chemo-radiotherapy

化学放射疗法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新技术的进步,再加上生物信息学,导致了更多基因的发现,例如长链非编码RNA(lncRNAs),与抗药性有关。LncRNA由超过200个核苷酸组成并且不具有任何蛋白质编码功能。这些lncRNAs在物种间表现出较低的保守性,通常以低水平表达,并且通常对特定组织和发育阶段表现出高度特异性。LncRNAMALAT1在基因组功能的各个方面发挥着至关重要的调节作用,包括基因转录,拼接,和表观遗传学。此外,它参与与细胞周期相关的生物过程,细胞分化,发展,和多能性。最近,MALAT1已成为一种有助于耐药性或敏感性的新机制,在癌症研究领域引起了极大的关注。本文旨在探讨MALAT1赋予癌细胞对化疗和放疗耐药的机制。
    The advancement of novel technologies, coupled with bioinformatics, has led to the discovery of additional genes, such as long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), that are associated with drug resistance. LncRNAs are composed of over 200 nucleotides and do not possess any protein coding function. These lncRNAs exhibit lower conservation across species, are typically expressed at low levels, and often display high specificity towards specific tissues and developmental stages. The LncRNA MALAT1 plays crucial regulatory roles in various aspects of genome function, encompassing gene transcription, splicing, and epigenetics. Additionally, it is involved in biological processes related to the cell cycle, cell differentiation, development, and pluripotency. Recently, MALAT1 has emerged as a novel mechanism contributing to drug resistance or sensitivity, attracting significant attention in the field of cancer research. This review aims to explore the mechanisms through which MALAT1 confers resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in cancer cells.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌仍然是全世界癌症死亡的最常见原因。非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)代表最常见的肺癌类型,并且经常在晚期被诊断。III期NSCLC,包括30%的病例,指局部和转移性疾病之间的状态,并与不良预后相关。正如这篇评论所强调的那样,阶段III代表一个异质组,其复杂的管理包括多模式治疗,下面讨论,并需要在多学科团队中进行讨论。这种方法的目标是在这些患有局部晚期和非转移性疾病的患者中采取最大的态度。然而,许多问题仍在争论中,包括不同治疗方式之间的最佳治疗顺序,特别是手术患者的选择,围手术期治疗的持续时间和生物标志物的识别,以确定哪些患者可能受益于特定治疗,如免疫治疗和靶向治疗。这篇综述描述了III期NSCLC的管理现状,讨论可切除性的关键问题,并强调了该领域的最新进展,特别是在这种情况下纳入免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和靶向治疗。
    Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death across the world. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the most frequent type of lung cancer and is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Stage III NSCLC, which encompasses 30% of cases, refers to a state between localized and metastatic disease, and is associated with poor prognosis. As highlighted in this review, stage III represents a heterogenous group, whose complex management includes multimodal treatment, discussed below, and requires discussion in multidisciplinary teams. The goal of this approach is a maximalist attitude in these patients with locally advanced and non-metastatic disease. However, many issues remain under debate including the optimal sequences of treatment between different treatment modalities, patient selection particularly for surgery, the duration of perioperative treatments and the identification of biomarkers to determine which patients might benefit of specific treatment like immunotherapy and targeted therapies. This review describes the current landscape of management of stage III NSCLC, discussing the critical issue of resectability, and highlighting the recent advancements in the field, particularly the incorporation of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies in this setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的可靠和可获得的生物标志物被保证用于生物驱动放疗(RT)。本研究旨在探讨推定的肿瘤干细胞(CSC)标志物的预后价值,缺氧,以局部高剂量失败(HDF)为终点的肿瘤体积。
    方法:在丹麦头颈部癌症研究组(DAHANCA)19研究中,从接受原发性化学疗法(C-)RT和尼莫拉唑治疗HNSCC的患者中检索肿瘤组织。肿瘤体积,低氧分类,并分析了CSC标志物CD44、SLC3A2和MET的表达。对于所有参数数据合格的患者(n=340),通过这些生物标志物整体分析了原发性化学(C-)RT后HDF的风险,并对p16阳性口咽(p16OPSCC)和p16阴性(p16-)肿瘤(口腔,p16-口咽,下咽和喉)。
    结果:原发性和淋巴结体积较大的患者出现HDF风险较高(>25cm3,危险比(HR):3.00[95%CI:1.73-5.18]),高SLC3A2(HR:2.99[1.28-6.99]),CD44(>30%阳性,HR:2.29[1.05-5.00]),和p16-肿瘤(HR:2.53[1.05-6.11])。p16-肿瘤具有比p16+OPSCC更高的CSC标志物表达。与最高HDF风险相关的因素是p16-肿瘤(n=178)的体积较大(HR:3.29[1.79-6.04])和p16+OPSCC(n=162)的SLC3A2(HR:6.19[1.58-24.23])。
    结论:肿瘤体积,p16和CSC标志物是用(C-)RT治疗的HNSCC患者的HDF的潜在生物标志物。CSC在p16+OPSCC中的较低表达可能有助于更好的肿瘤控制。
    OBJECTIVE: Reliable and accessible biomarkers for patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) are warranted for biologically driven radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of putative cancer stem cell (CSC) markers, hypoxia, and tumor volume using loco-regional high-dose failure (HDF) as endpoint.
    METHODS: Tumor tissue was retrieved from patients treated with primary chemo-(C-)RT and nimorazole for HNSCC in the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Study Group (DAHANCA) 19 study. Tumor volume, hypoxic classification, and expression of CSC markers CD44, SLC3A2, and MET were analyzed. For patients with eligible data on all parameters (n = 340), the risk of HDF following primary chemo-(C-)RT were analyzed by these biomarkers as a whole and stratified for p16-positive oropharynx (p16 + OPSCC) vs p16-negative (p16-) tumors (oral cavity, p16- oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx).
    RESULTS: Higher risk of HDF was seen for patients with larger primary and nodal volume (>25 cm3, Hazard Ratio (HR): 3.00 [95 % CI: 1.73-5.18]), high SLC3A2 (HR: 2.99 [1.28-6.99]), CD44 (>30 % positive, HR: 2.29 [1.05-5.00]), and p16- tumors (HR: 2.53 [1.05-6.11]). p16- tumors had a higher CSC marker expression than p16 + OPSCC. The factors associated with the highest risk of HDF were larger volume (HR: 3.29 [1.79-6.04]) for p16- tumors (n = 178) and high SLC3A2 (HR: 6.19 [1.58-24.23]) for p16 + OPSCC (n = 162).
    CONCLUSIONS: Tumor volume, p16, and CSC markers are potential biomarkers for HDF for patients with HNSCC treated with (C-)RT. Lower expression of CSC in p16 + OPSCC may contribute to better tumor control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们使用扩散和代谢成像重点关注进展(PN)的假性进展(PPN)和对放疗(RT)或放化疗(CRT)的反应。
    方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了75例神经胶质瘤患者(2023年9月由伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)(IRCT20230904059352N1)批准)。对比增强病变体积(CELV),非增强病变体积(NELV),坏死肿瘤体积(NTV),以及表观扩散系数(ADC)和磁共振波谱(Cho/Cr,Cho/NAA和NAA/Cr)由神经放射学家使用半自动方法计算。所有患者在CRT后1个月和6个月随访。
    结果:研究结果显示,在所有神经胶质瘤类型中,M-CELV在RT-CRT之前和之后六个月有统计学上的显着变化(?<0.05)。在神经胶质瘤细胞类型中,M-ADC的变化,M-Cho/Cr,对于PPN患者,PN的Cho/NAA指数增加且更高。6个月后,M-NAA/Cr比值下降,仅对GBM的PN有意义,和Epn(?<0.05)。观察到扩散指数之间存在显着差异,代谢比率,所有类型的CELV在六个月后发生变化(?<0.05)。治疗后1个月无一例怀疑PPN。DWI/ADC指标具有较高的敏感性和特异性(98.25%和96.57%,分别)。
    结论:本研究的结果表明,ADC值以及Cho/Cr和Cho/NAA比率可用于区分PPN和PN患者,虽然ADC更敏感和特异。
    We focused on Differentiated pseudoprogression (PPN) of progression (PN) and the response to radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using diffusion and metabolic imaging.
    Seventy-five patients with glioma were included in this prospective study (approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (IRCT20230904059352N1) in September 2023). Contrast-enhanced lesion volume (CELV), non-enhanced lesion volume (NELV), necrotic tumor volume (NTV), and quantitative values ​​of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Cho/Cr, Cho/NAA and NAA/Cr) were calculated by a neuroradiologist using a semi-automatic method. All patients were followed at one and six months after CRT.
    The results of the study showed statistically significant changes before and six months after RT-CRT for M-CELV in all glioma types (𝑝 < 0.05). In glioma cell types, the changes in M-ADC, M-Cho/Cr, and Cho/NAA indices for PN were incremental and greater for PPN patients. M-NAA/Cr ratio decreased after six months which was significant only on PN for GBM, and Epn (𝑝 < 0.05). A significant difference was observed between diffusion indices, metabolic ratios, and CELV changes after six months in all types (𝑝 < 0.05). None of the patients were suspected PPN one month after treatment. The DWI/ADC indices had higher sensitivity and specificity (98.25% and 96.57%, respectively).
    The results of the present study showed that ADC values and Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios can be used to differentiate between patients with PPN and PN, although ADC is more sensitive and specific.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:对于局部晚期和/或非转移性不可切除的食管癌,确定性放化疗(CRT)每日25次提供50Gy,同时结合铂类方案,仍然是标准的治疗方法,2年无病生存率为25%,值得与新的系统性治疗策略联系起来.近年来,几种免疫检查点抑制剂(抗PD1/抗PD-L1,抗程序死亡1/抗程序死亡配体1)已被批准用于治疗各种实体恶性肿瘤,包括转移性食管癌.因此,我们假设在CRT中加入抗PD-L1将为局部晚期食管癌患者提供临床获益.为了评估抗PD-L1durvalumab联合CRT的疗效,然后作为维持治疗,我们设计了随机II期ARION(放化疗与免疫疗法在不可切除的食管癌-UCGI33/PRODIGE67中的关联)。
    方法:ARION是一个多中心,开放标签,随机化,比较II期试验。根据肿瘤分期,以1:1的比例随机分配患者,组织学和中心。实验团队依靠每天25次50Gy的CRT,与每两周放疗期间和之后给予的FOLFOX方案相结合,共6个周期,从CRT开始的durvalumab共12次输注。标准臂是单独的CRT。使用调强放疗是强制性的。主要终点是将12个月时的无进展生存期从50%增加到68%(HR=0.55)(功率90%;单侧α风险,10%)。进展将通过成像的中央外部审查来定义。
    诊断活检标本的癌细胞和基质免疫细胞的PD-L1联合阳性评分将与无病生存期相关。肠道微生物群的研究旨在确定基线肠道细菌是否与肿瘤反应相关。血液样本的蛋白质组学分析将比较CRT和durvalumab后的长期应答者与非应答者,以鉴定生物标志物。
    结论:本研究的结果对于评估免疫治疗与CRT联合治疗的影响以及在这种未满足的临床需求情况下破译免疫反应具有重要意义。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT:03777813。试用登记日期:2018年12月5日。
    BACKGROUND: In case of locally advanced and/or non-metastatic unresectable esophageal cancer, definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) delivering 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions in combination with platinum-based regimen remains the standard of care resulting in a 2-year disease-free survival of 25% which deserves to be associated with new systemic strategies. In recent years, several immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1, anti-Program-Death 1/anti-Program-Death ligand 1) have been approved for the treatment of various solid malignancies including metastatic esophageal cancer. As such, we hypothesized that the addition of an anti-PD-L1 to CRT would provide clinical benefit for patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. To assess the efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab in combination with CRT and then as maintenance therapy we designed the randomized phase II ARION (Association of Radiochemotherapy with Immunotherapy in unresectable Oesophageal carciNoma- UCGI 33/PRODIGE 67).
    METHODS: ARION is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative phase II trial. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio in each arm with a stratification according to tumor stage, histology and centre. Experimental arm relies on CRT with 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions in combination with FOLFOX regimen administrated during and after radiotherapy every two weeks for a total of 6 cycles and durvalumab starting with CRT for a total of 12 infusions. Standard arm is CRT alone. Use of Intensity Modulated radiotherapy is mandatory. The primary endpoint is to increase progression-free survival at 12 months from 50 to 68% (HR = 0.55) (power 90%; one-sided alpha-risk, 10%). Progression will be defined with central external review of imaging.
    UNASSIGNED: PD-L1 Combined Positivity Score on carcinoma cells and stromal immune cells of diagnostic biopsy specimen will be correlated to disease free survival. The study of gut microbiota will aim to determine if baseline intestinal bacteria correlates with tumor response. Proteomic analysis on blood samples will compare long-term responder after CRT with durvalumab to non-responder to identify biomarkers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present study will be of great importance to evaluate the impact of immunotherapy in combination with CRT and decipher immune response in this unmet need clinical situation.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT: 03777813.Trial registration date: 5th December 2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,放射治疗计划系统旨在进行生物学优化,该优化在很大程度上依赖于肿瘤控制概率(TCP)和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)建模的计划指标。使用替代数据实施和扩展TCP和NTCP模型是朝着可靠的放射生物学治疗计划迈出的重要一步。在这项回顾性的单一机构研究中,回顾了139例接受放化疗的肺癌患者的治疗图,并将剂量学预测因子与食管炎的发生率相关联,并为肺癌患者建立了1级和2级食管炎的NTCP模型。
    方法:食管是肺癌放疗(RT)中的危险器官(OAR)。食管炎是由RT引起的常见毒性。在这项研究中,剂量体积参数Vx(Vx:接受≥xGy的食管体积百分比)和平均食管剂量(MED)作为定量剂量体积指标,以1级和2级食管炎为终点,进行了审查,并从治疗计划系统和电子病历系统中得出。进行二元逻辑回归和probit的统计分析,以将1级和2级食管炎的概率与MED和Vx相关联。在统计学分析中使用5%显着水平(α=0.05)的IBMSPSS软件版本24。
    结果:随着Vx和MED值的增加,1级和2级食管炎的发生概率成比例增加。V20、V30、V40、V50和MED是1级食管炎的统计学显著的良好剂量学预测因子。确定了1级和2级食管炎的MED发生率为50%(TD50)。LymanKutcherBurman模型参数,例如,n,m和TD50进行拟合,并与其他已发表的研究结果进行比较。此外,1级食管炎概率与MED之间的S形剂量反应曲线是根据种族产生的,性别,年龄和吸烟状况。
    结论:将V20、V30、V40和V50加入到临床正常组织效应的定量分析中,或QUANTEC组的V35,V50,V70和MED的剂量限制。我们的发现可用于验证3维计划时代模型以及使用放射生物学优化进行治疗计划和计划评估的其他临床指南。
    BACKGROUND: Currently, radiation therapy treatment planning system intends biological optimization that relies heavily upon plan metrics from tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling. Implementation and expansion of TCP and NTCP models with alternative data is an important step towards reliable radiobiological treatment planning. In this retrospective single institution study, the treatment charts of 139 lung cancer patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy were reviewed and correlated dosimetric predictors with the incidence of esophagitis and established NTCP model of esophagitis grade 1 and 2 for lung cancer patients.
    METHODS: Esophagus is an organ at risk (OAR) in lung cancer radiotherapy (RT). Esophagitis is a common toxicity induced by RT. In this study, dose volume parameters Vx (Vx: percentage esophageal volume receiving ≥ x Gy) and mean esophagus dose (MED) as quantitative dose-volume metrics, the esophagitis grade 1 and 2 as endpoints, were reviewed and derived from the treatment planning system and the electronic medical record system. Statistical analysis of binary logistic regression and probit were performed to have correlated the probability of grade 1 and 2 esophagitis to MED and Vx. IBM SPSS software version 24 at 5% significant level (α = 0.05) was used in the statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: The probabilities of incidence of grade 1 and 2 esophagitis proportionally increased with increasing the values of Vx and MED. V20, V30, V40, V50 and MED are statistically significant good dosimetric predictors of esophagitis grade 1. 50% incidence probability (TD50) of MED for grade 1 and 2 esophagitis were determined. Lyman Kutcher Burman model parameters, such as, n, m and TD50, were fitted and compared with other published findings. Furthermore, the sigmoid shaped dose responding curve between probability of esophagitis grade 1 and MED were generated respecting to races, gender, age and smoking status.
    CONCLUSIONS: V20, V30, V40 and V50 were added onto Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the clinic, or QUANTEC group\'s dose constrains of V35, V50, V70 and MED. Our findings may be useful as both validation of 3-Dimensional planning era models and also additional clinical guidelines in treatment planning and plan evaluation using radiobiology optimization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    现代世界死亡的关键原因,癌症是一种阴险的病理,应该在早期诊断以成功治疗。开发具有最小侵入性和高疗效的治疗干预措施,可以区分肿瘤和正常细胞是临床科学特别感兴趣的。因为它们可以提高患者的生存率。纳米颗粒是一种宝贵的资产,可用于开发此类诊断和治疗模式。因为它们的尺寸非常小,表面可以修改,高度安全和稳定,并且可以以受控的方式合成。迄今为止,不同的纳米粒子已被纳入多种模式,如肿瘤靶向治疗,热疗,化疗,和放射治疗。本文旨在简要介绍纳米粒子在基于热疗的癌症治疗中的研究和应用的最新进展。总结了最新的研究,以强调联合热-化学-放射疗法的发展的最新进展,以及与纳米粒子在癌症治疗中的应用相关的挑战。本文分为:治疗方法和药物发现>肿瘤疾病的纳米医学。
    A pivotal cause of death in the modern world, cancer is an insidious pathology that should be diagnosed at an early stage for successful treatment. Development of therapeutic interventions with minimal invasiveness and high efficacy that can discriminate between tumor and normal cells is of particular interest to the clinical science, as they can enhance patient survival. Nanoparticles are an invaluable asset that can be adopted for development of such diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, since they come in very small sizes with modifiable surface, are highly safe and stable, and can be synthesized in a controlled fashion. To date, different nanoparticles have been incorporated into numerous modalities such as tumor-targeted therapy, thermal therapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. This review article seeks to deliver a brief account of recent advances in research and application of nanoparticles in hyperthermia-based cancer therapies. The most recent investigations are summarized to highlight the latest advances in the development of combined thermo-chemo-radiotherapy, along with the challenges associated with the application of nanoparticles in cancer therapy. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们研究了确定性同步放化疗(CCRT)期间嗜酸性粒细胞耗竭的动态变化及其与Ⅱ-Ⅳa期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者预后的关系。
    方法:模糊C均值算法(FCMA)评估了1225例患者在根治性放疗期间循环嗜酸性粒细胞计数(CEC)的纵向趋势。通过Kaplan-Meier分析评估对患者生存的预后影响,并使用Cox比例风险模型来确定嗜酸性粒细胞耗竭等级中不良预后影响的风险比。在Cox回归模型的框架内使用HR评估治疗前CEC和CCRT对结果的交互影响。
    结果:三个级别的嗜酸性粒细胞耗竭,根据治疗期间动态类型的CEC与治疗终止时CEC的价值之间的相互作用定义,在无进展生存期(PFS)方面对不良预后进行了显着分层,总生存期(OS),和无远处转移生存率(DMFS)[1.57倍(p=0.001),1.69倍(p=0.007),G1的1.51倍(p=0.019),2.4倍(p<0.001),2.76倍(p<0.001),G2是G0的2.31倍(p<0.001)]。此外,高水平的治疗前CECs是对抗严重耗竭等级的最强保护因素(G0vs.G2,HR=0.20,P=0.005;G1vs.G2,HR=0.14,P<0.001)。然而,与单纯放疗相比,在治疗前CECs较高的患者中,CCRT获益减弱.
    结论:NPC患者治疗后CECs减少可能在临床环境中有助于评估NPC标准治疗的预后。
    OBJECTIVE: We investigated the dynamics of eosinophil depletion during definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) and their association with the prognosis of stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.
    METHODS: Fuzzy C-means algorithm (FCMA) assessed longitudinal trends in circulating eosinophil counts (CECs) of 1225 patients throughout the period of radical radiotherapy. The prognostic impact on patients\' survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional risk model was used to determine the hazard ratio for adverse prognostic effects in grades of eosinophil depletion. The interactive effect of pre-treatment CECs and CCRT on outcomes was evaluated using HRs within the framework of Cox regression models.
    RESULTS: Three grades of eosinophil depletion, as defined by the interaction between dynamic types of CECs in the period of treatment and the value of CECs at the termination of treatment, significantly stratified the poor prognosis in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) [1.57-fold (P = 0.001), 1.69-fold (P = 0.007), and 1.51-fold (P = 0.019) for G1, 2.4-fold (P < 0.001), 2.76-fold (P < 0.001), and 2.31-fold (P < 0.001) for G2, as compared with G0]. Furthermore, high levels of pre-treatment CECs acted as the strongest protective factor against severe depletion grade (G0 vs. G2, HR = 0.20, P = 0.005; G1 vs. G2, HR = 0.14, P < 0.001). However, compared with radiotherapy alone, the benefit from CCRT was attenuated in patients with high pre-treatment CECs.
    CONCLUSIONS: CECs reduction after treatment in patients with NPC may be helpful in the clinical setting to aid in assessing the prognosis for standard treatment of NPC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估晚期胸腺上皮肿瘤(TETs)患者同步放化疗(CCRT)与序贯放化疗(SCRT)诱导后手术切除的预后。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括2008年1月至2019年12月在广东省第二总医院接受CCRT或SCRT诱导并手术切除的晚期TET患者。主要结果是诱导反应率和手术完全切除率。次要结果是手术联合切除,诱导后T分期,术后TNM分期,术后病理肿瘤消退分级,无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),和不良事件(AE)。
    结果:共纳入31例患者,其中15人接受了CCRT,其他16人接受了SCRT。诱导应答率分别为80.0和62.5%,分别,诱导后降压率分别为46.7%和31.3%,分别,诱导后R0切除率分别为80.0和68.8%,分别,CCRT组和SCRT组之间无显著差异(均P>0.05)。5年OS率为64.2%和51.6%,分别,PFS分别为42.3%和21.4%,分别,CCRT组和SCRT组之间无显著差异(均P>0.05)。与SCRT相比,CCRT在血液系统中的AE明显高于SCRT(P=0.009)。
    结论:CCRT和SCRT诱导治疗的晚期TETs患者可能具有良好的预后,而SCRT诱导可能导致血液系统中AE的概率较低。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) versus sequential chemo-radiotherapy (SCRT) induction followed by surgical resection in patients with advanced thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).
    METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with advanced TETs who underwent CCRT or SCRT induction followed by surgical resection at the Second General Hospital of Guangdong Province between January 2008 and December 2019. The primary outcomes were induction response rate and surgical complete resection rate. The secondary outcomes were surgery combined resection, post-induction T staging, postoperative TNM staging, postoperative pathological tumor regression grade, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).
    RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included, 15 of whom received CCRT and the other 16 SCRT. The induction response rates were 80.0 and 62.5%, respectively, the post-induction step-down rates were 46.7 and 31.3%, respectively, and the post-induction R0 resection rates were 80.0 and 68.8%, respectively, without significant differences between CCRT and SCRT groups (all P > 0.05). The 5-year OS rate was 64.2 and 51.6%, respectively, and PFS was 42.3 and 21.4%, respectively, without significant differences between CCRT and SCRT groups (both P > 0.05). AEs in the hematologic system were significantly higher with CCRT compared with SCRT (P = 0.009).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced TETs might have a good prognosis with both CCRT and SCRT induction therapy, while SCRT induction may result in a lower probability of AEs in the hematologic system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景本研究旨在探讨局部晚期鼻咽癌(LANC)放化疗患者治疗前血红蛋白-红细胞分布宽度(RDW)比值(HRR)对总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的预后意义。
    方法:对2010年10月至2020年6月在肿瘤科就诊的LANC患者进行回顾性筛查。HRR计算为血红蛋白(g/dL)除以RDW(%)。患者被分配到低HRR组或高HRR组。
    结果:本研究共纳入102例患者。HRR的临界值为0.97。在低和高HRR组之间,平均年龄,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)表现得分,γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT),白蛋白和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平,诊断时体重减轻,复发和转移率差异有统计学意义。在低HRR组中,OS和DFS分别为44.4(95%CI:4.9-83.8)和15.7个月(95%CI:0.1-36.2),分别,但在高HRR组无法达到(p<0.001)。在多变量分析中,低HRR在OS(p=0.004,风险比(HR)=3.07,95%CI:1.444-6.529)和DFS(p<0.001,HR=3.94,95%CI:1.883-8.244)方面均显示为独立因素。
    结论:这是第一项研究表明,在接受放化疗的LANC患者中,HRR是OS和DFS的独立预后指标。因此,HRR可以作为一个容易适用的,该患者组的临床实践中廉价的标记物。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the prognostic significance of the pre-treatment hemoglobin-red blood cell distribution width (RDW) ratio (HRR) in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANC) treated with chemoradiotherapy.
    METHODS: Patients with LANC who attended the oncology clinic between October 2010 and June 2020 were retrospectively screened. HRR was calculated as hemoglobin (g/dL) divided by the RDW (%). Patients were assigned to either the low HRR group or the high HRR group.
    RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included in the study. The cut-off value for HRR was taken as 0.97. Between the low and high HRR groups, mean age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, weight loss at diagnosis, and recurrence and metastasis rate were significantly different. In the low HRR group, OS and DFS were 44.4 (95% CI: 4.9-83.8) and 15.7 months (95% CI: 0.1-36.2), respectively, but could not be reached in the high HRR group (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, low HRR was shown to be an independent factor in terms of both OS (p=0.004, hazard ratio (HR)=3.07, 95% CI: 1.444-6.529) and DFS (p<0.001, HR=3.94, 95% CI: 1.883-8.244).
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that HRR is an independent prognostic marker for OS and DFS in patients with LANC treated with chemoradiotherapy. Thus, HRR can be used as an easily applicable, inexpensive marker in clinical practice in this patient group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号