cefiderocol

头孢地洛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鲍曼不动杆菌是医院环境中的一个重要问题,特别是那些被迫长期住院的危重病人。由于其非凡的基因组可塑性,其产生抗性的能力不断增强,进一步加剧了管理和预防这种生物的挑战。特别是在应对不利的环境条件。它被认为是重大的公共卫生风险,为确定新的治疗方法和感染控制策略提供了重要动力。的确,目前使用的抗菌剂正逐渐失去其功效,被越来越新的细菌抗性机制中和,尤其是碳青霉烯类抗生素。迫切需要对潜在的分子机制进行深入的了解,以揭示鲍曼不动杆菌对标准疗法具有巨大弹性的特性。正在研究中的最有希望的替代品是舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦的组合,头孢吡肟/齐达巴坦,亚胺培南/funobactam,xeruborbactam,和最新的分子,如新型多粘菌素或zosurabalpin。此外,噬菌体疗法的潜力,以及深度学习和人工智能,提供一种互补的方法,在传统策略失败的情况下特别有用。与鲍曼不动杆菌的斗争不仅限于微生物学研究或医院病房的缩影;相反,这是一个更广泛的公共卫生困境,需要协调,全球反应。
    Acinetobacter baumannii represents a significant concern in nosocomial settings, particularly in critically ill patients who are forced to remain in hospital for extended periods. The challenge of managing and preventing this organism is further compounded by its increasing ability to develop resistance due to its extraordinary genomic plasticity, particularly in response to adverse environmental conditions. Its recognition as a significant public health risk has provided a significant impetus for the identification of new therapeutic approaches and infection control strategies. Indeed, currently used antimicrobial agents are gradually losing their efficacy, neutralized by newer and newer mechanisms of bacterial resistance, especially to carbapenem antibiotics. A deep understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms is urgently needed to shed light on the properties that allow A. baumannii enormous resilience against standard therapies. Among the most promising alternatives under investigation are the combination sulbactam/durlobactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/funobactam, xeruborbactam, and the newest molecules such as novel polymyxins or zosurabalpin. Furthermore, the potential of phage therapy, as well as deep learning and artificial intelligence, offer a complementary approach that could be particularly useful in cases where traditional strategies fail. The fight against A. baumannii is not confined to the microcosm of microbiological research or hospital wards; instead, it is a broader public health dilemma that demands a coordinated, global response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:头孢地洛是一种铁载体头孢菌素,对各种耐碳青霉烯的革兰氏阴性菌(CR-GNB)具有活性。目前没有关于头孢地洛在治疗类型方面的实际使用的数据(例如,经验性的或有针对性的,单一疗法或联合方案),适应症,和患者特征。
    方法:在这个多中心中,前瞻性研究,我们旨在描述头孢地洛在治疗类型方面的使用,适应症,和患者特征。
    结果:头孢地洛作为经验性和靶向性治疗在27.5%(55/200)和72.5%(145/200)的病例中使用,分别。总的来说,101/200例(50.5%)采用单药治疗,其余99/200例(49.5%)采用联合方案治疗CR-GNB感染.在多变量分析中,先前分离耐碳青霉烯的鲍曼不动杆菌比值比(OR)2.56,具有95%置信区间(95%CI)1.01-6.46,p=0.047]和先前的造血干细胞移植(OR8.73,95%CI1.05-72.54,p=0.045)与作为联合方案的一部分的头孢地洛的给药有关,而慢性肾脏病与头孢地洛单药治疗相关(联合治疗方案的OR为0.38,95%CI0.16-0.91,p=0.029)。累积30天死亡率为19.8%,45.0%,20.7%,接受靶向头孢地洛治疗肠杆菌感染的患者占22.7%,A.鲍曼尼,铜绿假单胞菌,和任何金属β-内酰胺酶生产者,分别。
    结论:头孢地洛主要用于靶向治疗,尽管经验疗法占处方的25%以上,因此需要专门的标准化和指导。头孢地洛单药治疗和基于头孢地洛的联合治疗的几乎相等的分布强调了需要进一步研究以确定两种方法之间可能的疗效差异。
    BACKGROUND: Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics.
    METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics.
    RESULTS: Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌(CR-PA)在全球范围内不断升级,近年来临床医生的治疗选择很少,β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(头孢特洛扎-他唑巴坦,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦)和一种新的铁载体头孢菌素(头孢地洛)已被批准用于治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染,并已显示出对碳青霉烯耐药的分离株的有效活性。这项研究的目的是确定这些药物在碳青霉烯酶新兴环境中针对CR-PA的表型特征。
    方法:CR-PA临床分离株来自2017年1月至2021年12月不同地理区域的三家教学医院。使用改良的碳青霉烯灭活法对所有分离物进行表型碳青霉烯酶测试。通过参考肉汤微量稀释测定MIC,并根据EUCAST标准进行评估。而基因型分析是使用PCR方法确定的。
    结果:244CR-PA最常见的来源是呼吸道(32.2%),评估了血液(20.4%)和尿液(17.5%)。在所有分离物中,32(13.1%)的表型和38(15.6%)的基因型定义为碳青霉烯酶阳性。最常见的碳青霉烯酶是GES(63.1%),其次是VIM(15.8%)。头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的MIC50/90(S%),头孢洛赞/他唑巴坦和头孢地洛在所有CR-PA分离株中分别为4和32(80%),1和>64(69%)以及0.25和1mg/L(96%),分别。头孢地洛也是碳青霉烯酶阳性分离株中最具活性的药物(90%)。
    结论:虽然头孢洛赞/他唑巴坦和头孢他啶/阿维巴坦对缺乏碳青霉烯酶的CR-PA保持高度活性,头孢地洛可提供有效的体外活性,而与碳青霉烯酶的产生无关。当考虑针对CR-PA的新型药物的潜在临床效用时,必须考虑碳青霉烯酶流行的区域差异。
    OBJECTIVE: Carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) is escalating worldwide and leaves clinicians few therapeutic options in recent years, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infection and have shown potent activity against isolates defined as carbapenem resistant. The aim of this study was to determine the phenotypic profile of these agents against CR-PA in the emerging setting of carbapenemases.
    METHODS: CR-PA clinical isolates were collected from three teaching hospitals in different geographical regions between January 2017-December 2021. All isolates were subjected to phenotypic carbapenemase testing using modified carbapenem inactivation method. MICs were determined by reference broth microdilution and evaluated according to EUCAST standards, while genotypic profiling was determined using PCR methods.
    RESULTS: 244 CR-PA sourced most frequently from the respiratory tract (32.2%), blood (20.4%) and urine (17.5%) were evaluated. Of all isolates, 32 (13.1%) were phenotypically and 38 (15.6%) were genotypically defined as carbapenemase-positive. The most common carbapenemase was GES (63.1%), followed by VIM (15.8%). The MIC50/90(S%) of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and cefiderocol in all CR-PA isolates were 4 and 32 (80%), 1 and > 64 (69%) and 0.25 and 1 mg/L (96%), respectively. Cefiderocol was also the most active agent in carbapenemase-positive isolates (90%).
    CONCLUSIONS: While ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam remained highly active against CR-PA devoid of carbapenemases, cefiderocol provided potent in vitro activity irrespective of carbapenemase production. When considering the potential clinical utility of newer agents against CR-PA, regional variations in carbapenemase prevalence must be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    铁载体-头孢菌素头孢地洛(FDC)为碳青霉烯耐药(CR)铜绿假单胞菌(PA)提供了一种有希望的治疗选择。FDC通过利用TonB依赖性受体(TBDR)进入周质空间来规避传统的孔蛋白和外排介导的抗性。新出现的FDC抗性与TBDR基因或控制TBDR表达的调节基因内的功能突变丧失有关。Further,抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)的困难和意想不到的负面临床治疗结果促使人们对异质耐药的担忧,其中单谱系分离物含有标准AST不可检测的抗性亚群。本研究旨在评估TBDR突变在铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株中的患病率以及表型对FDC易感性和异质性耐药的影响。我们评估了pirR的序列,海盗,pira,Piua,或piuD从从波特兰的四个临床站点引入FDC之前收集的498个独特的分离株,OR(1),休斯顿,TX(2),还有圣地亚哥,智利(1)。在一些临床场所,在高达25%的分离株中观察到TBDR突变,和插入,删除,预测或移码突变会损害蛋白质功能,在所有分离株的3%(n=15)中可见。使用人口分析概况测试,我们发现,与具有野生型TBDR基因的易感菌株相比,具有主要TBDR突变的铜绿假单胞菌富集了异源耐药表型,并且群体的易感性分布发生了变化.我们的结果表明,TBDR基因的突变早于FDC的临床引入,这些突变可能导致FDC电阻的出现。
    The siderophore-cephalosporin cefiderocol (FDC) presents a promising treatment option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) P. aeruginosa (PA). FDC circumvents traditional porin and efflux-mediated resistance by utilizing TonB-dependent receptors (TBDRs) to access the periplasmic space. Emerging FDC resistance has been associated with loss of function mutations within TBDR genes or the regulatory genes controlling TBDR expression. Further, difficulties with antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and unexpected negative clinical treatment outcomes have prompted concerns for heteroresistance, where a single lineage isolate contains resistant subpopulations not detectable by standard AST. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of TBDR mutations among clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and the phenotypic effect on FDC susceptibility and heteroresistance. We evaluated the sequence of pirR, pirS, pirA, piuA, or piuD from 498 unique isolates collected before the introduction of FDC from four clinical sites in Portland, OR (1), Houston, TX (2), and Santiago, Chile (1). At some clinical sites, TBDR mutations were seen in up to 25% of isolates, and insertion, deletion, or frameshift mutations were predicted to impair protein function were seen in 3% of all isolates (n = 15). Using population analysis profile testing, we found that P. aeruginosa with major TBDR mutations were enriched for a heteroresistant phenotype and undergo a shift in the susceptibility distribution of the population as compared to susceptible strains with wild-type TBDR genes. Our results indicate that mutations in TBDR genes predate the clinical introduction of FDC, and these mutations may predispose to the emergence of FDC resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了在不妨碍新型抗菌剂开发的情况下限制抗菌剂的使用,有兴趣建立创新模型,根据对抗菌药物价值的评估,而不是使用的数量,为抗菌药物提供资金。该项目的目的是评估英格兰NHS中头孢地洛的人口水平健康益处,在其许可适应症内使用时,用于治疗严重的需氧革兰氏阴性细菌感染。结果用于告知国家健康与护理卓越研究所指导,以支持有关制造商与NHS英格兰之间合同价值的商业讨论。
    头孢地洛的健康益处首先是针对一系列高价值临床方案得出的。这些代表的用途预计会对患者的死亡风险和健康相关的生活质量产生重大影响。头孢地洛相对于其比较物的临床有效性是通过在网络荟萃分析中合成有关目的病原体对抗菌药物的敏感性的证据来估计的。使用决策模型量化了各种使用情景下头孢地洛与替代管理策略相比的患者水平成本和健康结果。结果报告为以质量调整生命年表示的增量净健康影响,根据英国公共卫生部的数据,使用感染人数预测将其缩放为20年人口值。高价值临床方案的估计结果外推到头孢地洛的其他预期用途。
    在具有金属β-内酰胺酶耐药机制的肠杆菌分离株中,基本情况网络荟萃分析发现,头孢地洛与粘菌素相对较低的易感性相关(比值比0.32,95%可信区间0.04至2.47),但结果无统计学意义。其他治疗也与较低的敏感性比粘菌素,但结果无统计学意义。在金属β-内酰胺酶铜绿假单胞菌基础病例网络荟萃分析中,头孢地洛相对于粘菌素具有较低的敏感性(比值比0.44,95%可信区间0.03至3.94),但结果无统计学意义。其他治疗没有易感性。在基本情况下,头孢地洛的患者水平获益在0.02和0.15质量调整寿命年之间,根据感染部位的不同,病原体和使用场景。头孢地洛在所有亚组中的益处存在高度不确定性。适合头孢地洛治疗的感染数量存在很大的不确定性,因此,针对当前感染人数的一系列情况,提出了人口水平的结果,随着时间的推移,感染的预期增加和耐药的出现率。人口层面的福利在不同的基本情况下变化很大,从896到3559质量调整寿命年,超过20年。
    这项工作提供了对头孢地洛在NHS预期使用范围内的价值的定量估计。
    鉴于现有证据,头孢地洛的价值估计是高度不确定的。
    未来对抗菌药物的评估将受益于对NHS数据联系的改进;支持敏感性研究的适当综合的研究;以及常规数据和决策模型的应用,以评估启用价值。
    没有进行这项研究的注册。
    该奖项由美国国立卫生与护理研究所(NIHR)卫生技术评估政策研究计划(NIHR奖项编号:NIHR135591)资助,通过健康和社会护理干预的经济评估方法政策研究单位进行,PR-PRU-1217-20401,并在《卫生技术评估》中全文发表;第一卷。28号28.有关更多奖项信息,请参阅NIHR资助和奖励网站。
    该项目测试了估算抗生素对NHS价值的新方法,cefiderocol,因此,即使使用很少的药物,其制造商也可以获得公平的报酬,以降低细菌对产品产生抗药性的风险。临床医生说,头孢地洛的最大好处是用于由两种细菌(称为肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌)引起的复杂尿路感染和医院内获得的肺炎,具有称为金属β-内酰胺酶的抗性机制。因为没有相关的临床试验数据,我们通过对实验室感染产生细菌的研究进行系统的文献综述,并对其药物进行测试,估计了头孢地洛和替代疗法的有效性。我们将此与估计患者长期健康和生存的数据联系起来。一些证据是通过向临床医生询问他们认为基于他们的经验和现有证据的效果的详细问题来获得的。我们包括了替代疗法的副作用,其中一些会导致肾脏损伤。我们估计英国会有多少感染,它们是否会随着时间的推移而增加,以及对治疗的抵抗力如何随着时间的推移而改变。临床医生告诉我们,他们还将使用头孢地洛治疗腹内和血流感染,还有一些由另一种叫做窄食单胞菌的细菌引起的感染。我们估计会有多少这样的感染,并承担了与其他类型感染相同的健康益处。使用这些估计值计算NHS的总价值。我们还考虑了我们是否错过了任何其他有价值的元素。我们估计,在20年内,NHS的价值为1800万至7100万英镑。这反映出,如果由于支付这些费用而不是为其他NHS服务提供资金而导致的健康损失不超过使用这种抗菌剂的健康益处,则NHS可以为使用头孢地洛支付的最高费用。然而,这些估计是不确定的,因为用于产生它们的证据和必须作出的假设的限制。
    UNASSIGNED: To limit the use of antimicrobials without disincentivising the development of novel antimicrobials, there is interest in establishing innovative models that fund antimicrobials based on an evaluation of their value as opposed to the volumes used. The aim of this project was to evaluate the population-level health benefit of cefiderocol in the NHS in England, for the treatment of severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections when used within its licensed indications. The results were used to inform the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance in support of commercial discussions regarding contract value between the manufacturer and NHS England.
    UNASSIGNED: The health benefit of cefiderocol was first derived for a series of high-value clinical scenarios. These represented uses that were expected to have a significant impact on patients\' mortality risks and health-related quality of life. The clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol relative to its comparators was estimated by synthesising evidence on susceptibility of the pathogens of interest to the antimicrobials in a network meta-analysis. Patient-level costs and health outcomes of cefiderocol under various usage scenarios compared with alternative management strategies were quantified using decision modelling. Results were reported as incremental net health effects expressed in quality-adjusted life-years, which were scaled to 20-year population values using infection number forecasts based on data from Public Health England. The outcomes estimated for the high-value clinical scenarios were extrapolated to other expected uses for cefiderocol.
    UNASSIGNED: Among Enterobacterales isolates with the metallo-beta-lactamase resistance mechanism, the base-case network meta-analysis found that cefiderocol was associated with a lower susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 0.32, 95% credible intervals 0.04 to 2.47), but the result was not statistically significant. The other treatments were also associated with lower susceptibility than colistin, but the results were not statistically significant. In the metallo-beta-lactamase Pseudomonas aeruginosa base-case network meta-analysis, cefiderocol was associated with a lower susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 0.44, 95% credible intervals 0.03 to 3.94), but the result was not statistically significant. The other treatments were associated with no susceptibility. In the base case, patient-level benefit of cefiderocol was between 0.02 and 0.15 quality-adjusted life-years, depending on the site of infection, the pathogen and the usage scenario. There was a high degree of uncertainty surrounding the benefits of cefiderocol across all subgroups. There was substantial uncertainty in the number of infections that are suitable for treatment with cefiderocol, so population-level results are presented for a range of scenarios for the current infection numbers, the expected increases in infections over time and rates of emergence of resistance. The population-level benefits varied substantially across the base-case scenarios, from 896 to 3559 quality-adjusted life-years over 20 years.
    UNASSIGNED: This work has provided quantitative estimates of the value of cefiderocol within its areas of expected usage within the NHS.
    UNASSIGNED: Given existing evidence, the estimates of the value of cefiderocol are highly uncertain.
    UNASSIGNED: Future evaluations of antimicrobials would benefit from improvements to NHS data linkages; research to support appropriate synthesis of susceptibility studies; and application of routine data and decision modelling to assess enablement value.
    UNASSIGNED: No registration of this study was undertaken.
    UNASSIGNED: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Policy Research Programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135591), conducted through the Policy Research Unit in Economic Methods of Evaluation in Health and Social Care Interventions, PR-PRU-1217-20401, and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 28. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
    This project tested new methods for estimating the value to the NHS of an antimicrobial, cefiderocol, so its manufacturer could be paid fairly even if very little drug is used in order to reduce the risk of bacteria becoming resistant to the product. Clinicians said that the greatest benefit of cefiderocol is when used for complicated urinary tract infections and pneumonia acquired within hospitals caused by two types of bacteria (called Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), with a resistance mechanism called metallo-beta-lactamase. Because there were no relevant clinical trial data, we estimated how effective cefiderocol and alternative treatments were by doing a systematic literature review of studies that grew bacteria from infections in the laboratory and tested the drugs on them. We linked this to data estimating the long-term health and survival of patients. Some evidence was obtained by asking clinicians detailed questions about what they thought the effects would be based on their experience and the available evidence. We included the side effects of the alternative treatments, some of which can cause kidney damage. We estimated how many infections there would be in the UK, whether they would increase over time and how resistance to treatments may change over time. Clinicians told us that they would also use cefiderocol to treat intra-abdominal and bloodstream infections, and some infections caused by another bacteria called Stenotrophomonas. We estimated how many of these infections there would be, and assumed the same health benefits as for other types of infections. The total value to the NHS was calculated using these estimates. We also considered whether we had missed any additional elements of value. We estimated that the value to the NHS was £18–71 million over 20 years. This reflects the maximum the NHS could pay for use of cefiderocol if the health lost as a result of making these payments rather than funding other NHS services is not to exceed the health benefits of using this antimicrobial. However, these estimates are uncertain due to limitations with the evidence used to produce them and assumptions that had to be made.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌是一种机会主义,多重耐药非发酵革兰阴性杆菌,由于其众多的内在和获得性耐药机制,在临床治疗中构成了重大挑战。本研究旨在使用药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)方法评估用于治疗危重患者嗜麦芽嗜血杆菌感染的抗生素的充分性。研究的抗生素包括复方新诺明,左氧氟沙星,米诺环素,替加环素,cefiderocol,和新的组合氨曲南/阿维巴坦,尚未批准。通过蒙特卡罗模拟,达到目标概率(PTA),PK/PD断点,并估计了累积反应分数(CFR)。PK参数和MIC分布来自文献,欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST),和SENTRY抗菌药物监测计划收集。头孢地洛2克q8h,米诺环素200毫克q12h,替加环素100毫克q12h,和氨曲南/阿维巴坦1500/500mgq6h是治疗嗜麦芽嗜血杆菌经验性感染的最佳选择。复方新诺明为美国分离株提供了比欧洲分离株更高的治疗成功概率。对于所有的抗生素,检测到PK/PD断点与EUCAST(或ECOFF)和CLSI定义的临床断点之间存在差异.
    Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic, multidrug-resistant non-fermentative Gram-negative bacillus, posing a significant challenge in clinical treatment due to its numerous intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms. This study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of antibiotics used for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections in critically ill patients using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approach. The antibiotics studied included cotrimoxazole, levofloxacin, minocycline, tigecycline, cefiderocol, and the new combination aztreonam/avibactam, which is not yet approved. By Monte Carlo simulations, the probability of target attainment (PTA), the PK/PD breakpoints, and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) were estimated. PK parameters and MIC distributions were sourced from the literature, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), and the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program collection. Cefiderocol 2 g q8h, minocycline 200 mg q12h, tigecycline 100 mg q12h, and aztreonam/avibactam 1500/500 mg q6h were the best options to treat empirically infections due to S. maltophilia. Cotrimoxazole provided a higher probability of treatment success for the U.S. isolates than for European isolates. For all antibiotics, discrepancies between the PK/PD breakpoints and the clinical breakpoints defined by EUCAST (or the ECOFF) and CLSI were detected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:产生碳青霉烯酶的肺炎克雷伯菌(CP-KP)对公共卫生构成全球威胁,有限的抗菌治疗选择。在这项研究中,我们分析了从一名患者中获得的头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)耐药肺炎克雷伯菌分离株,该患者先前暴露于表达新型肺炎克雷伯酶(KPC)-3变异体的CAZ-AVI.
    方法:使用参考肉汤微量稀释进行抗菌药物敏感性试验。使用Illumina和纳米孔技术进行全基因组测序(WGS)。短读段和长读段与Unicycler组合。研究了组装的多位点序列分型(MLST),抗菌素抗性基因,孔,和质粒。
    结果:肺炎克雷伯菌分离株(KP_RM_1)对CAZ-AVI耐药,广谱头孢菌素,阿米卡星,厄他培南,和头孢地洛(FDC),但对替加环素敏感,粘菌素,甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑,美罗培南-瓦巴坦,还有亚胺培南-莱巴坦.WGS揭示KP_RM_1基因组由5个Mbp的单个染色体和5个环状质粒组成。进一步分析显示存在位于72kb质粒上的新型blaKPC-216。KPC-216与KPC-3的不同之处在于Lysin(K)在位置168(+K168)插入。
    结论:我们报告了与CAZ-AVI抗性相关的新KPC-3变体的鉴定。应确定与CAZ-AVI耐药性相关的KPC变体,以及时通知临床医生并开始适当的抗菌治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-KP) represents a global threat to public health, with limited antimicrobial therapeutic options. In this study, we analyzed a ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate obtained from a patient previously exposed to CAZ-AVI expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-3 variant.
    METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using reference broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using Illumina and Nanopore Technologies. Short- and long-reads were combined with Unicycler. Assemblies were investigated for multilocus sequence typing (MLST), antimicrobial resistance genes, porins, and plasmids.
    RESULTS: The K. pneumoniae isolate (KP_RM_1) was resistant to CAZ-AVI, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, amikacin, ertapenem, and cefiderocol (FDC) but was susceptible to tigecycline, colistin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam. WGS revealed that the KP_RM_1 genome is composed of a single chromosome of 5 Mbp and five circular plasmids. Further analysis showed the presence of novel blaKPC-216 located on a 72 kb plasmid. KPC-216 differs from KPC-3 by a Lysin (K) insertion at position 168 (+K168).
    CONCLUSIONS: We report the identification of a new KPC-3 variant associated with CAZ-AVI resistance. The KPC variants associated with CAZ-AVI resistance should be determined to promptly inform clinicians and start the appropriate antimicrobial therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据估计,抗生素耐药性(AMR)每年导致全球近500万人死亡,到2050年将达到1000万人。耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)感染是全球因抗菌素耐药性引起的第四大死亡原因。但是仍然缺乏标准化的治疗方法。在考虑的抗生素中,舒巴坦/durlobactam似乎是替代当前骨干药物的最佳候选药物。头孢地洛可在联合治疗方案中起关键作用。由于毒性和药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)的限制,粘菌素(或多粘菌素B)应用作替代药物(当没有其他选择时)。替加环素(或米诺环素)和磷霉素可以代表两种NBL的合适伴侣。需要进行随机临床试验(RCT),以更好地评估NBLs在CRAB感染治疗中的作用,并比较替加环素和磷霉素作为伴侣抗生素的疗效。应测试NBLs与“旧”药物(利福平和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑)之间的协同作用。应该做出巨大的努力,以加快对具有改善的肺活动的更安全的多粘菌素候选物的临床前和临床研究,以及IV利福布汀配方。在这篇叙述性评论中,鉴于新开发的β-内酰胺类药物(NBLs),我们重点关注CRAB感染的抗生素治疗.
    It is estimated that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is responsible for nearly 5 million human deaths worldwide each year and will reach 10 million by 2050. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections represent the fourth-leading cause of death attributable to antimicrobial resistance globally, but a standardized therapy is still lacking. Among the antibiotics under consideration, Sulbactam/durlobactam seems to be the best candidate to replace current back-bone agents. Cefiderocol could play a pivotal role within combination therapy regimens. Due to toxicity and the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) limitations, colistin (or polymyxin B) should be used as an alternative agent (when no other options are available). Tigecycline (or minocycline) and fosfomycin could represent suitable partners for both NBLs. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are needed to better evaluate the role of NBLs in CRAB infection treatment and to compare the efficacy of tigecycline and fosfomycin as partner antibiotics. Synergism should be tested between NBLs and \"old\" drugs (rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). Huge efforts should be made to accelerate pre-clinical and clinical studies on safer polymyxin candidates with improved lung activity, as well as on the iv rifabutin formulation. In this narrative review, we focused the antibiotic treatment of CRAB infections in view of newly developed β-lactam agents (NBLs).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯的肠杆菌代表了主要的健康威胁,几乎没有批准的治疗选择。从六个欧洲国家(2020年1月1日至12月31日)的49个地点的住院患者中收集肠杆菌分离株,并对头孢地洛和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合进行了敏感性测试。通过PCR分析了耐美罗培南(MIC>8mg/L)和对头孢地洛敏感的分离株,通过全基因组测序和抗头孢霉素分离株,确定抗性机制。总的来说,1,909株(包括970个克雷伯菌属。,382大肠杆菌,和244种肠杆菌属。)被收集,通常来自血液感染(43.6%)。头孢地醇对所有肠杆菌的敏感性高于批准的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合,并且与头孢吡肟-坦尼巴坦和氨曲南-阿维巴坦相当(98.1%vs78.1%-97.4%和98.7%-99.1%,分别)和对美罗培南耐药的肠杆菌(n=148,包括125种克雷伯菌。;87.8%vs0%-71.6%和93.2%-98.6%,分别),β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(66.7%-92.1%vs0%-88.1%和66.7%-97.9%,分别),美罗培南和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(61.9%-65.9%vs0%-20.5%和76.2%-97.7%,分别)。批准和开发的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对头孢地洛耐药肠杆菌(n=37)的敏感性分别为10.8%-56.8%和78.4%-94.6%,分别。大多数耐美罗培南的肠杆菌含有肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(110/148)基因,尽管金属-β-内酰胺酶(35/148)和氧嘧啶酶(OXA)碳青霉烯酶(6/148)基因较不常见;头孢地洛敏感性保留在β-内酰胺酶生产者中,除了NDM,AMPC,和非碳青霉烯酶OXA生产者。大多数头孢地洛耐药肠杆菌具有多种耐药机制,包括≥1个铁摄取相关突变(37/37),碳青霉烯酶基因(33/37),和FTSI突变(24/37)。对头孢地洛的敏感性高于批准的β-lac+tam/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对欧洲肠杆菌的敏感性,包括美罗培南和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合耐药的分离株。
    目的:这项研究收集了大量来自欧洲的肠杆菌分离株,首次直接比较了头孢地洛和发育型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合的体外活性。高剂量美罗培南的MIC断点用于定义美罗培南耐药性,因此,在临床上可用于患者的剂量下,仍对美罗培南耐药的分离株被包括在数据中。对头孢地洛的易感性,作为单一的活性化合物,对肠杆菌的抵抗力较高,并且高于或与可用的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合相当。这些结果提供了对由于具有抗性表型的肠杆菌引起的感染的治疗选择的见解。头孢地洛与β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合平行的早期敏感性测试将允许患者及时接受最合适的治疗选择。当选项更有限时,这一点尤其重要,例如针对产生金属-β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌。
    Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January-31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-‍resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%-‍97.4% and 98.7%-99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%-71.6% and 93.2%-98.6%, respectively), β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%-‍92.1% vs 0%-‍88.1% and 66.7%-97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and β-‌lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%-65.9% vs 0%-‍20.5% and 76.2%-97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%-‍56.8% and 78.4%-94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-β-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in β-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved β-lac‌tam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates.
    OBJECTIVE: This study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由多重耐药细菌引起的感染的管理对于任何医疗实践已经变得至关重要。甘氨酸是人类中最常见和最简单的非必需氨基酸。甘氨酸在改善健康和支持人类和动物的生长和福祉方面非常有效。相反,对于许多细菌来说,高浓度的甘氨酸诱导裂解或深层形态学改变。甘氨酸对多药耐药(MDR)微生物的影响尚未得到广泛研究。本研究进行了1)以确定甘氨酸对常规诊断研究期间分离的不同医院病原体的影响;2)确定甘氨酸的最低抑制浓度和对代表性分离株进行的活性类型(抑菌或杀菌);3)测试甘氨酸和美罗培南之间的相互作用,cefiderocol,或者粘菌素.此处报道的数据显示甘氨酸对细菌的剂量依赖性活性及其对MDR细菌的杀菌活性。此外,我们发现,甘氨酸的作用在体外恢复了多重耐药医院病原体对所测试抗生素的敏感性。重要抗菌药物耐药性是全世界不断增加的问题,意大利是抗菌素耐药性最普遍的西方国家之一。在托斯卡纳,产碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌现在甚至是地方性的。在这项研究中,我们用一种众所周知的分子挑战了一些耐药细菌,甘氨酸,其抗菌性能自上世纪以来就已为人所知。这项研究可以为将抗生素与所有氨基酸中最简单的氨基酸相结合带来新的见解。通过天然化合物恢复对上述抗生素的敏感性,已经用于临床目的,在多重耐药细菌扩散的时代非常重要。应研究该氨基酸在评估其抗感染效力中的体内用途。这种分子的低成本也可以使其即使在低收入国家也易于使用。
    The management of infections caused by multiresistant bacteria has become of fundamental importance for any medical practice. Glycine is the most common and the simplest non-essential amino acid in humans. Glycine is very effective in improving health and supporting growth and wellbeing of humans and animals. Instead, for many bacteria, high concentrations of glycine induce lysis or deep morphological alterations. The effect of glycine on multidrug resistant (MDR) microorganisms has not yet been extensively researched. The present study was conducted 1) to establish the effect of glycine on different nosocomial pathogens isolated during routine diagnostic investigations; 2) to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of glycine and the type of activity performed (bacteriostatic or bactericidal) on representative isolates; 3) to test the interaction between glycine and meropenem, cefiderocol, or colistin. The data reported here show a dose-dependent activity of glycine on bacteria and its bactericidal activity on MDR bacteria. Furthermore, we found that the action of glycine restores in vitro the susceptibility of multiresistant nosocomial pathogens to the tested antibiotics.IMPORTANCEAntimicrobial resistance is a constantly growing concern throughout the world, and Italy is among the Western countries where antimicrobial resistance is most widespread. In Tuscany, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales are now even endemic. In this study, we challenged some resistant bacteria with a well-known molecule, glycine, the antibacterial properties of which have been known since the past century. This study could bring new insights into combining antibiotics with the simplest of all amino acids. The restoration of sensitivity to the aforementioned antibiotics by a natural compound, already used for clinical purposes, is of extreme importance in an era of proliferation of multiresistant bacteria. The in vivo use of this amino acid in evaluating its effectiveness against infections should be investigated. The low cost of this molecule can also make it easy to use even in low-income countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号