carotid body tumors

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:延伸至颅底的颈动脉体瘤是高血管肿瘤,使用传统的颈外侧入路难以接近。术前栓塞可以减少术中出血量。
    方法:我们报告了两名颈动脉体瘤延伸至颅底的患者,他们在术前使用Amplatzer血管塞栓塞了颈外动脉。栓塞后两天,进行了手术切除。两名患者的栓塞均成功,切除进展顺利。均于术后第9天出院,无并发症发生。每个患者的肿瘤被分类为Shamblin组III。手术后六个月,颈部计算机断层扫描血管造影显示同侧颈内动脉通畅,无肿瘤复发。
    结论:术前使用Amplatzer血管塞栓塞颈外动脉对于颈动脉体瘤延伸至颅底的患者是安全可行的。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumors extending to the skull base are hypervascular tumors which are difficult to access using a traditional lateral cervical approach. Preoperative embolization can reduce intraoperative blood loss.
    METHODS: We report two patients with a carotid body tumor extending to the skull base who underwent preoperative embolization of the external carotid artery using an Amplatzer vascular plug. Two days after embolization, surgical resection was performed. Embolization was successful in both patients and resection proceeded smoothly. Both were discharged on postoperative day 9 without complications. The tumor in each patient was classified as Shamblin group III. Computed tomography angiography of the neck six months after surgery showed patency of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery and no tumor recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative embolization of the external carotid artery using the Amplatzer vascular plug is safe and feasible for patients with carotid body tumors extending to the skull base.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈动脉体瘤是具有恶性潜能的罕见肿瘤。我们的目标是随访我们在2015年发表的初步经验,并比较使用后颈动脉夹层(RCD)与标准的尾颅(SCCD)技术的并发症发生率和术后结局。
    这是一个观察,病例对照研究,我们分析了1986年至2022年进行的所有颈动脉体瘤切除术。相应地使用参数和非参数检验。对Stata17进行统计分析。
    共包括181例外科手术,平均年龄56岁(±13.63),168例(93%)在女性中进行。RCD组的平均内外侧直径较大(2.85±1.57cmvs1.93±1.85cm;p=0.002),SCCD组的术前栓塞频率更高(27.5%vs0.7%;p<0.001)。使用SCCD技术共进行了40例(22.09%)切除。相比之下,在141例(77.91%)手术中使用了RCD技术。RCD组的平均手术时间较低(197.37±70.56分钟vs232±98.34分钟;p=0.01)。SCCD和RCD在血管病变方面无统计学差异(n=20[11.04%],15%对9%,分别为;p=0.36),短暂性或永久性神经损伤(25%vs33%,分别为;p=0.31),或平均术中出血(SCCD:689.95±680.05mL,RCD:619.64±837.94mL;p>0.05)。
    就术中出血或血管病变而言,RCD似乎是标准尾颅入路的安全且等效的替代方法,一个持续的,手术时间显著减少。
    UNASSIGNED: Carotid body tumors are rare neoplasms with malignant potential. We aim to follow up on our initial experience published in 2015 and compare the occurrence of complications and postoperative outcomes with the use of retrocarotid dissection (RCD) against the standard caudocranial (SCCD) technique.
    UNASSIGNED: This was an observational, case-control study in which we analyzed all of the carotid body tumor resections performed from 1986 to 2022. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used accordingly. Statistical analysis was performed on Stata 17.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 181 surgical procedures were included, mean age was 56 years (± 13.63), and 168 (93%) were performed in women. The mean medio-lateral diameter was larger in the RCD group (2.85 ± 1.57 cm vs 1.93 ±1.85 cm; p = 0.002) and presurgical embolization was more frequently performed in the SCCD group (27.5% vs 0.7%; p < 0.001). A total of 40 (22.09%) resections were performed using the SCCD technique. In contrast, in 141 (77.91%) procedures the RCD technique was used. The mean surgical time in the RCD group was lower (197.37 ± 70.56 min vs 232 ± 98.34 min; p = 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found between SCCD and RCD in terms of vascular lesions (n = 20 [11.04%], 15% vs 9%, respectively; p = 0.36), transient or permanent nerve injuries (25% vs 33%, respectively; p = 0.31), or mean intraoperative bleeding (SCCD: 689.95 ± 680.05 mL vs RCD: 619.64 ± 837.94 mL; p > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: RCD appears to be a safe and equivalent alternative to the standard caudocranial approach in terms of intraoperative bleeding or vascular lesions, with a sustained, significant decrease in surgical time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究提供了涉及ShamblinII颈动脉体瘤(CBT)的囊内解剖的单中心经验,并将其结果与经典的外膜下切除术技术进行了比较。根据初步结果,似乎摘除术技术有助于颈动脉体瘤的解剖,通过利用胶囊作为屏障对颅神经和内/外/颈总动脉提供保护。经典的外膜下切除方法和眼球摘除技术具有可比性的术后并发症。然而,继续追踪接受这些切除技术的患者以确定长期结局至关重要.此外,摘除技术可显著缩短手术时间和术中失血量.
    This study provides a single-center experience involving intracapsular dissection for Shamblin II carotid body tumors (CBTs) and compares the outcomes with the classic technique of subadventitial resection. Based on the preliminary results, it seems that the enucleation technique facilitates the dissection of carotid body tumors, offering protection to cranial nerves and the internal/external/common carotid artery by utilizing the capsule as a barrier. The classic subadventitial resection approach and the enucleation technique have comparable postoperative complications. However, it is crucial to continue following the patients who underwent these resection techniques to determine the long-term outcomes. Moreover, the enucleation technique significantly reduces surgery duration and intraoperative blood loss.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    颈动脉体瘤很罕见,在颈总动脉(CCA)分叉附近出现的高度血管化的神经内分泌肿瘤。关于术前栓塞是否有利于手术切除和降低围手术期并发症风险,这些肿瘤的治疗存在争议。我们介绍了一名26岁的颈动脉体瘤患者的病例,该患者表现为颈部左侧前三角形的无痛搏动肿块,并提供了术前诊断步骤的详细信息。治疗包括术前栓塞肿瘤,然后在48小时后进行手术切除,以安全地解决这种罕见的病理。为患者带来有利的结果。
    Carotid body tumors are rare, highly vascularized neuroendocrine tumors that arise near the bifurcation of the common carotid artery (CCA). Controversy exists in the management of those tumors about whether preoperative embolization facilitates surgical excision and decreases perioperative complication risk. We present the case of a 26-year-old patient with a carotid body tumor manifesting as a painless pulsatile mass in the anterior triangle over the left side of the neck and provide details of the preoperative diagnostic steps. Treatment included preoperative embolization of the tumor followed by surgical excision after 48 hours to safely address this rare pathology, resulting in a favorable outcome for the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估多学科外科治疗颈动脉体瘤(CBT)的效果和结果。
    加州大学洛杉矶分校医学中心进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象是1998年至2020年接受CBT治疗并接受手术切除的患者。使用IBMSPSSv27和Excel进行统计分析。
    共纳入75例79例CBT切除患者。手术手术亚专科包括:41.8%的血管手术,24.1%耳鼻咽喉头颈外科医生(OHNS),31.6%合并OHNS和血管。68.4%的肿瘤术前栓塞。EBL与肿瘤大小直接相关。OHNS(30mm)和血管(31mm)的CBT大小相似,但OHNS和血管合并病例(38mm)的CBT大小明显更大。与单独的OHNS(124mL)或血管(203mL)相比,合并病例(301mL)的EBL更高。术后颅神经功能缺损的发生率为7.8%,与OHNS(5.3%)和仅进行血管手术(12.1%)相比,OHNS和血管合并病例的发生率为4.0%。
    CBT可以通过单个外科专业进行有效管理,在血管外科和OHNS之间具有相似的结果。在更大的,更高级别的肿瘤,然而,与单一专业切除相比,血管和OHNS联合入路术后颅神经损伤的发生率较低,尽管EBL更大。因此,多学科外科方法表明,对于较大的患者,颅神经缺损的发生率较低,更复杂的CBT切除。
    2b-个体回顾性队列研究。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the effects and outcomes of multidisciplinary surgical approaches in the management of carotid body tumors (CBT).
    UNASSIGNED: A single-center retrospective study at the University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center was conducted on patients who presented with CBTs and underwent surgical resections from 1998 to 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v27 and Excel.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 75 patients with 79 CBT resections were included. Operating surgical subspecialties included: 41.8% vascular surgery, 24.1% otolaryngology head and neck surgeons (OHNS), and 31.6% combined OHNS and vascular. 68.4% of tumors underwent preoperative embolization. EBL was directly correlated with tumor size. CBT size was similar for OHNS (30 mm) and vascular (31 mm) but was significantly larger for combined OHNS and vascular cases (38 mm). EBL was higher in combined cases (301 mL) compared to OHNS (124 mL) or vascular (203 mL) alone. Incidence of postoperative cranial nerve deficits was 7.8%, with combined OHNS and vascular cases having an incidence of 4.0% when compared to OHNS (5.3%) versus vascular surgery alone (12.1%).
    UNASSIGNED: CBTs can be managed effectively by single surgical specialties with similar outcomes between vascular surgery and OHNS. In larger, higher grade tumors, however, a combined vascular and OHNS approach had lower incidence of postoperative cranial nerve injuries when compared to single specialty resections, despite a larger EBL. Thus, a multidisciplinary surgical approach suggests favorable outcomes with fewer incidence of cranial nerve deficits for larger, more complex CBT resections.
    UNASSIGNED: 2b-Individual retrospective cohort study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉体瘤(CBT)是罕见的,但由于其生长和恶性的潜力,需要手术切除。对于一些手术团队来说,肿瘤血管过多证明术前栓塞是合理的,以促进切除和限制并发症。我们研究的目的是在双中心队列中评估两种不同的手术切除方法,包括或不包括术前栓塞。
    方法:连续一系列接受CBT手术的患者,从2011年1月到2019年6月,分为两组,术前是否栓塞(ECBT)或是否栓塞(NECBT)。两组根据手术时间进行具体比较,术后并发症,和逗留时间的长短。
    结果:纳入22例患者,平均年龄为48.5±14.3岁。在该系列中,切除23例CBT:术前栓塞13例;栓塞和手术之间的平均时间为2.62天±1.50。根据人群和肿瘤的特征,两组具有可比性。平均尺寸为33.2±11.9毫米。我们注意到ECBT组手术时间显着增加:151分钟(±40.9)vs87.0分钟(±21)p<0.01。两组在颅神经方面没有差异(50%vs46%;p=1),交感神经系统(20%对23%;p=1),或血管神经(20%vs23%;p=0.18)并发症。未发现脑血管意外。住院时间分别为3.60天(±1.78)和3.73天(±1.19;p=0.44)。
    结论:本研究反映了两个中心管理CBT的经验,CBT是一种罕见的病理,没有标准化治疗。我们的系列研究显示,ECBT和NECBT组在术后并发症和住院时间方面没有显着差异。NECBT组的运行时间减少仍有待证明。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare but require surgical resection given their potential for growth and malignancy. For some surgical teams, tumor hypervascularity justifies preoperative embolization to facilitate resection and limit complications. The objective of our study was to evaluate 2 different practices of surgical resection with or without preoperative embolization in a 2-center cohort.
    METHODS: A consecutive series of patients who underwent CBT surgery, from January 2011 to June 2019, were divided into 2 groups, as to whether they were (embolized CBT [ECBT]) or not (nonembolized CBT [NECBT]) preoperatively embolized. Both groups were compared specifically according to the duration of operation, postoperative complications, and length of stay.
    RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with a mean age of 48.5 ± 14.3 years were included. In the series, 23 CBTs were resected: 13 were embolized preoperatively; the mean time between embolization and surgery was 2.62 ± 1.50 days. Both groups were comparable based on characteristics of population and tumor, with a mean size of 33.2 ± 11.9 mm. We noted a significant increase in operation duration in the ECBT group: 151 min (±40.9) vs. 87.0 min (±21); P < 0.01. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding cranial nerve (50% vs. 46%; P = 1), sympathetic nervous system (20% vs. 23%; P = 1), or vascular nerve (20% vs. 23%; P = 0.18) complications. No cerebrovascular accident was identified. The length of stay was 3.60 days (±1.78) vs. 3.73 days (±1.19; P = 0.44).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study reflects the experience of 2 centers in the management of CBT which is a rare pathology with no standardized treatment. Our series showed no significant difference between the ECBT and NECBT groups regarding postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The reduction in operating time in the NECBT group remains to be demonstrated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    囊内夹层入路在颈动脉体瘤手术切除中的应用。喉镜,2023年。
    Intracapsular dissection approaches in surgical resection of carotid body tumors. Laryngoscope, 133:2627-2630, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    UNASSIGNED:颈动脉体瘤手术与各种并发症有关。然而,术中心脏骤停非常罕见,报告不超过10例。
    UNASSIGNED:一名58岁被诊断为双侧颈动脉体瘤的妇女接受了右颈动脉体瘤手术。切除期间发生心脏骤停,归因于颈动脉窦超敏反应。患者经及时治疗后痊愈,肿瘤完全切除,无并发症发生。
    UNASSIGNED:在颈动脉体瘤切除术期间,由于颈动脉窦超敏反应引起的心脏骤停非常罕见。适当的治疗可以逆转术中心脏骤停。如果术前检测到颈动脉窦超敏反应,预防性临时起搏器植入可能是合适的。
    UNASSIGNED: Carotid body tumor surgery is associated with various complications. However, intraoperative cardiac arrest is very rare and no more than 10 cases have been reported.
    UNASSIGNED: A 58-year-old woman diagnosed with bilateral carotid body tumors underwent right carotid body tumor surgery. Sudden cardiac arrest occurred during the resection and was attributed to carotid sinus hypersensitivity. The patient recovered after prompt treatment and the tumor was removed completely with no complications.
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiac arrest attributed to carotid sinus hypersensitivity during carotid body tumor resection is very rare. Proper treatments can reverse intraoperative cardiac arrest. If carotid sinus hypersensitivity is detected preoperatively, prophylactic temporary pacemaker implantation may be appropriate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    颈动脉体瘤(CBT)是一种影响颈动脉球瘤的肿瘤。本研究旨在改善厄瓜多尔的CBT管理。这个单一中心,回顾性观察性研究在TiroidesyEnfermedadesdeCabezayCuello研究所(ITECC)进行.我们包括了患有CBTs的成年人,2019年1月至2022年8月。共纳入15例CBTs患者。所有患者均为生活在高海拔(>2500m)的女性。在Shamblin分类中,12个肿瘤为II型,和3个是III型。所有未进行术前栓塞的患者均进行了完整的肿瘤切除术。所有患者均为良性CBT,平均随访时间为17、73个月。在一个医疗费用高的时代,主要是在厄瓜多尔等低收入国家,应以随机前瞻性试验的形式进行进一步调查,以回答谁将从TAE前手术中获益.
    Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are a neoplasm that affects the carotid glomus. This study aims to improve the management of CBTs in Ecuador. This single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted at the Instituto de la Tiroides y Enfermedades de Cabeza y Cuello (ITECC). We included adults with CBTs, between January 2019 and August 2022. A total of 15 patients with CBTs were included. All patients were females living at high altitudes (>2500 m). In the Shamblin classification, 12 tumors were type II, and 3 were type III. Complete tumor resection was performed in all patients without pre-operative embolization. All patients had benign CBTs with a mean follow-up of 17, 73 months. In a time when the medical cost is high mainly in low-income countries such as Ecuador, further investigation should be undertaken in the form of randomized prospective trials to answer who would benefit from the pre-TAE procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    提出可行性,适用性,临床有效性,以及采用两阶段混合手术方法治疗复杂的ShamblinII或III颈动脉体瘤的结果。
    回顾,观察,横截面,成功治疗16例困难的ShamblinII或III颈动脉体瘤的描述性研究,由两阶段手术方法组成。我们做了一个回顾,观察,横截面,一系列复杂的ShamblinII或III颈动脉体瘤患者的描述性研究,我们用两阶段混合手术治疗,我们首先放置了颈动脉内假体,45天后进行了肿瘤的手术切除,遵循我们最初发布的技术。这项研究从2月开始进行,2007年至11月,2019年,在三级护理中心。
    我们治疗了16例患者,平均年龄为50.5岁。全部居住在海拔2000米以上。在所有16个中进行了完全切除。手术时间平均为103.9分钟,术中平均出血量为69ml。有3例神经性失用症。3例必须切开颈神经,2例永久性喉上神经损伤。内假体的放置没有永久性脑血管损伤。一名患者出现了短暂性脑缺血(TIA),没有长期后遗症。有2例无症状的内置假体晚期闭塞。肿瘤的平均初始体积为54.4cc。内假体植入后35天的平均肿瘤体积为30.9cc。
    在所有病例和2例吞咽困难中,颈部存在肿瘤。
    这种两阶段混合技术可以完全切除困难的ShamblinII或III颈动脉体肿瘤,1例TIA,2例永久性喉上神经损伤,无死亡。
    Present the feasibility, applicability, clinical effectiveness, and results of complicated Shamblin II or III carotid body tumors treated with a two-stage hybrid surgical approach.
    Retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study of the successful treatment of 16 cases of difficult Shamblin II or III carotid body tumors, consisting of a two-stage surgical approach. We conducted a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study of a series of patients with complicated Shamblin II or III carotid body tumors, which we treated with a two-stage hybrid surgical procedure, in which we first placed a carotid endoprosthesis and 45 days later performed surgical resection of the tumor, following our originally published technique. This study was conducted from February, 2007 to November, 2019, in a third level care centre.
    We treated 16 patients with a mean age of 50.5 years. All resided at more than 2000 meters above sea level. In all 16 a complete resection was performed. The average duration of surgery was 103.9 min, the average intraoperative bleeding was 69 ml. There were three cases of neuropraxia. The ansa cervicalis nerve had to be sectioned in three cases and there was permanent upper laryngeal nerve injury in two cases. There were no permanent cerebrovascular injuries from placement of the endoprostheses. One patient developed transient cerebral ischaemia (TIA) with no long-term sequelae. There were two cases of asymptomatic late occlusion of the endoprostheses. The average initial volume of the tumors was 54.4 cc. The average tumor volume 35 days after implant of the endoprosthesis was 30.9 cc.
    Presence of tumors in the neck in all cases and two cases of dysphagia.
    This two-stage hybrid technique allowed for the complete resection of difficult Shamblin II or III carotid body tumors, with one case of TIA and two with permanent upper laryngeal nerve injuries and without mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号