care relationship

护理关系
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与女性一起工作以最好地满足她们的需求一直是魁北克助产的核心,加拿大。1990年代末建立了分娩中心,巩固了优先考虑妇女参与围产期护理的愿望,并旨在鼓励在护理提供者和使用者之间建立护理和服务伙伴关系。这项试点研究的目的是评估客户的看法,助产士和助产士在魁北克分娩中心参与伙伴关系工作的方式。
    方法:对助产士进行了单个定性病例和初步研究(n=5),助产士(n=4),经理(n=1),魁北克分娩中心的客户(n=5)和用户委员会成员(n=2),加拿大在2023年7月和8月。使用经过验证的CADICEE问卷的维度对伙伴关系进行了评估。
    结果:妇女和专业人士强调,这种关系是在信任的气氛中建立的。照顾者还重视自主性,信息共享和决策,适应上下文,同情和承认这对夫妇的专长。这些妇女证实,当专业人员表现出同理心时,他们与专业人员建立了信任关系,并根据他们的知识和生活背景调整了后续行动。建立这种照顾关系的关键因素是给定的时间,去医疗化的环境,得到的全面护理,和专业人士谁是充分了解伙伴关系。此外,分娩中心有一个用户委员会,可以提出想法,但没有决策权。
    结论:妇女和分娩中心的专业人员似乎都在合作。然而,在组织层面,妇女不参与决策。对魁北克所有分娩中心的研究将提供更全面的情况。
    BACKGROUND: Working with women to best meet their needs has always been central to midwifery in Quebec, Canada. The creation of birthing centres at the end of the 1990s consolidated this desire to prioritize women\'s involvement in perinatal care and was intended to encourage the establishment of a care and services partnership between care providers and users. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the perceptions of clients, midwives and birth assistants of the way in which women are involved in partnership working in Quebec birthing centres.
    METHODS: A single qualitative case and pilot study was conducted with midwives (n = 5), birth assistants (n = 4), a manager (n = 1), clients (n = 5) and members of the users\' committee (n = 2) at a birthing centre in Quebec, Canada in July and August 2023. The partnership was evaluated using the dimensions of a validated CADICEE questionnaire.
    RESULTS: The women and professionals stressed that the relationship was established in a climate of trust. The caregivers also attached importance to autonomy, information sharing and decision-making, adaptation to context, empathy and recognition of the couple\'s expertise. The women confirmed that they establish a relationship of trust with the professionals when the latter show empathy and that they adapt the follow-up to their knowledge and life context. Key factors in establishing this kind of care relationship are the time given, a de-medicalized environment, the comprehensive care received, and professionals who are well-informed about the partnership. In addition, the birthing centre has a users\' committee that can put forward ideas but has no decision-making powers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both the women and the professionals at the birthing centre appear to be working in partnership. However, at the organizational level, the women are not involved in decision-making. A study of all birthing centres in Quebec would provide a more comprehensive picture of the situation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    儿科护理期间的约束是一项开始研究的专业实践。然而,很少有研究从儿童父母在照料过程中受到坚定约束的角度来探讨这一现象。在照顾者的视角指导下,照顾仍然是他们的优先事项。一些人认为局势的暴力,而其他人则专注于专业人士的仁慈。在所有情况下,这种做法意味着需要专业人员支持有关的父母和孩子,以维护年轻患者的最大利益。
    Restraint during care in pediatrics is a professional practice that is beginning to be studied. However, few studies explore this phenomenon from the point of view of the parents of children who are firmly restrained during care. Guided by the caregiver\'s perspective, care remains a priority for them. Some perceive the violence of the situation, while others focus on the benevolence of the professionals. In all cases, this practice implies the need for professionals to support the parents and children concerned, in order to safeguard the best interests of the young patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Joy,恐惧,厌恶,愤怒,悲伤,惊喜,情绪是短暂而自然的影响,让我们措手不及。Care,作为与他人面对面的接触,在有时困难的严重或慢性疾病的情况下,可以成为一个情感的地方,当关怀跨越身体亲密的障碍时,更是如此。在护理中如何处理一个人的情绪?
    Joy, fear, disgust, anger, sadness, surprise, emotions are fleeting and natural affects that catch us off guard. Care, as a face-to-face encounter with others, in a sometimes difficult context of serious or chronic pathologies, can become a place of affectivity, all the more so as care crosses the barriers of bodily intimacy. What to do with one\'s emotions in care?
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    作为MAEVAS日的一部分,由巴黎精神病学和神经科学大学医院集团组织,来自Neuilly-sur-Marne的Theodore-Simon医院间培训机构的三名护理学生(93)于2022年5月23日向护理人员的听众发表了题为“护理关系核心的人道主义与治疗:敢于思考!”的会议。他们报告了共同思考的实质。
    As part of the MAEVAS day, organized by the Paris Psychiatry & Neurosciences University Hospital Group, three nursing students from the Théodore-Simon inter-hospital training institute in Neuilly-sur-Marne (93) presented a conference entitled \"Humanism & Cure at the Heart of the Care Relationship: Dare to Think!\" to an audience of caregivers on May 23, 2022. They report on the essence of the reflections shared.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    触摸某人是与另一个人的多感官相遇,它在倾听,听力,看到,闻,感觉,感知,等。这种联系允许在亲密关系中进行大量信息的人际传播。护理人员用他或她的眼睛触摸病人的身体,然后开始用他或她的手抓住它。为了调整他或她的护理方法,他或她必须注意病人发送的信息。但是触摸病人的身体也意味着护理人员被人的身体与他或她自己的身体对抗所产生的情绪所感动。
    Touching someone is a multisensory encounter with the other, it is listening, hearing, seeing, smelling, feeling, perceiving, etc. This contact allows for the interpersonal circulation of a host of information in a close relationship. The caregiver touches the patient\'s body with his or her eyes before beginning to grasp it with his or her hands. In order to adjust his or her approach to care, he or she must be attentive to the messages that the patient sends. But touching a patient\'s body also means that the caregiver is touched by the emotions produced by the confrontation of the person\'s body with his or her own body.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于经验的协同设计(EBCD)是参与式质量改进的宝贵工具。然而,EBCD流程需要调整,使其适合长期护理。改善过程的重点需要转移到护理关系上,因为这是这些环境中护理质量的重要组成部分。此外,需要使脆弱人群更容易获得EBCD进程。
    方法:通过参与式研究方法,EBCD调整为长期护理。这项研究是在两个护理组织中进行的:一个支持患有严重精神疾病和智力障碍者的独立生活,另一个为老年人提供家庭护理服务。
    结果:参与式研究导致了“问我们!”的发展。该研究还为弱势客户的参与性项目提供了宝贵的经验教训。长期护理参与性研究的一个常见问题是确保客户和非正式护理人员的参与。我们报告了各种策略,包括各种服务用户的体验,例如将访谈与参与者观察相结合,照片-声音和涉及专家的经验,作为合作人种学家。与一家包容性戏剧公司密切合作,这些经历被翻译成42个短视频,从客户的角度讲述护理关系中的复杂情况,专业人员或非正式护理人员。这些视频引发了批判性反思,并加速了参与式质量改进过程。此外,开发了实用工具来克服残疾人参与方面的障碍。这些措施包括使用照片启发来使残疾客户参与异质小组讨论,并让专家根据经验作为代理分享客户的经验,这些客户的经验仍然无法参与“询问我们”方法。
    结论:强大的参与过程的结果,“问我们!”是长期护理中参与性质量改进的一种有前途的方法。该研究还为弱势群体参与参与性研究和共同设计提供了经验教训。
    未经评估:客户作为线人参与,在面试中分享他们与护理关系的经验,语音和观察。他们还作为顾问参与其中,帮助在数据验证会话期间分析电影脚本的输入。
    BACKGROUND: Experience-based codesign (EBCD) is a valuable tool for participatory quality improvement. However, the EBCD process needs to be adjusted to make it suitable for long-term care. The focus of the improvement process needs to shift to the care relationship, as this is an important part of the quality of care in these settings. Furthermore, the EBCD process needs to be made more accessible to vulnerable populations.
    METHODS: Through a participatory research approach, EBCD was adjusted to long-term care. The research was conducted in two care organisations: one supporting people with serious mental illness and intellectual disabilities in independent living and one providing homecare services for older persons.
    RESULTS: The participatory research resulted in the development of \'Ask us!\'-a method for critical reflective codesign. The research furthermore provided valuable lessons for participatory projects with vulnerable clients. A common problem with participatory research in long-term care is ensuring the involvement of clients and informal carers. We report on various strategies developed to include experiences of a diverse set of services users, such as combining interviews with participant observation, photo-voice and involving experts-by-experiences as co-ethnographers. In close collaboration with an inclusive theatre company, these experiences were translated into 42 short videos on complex situations in the care relationship from the perspective of clients, professionals or informal carers. These videos instigate critical reflection and accelerate the participatory quality improvement process. Moreover, practical tools were developed to overcome barriers regarding the involvement of people with disabilities. These include the use of photo-elicitation to enable participation of clients with disabilities in heterogeneous group discussions and involving experts-by-experience as proxies to share experiences of clients for whom participation in the \'Ask us\' method remains inaccessible.
    CONCLUSIONS: The result of a robust participatory process, \'Ask us!\' is a promising method for participatory quality improvement in long-term care. The research furthermore generated lessons for involving vulnerable populations in participatory research and codesign.
    UNASSIGNED: Clients were involved as informants, sharing their experiences with the care relationship in interviews, photovoice and observations. They were also involved as consultants, helping to analyse input for the film scripts during data validation sessions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    The sense of smell presents itself to us as a means of forging an opinion of a situation, sending us back to our memories and giving us a form of knowledge of the patient. In addition, besides the obvious repulsion that certain wounds can engender, the sense of smell can also, conversely, lead us into an eroticization of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如今,精准医学在肿瘤学中的新范式质疑循证医学和医患关系的各自地位。根据一项随机研究的结果,比较顺势疗法分子在预防非转移性乳腺癌化疗引起的恶心和呕吐中的疗效,本文扩展和发展了关于维持医学艺术与医学之间未解决的紧张关系的讨论,在护理和治疗之间。这种紧张关系为医学治疗联盟的作者奠定了基础,定义为医生与患者的联盟和他的治疗之间不断休会的辩证法,以及这个联盟的治疗效果。因为如果一项政策或舆论要推广一种完全理性的药物,而没有与护理相关的领域,或者相反,一种仅基于临床意义和直觉的药物,那么护理的伦理和治疗的进展将分别受到威胁。明智的做法是意识到错误的事实,今天被社交网络放大了,由于科学实证主义的浪潮,作为“善良关怀的灵魂”的过剩。考虑到治疗联盟,可以不再反对科学医学和护理关系。
    The new paradigm of precision medicine in oncology questions today the respective place of evidence-based medicine and doctor-patient relationship. Based on the results of a randomized study comparing the efficacy of a homeopathic molecule in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer, this article extends and develops the discussion of maintaining an unresolved tension between medical art and medical science, between care and cure. This tension sets a base for the authors of the therapeutic alliance in medicine, defined as a dialectic constantly adjourned between the alliance of the doctor with the patient and his therapy, and the therapeutic effect of this alliance. Because if a policy or a public opinion were to promote an exclusively rational medicine deprived of the field of relation to care, or on the contrary a medicine based only on clinical sense and intuition, then respectively the ethics of care and the progress of therapy would be threatened. It is advisable to be aware of erring from the truth, amplified today by social networks, as much due to a tide of scientific positivism, as an excess of the \"good caring soul\". Taking into account the therapeutic alliance makes it possible to no longer oppose scientific medicine and care relationship.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The reform of health studies and the inclusion in the Bachelor-Master-Doctorate curriculum implies a new way of teaching, with an inverted pedagogical relationship between student and teacher. The competency-based approach contributes to the development of the student\'s professional and interpersonal skills, in the same way as the support provided by the nurse in the care relationship, particularly in therapeutic education, in order to promote patient autonomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This research was focused on expert professionals in epilepsy care to understand their points of view on the care pathway and their living relationships with patients.
    METHODS: Researchers prepared a semi-structured parallel chart and distributed it online among 21 Italian centres of care. Each health professional was prompted to write five narratives on cases of patients with epilepsy, subsequently analysed through narrative medicine methods. Next, a consensus meeting was held, to individualise an action plan based on the narratives.
    RESULTS: Ninety-one parallel charts were collected from 25 epileptologists, who had a mean age of 50 years; their narratives concerned patients with a mean age of 37 years, with different types of epilepsy (53 % drug-resistant; 31 % unemployed). The limitations in the daily life of people with epilepsy (57 %), employment (42 %), caregiver burden (51 %), and the universal prevalence of fear were the primary topics that emerged. Attentive and reassuring care relationships were found to be the main element of coping (21 %). A new multi-factorial classification of epilepsies, integrating clinical with social and legal risk factors, was the main agreed action to face the issues identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: The narrative medicine approach supplied a broader scenario of living with epilepsy, including the family and social impact and possible effects on the choices for care pathways. The epileptologists showed a strong motivation to care for patients with epilepsy and deep involvement in the care relationships; the use of parallel chart demonstrated to be an effective tool to preserve their wellbeing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号