BACKGROUND: Keratin pearls are foci of central keratinization within concentric layers of squamous cells that can form under the clitoral prepuce and cause pain (clitorodynia); in-office removal of keratin pearls may reduce clitoral pain and improve sexual function.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate clitoral pain and sexual function in women with partial clitoral phimosis and keratin pearls before and after in-office lysis of clitoral adhesions with keratin pearl excision (LCA-KPE).
METHODS: A pre-post interventional study evaluated patients who underwent LCA-KPE between January 2017 and February 2023 in 2 metropolitan gynecology clinics specializing in vulvar pain. Patients presenting with keratin pearls and partial clitoral phimosis identified through retrospective chart review were asked to complete postprocedure questionnaires and provide subjective responses on clitoral discomfort, sexual function, sexual distress, and their experience with in-office LCA-KPE. Bivariate analyses with paired t tests were conducted to determine the effect of LCA-KPE. Qualitative data were analyzed with thematic coding.
RESULTS: An 11-point pain visual analog scale was utilized to determine pre- and postprocedure clitoral discomfort and difficulty with orgasm. Female sexual dysfunction was measured with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised.
RESULTS: A total of 32 of 74 patients who met inclusion criteria completed postprocedure surveys (43% response rate). Mean clitoral pain for respondents was 6.91 at baseline and 2.50 after LCA-KPE (P < .001). Mean difficulty with orgasm was significantly decreased from 5.45 at baseline to 3.13 after LCA-KPE (P < .001). Participants had a mean FSFI total score of 17.68 after treatment compared with a mean total baseline FSFI of 12.12 (P = .017). The mean FSFI score for pain was 2.43 at follow-up compared with 1.37 at baseline (P = .049). There was no significant difference in the mean Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised score before vs after the procedure (P = .27). Qualitative themes described the procedure as painful but worthwhile, with 77% of participants reporting the overall experience as positive. Recurrence rate overall was 28%, with a median of 2 repeat procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing keratin pearls as a structural cause of clitoral pain and offering in-office treatment is an important tool in addressing clitorodynia and improving sexual function.
UNASSIGNED: This is the largest study to date documenting the occurrence, identifying associated pain conditions, and evaluating procedural outcomes for clitoral keratin pearls. This study was limited by a relatively small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: In-office LCA-KPE significantly reduced clitoral discomfort and difficulty with orgasm.

Clitoral adhesions occur when the prepuce adheres to the glans. These adhesions have been found in up to 22% of women seeking evaluation for sexual dysfunction. The etiology of clitoral adhesions remains largely unclear. Studies published to date on the presentation and management of clitoral adhesions are relatively recent and raise questions for future research.
We sought to provide a background of existing knowledge on the prevalence, presentation, etiology, associated conditions, and management of clitoral adhesions and to identify areas for future research.
A review of literature was performed for studies that investigate clitoral adhesions.
Conditions associated with chronic clitoral scarring appear to have a role in the development of clitoral adhesions. Symptoms include clitoral pain (clitorodynia), discomfort, hypersensitivity, hyposensitivity, difficulty with arousal, and muted or absent orgasm. Complications include inflammation, infection, and the development of keratin pearls and smegmatic pseudocysts. There are surgical and nonsurgical interventions to manage clitoral adhesions. Additionally, topical agents can be included in conservative and/or postprocedural management. Although many studies on clitoral adhesions are limited to patients with lichen sclerosus (LS), clitoral adhesions are not confined to this population.
Areas for future research include etiologies of clitoral adhesion; such knowledge is imperative to improve prevention and management. Also, in previous studies, patients were instructed to apply various topical agents and manually retract the prepuce for conservative management or postlysis care. However, the efficacy of these interventions has not been investigated. Surgical and nonsurgical lysis procedures have been described for the management of pain and difficulties with arousal and orgasm that are causes of the sexual dysfunction associated with clitoral adhesion. Although previous studies have assessed efficacy and patient satisfaction, many of these studies were limited to small sample sizes and focused solely on patients with LS. Future studies are needed to inform a standard of care for the management of clitoral adhesions.

Clitoral adhesions are characterized by adherence of preputial tissue to the glans clitoris and can be managed using a non-surgical approach in order to relieve symptoms of sexual dysfunction.
To evaluate efficacy and patient satisfaction associated with the non-surgical lysis procedure in order to determine if it is an appropriate treatment for symptomatic clitoral adhesions.
The non-surgical lysis procedure is performed by using a fine Jacobsen mosquito forceps to separate the plane between the prepuce and the glans of the clitoris, removing smegma and/or keratin pearls from underneath the adhesions and allowing for visualization of the entire glans. A chart review of 61 women that were treated for clitoral adhesions using the non-surgical lysis procedure at 1 sexual medicine practice was performed and an online survey was sent to these patients.
Encrypted survey responses were used to evaluate patient satisfaction as well as self-reported improvement in sexual functioning and pain before and after the procedure.
41 survey responses were received out of 61 eligible (67% response rate). A large majority reported improvement in pain (76%), sexual arousal (63%), and ability to achieve orgasm (64%) and no participants reported worsening in these symptoms. Of the 16 women that reported the inability to orgasm from external clitoral stimulation prior to the procedure, 6 (38%) were able to do so afterwards. Seventy-one percent of respondents reported improvement in their satisfaction with sex and 83% reported being satisfied with their decision to have the procedure. Ninety-three percent of participants reported that they would recommend this procedure to a friend with clitoral adhesions.
The results of this study will help clinicians to recognize the non-surgical lysis procedure as a treatment option for clitoral adhesions.
This study is the first of its kind assessing a cohort of patients undergoing the non-surgical lysis procedure for clitoral adhesions. Its limitations include a small sample size from 1 clinic and lack of validated instrument to evaluate sexual function and pain before and after the procedure.
Providers should regularly examine the clitoris of patients with symptoms of sexual dysfunction in order to determine if they have clitoral adhesions. The non-surgical lysis procedure may be a viable therapeutic option for these patients that has demonstrated both satisfaction and symptom relief. Myers MC, Romanello JP, Nico E, et al. A Retrospective Case Series on Patient Satisfaction and Efficacy of Non-Surgical Lysis of Clitoral Adhesions. J Sex Med 2022;19:1412-1420.