clomiphene

克罗米芬
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:男性因素不育症影响高达50%的无法自发受孕的夫妇。已经提出了几种非激素药物治疗方法来促进精子发生并增加不育男性的受孕机会。尽管如此,没有明确的证据表明最有效的治疗策略.
    目的:我们旨在使用系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较非激素药物治疗方案对男性不孕症的有效性。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,和CENTRAL,直到2023年10月进行随机/半随机试验,评估特发性精液异常或性腺功能减退男性的任何非激素药物治疗方案。我们使用随机效应模型进行了成对和网络荟萃分析。我们评估了偏见的风险,异质性,网络不一致。我们计算了每个干预措施实现每个报告结果的最大可能性的平均排名和累积排名曲线(SUCRA)下的表面。我们主要使用标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)报道了精子浓度和其他重要精液和生化结果。
    结果:我们纳入了14项随机试验,评估了四种治疗方法(柠檬酸克罗米芬,他莫昔芬,芳香化酶抑制剂,抗氧化剂)及其在1342名男性中的组合。纳入试验的总体质量较低。与抗氧化剂相比,克罗米芬提高了精子浓度(SMD2.15,95CI0.78-3.52),芳香化酶抑制剂(SMD2.93,95CI1.23-4.62),他莫昔芬(SMD-1.96,95CI-3.57;-0.36),但与安慰剂(SMD-1.53,95CI-3.52-0.47)相比。克罗米芬具有最高的可能性来实现精子浓度的最大变化(SUCRA97.4)。所有的治疗方法对精子活力都有相似的作用,精液体积,精子形态正常.氯米芬与氯米芬的FSH水平显着改善。抗氧化剂(SMD1.48,95CI0.44-2.51),但与安慰剂相比。与其他治疗相比,克罗米芬和睾丸激素的证据网络存在显着不一致性(p=0.01),但与安慰剂相比,克罗米芬的改善趋势相似。
    结论:没有足够的证据支持常规使用克罗米芬,他莫昔芬,和芳香化酶抑制剂,以优化不育男性的精液参数。未来的随机试验需要证实克罗米芬在改善男性生育结局方面的功效。
    CRD42023430179。
    BACKGROUND: Male factor infertility affect up to 50% of couples unable to conceive spontaneously. Several non-hormonal pharmacological treatments have been proposed to boost spermatogenesis and increase chances of conception in men with infertility. Still, no clear evidence exists on the most effective treatment strategy.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of non-hormonal pharmacological treatment options for men with infertility using a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until October 2023 for randomised/quasi-randomised trials that evaluated any non-hormonal pharmacological treatment options for men with idiopathic semen abnormalities or those with hypogonadism. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses using a random effect model. We assessed risk of bias, heterogeneity, and network inconsistency. We calculated the mean rank and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each intervention the maximum likelihood to achieve each of reported outcomes. We reported primarily on sperm concentration and other important semen and biochemical outcomes using standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence-intervals(CI).
    RESULTS: We included 14 randomised trials evaluating four treatments (Clomiphene citrate, Tamoxifen, Aromatase inhibitors, anti-oxidants) and their combinations in 1342 men. The overall quality of included trials was low. Sperm concentration improved with clomiphene compared to anti-oxidants (SMD 2.15, 95%CI 0.78-3.52), aromatase inhibitor (SMD 2.93, 95%CI 1.23-4.62), tamoxifen (SMD - 1.96, 95%CI -3.57; -0.36) but not compared to placebo (SMD - 1.53, 95%CI -3.52- 0.47). Clomiphene had the highest likelihood to achieve the maximum change in sperm concentration (SUCRA 97.4). All treatments showed similar effect for sperm motility, semen volume, and normal sperm morphology. FSH levels showed significant improvement with clomiphene vs.anti-oxidant (SMD 1.48, 95%CI 0.44-2.51) but not compared to placebo. The evidence networks for LH and testosterone suffered from significant inconsistency (p = 0.01) with similar trend of improvement with clomiphene compared to other treatments but not compared to placebo.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of Clomiphene, tamoxifen, and aromatase inhibitors to optimise semen parameters in men with infertility. Future randomised trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of clomiphene in improving fertility outcomes in men.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42023430179.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:西地那非和雌二醇均可改善接受克罗米芬诱导周期的不孕症患者的子宫内膜厚度。然而,子宫内膜厚度与妊娠率之间的相关性尚有争议。这项研究调查了口服西地那非对柠檬酸克罗米芬(CC)的影响,与添加戊酸雌二醇相比,子宫生物物理特征(Applebaum评分)和妊娠率。
    方法:这是一个双盲,2021年10月1日至2023年10月31日在刚果民主共和国基桑加尼进行的随机对照试验.无法解释的不孕症患者被随机分为两组:介入治疗,给予CC(从月经周期的第3天到第7天2x50mg/天)+西地那非(从第8天到第12天口服2x25mg/天)或(ii)对照组,给予CC(与干预组相似的剂量)+EV(从第8天至第12天口服2x2mg/天),最多三个周期。测量Applebaum评分和临床妊娠率。
    结果:西地那非组和EV组患者的平均年龄相似(29.04对28.89岁)。在每组的74名患者中,西地那非组71例和EV组72例接受治疗并随访至完成。西地那非组的Applebaum评分明显高于EV组(分别为17.05和15.14,P=0.000)。在西地那非组中,临床妊娠率也明显较高,EV组为28.92%对20.83%(P=0.04)。
    结论:与EV相比,对于原因不明的不孕症患者,在CC中口服西地那非与良好的Applebaum评分和较高的临床妊娠率相关.
    BACKGROUND: Both sildenafil and estradiol are seen to improve endometrial thickness in patients with infertility who are undergoing clomiphene induction cycles. However, the correlation between endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate is debatable. This study investigated the effect of adding oral sildenafil to clomiphene citrate (CC), compared to adding estradiol valerate, on the uterine biophysical profile (Applebaum score) and pregnancy rate.
    METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted in Kisangani in the Democratic Republic of the Congo from October 1, 2021, to October 31, 2023. Patients with unexplained infertility were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the interventional, which was given CC (2 x 50 mg/day from day 3 to day 7 of the menstrual cycle) + sildenafil (2 x 25 mg/day orally from day 8 to day 12) or (ii) the control group, which was given CC (similar dosage as the intervention group) + EV (2 x 2 mg/day orally from day 8 to day 12), for a maximum of three cycles. Applebaum scores and clinical pregnancy rates were measured.
    RESULTS: Patients in the sildenafil and EV groups were similar in mean age (29.04 versus 28.89 years). Of the 74 patients enrolled in each group, 71 in the sildenafil group and 72 in the EV group received treatment and were followed to completion. The Applebaum scores were significantly higher in the sildenafil group than in the EV group (17.05 versus 15.14, respectively, P=0.000). In the sildenafil group, the clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly higher, at 28.92% versus 20.83% in the EV group (P = 0.04).
    CONCLUSIONS: As compared to EV, the oral addition of sildenafil to CC is associated with a good Applebaum score and a high rate of clinical pregnancy in patients with unexplained infertility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了确定子宫内膜厚度(EMT)在i)柠檬酸克罗米芬(CC)和促性腺激素(Gn)之间是否不同,使用患者作为自己的对照,和ii)受孕CC和未受孕CC的患者。此外,研究晚期卵泡EMT与妊娠结局之间的关系,在CC和Gn周期。
    回顾性研究。为了本研究的目的,分别进行了三组分析。在分析1中,我们纳入了最初接受CC/IUI(CC1,n=1252)的女性的所有周期,其次是Gn/IUI(Gn1,n=1307),要比较CC/IUI和Gn/IUI之间的EMT差异,利用女性作为自己的控制。在分析2中,我们纳入了所有CC/IUI周期(CC2,n=686),这些周期来自在同一研究期间最终受孕CC的女性,评估受孕CC(CC2)和未受孕CC(CC1)的患者之间的EMT差异。在分析3中,在CC/IUI和Gn/IUI周期中评估了不同EMT四分位数之间的妊娠结局,分开,探讨EMT与妊娠结局之间的潜在关联。
    在分析1中,当CC1与Gn1循环进行比较时,EMT明显变薄[中位数(IQR):6.8(5.5-8.0)与8.3(7.0-10.0)mm,p<0.001]。患者内,CC1与Gn1EMT相比平均薄1.7mm。广义线性混合模型,针对混杂因素进行了调整,结果相似(系数:1.69,95%CI:1.52-1.85,CC1为参考。).在分析2中,将CC1与CC2EMT进行了比较,前者在[中位数(IQR):6.8(5.5-8.0)与7.2(6.0-8.9)mm,p<0.001]和调整后(系数:0.59,95CI:0.34-0.85,CC1为参考。).在分析3中,随着CC周期中EMT四分位数的增加(Q1至Q4),临床妊娠率(CPRs)和持续妊娠率(OPR)得到改善(分别为p<0.001,p<0.001),而在Gn周期中没有观察到这种趋势(分别为p=0.94,p=0.68)。广义估计方程模型,针对混杂因素进行了调整,提示在CC周期中EMT与CPR和OPR呈正相关,但不是在Gn周期。
    患者内部,与Gn相比,CC通常导致更薄的EMT。子宫内膜变薄与CC周期中OPR降低有关,而在Gn周期中未检测到这种关联。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine whether endometrial thickness (EMT) differs between i) clomiphene citrate (CC) and gonadotropin (Gn) utilizing patients as their own controls, and ii) patients who conceived with CC and those who did not. Furthermore, to investigate the association between late-follicular EMT and pregnancy outcomes, in CC and Gn cycles.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective study. Three sets of analyses were conducted separately for the purpose of this study. In analysis 1, we included all cycles from women who initially underwent CC/IUI (CC1, n=1252), followed by Gn/IUI (Gn1, n=1307), to compare EMT differences between CC/IUI and Gn/IUI, utilizing women as their own controls. In analysis 2, we included all CC/IUI cycles (CC2, n=686) from women who eventually conceived with CC during the same study period, to evaluate EMT differences between patients who conceived with CC (CC2) and those who did not (CC1). In analysis 3, pregnancy outcomes among different EMT quartiles were evaluated in CC/IUI and Gn/IUI cycles, separately, to investigate the potential association between EMT and pregnancy outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: In analysis 1, when CC1 was compared to Gn1 cycles, EMT was noted to be significantly thinner [Median (IQR): 6.8 (5.5-8.0) vs. 8.3 (7.0-10.0) mm, p<0.001]. Within-patient, CC1 compared to Gn1 EMT was on average 1.7mm thinner. Generalized linear mixed models, adjusted for confounders, revealed similar results (coefficient: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.52-1.85, CC1 as ref.). In analysis 2, CC1 was compared to CC2 EMT, the former being thinner both before [Median (IQR): 6.8 (5.5-8.0) vs. 7.2 (6.0-8.9) mm, p<0.001] and after adjustment (coefficient: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.34-0.85, CC1 as ref.). In analysis 3, clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) and ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) improved as EMT quartiles increased (Q1 to Q4) among CC cycles (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), while no such trend was observed among Gn cycles (p=0.94, p=0.68, respectively). Generalized estimating equations models, adjusted for confounders, suggested that EMT was positively associated with CPR and OPR in CC cycles, but not in Gn cycles.
    UNASSIGNED: Within-patient, CC generally resulted in thinner EMT compared to Gn. Thinner endometrium was associated with decreased OPR in CC cycles, while no such association was detected in Gn cycles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    据我们所知,这是卵巢早衰妇女口服促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂治疗后健康婴儿妊娠的首例病例.一名36岁的女性在被以前的医生诊断为卵巢早衰后出现在我们医院。我们服用了克罗米芬,人类更年期促性腺激素(hMG),GnRH拮抗剂(注射)与雌激素替代治疗11个周期(27个月),但未观察到卵泡发育。当口服GnRH拮抗剂(relugolix),它最近变得可用,在第12周期中使用,在刺激的第14天证实了13毫米的卵泡生长。刺激后,继续使用hMG和GnRH拮抗剂(注射),和成熟触发器,人绒毛膜促性腺激素10000IU,被管理。成功取出卵母细胞,进行卵胞浆内单精子注射和冷冻胚胎移植,胎儿心跳得到证实。患者被送进围产期管理设施。她在41周+2时通过剖宫产分娩了一个3,732克的健康婴儿。该病例显示了使用口服GnRH拮抗剂作为不孕症治疗选择的可能性。
    To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of pregnancy with a healthy baby after treatment with an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist in women with premature ovarian insufficiency. A 36-year-old female presented at our hospital after being diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency by a previous doctor. We administered clomiphene, human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), and GnRH antagonist (injection) together with estrogen replacement for 11 cycles (27 months), but no follicular development was observed. When the oral GnRH antagonist (relugolix), which has recently become available, was used in the 12th cycle, follicular growth of 13 mm was confirmed on the 14th day of stimulation. After stimulation, the use of hMG and GnRH antagonist (injection) was continued, and a maturation trigger, human chorionic gonadotropin 10000 IU, was administered. Oocyte retrieval was performed successfully, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer were performed, and fetal heartbeat was confirmed. The patient was admitted to the perinatal management facility. She delivered a healthy baby of 3,732 g via cesarean section at 41 weeks +2. This case shows the possibility of using an oral GnRH antagonist as an option for infertility treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年妇女辅助生殖技术成功率下降,归因于卵母细胞数量和质量的下降,提出了重大挑战。目前,对于接受IVF的老年女性的最佳卵巢刺激方案尚无共识.这项回顾性注册的队列研究旨在比较累积活产率(CLBR),活产时间(TTLB),35岁以上女性接受促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)或克罗米芬和促性腺激素联合治疗(CC联合治疗)卵巢刺激方案的成本效益。为了比较治疗结果,我们对2871个接受GnRHa或CC联合治疗方案的35岁以上女性IVF周期进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM),导致每组375个周期。此外,利用决策树模型评估两种方案的成本效益.在PSM之后,两组的基线特征相似.CC共同处理方案导致更高的周期取消率(13.07%vs.8.00%,p=0.032),但两组的受精率和胚胎质量相当。尽管在CC共处理组中TTLB更长,每个初始周期的CLBR(41.07%与45.33%,p=0.269),在24个月的随访中,两组的分娩结果相似。此外,CC共同治疗组的平均每次活产成本比GnRHa组低21.27%(¥32,301.42vs.¥39,174.22)。总之,对于35岁以上接受试管婴儿的女性,CC共处理协议提供了与GnRHa协议相当的CLBR,但成本较低,表明其作为一种可行且具有成本效益的卵巢刺激选择的潜力。临床试验注册:https://www.chictr.org.cn/,标识符[ChiCTR2300076537]。
    The decrease in assisted reproductive technology success among older women, attributed to decreased oocyte quantity and quality, poses a significant challenge. Currently, no consensus on the optimal ovarian stimulation protocol for older women undergoing IVF exists. This retrospectively registered cohort study aimed to compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), time to live birth (TTLB), and cost-effectiveness among women older than 35 years who were receiving either the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin cotreatment with ovarian stimulation (CC cotreatment) protocol. To compare treatment outcomes, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) on 2871 IVF cycles in women older than 35 years who received either the GnRHa or CC cotreatment protocol, resulting in 375 cycles in each group. Additionally, a decision tree model was utilized to assess the cost-effectiveness of the two protocols. Following PSM, both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The CC cotreatment protocol resulted in a greater rate of cycle cancellation (13.07% vs. 8.00%, p = 0.032), but the groups maintained comparable fertilization rates and embryo quality. Although the TTLB was longer in the CC cotreatment group, the CLBR per initial cycle (41.07% vs. 45.33%, p = 0.269) and delivery outcomes were similar between the two groups at the 24 months follow-up. Additionally, the average cost per live birth in the CC cotreatment group was 21.27% lower than in the GnRHa group (¥32,301.42 vs. ¥39,174.22). In conclusion, for women older than 35 years undergoing IVF, the CC cotreatment protocol offered a comparable CLBR to the GnRHa protocol but with reduced costs, indicating its potential as a viable and cost-effective ovarian stimulation option.Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier [ChiCTR2300076537].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    克罗米芬广泛用于治疗无排卵性不孕症,但仍有许多未发现的不良事件(AE).本研究的目的是全面概述克罗米芬的安全性。
    数据是从2004年第一季度到2023年第三季度从食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库得出的。新AE信号的检测涉及使用四种算法:报告比值比(ROR),比例报告比率(PRR),贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPNN),和经验贝叶斯几何平均值(EBGM)。
    在研究期间,从FAERS数据库中获得了所有药物的16,677,289例不良事件报告,720例患者在使用克罗米芬后具体报告了2,620例AE。AE涵盖了24个系统器官类别(SOC)的102个首选术语(PT)。SOC包括怀孕,产褥期和围产期状况,先天性,家族性和遗传性疾病,生殖系统和乳房疾病,和眼部疾病。发现了一些新的AE,包括连体双胞胎(0.5%),波特综合症(0.3%),外生殖器外型模棱两可(0.3%),食管闭锁(0.6%),和肛门闭锁(0.3%),药物说明书中没有提到。
    尽管大多数不良事件与药物说明书一致,未捕获一些新的AE信号,例如连体双胞胎和生殖器外部歧义。需要精心设计的研究来证明克罗米芬的安全性。这些发现对告知患者具有重要意义,医疗保健提供者,以及政策制定者关于使用克罗米芬的潜在风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Clomiphene is widely used for the treatment of anovulatory infertility, yet there remain many unrecognized adverse events (AEs). The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the safety profile of clomiphene.
    UNASSIGNED: The data were derived from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2023 from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The detection of new AE signals involved the use of four algorithms: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 16,677,289 AE reports were acquired from the FAERS database, and there were 2,620 AEs specifically reported in 720 patients following clomiphene use. The AEs encompassed 102 preferred terms (PTs) across 24 system organ classes (SOCs). Some new AEs were identified, including conjoined twins (0.5%), Potter\'s syndrome (0.3%), genitalia external ambiguous (0.3%), esophageal atresia (0.6%), and anal atresia (0.3%).
    UNASSIGNED: Although the majority of AEs aligned with the drug instruction, some new AE signals such as conjoined twins and genitalia external ambiguous were not captured. Well-designed studies are required to demonstrate the safety of clomiphene.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是一种影响许多育龄妇女的内分泌妇科疾病。克罗米芬是PCOS患者的一线治疗药物,但是大多数人可能会对它产生抵抗力。本研究旨在评估地塞米松和氯米芬治疗PCOS患者的疗效。为临床医师研究和治疗PCOS提供理论依据。
    方法:中文和英文数据库,包括PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万方医学网,和VIP信息中文期刊服务平台(VIP)从成立至2023年1月进行搜索。使用ReviewManager和Stata软件进行Meta分析。使用Cochrane的偏倚风险工具评估符合条件的研究的偏倚风险。通过漏斗图评估出版偏倚,Begg\和Egger\的测试。
    结果:最终收录了12篇文献,共有1270名PCOS患者。与对照组相比,地塞米松联合克罗米芬能显著改善妊娠(RR=1.71,P<0.00001),排卵(RR=1.30,P<0.00001),黄体生成素水平(SMD=-0.94,P<0.00001),雌二醇水平(SMD=0.99,P=0.05),孕酮程度(SMD=5.08,P=0.002)和睾酮程度(SMD=-1.59,P<0.00001)。然而,对促排卵激素水平无显著影响(SMD=0.15,P=0.37),不良反应(RR=1.30,P=0.30),头晕(RR=1.50,P=0.45),呕吐(RR=1.67,P=0.48)。
    结论:地塞米松联合克罗米芬治疗有助于提高PCOS患者的排卵率和妊娠率。改善患者的激素水平。
    OBJECTIVE: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine gynecological disease affecting many women of reproductive age. Clomiphene is the first-line treatment for PCOS patients, but most individuals may be resistant to it. This study aims to assess the efficacy of dexamethasone and clomiphene in the treatment of PCOS patients, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to study and treat PCOS.
    METHODS: Chinese and English databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Medical Network, and VIP Information Chinese Journal Service Platform (VIP) were searched from the inception to January 2023. Review Manager and Stata software were used for meta- analysis. The risk of bias of eligible studies were assessed using Cochrane\'s risk of bias tool. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots, Begg\'s and Egger\'s tests.
    RESULTS: A total of 12 literatures were finally included, with a total of 1270 PCOS patients. Compared with the control group, dexamethasone combined with clomiphene could significantly improve pregnancy (RR = 1.71, P < 0.00001), ovulation (RR = 1.30, P < 0.00001), luteinizing hormone level (SMD = -0.94, P < 0.00001), estradiol level (SMD = 0.99, P = 0.05), progesterone level (SMD = 5.08, P = 0.002) and testosterone level (SMD = -1.59, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant effects on ovulation-stimulating hormone level (SMD = 0.15, P = 0.37), adverse reactions (RR = 1.30, P = 0.30), dizziness (RR = 1.50, P = 0.45), and vomiting (RR = 1.67, P = 0.48).
    CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of dexamethasone combined with clomiphene is helpful to improve the ovulation and pregnancy rate in patients with PCOS, and improve the hormone levels of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:枸橼酸氯米芬是一种排卵诱导剂,在妊娠早期可能会发生意外的受孕后暴露。在临床前研究中,受孕后暴露在不同物种中显示出致畸作用。在人类中,到目前为止,对于意外怀孕后暴露妊娠的结局知之甚少.
    目的:我们研究的目的是评估生育后柠檬酸氯米芬暴露与后代主要和次要先天性畸形之间的关联。
    方法:对前瞻性确定病例进行回顾性队列研究,基于来自Tératogènes代理中心(CRAT)的临床数据,巴黎,法国。受孕后暴露于柠檬酸克罗米芬的女性(n=309),和未暴露的孕妇(n=1236,比例为1:4)与前瞻性收集的数据,2022年01月02日之前已知的妊娠结局和分娩日期按日历年进行匹配.裁决委员会根据EUROCAT(欧洲先天性异常和双胞胎注册)分类对主要和次要先天性畸形进行了分类。
    结果:在受孕后暴露的女性中,与未暴露女性相比,未发现重大畸形风险增加(粗相对危险度=0.64,95%置信区间0.19-2.15).在暴露组中报告了三个主要和十个次要的先天性畸形。尽管没有特定的临床模式,但发现轻微畸形的风险增加(粗相对风险=4.05,95%置信区间1.70-9.64)。
    结论:受孕后接触克罗米芬与重大先天性畸形的风险增加无关。考虑到潜在的混淆和信息偏见,对轻微畸形的结果应谨慎解释,因为没有发现具体的临床模式.
    BACKGROUND: Clomiphene citrate is an ovulation inductor for which inadvertent post-conceptional exposures may occur in early pregnancy. In preclinical studies, post-conceptional exposures showed a teratogenic effect in different species. In humans, to date, little is known about the outcomes of inadvertently post-conceptionally exposed pregnancies.
    OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to assess the association between post-conceptional exposures to clomiphene citrate and major and minor congenital malformations in the offspring.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively ascertained cases was undertaken, based on clinical data from the Centre de Référence sur les Agents Tératogènes (CRAT), Paris, France. Women with post-conceptional exposure to clomiphene citrate (n = 309), and unexposed pregnant women (n = 1236, 1:4 ratio) with prospectively collected data, known pregnancy outcome and delivery date prior to 01/02/2022, were matched by calendar year. An adjudication committee classified major and minor congenital malformations according to the EUROCAT (European Registration of Congenital Anomalies and Twins) classification.
    RESULTS: Among post-conceptional exposed women, no increased risk of major malformation was found (crude relative risk = 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.19-2.15) as compared to unexposed women. Three major and ten minor congenital malformations were reported in the exposed group. An increased risk of minor malformations was found (crude relative risk = 4.05, 95% confidence interval 1.70-9.64) although there was no specific clinical pattern.
    CONCLUSIONS: Post-conceptional exposure to clomiphene citrate was not associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations. Given potential confounding and information biases, the results about minor malformations should be interpreted with caution as no specific clinical pattern was identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA)通过抑制促性腺激素的分泌而发挥避孕作用,阻止卵泡成熟和排卵,以及子宫内膜变薄导致计划外阴道出血和随后停用DMPA。我们的研究旨在评估柠檬酸氯米芬(CC)在DMPA使用者中止血的有效性和安全性。
    方法:我们使用计算机生成的随机数表以1:1的比例将200名DMPA用户随机分配到两组中的一组;研究组,以50mg的剂量每天两次接受CC,持续五天(n=100),和对照组,接受安慰剂五天(n=100)。我们的主要结局指标是出血停止的开始和持续时间。次要结果包括子宫内膜厚度,阴道出血复发,以及任何与CC使用相关的副作用。
    结果:枸橼酸氯米芬显著导致83%的患者阴道出血早期停止,持续了三个月的随访。此外,与对照组相比,CC组的阴道出血复发率显着降低(11%vs.67%;p<0.001)。CC组子宫内膜厚度明显大于对照组(p<0.001)。在研究组中,乳房压痛的报告频率更高,两组在性交困难方面无差异。
    结论:枸橼酸氯米芬可有效控制DMPA使用者的出血。我们鼓励进一步的研究来证实我们的发现。
    BACKGROUND: Depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) functions as a contraceptive method by inhibiting the secretion of gonadotropins, which prevents follicular maturation and ovulation, as well as thinning of the endometrium leading to unscheduled vaginal bleeding and subsequent discontinuation of DMPA. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clomiphene citrate (CC) in stopping bleeding among DMPA users.
    METHODS: We randomly assigned 200 DMPA users using a computer-generated random numbers table in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups; the study group, which received CC at a dose of 50 mg twice daily for five days (n = 100), and the control group, which received a placebo for five days (n = 100). Our primary outcome measure was the onset and duration of bleeding cessation. Secondary outcomes included endometrial thickness, recurrence of vaginal bleeding, and any reported side effects associated with CC use.
    RESULTS: Clomiphene citrate significantly resulted in early cessation of vaginal bleeding in 83 % of the patients, which continued for three months of follow-up. In addition, the recurrence of vaginal bleeding was significantly reduced in the CC group compared to the control group (11 % vs. 67 %; p < 0.001). Endometrial thickness was significantly greater in the CC group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Breast tenderness was more frequently reported in the study group, with no difference in dyspareunia between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clomiphene citrate is effective in controlling bleeding among DMPA users. Further studies are encouraged to confirm our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号