children of parents with a mental illness

患有精神疾病的父母的孩子
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心理健康素养(MHL)对于促进青年心理健康很重要。MHL的一个关键方面是关于精神障碍的知识,这对有精神障碍风险的人群尤其重要,例如患有精神疾病(COPMI)的父母的孩子,代表跨代传播中的一种机制。目前,COPMI的总体障碍知识水平,关于具体的父母失调还没有得到全面的研究。我们,因此,旨在对COPMI的疾病知识进行评估,并探索性地阐明其与COPMI年龄和性别的关系。为了评估一般知识和特定于疾病的知识,我们采用了一种新颖的方法,使疾病知识在样本之间和随着时间的推移具有可比性。
    在德国的COMPARE-家庭研究中,对N=181半结构化MHL与COPMI(5至17岁)的访谈进行了混合方法分析。我们进行了面向DSM的演绎定性内容分析,以评估COPMI的一般和特定障碍知识。卡方检验用于确定年龄和性别差异。
    儿童普遍对精神障碍的认识有限,而青少年表现出更多的知识,这些知识也与DSM-5等分类系统的描述部分一致。关于父母的疾病的具体知识水平取决于疾病组。与创伤和抑郁障碍相比,更多的儿童表现出足够的躯体和焦虑障碍知识,更多的青少年对抑郁和焦虑症有足够的了解。发现COPMI的年龄和性别与障碍知识显著相关:青少年表现出更高水平的足够的一般和特定障碍知识,男性表现出更高水平的足够的一般疾病知识。
    评估COPMI的障碍知识并确定相关的年龄和性别差异可以为MHL理论的知识组成部分提供有价值的见解。我们的发现可以通过使COPMI适应其普遍的疾病知识水平来帮助改善COPMI的心理教育干预措施。我们建议采用和扩展面向DSM的演绎方法来评估MHL中的知识。COMPARE-family研究中涉及额外评估的分析正在准备中,以确定随着时间的推移潜在的知识收益。以及与COPMI自身福祉和心理健康症状的关联。
    UNASSIGNED: Mental Health Literacy (MHL) is important in promoting youth mental health. One key aspect of MHL is knowledge about mental disorders, which is particularly relevant for populations at risk for developing mental disorders, such as children of parents with a mental illness (COPMI), representing a mechanism within the transgenerational transmission. Currently, COPMI\'s level of disorder knowledge in general, and about the specific parental disorder has not been comprehensively researched. We, therefore, aimed to assess COPMI\'s disorder knowledge and clarify its association with COPMI\'s age and sex exploratively. To assess both general and disorder-specific knowledge, we took a novel approach that makes disorder knowledge comparable across samples and over time.
    UNASSIGNED: A mixed method analysis of N = 181 semi-structured MHL interviews with COPMI (aged 5 to 17 years) was carried out in the COMPARE-family study in Germany. We conducted a DSM-oriented deductive qualitative content analysis to assess COPMI\'s general and specific disorder knowledge. Chi-square tests served to identify age and sex differences.
    UNASSIGNED: Children revealed limited knowledge of mental disorders in general, whereas adolescents displayed more knowledge that was also partly consistent with descriptions of classification systems like the DSM-5. The level of specific knowledge about the parent\'s disorder depended on the disorder group. More children displayed adequate knowledge of somatic and anxiety disorders compared to trauma and depressive disorders, and more adolescents displayed adequate knowledge of depressive and anxiety disorders. COPMI\'s age and sex were found to be significantly associated with disorder knowledge: adolescents exhibited higher levels of adequate general and specific disorder knowledge, and males exhibited higher levels of adequate general disorder knowledge.
    UNASSIGNED: Assessing COPMI\'s disorder knowledge and identifying associated age and sex differences yield valuable insights into the knowledge component of the MHL theory. Our findings can help to improve psychoeducational interventions for COPMI by orienting them to their prevailing levels of disorder knowledge. We recommend employing and extending the DSM-oriented deductive approach to assess knowledge within MHL. Analyses involving additional assessments within the COMPARE-family study are in preparation to identify potential knowledge gains over time, and associations to COPMI\'s own well-being and mental health symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神障碍在社会中经常受到污名化。精神疾病的污名会影响患有精神疾病的人本身及其家庭成员-这种现象称为协会污名(SBA)。患有精神疾病(COPMI)的父母的孩子是SBA的特殊弱势群体。在我们的系统审查中,经验丰富的SBA,预期的SBA,附属SBA,结构性歧视被确定为患有精神疾病的父母子女的相关污名化维度。评估与患有精神疾病的父母一起长大的青少年的SBA,开发了COPMI-SQ。
    N=930名青少年完成了这项研究。其中,N=380名青少年(样本1;72.6%为女性,平均年龄17.12(SD=2.01)岁)报告与至少一位患有精神疾病的父母一起长大。使用验证性因素分析(CFA)和探索性因素分析(EFA)以及标准项目和可靠性分析,我们对第一个样本的COPMI-SQ进行了分析和修正。为了验证修订后的COPMI-SQ的阶乘结构,CFA也在其他N=550青少年的独立样本中进行(样本2;80.0%女性,平均年龄16.36(SD=1.98)岁),报告没有与患有精神疾病的父母一起长大。要测试四个测量不变性,在报告父母有或无精神疾病成长的青少年的合并样本中进行了多组CFA(样本1和样本2).
    样本1中的CFA导致理论上假定的四因素结构的模型拟合不充分(CFI=.687;RMSEA=.064(90%CI=.062-.066);SRMR=.092;AIC=229155.63)。在对样本1进行EFA和项目和可靠性分析后,COPMI-SQ降低到四个量表(“有经验的SBA,\“\”附属公司SBA,\"\"羞耻,\"和\"预期SBA\")和两个额外的筛查量表(\"医疗保健\"和\"社会支持\")。为了方便问卷的使用,每个量表只保留了三个最好的项目,将项目总数减少到12个,外加5个额外的筛选项目。样本2中的CFA也导致理论上假定的四因素结构的模型拟合不充分(CFI=.667;RMSEA=.065(90%CI=.063-.066);SRMR=.101;AIC=335651.99)。相比之下,最终版本的COPMI-SQ-r显示出最佳的模型拟合(CFI=.945;RMSEA=.062(90%CI=.052-.072);SRMR=.049;AIC=60008.05)。在多组CFA(样本1和样本2)中,建立了度量不变性(χ2(208)=481.58,p<.001;CFI=.939;RMSEA=.053(90%CI=.047-.059);SRMR=.056)。在样本2中,发现内部一致性对于总量表(α=.84)是好的,对于子量表(α=.64至.78)几乎可以接受。
    COPMI-SQ(COPMI-SQ-r)的修订版是一种可靠且经济的问卷,用于评估与患有精神疾病的父母一起长大的青少年的SBA。COPMI-SQ-r可用于帮助开发和评估受影响青少年的反污名和一般干预措施。
    UNASSIGNED: Mental disorders are often stigmatized in society. The stigma of mental illness affects people with a mental illness themselves as well as their family members-a phenomenon called stigma by association (SBA). Children of parents with a mental illness (COPMI) are a particular vulnerable group for SBA. In our systematic review, experienced SBA, anticipated SBA, affiliate SBA, and structural discrimination were identified as relevant stigma dimensions for children of parents with a mental illness. To assess SBA in adolescents who grow up with a parent with a mental illness, the COPMI-SQ was developed.
    UNASSIGNED: N = 930 adolescents completed the study. Of those, N = 380 adolescents (sample 1; 72.6% female, mean age 17.12 (SD = 2.01) years) reported growing up with at least one parent with a mental illness. Using confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) as well as standard item and reliability analyses, we analyzed and revised the COPMI-SQ in the first sample. To validate the factorial structure of the revised COPMI-SQ, CFA was also conducted in the independent sample of the other N = 550 adolescents (sample 2; 80.0% female, mean age 16.36 (SD = 1.98) years) who reported not growing up with a parent with a mental illness. To test four measurement invariance, a multiple-group CFA was conducted in the combined sample of adolescents who reported growing up with and without a parent with a mental illness (sample 1 and sample 2).
    UNASSIGNED: CFA in sample 1 resulted in an inadequate model fit for the theoretically assumed four-factor structure (CFI = .687; RMSEA = .064 (90% CI = .062-.066); SRMR = .092; AIC = 229 155.63). Following EFA and item and reliability analyses in sample 1, the COPMI-SQ was reduced to four scales (\"Experienced SBA,\" \"Affiliate SBA,\" \"Shame,\" and \"Anticipated SBA\") and two additional screening scales (\"Healthcare\" and \"Social support\"). To facilitate questionnaire use, only the three best items were retained in each scale, reducing the total item number to 12 plus five additional screener items. CFA in sample 2 also resulted in an inadequate model fit for the theoretically assumed four factor structure (CFI = .667; RMSEA = .065 (90% CI = .063-.066); SRMR = .101; AIC = 335 651.99). In comparison, the final version of the COPMI-SQ-r showed the best model fit (CFI = .945; RMSEA = .062 (90% CI = .052-.072); SRMR = .049; AIC = 60 008.05). In the multiple-group CFA (sample 1 and sample 2), metric invariance was established (χ2 (208) = 481.58, p < .001; CFI = .939; RMSEA = .053 (90% CI = .047-.059); SRMR = .056). In sample 2, internal consistency was found to be good for the total scale (α = .84) and almost acceptable to almost good for the subscales (α = .64 to.78).
    UNASSIGNED: The revised version of the COPMI-SQ (COPMI-SQ-r) is a reliable and economic questionnaire to assess SBA in adolescents who grow up with a parent with a mental illness. The COPMI-SQ-r can be used to help develop and evaluate anti-stigma and general interventions for affected adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    让家庭成员参与精神疾病患者的持续护理是一种众所周知的做法,可以支持客户的康复之旅,并提高所涉及的儿童和家庭的整体福祉。尽管有潜在的好处,对于为成年人服务的心理健康专业人员实施以家庭为中心的做法(FFP),仍然缺乏理解,以及可能促进或阻碍这种做法的因素。这种知识差距在北美环境中尤为明显。
    这项研究的目的是确定在成人心理健康服务中使用FFP的潜在阻碍和促成因素。
    512名与成年心理健康客户合作的专业人员的样本,来自魁北克的所有地区,加拿大,具有各种学科背景并在不同的工作环境中工作,完成了以家庭为中心的心理健康实践问卷(FFMHPQ)。进行了多因素logistic回归分析,以评估几个因素的影响-组织,专业,和个人-关于精神卫生工作者基于家庭的做法的程度。
    这项研究的结果表明,魁北克成人心理健康专业人员采用较高FFP水平的最强预测因素,全职工作,感知更高水平的技能,知识,和对FFP的信心,有一个支持性的工作环境。结果强调需要解决组织和工人相关方面的问题,以有效促进心理健康服务中更好的FFP。
    UNASSIGNED: Engaging family members in the ongoing care of individuals with mental illness is a practice known to bolster the client\'s recovery journey and enhance the overall wellbeing of both children and families involved. Despite its potential benefits, there remains a dearth of understanding surrounding the implementation of family-focused practices (FFP) by mental health professionals serving adults, as well as the factors that could either promote or hinder such practices. This knowledge gap is particularly pronounced within North American settings.
    UNASSIGNED: The goal of this study was to identify potential hindering and enabling factors of FFP used in adult mental health services.
    UNASSIGNED: A sample of 512 professionals working with adult mental health clients, from all regions of Quebec, Canada, with a variety of disciplinary backgrounds and working in different work settings, completed the Family Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFMHPQ). Multinominal logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of several factors - organizational, professional, and personal - on the degree of family-based practices of mental health workers.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings of this study show that the strongest predictors for the adoption of higher FFP levels among adult mental health professionals in Quebec, are being employed on a full-time basis, perceiving a higher level of skills, knowledge, and confidence toward FFP, and having a supportive workplace environment. Results underscore the need to address both organizational and worker-related aspects to effectively promote better FFP in mental health services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引起同情,并向决策者和政府传达紧迫性,研究人员和项目开发人员提出了一种脆弱性和风险的叙述,以描述父母被诊断患有精神疾病时家庭的经历。在西方医学社会文化背景下发展起来的,这一框架将重点放在预防和早期干预服务响应的必要性上,同时也无意中“打扰”这些家庭并将“问题”个性化。这个框架产生了一些意想不到的后果,通过赤字饱和的镜头看到这些家庭,错过了力量,将家庭成员的结果彼此分开。本文提出了有关此框架的持续适合性的问题,并建议需要重新构想一个新的框架。
    To elicit compassion and communicate urgency to policy makers and governments, researchers and program developers have promoted a narrative of vulnerability and risk to frame the experience of families when parents have been diagnosed with mental illness. Developed within a western medicalised socio-cultural context, this frame has provided a focus on the need for prevention and early intervention in service responses while also unintentionally \'othering\' these families and individualizing the \'problem\'. This frame has had some unintended consequences of seeing these families through a deficit-saturated lens that misses strengths and separates family members\' outcomes from each other. This paper raises questions about the continued fit of this frame and suggests a need to reimagine a new one.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于父母人格障碍与儿童精神障碍之间关系的知识有限。目的研究父母人格障碍与后代精神障碍风险之间的关系。
    方法:我们链接了丹麦的健康登记册,以创建1995年1月1日至2016年12月31日出生的儿童队列。孩子们被跟踪到18岁生日,诊断集,移民,死亡,或2016年12月31日。根据国际疾病分类(ICD)第八或第十次修订的父母人格障碍。使用泊松回归分析来估计后代(0-17岁)ICD第10种精神障碍的发生率风险比(IRR)和累积发生率。
    结果:研究队列包括1,406,965名儿童。对于女孩来说,母系或父系人格障碍(MPD/PPD)与精神障碍相关:MPD女孩(IRR,2.74;95%CI,2.59-2.89)和PPD女孩(IRR,2.10;95%CI,1.94-2.27)。同样,两个MPD男孩的风险都增加了(IRR,2.44;95%CI,2.33-2.56)和PPD男孩(IRR,2.04;95%CI,1.91-2.18)。对于女孩和男孩来说,暴露于两名患有人格障碍的父母与最高风险相关(IRR,3.69;95%CI,3.15-4.33)。在18岁时,一个或两个患有人格障碍的父母的儿童中任何精神障碍的累积发生率为34.1%(95%CI,33.0-35.1)。这是非暴露儿童精神障碍累积发病率的两倍(15.2%[95%CI,15.1-15.3]).
    结论:父母有人格障碍的子女患精神障碍的风险是未接触子女的2-3.5倍。从父母到孩子传播精神障碍的可能机制涉及遗传,环境,和基因-环境途径。有必要对这些机制进行更多的研究,并对预防性干预措施进行研究。
    Knowledge of the association between parental personality disorders and mental disorders in children is limited. To examine the association between parental personality disorders and the risk of mental disorders in offspring.
    We linked Danish health registers to create a cohort of children born from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2016. Children were followed until their 18th birthday, diagnosis set, emigration, death, or December 31, 2016. Parental personality disorders according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Eighth or 10th Revision. Poisson regression analyses were used to estimate the incidence risk ratio (IRR) and cumulative incidence of ICD 10th mental disorders in offspring (age 0-17).
    The study cohort included 1,406,965 children. For girls, maternal or paternal personality disorder (MPD/PPD) was associated with mental disorders: MPD girls (IRR, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.59-2.89) and PPD girls (IRR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.94-2.27). Likewise, the risk was increased for both MPD boys (IRR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.33-2.56) and PPD boys (IRR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.91-2.18). For girls and boys combined, exposure to two parents with a personality disorder was associated with the highest risk (IRR, 3.69; 95% CI, 3.15-4.33). At age 18, the cumulative incidence of any mental disorder in children of one or two parents with a personality disorder was 34.1% (95% CI, 33.0-35.1), which was twice the cumulative incidence of mental disorders in nonexposed children (15.2% [95% CI, 15.1-15.3]).
    Children of parents with a personality disorder were at a 2 to 3.5 times higher risk of mental disorders compared with nonexposed offspring. Possible mechanisms of transmission of mental disorders from parent to child involve genetic, environmental, and gene-environment pathways. More research into these mechanisms and research into preventive interventions is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Controlled Clinical Trial
    目的:探讨预防干预对8-17岁儿童抑郁症患者的效果。焦虑,或躁郁症。
    方法:包括89名儿童在内的62个家庭接受了更广泛的家庭谈话干预(FTI;n=35),简短的让我们谈谈孩子(LTC;n=16),或成人精神病学常规护理中的常规干预(IAU;n=38)。在基线时收集父母评估的问卷数据,6个月和12个月后。我们使用生长曲线模型来研究干预对儿童心理健康问题(SDQ-P总困难)和父母对儿童行为的感知控制(PLOC-PPC)的影响。
    结果:FTI和LTC组的父母,与IAU组相比,在防止儿童心理健康问题增加方面报告了更有利的发展,标准化干预效果分别为d=-0.86和-0.88,到研究结束时,并报告改善了感知的父母控制,d分别=1.08和0.71,通过研究结束。比较FTI和LTC时,效果没有显着差异。
    结论:结果支持在成人精神病学中继续使用FTI和LTC,由于LTC是一个简短的干预,作为最低限度的预防性干预措施可能是有用的。
    To investigate the effectiveness of preventive interventions for 8-17-year-old children of patients diagnosed with depression, anxiety, or bipolar disorder.
    Sixty-two families including 89 children received either the more extensive Family Talk Intervention (FTI; n = 35), the brief Let\'s Talk about Children (LTC; n = 16), or Interventions as Usual (IAU; n = 38) in routine care in adult psychiatry. Parent-rated questionnaire data were collected at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. We used growth curve models to investigate the effect of intervention on child mental health problems (SDQ-P Total Difficulties) and perceived parental control of child behaviour (PLOC-PPC).
    Parents in the FTI and LTC groups, versus the IAU group, reported more favourable development in terms of preventing increase in child mental health problems with standardised intervention effects of d = -0.86 and -0.88 respectively, by study end, and reported improved perceived parental control, d = 1.08 and 0.71, respectively, by study end. No significant differences in effect were found when FTI and LTC were compared.
    The results support continued use of FTI and LTC in adult psychiatry, and since LTC is a brief intervention, it might be useful as a minimum-level preventive intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有精神疾病的父母的孩子是一个特别脆弱的群体,因为他们自己有很高的患精神障碍的风险,并且那些与高污名有关。此外,就像污名的主要接受者一样,他们受到围绕精神疾病的社会禁忌的影响:他们没有得到足够的信息,经常独自面对他们的问题,因此被认为是“看不见的孩子”。在以前的研究中,家庭污名仅通过对所有家庭成员的一般问卷进行评估。尚未得到充分调查的是,污名化困难如何特别影响患有精神疾病的父母的孩子。为了解决这些限制,我们开发了患有精神疾病的父母的孩子-污名问卷(COPMI-SQ),12-19岁年轻人的自我报告工具,旨在评估年轻人在日常生活中的污名体验。根据问卷前的系统回顾,我们为患有精神疾病的父母的孩子确定了相关的污名维度,这导致了93个项目,根据理论,这些项目被假定在四个不同的尺度上加载:经历的污名,预期的耻辱,自我污名,结构性歧视。专家讨论,随后对目标群体进行了可理解性分析。在本文中,我们报告了COPMI-SQ的心理测量特性的开发过程和初始试点数据(N=32)。通过项目难度指数进行项目分析,歧视性权力,以及内部一致性分析导致修订后的工具减少到67个项目。我们观察到分量表的内部一致性非常高(在α=0.868和α=0.975之间)。制定COPMI-SQ的方法遵循科学公认的原则,确保不同的施工阶段,被认为是进一步可靠性和有效性研究的坚实基础。该研究正在进行中,并正在进行进一步的验证调查;维度和因素结构也将被检查。
    Children of parents with a mental illness are a particularly vulnerable group as they have a high risk to develop a mental disorder themselves and those are associated with high stigma. Moreover, just like primary recipients of stigma, they are affected by the social taboo surrounding mental illness: they do not receive enough information, are often left alone with their problems, and are thus considered \"invisible children\". In previous research, family stigma has only been assessed through general questionnaires for all family members. What has not yet been adequately investigated is how stigma difficulties affect the children of parents with mental illness in particular. To address these limitations, we developed the Children of Parents with Mental Illness-Stigma-Questionnaire (COPMI-SQ), a self-report instrument for young people aged 12-19 years, designed to assess young people\'s stigma experiences in daily life. Based on a systematic review preceding the questionnaire, we identified relevant stigma dimensions for children of parents with a mental illness that resulted in 93 items that according to theory were assumed to load on four different scales: experienced stigma, anticipated stigma, self-stigma, and structural discrimination. An expert discussion, and a comprehensibility analysis with the target group followed. In this paper, we report on the development process and initial pilot data (N = 32) on the psychometric properties of the COPMI-SQ. Item analyses via an item difficulty index, discriminatory power, as well as internal consistency analysis resulted in a revised instrument reduced to 67 items. We observed very high internal consistencies (between α = 0.868 and α = 0.975) for the subscales. The approach taken to develop the COPMI-SQ followed scientifically accepted principles by ensuring different construction phases and is considered a solid basis for further reliability and validity studies. The study is ongoing and undergoing a further validation investigation; dimensionality and factor structure will also be examined.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:高表达情绪(HEE)已被确定为精神疾病恶化和病程的危险因素。EE已被调查为照顾者对后代问题行为和病理的反应。本荟萃分析从跨代的角度将EE视为一种可能解释精神障碍的跨代传播的机制。
    方法:我们确定了总共13项研究,这些研究依赖于16个独立样本的父母和健康对照,这些样本包括在我们的分析中。结果被合成为每个样本的一个效应大小;关于父母诊断类别的额外效应的荟萃回归,儿童精神疾病,和儿童年龄也适用。
    结果:患有精神疾病的父母被归类为HEE的频率明显更高。建立了高度批评的效果,尽管尺寸小(OR=1.45),尽管只要后代本身表现出精神疾病,它们就会变得更强壮(OR=2.82)。
    结论:当前的研究强调了父母患有精神疾病及其对子女的影响的家庭中关于EE的研究的匮乏。我们的发现强调EE是归因于精神障碍的跨代传播的潜在机制,特别是对于EE变量的批评,指示功能失调的亲子互动。
    背景:http://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/display_record。php?ID=CRD42019117609,标识符:CRD42019117609。
    BACKGROUND: High Expressed Emotion (HEE) has been identified as a risk factor for the exacerbation and course of mental illness. EE has been investigated as a caregiver\'s response to an offspring\'s problem behavior and pathology. The present meta-analysis regards EE from a transgenerational perspective and as one mechanism that might explain the transgenerational transmission of mental disorders.
    METHODS: We identified a total of 13 studies relying on 16 independent samples of parent-child dyads of parents with a mental illness and healthy controls; these were included in our analysis. Results were synthesized into one effect size per sample; meta-regression on additional effects of parental diagnostic category, child mental illness, and child age were also applied.
    RESULTS: Parents with a mental illness are classified as HEE significantly more often. Effects were established for high criticism, albeit of small size (OR = 1.45), although they become stronger whenever offspring exhibit mental illness themselves (OR = 2.82).
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study highlights the dearth of studies on EE in families in which a parent has a mental illness and its effects on their children. Our findings highlight EE as a potential mechanism for attributing the transgenerational transmission of mental disorders, especially for the EE-variable criticism, indicating dysfunctional parent-child interactions.
    BACKGROUND: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019117609, identifier: CRD42019117609.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文报告了一种基于优势的干预措施,以支持患有精神疾病的父母及其在成人心理健康环境中的孩子:“让我们谈谈儿童”(LTC)干预。采用定性方法,父母参与者接受成人心理健康和家庭服务的LTC。在实施该计划后,通过对25名父母的深入访谈,描述了接受LTC的父母的福利。访谈数据确定了对父母自我调节的影响-主要是通过改变作为父母的代理意识和技能建设,一旦他们的孩子的日常生活更清晰的图片被理解。这项研究概述了在常规心理健康治疗期间与父母谈论孩子的优势和脆弱性的好处。父母在儿童预防干预中的自决作用是心理健康恢复的重要考虑因素,这也有助于打破家庭中跨代精神疾病的循环。
    This article reports a strengths-based intervention to support parents with mental illness and their children in adult mental health settings: \"Let\'s Talk About Children\" (LTC) intervention. A qualitative methodology was adopted with parent participants receiving LTC in adult mental health and family services. The benefits for parents receiving LTC were described through in-depth interviews with 25 parents following the delivery of the program. Interview data identified an impact on parental self-regulation-mainly through a change in a sense of agency as a parent-and skill building, once a clearer picture of their child\'s everyday life was understood. This study outlines the benefits of talking with parents about the strengths and vulnerabilities of their children during routine mental health treatment. The role for self-determination of parents in preventive interventions for children is an important consideration for mental health recovery, and it also helps to break the cycle of transgenerational mental illness within families.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Children living in families impacted by parental mental illness are at increased risk of adverse mental and physical health outcomes compared with children living in families unaffected by mental illness. Considered to be a hard-to reach group, it is likely that there are unique barriers for these young people in seeking help for their difficulties. This systematized review synthesizes what is currently known about help-seeking barriers, facilitators and interventions for young people affected by parental mental illness.
    METHODS: Three databases were searched, yielding 2556 results and three studies were identified through other sources. Studies were screened on title and abstract review and were excluded if they were published before 2005 or if they did not include the perspectives of young people. At a second stage, full-text articles were screened based on the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies were included for data extraction and quality appraisal.
    RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative data synthesis revealed three significant barriers (i) stigma, (ii) family communication and (iii) lack of belonging and shared experience, three key facilitators (i) individual characteristics, (ii) group identification and (iii) anonymity and three primary components of therapeutic interventions (i) psychoeducation, (ii) connection with peers and (iii) accessibility.
    CONCLUSIONS: It was found that stigma towards mental illness is highly salient amongst young people impacted by parental mental illness and has unique effects on their patterns of help-seeking. Help-seeking research amongst this group is still emerging, with a need for greater clarity in operationalisation of help-seeking constructs and more robust methodological designs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号