesterol, and PEG (47.5: 47.5:5), more encapsulation effectiveness was attained. By combining CUR with BBR, especially when given in TNV, apoptosis increased. Additionally, when CUR and BBR were administered in combination, they significantly reduced the risk of MDR1 development. The current work suggests that the delivery of berberine and curcumin as a combination medication therapy via tween-based nanovesicles may be a potential lung cancer treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种早发性疾病,在儿童中的患病率为1%,据报道,残疾调整寿命为431万。易怒是一种与ASD相关的具有挑战性的行为,药物开发滞后。更具体地说,药物治疗的有效性可能是有限的高不良反应(考虑副作用和患者的药物敏感性);因此,药物干预的可能益处必须与每位患者的潜在不良事件相平衡.
    在回顾了ASD相关易怒的神经病理生理学之后,根据作用机制和作用目标,我们详细介绍了基于随机对照试验的新兴药物在治疗中的获益和耐受性.
    继续服用利培酮和阿立哌唑,美金刚的单一疗法可能是有益的。此外,N-乙酰半胱氨酸,加兰他敏,萝卜硫素,塞来昔布,棕榈酰乙醇胺,己酮可可碱,辛伐他汀,米诺环素,金刚烷胺,孕烯醇酮,泼尼松龙,利鲁唑,propentofylline,吡格列酮,还有托吡酯,利培酮的所有辅料,可乐定和哌醋甲酯优于安慰剂。这些作用是通过谷氨酸,γ-氨基丁酸能,炎症,氧化,胆碱能,多巴胺能,和血清素能系统。据报道,所有药物都是安全和可耐受的。考虑到样本量,后续行动,和效果大小,需要进一步的研究。随着药物的发展,建议重新定位和合并由作用机制支持的现有药物。
    UNASSIGNED: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is an early-onset disorder with a prevalence of 1% among children and reported disability-adjusted life years of 4.31 million. Irritability is a challenging behavior associated with ASD, for which medication development has lagged. More specifically, pharmacotherapy effectiveness may be limited against high adverse effects (considering side effect profiles and patient medication sensitivity); thus, the possible benefits of pharmacological interventions must be balanced against potential adverse events in each patient.
    UNASSIGNED: After reviewing the neuropathophysiology of ASD-associated irritability, the benefits and tolerability of emerging medications in its treatment based on randomized controlled trials were detailed in light of mechanisms and targets of action.
    UNASSIGNED: Succeeding risperidone and aripiprazole, monotherapy with memantine may be beneficial. In addition, N-acetylcysteine, galantamine, sulforaphane, celecoxib, palmitoylethanolamide, pentoxifylline, simvastatin, minocycline, amantadine, pregnenolone, prednisolone, riluzole, propentofylline, pioglitazone, and topiramate, all adjunct to risperidone, and clonidine and methylphenidate outperformed placebo. These effects were through glutamatergic, γ-aminobutyric acidergic, inflammatory, oxidative, cholinergic, dopaminergic, and serotonergic systems. All medications were reported to be safe and tolerable. Considering sample size, follow-up, and effect size, further studies are necessary. Along with drug development, repositioning and combining existing drugs supported by the mechanism of action is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们介绍了一个75岁的女性同时患有EGFR突变的IV期肺癌和晚期BRCA2突变的卵巢癌的病例。用独特的方案治疗。在这个案例报告中,患者接受了交替数月的奥希替尼和奥拉帕尼治疗,以控制她的肺癌和卵巢癌,分别。当两种疾病都出现进展时,患者接受了两种药物同时治疗的试验,然而,由于患者报告的不良副作用,该方法已停止。可能需要联合靶向药物治疗来治疗复杂的诊断,例如双重恶性肿瘤。然而,奥希替尼和奥拉帕尼组成的联合药物治疗以前尚未探索过.该病例报告首次证明奥希替尼和奥拉帕尼联合治疗是并发肺癌和卵巢癌的独特治疗方案。这两种药物可以交替给药或一起给药,短期,具有较高但可耐受的毒性。
    We present the case of a 75-year-old female with simultaneous EGFR-mutated stage IV lung cancer and advanced BRCA2-mutated ovarian cancer, treated with a unique regimen. In this case report, the patient was treated with alternating months of osimertinib and olaparib to control her lung and ovarian cancers, respectively. When both diseases showed progression, the patient underwent a trial of concurrent therapy with both drugs, yet this was discontinued due to patient-reported adverse side effects. Combination targeted drug therapy may be required to treat complex diagnoses such as dual malignancies. However, combination drug therapy consisting of osimertinib and olaparib has not previously been explored. This case report represents the first to demonstrate osimertinib and olaparib combination therapy as a unique treatment regimen for concurrent lung and ovarian cancers. These two drugs can either be given in an alternating way or given together, short-term, with a higher but tolerable toxicity profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    氟喹诺酮类药物是用于初始经验性联合治疗的常用抗生素之一。然而,没有足够的证据支持使用氟喹诺酮类药物联合治疗医院获得性肺炎(HAP).本研究旨在使用韩国国家健康保险索赔数据评估氟喹诺酮类药物作为HAP经验性联合治疗的一部分的有效性。
    我们比较了接受氟喹诺酮类药物联合治疗的HAP患者和接受头孢吡肟或哌拉西林/他唑巴坦单药治疗的HAP患者的临床结局。主要结果是医院死亡率,次要结局是因肺炎作为住院的主要原因在住院患者出院后7天内再入院.用logistic回归分析评价与氟喹诺酮类药物联合用药与预后的相关性。
    在9,955名接受头孢吡肟或哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的HAP患者中,4,918(49%)接受了氟喹诺酮类药物的组合。住院期间,1,059例(11%)HAP患者死亡。与单药治疗组相比,氟喹诺酮类药物联合治疗组有较高的死亡风险[校正比值比(OR),1.30;95%置信区间(CI):1.02-1.65]。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,在非高危HAP组中,该关联仍然显着(调整后的OR,1.30;95%CI:1.02-1.66)。同时,氟喹诺酮类药物联合治疗组和单药治疗组的高危HAP患者的死亡风险相似(校正后的OR,0.99;95%CI:0.35-1.16)。在存活和出院的患者中(n=8,896),152例(1.7%)在出院后7天内再次入院。在高危HAP患者中,氟喹诺酮类药物联合治疗组比单药治疗组更容易因肺炎再次入院(调整后的OR,1.60;95%CI:1.04-2.47)。
    在近一半的低危HAP患者中使用了氟喹诺酮类药物联合β-内酰胺类药物,在现实世界的实践中,它与更高的死亡风险相关。然而,即使在高危HAP患者中,它也与住院死亡率无关.
    UNASSIGNED: Fluoroquinolones are one of the commonly used antibiotics for the initial empiric combination treatment. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of fluoroquinolones combination therapy for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of fluoroquinolones as part of the empiric combination therapy for HAP using national health insurance claims data in Korea.
    UNASSIGNED: We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with HAP who received fluoroquinolones combination and those treated with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was readmission caused by pneumonia as the primary cause of hospitalization within 7 days after discharge from index hospitalization. The association between the combination with fluoroquinolones and outcomes was evaluated with logistic regression analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 9,955 patients with HAP administered with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam, 4,918 (49%) received fluoroquinolones combination. During hospitalization, 1,059 (11%) patients with HAP died. Compared with the monotherapy group, the fluoroquinolones combination therapy group was associated with a higher mortality risk [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.65]. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the association remained significant in the non-high-risk HAP group (adjusted OR, 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.66). Meanwhile, the mortality risk was similar between the fluoroquinolones combination therapy group and the monotherapy group of patients with high-risk HAP (adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.35-1.16). Among the patients alive and discharged (n=8,896), 152 (1.7%) were readmitted within 7 days after discharge. The fluoroquinolones combination therapy group was more likely to be readmitted because of pneumonia than the monotherapy group in patients with high-risk HAP (adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI: 1.04-2.47).
    UNASSIGNED: Fluoroquinolones combined with β-lactams was prescribed in nearly half of patients with low-risk HAP, and it was associated with a higher mortality risk in real-world practice. However, it was not associated with hospital mortality even in patients with high-risk HAP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号