Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) is indicated after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce the risk of atherothrombotic events. Approximately 30% of the US population has a CYP2C19 no-function allele that reduces the effectiveness of clopidogrel, but not prasugrel or ticagrelor, after PCI. We have shown improved outcomes with the integration of CYP2C19 genotyping into clinical care to guide the selection of prasugrel or ticagrelor in CYP2C19 no-function allele carriers. However, the influence of patient-specific demographic, clinical, and other genetic factors on outcomes with genotype-guided DAPT has not been defined. In addition, the impact of genotype-guided de-escalation from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel in patients without a CYP2C19 no-function allele has not been investigated in a diverse, real-world clinical setting. The Precision Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Precision PCI) Registry is a multicenter US registry of patients who underwent PCI and clinical CYP2C19 testing. The registry is enrolling a diverse population, assessing atherothrombotic and bleeding events over 12 months, collecting DNA samples, and conducting platelet function testing in a subset of patients. The registry aims to define the influence of African ancestry and other patient-specific factors on clinical outcomes with CYP2C19-guided DAPT, evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided DAPT de-escalation following PCI in a real-world setting, and identify additional genetic influences of clopidogrel response after PCI, with the ultimate goal of establishing optimal strategies for individualized antiplatelet therapy that improves outcomes in a diverse, real-world population.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is common, but PPI may reduce the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the impact of PPI use on clinical outcomes in post-PCI patients, by incorporating P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) and CYP2C19 genotyping results.
METHODS: From a multicenter registry of patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation and received clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), patients who were prescribed a PPI at the time of PCI (PPI users) were compared to those who were not (non-users). The primary outcome included all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or cerebrovascular accident at 12 months. Major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] types 3-5) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (BARC types 3-5) were important secondary outcomes. The adjusted outcomes were compared using a 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matching and competing risk analysis.
RESULTS: Of 13,160 patients, 2,235 (17.0%) were prescribed PPI, with an average age of 65.4 years. PPI users had higher on-treatment PRU levels than non-users. After PS matching, the primary outcome occurred in 51 patients who were PPI users (cumulative incidence, 4.7%) and 41 patients who were non-users (cumulative incidence, 3.7%; log-rank p = 0.27). In carriers of both CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, PPI use was linked to an increased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-8.78). The incidence of major bleeding and GI bleeding (BARC types 3-5) was comparable between PPI users and non-users in the PS-matched cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: In post-PCI patients receiving clopidogrel-based DAPT, PPI use was not linked to an increased risk of adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, but there was a small but significant increase in on-treatment PRU. Future research using a more individualized approach would further elucidate these interactions and guide evidence-based clinical practices.

Clopidogrel remains the most widely used P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitor worldwide and is often used in combination with aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with arterial disease. The drug is associated with a wide response variability with one on three patients exhibiting little or no inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation. It is a prodrug that is mainly metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19. Patients who carry a CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) allele have reduced metabolism of clopidogrel that is associated with reduced platelet inhibition compared to non-carriers that is associated with increased risk for thrombotic event occurrences, particularly, stent thrombosis. The United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) issued a black box warning in the clopidogrel label highlighting the importance of presence of CYP2C19 LOF allele during the insufficient metabolism of clopidogrel and availability of other potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitor for the treatment in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers. Clinical trials have conclusively demonstrated greater anti-ischemic benefits of prasugrel/ticagrelor in the treatment of patients carrying the CYP2C19 LoF allele. However, uniform use of these more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors has been associated with greater bleeding and cost, and lower adherence. The latter information provides a strong rationale for personalizing P2Y₁₂ inhibitor therapy based on the laboratory determination of CYP2C19 genotype. However, cardiologists have been slow to take up pharmacogenetic testing possibly due to lack of provider and patient education, clear cardiology guidelines and, and lack of positive results from adequately sized randomized clinical trials. However, current evidence strongly supports genotyping of patients who are candidates for clopidogrel. Physicians should strongly consider performing genetic tests to identify LoF carriers and treat these patients with more pharmacodynamically predictable P2Y₁₂ inhibitors than clopidogrel.

Introduction: Clopidogrel hyperresponsiveness is a timely topic, with wide ranging reports of hemorrhagic complications, using various clopidogrel dosing strategies following neuroendovascular procedures. This study serves to investigate hemorrhagic complications using standard clopidogrel doses and timing of these complications in relation to the procedure. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort of consecutive adult patients undergoing flow diversion with Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) at an academic medical center, receiving on-label clopidogrel doses. Patients with clopidogrel hyperresponsiveness (VerifyNowTM P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) ≤ 70) were compared to those who were normoresponsive. The primary outcome is the rate of hemorrhagic complications between groups. Results: Of 148 included patients, 54 (36.5%) were identified as clopidogrel hyperresponsive (PRU ≤ 70) and 94 (63.5%) as clopidogrel normoresponsive (PRU 71 - 194). There were no hemorrhagic complications observed in patients who were clopidogrel hyperresponsive, with 5 occurring in patients who were normoresponsive (P = 0.09). Three (60%) of the hemorrhages were intracranial with most occurring intra-procedure or within the first week of the procedure. Age > 60 years was the only candidate predictor for hemorrhagic complications (P = 0.004). Conclusion: Our findings are contradictory, with lower hemorrhagic complications in clopidogrel hyperresponders than prior literature, and most occurring intra-op or in the immediate acute post-op phase.

Currently, the standard treatment for patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following acute myocardial infarction (MI) involves dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a combination of aspirin and a potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. However, the potential benefits of aspirin were partially constrained by the intolerance of some patients. The safety and efficacy of indobufen, an alternative antiplatelet agents to aspirin, in patients with AMI after PCI are yet to be thoroughly investigated.This retrospective study was conducted at a single center and utilized propensity score matching. The enrollment spanned from January 2019 to June 2022, incorporating patients with AMI after PCI. The participants were categorized into two groups based on discharged prescriptions: the aspirin DAPT group and the indobufen DAPT group. The primary endpoint focused on net adverse clinical event (NACE), defined as a composite outcome, including cardiac death, recurrence of MI, definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularization (TLR), ischemic stroke and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria type 2, 3, or 5. All the patients underwent a one-year follow-up period.A total of 1451 patients were enrolled in this study, with 258 assigned to the indobufen DAPT group and 1193 to the aspirin DAPT group. Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 224 patients were retained in each group. In the indobufen DAPT group, 58 individuals (25.9%) experienced the primary endpoint within one year, compared to 52 individuals (23.2%) in the aspirin DAPT group (HR 1.128, 95% CI 0.776-1.639, p = .527). Specifically, no significant differences were observed in either the efficacy endpoint (MACCE, 20.1% vs. 14.7%, HR 1.392, 95% CI 0.893-2.170, p = .146) or the safety endpoint (BARC 2,3 or 5, 8.04% vs. 10.30%, HR 0.779, p = .427). These findings remained consistent at 1, 3, or 6 months. Additionally, the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly lower in indobufen DAPT group compared to the aspirin DAPT group (7.1% vs. 14.3%, p = .022).Our research reveals that the efficacy and safety of indobufen are comparable to aspirin in Chinese patients with AMI following PCI. Given the potential advantages of indobufen in alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms, we propose it as a viable alternative for individuals intolerant to aspirin.
What is the context? Currently, the standard treatment for patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention following acute myocardial infarction involves dual antiplatelet therapy with a combination of aspirin and a potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor.However, the potential benefits of aspirin were partially constrained by the intolerance of some patients.The safety and efficacy of indobufen, an alternative antiplatelet agents to aspirin, in patients with AMI after PCI are yet to be thoroughly investigated.What is new? While both American and European clinical guidelines recommend the use of indobufen as an alternative treatment for patients who cannot tolerate aspirin, there exists a limited body of research on this subject.Our research is the first to address this gap by comparing the efficacy and safety of indobufen and aspirin in patients with AMI.Our research reveals that the efficacy and safety of indobufen are comparable to aspirin in Chinese patients with AMI following PCI. Given the potential advantages of indobufen in alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms, we propose it as a viable alternative for individuals intolerant to aspirin.What is the impact? These findings might pave the way for further exploration of alternatives to aspirin in patients with AMI.

UNASSIGNED: The objective of this research was to evaluate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) associated with the use of various proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in combination with clopidogrel in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
UNASSIGNED: To accomplish this, we analyzed data from randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies sourced from key electronic databases. These studies specifically examined the effects of different PPIs, such as lansoprazole, esomeprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole, when used in conjunction with clopidogrel on MACEs. The primary focus was on the differential impact of these PPIs, while the secondary focus was on the comparison of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events in groups receiving different PPIs with clopidogrel vs. a placebo group. This study\'s protocol was officially registered with INPLASY (INPLASY2024-2-0009).
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a network meta-analysis involving 16 studies with a total of 145,999 patients. Our findings indicated that rabeprazole when combined with clopidogrel, had the lowest increase in MACE risk (effect size, 1.05, 95% CI: 0.66-1.66), while lansoprazole was associated with the highest risk increase (effect size, 1.48, 95% CI: 1.22-1.80). Esomeprazole (effect size, 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.51), omeprazole (effect size, 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07-1.43), and pantoprazole (effect size, 1.38, 95% CI: 1.18-1.60) also significantly increased MACE risk. For the secondary outcome, esomeprazole (effect size, 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09-0.94), omeprazole (effect size, 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14-0.81), and pantoprazole (effect size, 0.33, 95% CI: 0.13-0.84) demonstrated an increased potential for GI bleeding prevention.
UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, the combination of lansoprazole and clopidogrel was found to significantly elevate the risk of MACEs without offering GI protection in post-PCI patients. This study is the first network meta-analysis to identify the most effective regimen for the concurrent use of clopidogrel with individual PPIs.
UNASSIGNED: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-2-0009/, identifier (INPLASY2024-2-0009).

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of GDF-15 in relation the development of bleeding and events in stable CAD patients, receiving combined antithrombotic therapy.
METHODS: The data was obtained from the prospective registry REGATA, 343 CAD patients (249 males), median age 68 [IQR 62; 75] years) were enrolled. Patients with sinus rhythm and concomitant PAD received acetylsalicylic acid in combination with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bid (31.8%) or clopidogrel (24.8%). Other 43.4% with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) received direct oral anticoagulants in combination with antiplatelet therapy after elective percutaneous coronary interventions. Median follow-up was 12 months [IQR 9.0; 18.0]. The safety end point was major and clinically relevant bleedings (type 2-5) according to the BARC classification. Plasma samples for GDF-15 identification were taken at the inclusion and analyzed using ELISA assay.
RESULTS: Frequency of BARC 2-5 bleedings was 16% (BARC 2 - 46; BARC 3 - 9; BARC 4-5 - 0), median GDF-15 level was 1185.0 pg/ml [850.0; 1680.0]. In patients with AF and concomitant MFA, the level of GDF-15 was significantly higher than in the subgroups of patients with only AF or MFA (p=0.0022). According to the quintile analysis, GDF-15 values in the top three quintiles of distribution (cut-off value >943 pg/ml) were associated with higher frequency of bleeding events: 23.2% versus 5.1%; p=0.0001. The multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated that bleeding events were independently associated with GDF-15 level>943 pg/ml (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.11-6.30; p=0.0275), AF (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.41-4.83; p=0.0023) and chronic kidney disease (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.03-3.60; p=0.0401). Clinical factors determining the risk of bleeding events also determined a GDF-15 elevation.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of GDF-15 level may improve bleeding risk stratification in CAD patients with concomitant AF and/or PAD receiving combined antithrombotic therapy.
Цель. Оценить значимость ростового фактора дифференцировки 15 (Growth Differentiation Factor – GDF-15) в отношении прогнозирования кровотечений у больных со стабильной ишемической болезнью сердца (ИБС), получающих многокомпонентную антитромботическую терапию (МАТ). Материалы и методы. Среди участников РЕГистра Антитромботической ТерАпии (РЕГАТА) отобраны 343 пациента с ИБС, из них 249 – мужчины, медиана возраста – 68 лет [62; 75], получающих МАТ в соответствии с различными клиническими показаниями. Пациенты с мультифокальным атеросклерозом (МФА) и синусовым ритмом принимали ацетилсалициловую кислоту в комбинации с «сосудистой дозой» ривароксабана 2,5 мг 2 раза в сутки (31,8%) или клопидогрелом (24,8%). Остальные (43,4%) больные имели сопутствующую фибрилляцию предсердий (ФП) и получали прямые оральные антикоагулянты в комбинации с антиагрегантной терапией после плановых чрескожных коронарных вмешательств. Медиана периода наблюдения составила 12 мес [интерквартильный размах 9,0; 18,0]. Конечной точкой безопасности стали большие и клинически значимые кровотечения (2–5-го типа) согласно классификации тяжести кровотечений Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC). На этапе включения у всех пациентов взяты образцы плазмы крови с целью определения GDF-15 методом иммуноферментного анализа. Результаты. Частота больших и клинически значимых кровотечений составила 16% (BARC 2 – 46, BARC 3 – 9, BARC 4–5 – 0), а медиана уровня GDF-15 – 1185,0 пг/мл [850,0; 1680,0]. У пациентов с ФП и сопутствующим МФА уровень GDF-15 был достоверно выше, чем в подгруппах больных, имевших только ФП или МФА (p=0,0022). По данным квинтильного анализа значения GDF-15 в 3 верхних квинтилях распределения признака (отрезное значение >943 пг/мл) ассоциировались с большей частотой кровотечений: 23,2% против 5,1%; p=0,0001. При построении модели многофакторной логистической регресии независимыми предикторами кровотечений стали уровень GDF-15>943 пг/мл (отношение шансов – ОШ 2,65, 95% доверительный интервал – ДИ 1,11–6,30; p=0,0275), наличие ФП (ОШ 2,61, 95% ДИ 1,41–4,83; p=0,0023), хроническая болезнь почек (ОШ 1,92, 95% ДИ 1,03–3,60; p=0,0401). Клинические факторы, выявлявшие риск развития кровотечений, одновременно определяли и повышение GDF-15. Заключение. Оценка уровня GDF-15 может улучшить стратификацию риска кровотечений у больных с ИБС с сопутствующей ФП и/или МФА, получающих МАТ.

In 2020, a 48-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital due to unstable angina. In 2005, three first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (1st-SESs) had been deployed to his right coronary artery (RCA). Over the past 10 years or so, the patient has been treated with single antiplatelet therapy using aspirin. Coronary angiography (CAG) revealed severe stenosis in the left circumflex artery (LCx) and total occlusion at the proximal portion of the stented RCA. Furthermore, fluoroscopy showed multiple 1st-SES fractures. After ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention of the LCx, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was resumed by adding the P2Y12 inhibitor clopidogrel to aspirin. Two months later, CAG revealed complete recanalization and multiple peri-stent coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) in the RCA. Intravascular ultrasound revealed late-acquired stent malapposition (LSM) and formation of true aneurysms. Coronary angioscopy showed the uncovered struts of the 1st-SES and mural red thrombus. DAPT was continued thereafter, and 8 months later, follow-up CAG showed no significant RCA restenosis. To date, the patient remains free from cardiovascular events. This report documents a rare case of thrombotic occlusion of a 1st-SES with LSM, CAA, and stent fractures followed by non-invasive recanalization after clopidogrel treatment 15 years after 1st-SES implantation.
UNASSIGNED: Stent thrombosis due to stent fracture and coronary aneurysm can occur even years after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent (1st-SES) implantation. Risk assessment using coronary imaging should be made and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be recommended in patients with a high risk of stent thrombosis after 1st-SES implantation. In cases of stent thrombosis of the 1st-SES, resuming DAPT, including P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, may be a useful non-invasive treatment option.

UNASSIGNED: A multitude of variables influence the healing of tooth extraction wounds, and delayed or non-healing extraction wounds might complicate later prosthodontic therapy. In this research, we analyzed the effects of systemic clopidogrel and aspirin alone or in combination on the healing of tooth extraction wounds in mice in order to provide experimental evidence for the healing of extraction wounds in patients who are clinically treated with the two medicines.
UNASSIGNED: 7-week-old ICR mice were randomly divided into four groups: control group (CON), clopidogrel group (CLOP), aspirin group (ASP), and clopidogrel combined with aspirin group (CLOP + ASP); left upper first molar was extracted, after which mice in 1 week of adaptive feeding, CLOP/ASP/CLOP + ASP groups were respectively administered with clopidogrel (10 mg/kg/d), aspirin (15 mg/kg/d), clopidogrel (10 mg/kg/d)+aspirin (15 mg/kg/d), and the control group was given an equal amount of 0.9% saline by gavage. Mice in each group were euthanized at 14 and 28 days postoperatively, and the maxilla was extracted. The tissues in the extraction sockets were examined using MicroCT and sectioned for HE staining, Masson staining, and TRAP staining, and immunohistochemistry staining (for TRAP, RANKL and osteoprotegerin).
UNASSIGNED: MicroCT analysis showed that at day 14, BS/BV was significantly lower in CLOP and CLOP + ASP groups compared to control and ASP groups, while BV/TV, Tb.Th was significantly higher. At day 28, BV/TV was significantly higher in the CLOP + ASP group compared to the CLOP group, with p < 0.05 for all results. HE staining and Masson trichrome staining findings revealed that at day 28, the mesenchyme in the bone was further decreased compared to that at day 14, accompanied with tightly arranged and interconnected bone trabeculae. In the quantitative analysis of Masson, the fraction of newly formed collagen was significantly higher in the CLOP group in comparison with that in the CON group (p < 0.05). At day 14, the ASP group had substantially more TRAP-positive cells than the CLOP and CLOP + ASP groups (p < 0.05). In immunohistochemical staining, RANKL expression was found to be significantly higher in the ASP group than those in the other three groups at day 28 (p < 0.05); OPG expression was significantly higher in the CLOP group and the CLOP + ASP group compared with that at day 14, and was higher than that in the ASP group at day 14 and day 28. OPG/RANKL was significantly higher in the CLOP and the CLOP + ASP groups than in the ASP group (p < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Clopidogrel alone promotes osteogenesis in the extraction wound, whereas aspirin alone inhibits alveolar bone healing. When the two drugs were combined, the healing effect of the extraction wound was more similar to that of the clopidogrel alone group. These results indicated that clopidogrel could promote the healing of the tooth extraction wound, and neutralize the adverse effect of ASP on osteogenesis when the two drugs were used in combination.