Aim: This study aimed to establish the in vitro efficacy and susceptibility profiles of new β-lactam antibiotics against clinically isolated carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) strains. Materials and Methods: A total of 117 nonduplicated CPKP isolates were tested against cefiderocol, cefepime-zidebactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, tigecycline, and other 20 antibiotics by broth microdilution. The carbapenemase genes were identified using PCR and sequencing, while multilocus sequence typing established the bacterial strains. Results: Three significant sequence types (STs), including ST147, ST16, and ST11, were shown to be the dominant STs, which occupied ∼90% of the tested population. Three carbapenemase genes, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-181, and blaOXA-232, were detected. The blaNDM-1 was found in ST147 and ST16 but not in ST11, while the blaOXA-232 was not detected in ST147. The majority of ST16 isolates contained both blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-232, which was not seen in other strains. Cefiderocol, cefepime-zidebactam, and tigecycline were the most active agents against CPKP. Both MIC50 and MIC90 of these three antibiotics remained within the susceptible categories, while nearly all other antibiotics were in the resistant levels. However, in ST11, which carried only blaOXA genes without blaNDM-1, ceftazidime-avibactam was effective with the MIC90 at 2 μg/mL. In addition, amikacin was shown to have good activity in ST11. In contrast, gentamicin was active in only ST16 and ST147. Conclusions: This study is the first report that demonstrates the prevalence of CPKP, distribution of strains, resistant genes, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles in northern Thailand. These data would contribute to appropriate individual treatment and the selection of infection control strategies.

Multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) are critical antimicrobial resistance threats. Despite their increasing prevalence, treatment options for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing PA are limited, especially for New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) producers. Pending further clinical studies, this case provides support for limited-scope use of cefepime-zidebactam for treating disseminated infections secondary to NDM-producing XDR PA. Susceptibilities should be tested and/or alternative regimens considered when treating isolates with alternative MBLs or increased efflux pump expression because some in vitro data suggest associated loss of cefepime-zidebactam susceptibility.

With limited and often toxic treatment options, carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections are associated with significant mortality. Cefepime-zidebactam is a promising antibiotic option undergoing a phase 3 trial that has activity against diverse antibiotic-resistant mechanisms in Gram-negative pathogens due to its β-lactam enhancer mechanism, mediating multiple PBP binding. We report a case of disseminated infection caused by a New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing, extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate in a patient with acute T-cell leukemia, successfully managed with cefepime-zidebactam as a salvage therapy.

Novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) are in clinical development for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) (defined as resistance to all tested β-lactams and fluoroquinolones) Gram-negative bacilli. This study evaluated the in vitro activities of cefepime-zidebactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, cefepime-tazobactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and other comparators against 4,042 nonduplicate Gram-negative clinical isolates collected from different regions of China (46 hospitals) in 2019. Based on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) breakpoints, cefepime-zidebactam inhibited 98.5% of Enterobacterales and 98.9% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Against carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacilli, cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated better activity against Enterobacterales (96% and 97.2%, respectively) and P. aeruginosa (98.2% and 96.9%, respectively). Among the 379 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates, the most common carbapenemase genes detected were blaKPC-2 (64.1%) and blaNDM (30.9%). Cefepime-zidebactam showed an MIC90 of ≤2 mg/L for 98.8% of blaKPC-positive isolates and 89.7% of blaNDM-positive isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam also showed efficient in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (93.6%) and P. aeruginosa (87.7%). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 97.5% of blaKPC-positive isolates and 100% of blaOXA-232-positive isolates. Cefepime-zidebactam inhibited 97.3% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates with an MIC50/90 of 16/32 mg/L. Our study systematically evaluated the in vitro activities of these new BLBLIs against a variety of Gram-negative bacilli, provided preclinical data for the approval of these BLBLIs in China, and supported cefepime-zidebactam and ceftazidime-avibactam as potential efficient therapies for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA), and DTR isolates. IMPORTANCE Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii are the most common Gram-negative bacilli to cause nosocomial infections throughout the world. Due to their large public health and societal implications, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB), carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA), and carbapenem-resistant and third-generation-cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were regarded by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global priority for investment in new drugs in 2017. The present study showed the potent in vitro activity of these novel BLBLIs and other comparators against Gram-negative bacillus isolates, including carbapenem-resistant or difficult-to-treat resistant phenotypes. Polymyxins, tigecycline, and ceftazidime-avibactam (except for blaNDM-positive isolates) were available for the treatment of infections caused by CRE isolates. Currently, cefepime-zidebactam and other BLBLIs have not yet been approved for use in China. Here, our study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activities of BLBLIs against Gram-negative bacillus isolates, especially CRE, before clinical use.

To determine the in vitro activities of novel and comparator antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in Taiwan.
Isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 335), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 316; 144 isolates with hyperviscosity characteristics), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 271), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 187), and non-typhoidal Salmonella species (n = 226), Shigella species (n = 13) from miscellaneous culture sources were collected in 2020 in Taiwan. The MICs of the isolates to test antibiotics were determined using the broth microdilution method. GeneXpert was used to detect genes encoding carbapenemases among the carbapenem-non-susceptible (NS) Enterobacterales isolates.
The MIC values of the cefepime-enmetazobactam combination against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates (MIC90 ≤ 0.5 mg/L), blaKPC-harboring E. coli isolates (0.25 mg/L; n = 2), and 80% of blaOXA-48-like gene-harboring K. pneumoniae isolates (≤2 mg/L) were low. The MIC ranges of the cefepime-zidebactam against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates (irrespective of the carbapenemase type [MIC90 ≤ 4 mg/L]) and carbapenem-NS or ceftolozane-tazobactam-NS P. aeruginosa isolates (MIC90 value, 8 mg/L) were significantly lower than those of the cefepime-enmetazobactam.
The efficacy of novel antibiotics against important drug-resistant GNB must be monitored and validated during the clinical treatment of patients.

This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefepime-zidebactam in comparison with that of ceftazidime-avibactam and other comparators against clinically significant Gram-negative bacillus isolates. A total of 3,400 nonduplicate Gram-negative clinical isolates were collected from 45 medical centers across China in the CHINET Program in 2018, including Enterobacterales (n = 2,228), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 657), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 515). The activities of cefepime-zidebactam and 20 comparators were determined by broth microdilution as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated potent activity against almost all Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.125/1 mg/liter) and good activity against P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 2/8 mg/liter). Among the 373 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 57.3% (213/373) and 15.3% (57/373) were positive for bla KPC-2 and bla NDM, respectively. Cefepime-zidebactam showed a MIC of ≤2 mg/liter for 92.0% (196/213) of bla KPC-2 producers and 79.7% (47/59) of bla NDM producers. Ceftazidime-avibactam showed good in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.25/2 mg/liter; 94.0% susceptible) and P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 4/16 mg/liter; 86.9% susceptible). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 9.1% of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli isolates (63.6% were bla NDM producers) and 84.6% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (74.3% were bla KPC producers). Most (90.1%) bla KPC-2 producers were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated limited activity (MIC50/90, 16/32 mg/liter) against the 515 A. baumannii isolates (79.2% were carbapenem resistant), and ceftazidime-avibactam was less active (MIC50/90, 64/>64 mg/liter). Cefepime-zidebactam was highly active against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, including bla KPC-2-positive Enterobacterales and bla NDM-positive Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa And ceftazidime-avibactam was highly active against bla KPC-2-positive Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa.

Increasing burden of carbapenem resistance and resultant difficult-to-treat infections are of particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe treatment options. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens have been approved for clinical use. These include ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. For the management of MBL infections, clinically used triple combination comprising ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam is hindered due to non-availability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and lack of information on potential drug-drug interaction leading to PK changes impacting its safety and efficacy. Moreover, in several countries including Indian subcontinent and developing countries, these new agents are yet to be made available. Under these circumstances, polymyxins are the only last resort for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections. With the recent evidence of suboptimal PK/PD particularly in lung environment, limited efficacy and increased nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin use, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised both colistin and polymyxin B breakpoints. Thus, polymyxins \'intermediate\' breakpoint for Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. are now set at ≤ 2 mg/L, implying limited clinical efficacy even for isolates with the MIC value 2 mg/L. This change has questioned the dependency on polymyxins in treating XDR infections. In this context, recently approved cefiderocol and phase 3 stage combination drug cefepime-zidebactam assume greater significance due to their potential to act as polymyxin-supplanting therapies.