据推测,负面反刍动物通过增加唤醒来使失眠症状持续存在。关于积极反省的作用知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们开始在非临床样本中测试阳性和阴性反刍动物与失眠症状之间的关联,询问重新评估和抑制是否适度反省类型和失眠症状之间的关系。
未经评估:354名参与者(59%为女性)的便利样本,年龄18-50岁,回答有关失眠症状的在线问卷(失眠严重程度指数[ISI]),情绪调节问卷,为重新评估和抑制提供单独的量表,负反思性(反思性反应量表),积极反省和抑制(对积极影响问卷的回应),以及总体健康和人口统计。
未经评估:根据ISI,约30%的受访者有中度至重度失眠症状。主要假设使用三个适度模型进行了检验,在那里,反思型,情绪调节方式,交互项是预测因子,ISI评分是结果变量。负反推正预测ISI(β=0.56,p<0.001),而与重新评估(β=0.02,p=0.575)和抑制(β=0.07,p=0.092)的相互作用项不显著。衰减也正预测ISI(β=0.56,p<0.001),与重新评估的交互项几乎显著(β=-0.09,p=0.060),但没有抑制(β=0.08,p=0.098)。正反推负预测ISI(β=-0.12,p=0.021),这种关系与模型中的情绪调节因子相反(β=0.11,p=0.094),其中与重新评估(β=0.13,p=0.020)和抑制(β=-0.13,p=0.024)的相互作用均显着。
未经评估:正沉思与ISI弱负相关,但与重新评估的组合与更多的失眠症状相关。相比之下,缓解与更多的失眠症状有关,具有最小或没有调节作用。这些观察是在情绪调节策略和睡眠的作用的背景下进行解释的,以及它们潜在的临床意义。
It is postulated that negative ruminations perpetuate insomnia symptoms by increasing arousal. Less is known about the role of positive rumination. In this study, we set out to test the association between positive and negative ruminations and insomnia symptoms in a non-clinical sample, asking whether reappraisal and suppression moderate the relationship between rumination types and symptoms of insomnia.
UNASSIGNED: A convenience sample of 354 participants (59% women), ages 18-50, responded to online questionnaires regarding symptoms of insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire that provides separate scales for Reappraisal and Suppression, Negative Rumination (Ruminative Response Scale), Positive Rumination and Dampening (Responses to Positive Affect questionnaire), and general health and demographics.
UNASSIGNED: About 30% of respondents had moderate to severe symptoms of insomnia according to the ISI. The primary hypothesis was tested using three moderation models, where rumination type, emotion regulation styles, and interaction terms were predictors, and ISI scores were the outcome variable. Negative rumination positively predicted ISI (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), while the interaction terms with Reappraisal (β = 0.02, p = 0.575) and Suppression (β = 0.07, p = 0.092) were not significant. Dampening also positively predicted ISI (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), with the interaction term with Reappraisal nearly significant (β = -0.09, p = 0.060), but not with Suppression (β = 0.08, p =0.098). Positive rumination negatively predicted ISI (β = -0.12, p = 0.021), this relationship was reversed with emotion regulation factors in the model (β = 0.11, p = 0.094), where the interaction with Reappraisal (β = 0.13, p = 0.020) and Suppression (β = -0.13, p = 0.024) were both significant.
UNASSIGNED: Positive Rumination weakly and negatively correlated with ISI, but the combination with Reappraisal was associated with more insomnia symptoms. By contrast, Dampening was associated with more insomnia symptoms, with minimal to no moderating effects. These observations are interpreted in the context of the role of emotion regulation strategies and sleep, and their potential clinical implications.