UNASSIGNED: Lewy body dementia (LBD) is the second most common neurodegenerative dementia in the US, presenting unique end-of-life challenges.
UNASSIGNED: This study examined healthcare utilization and care continuity in the last year of life in LBD.
UNASSIGNED: Medicare claims for enrollees with LBD, continuously enrolled in the year preceding death, were examined from 2011-2018. We assessed hospital stays, emergency department (ED) visits, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, life-extending procedures, medications, and care continuity.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 45,762 LBD decedents, predominantly female (51.8%), White (85.9%), with average age of 84.1 years (SD 7.5). There was a median of 2 ED visits (IQR 1-5) and 1 inpatient stay (IQR 0-2). Higher age was inversely associated with ICU stays (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.96-0.97) and life-extending procedures (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.95-0.96). Black and Hispanic patients experienced higher rates of ED visits, inpatient hospitalizations, ICU admissions, life-extending procedures, and in-hospital deaths relative to White patients. On average, 15 (7.5) medications were prescribed in the last year. Enhanced care continuity correlated with reduced hospital (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.70-0.74) and ED visits (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.69-0.87) and fewer life-extending procedures (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.64-0.79).
UNASSIGNED: This study underscored the complex healthcare needs of people with LBD during their final year, which was influenced by age and race. Care continuity may reduce hospital and ED visits and life-extending procedures.

UNASSIGNED: Multiple studies have explored the needs and experiences of patients, family members, and healthcare professionals regarding hospital-to-home transitions. Our study aimed to identify, critically appraise, and summarize these studies in a qualitative meta-synthesis.
UNASSIGNED: Medline, CINAHL and Embase were systematically searched to identify eligible articles from inception to June 2024. Qualitative studies were included and critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Insufficient-quality papers were excluded. We performed a meta-synthesis following (1) open coding by two independent researchers and (2) discussing codes during reflexivity meetings.
UNASSIGNED: Ninety-eight studies were appraised, of which 53 were included. We reached thematic saturation, four themes were constructed: (1) care coordination and continuity, (2) communication, (3) patient and family involvement, and (4) individualized support and information exchange. For patients and families, tailored information and support are prerequisites for a seamless transition and an optimal recovery trajectory after hospital discharge. It is imperative that healthcare professionals communicate effectively within and across care settings to ensure multidisciplinary collaboration and care continuity.
UNASSIGNED: This study identifies essential elements of optimal transitional care. These findings could be supportive to researchers and healthcare professionals when (re)designing transitional care interventions to ensure care continuity after hospital discharge.
Patients and their families need to receive tailored information and support, which are prerequisites for a seamless transition from hospital to homeProfessionals must communicate effectively within and across hospital and primary care settingsProfessional roles should be clarified to ensure effective collaboration and continued high-quality care after hospital discharge.Integrated allied health pathways addressing coordination and communication are needed to ensure seamless transitions.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effectiveness and implementability of a standardized EHR-integrated handoff report to support intraoperative handoffs.
METHODS: A pre-post intervention study was used to compare the quality of intraoperative handoffs supported by unstructured notes (pre) to structured, standardized EHR-integrated handoff reports (post). Participants included anesthesia clinicians involved in intraoperative handoffs. A mixed-method approach was followed, supported by general observations, shadowing, surveys, and interviews.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one intraoperative permanent handoffs (78 pre, 73 post) were included. One hundred percent of participants in the post-intervention cohort utilized the report. Compared to unstructured, structured handoffs using the EHR-integrated handoff report led to: (1) significant increase in the transfer of information about airway management (55%-78%, P < .001), intraoperative course (63%-86%, P < .001), and potential concerns (64%-88%, P < .001); (2) significant improvement in clinician satisfaction scores, with regards to information clarity and succinctness (4.5-4.7, P = .002), information transfer (3.8-4.2, P = .011), and opportunities for fewer errors reported by senders (3.3-2.5, P < .001) and receivers (3.2-2.4, P < .001); and (3) significant decrease in handoff duration (326.2-262.3 s, P = .016). Clinicians found the report implementation highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible but noted a few areas for improvement to enhance its usability and integration within the intraoperative workflow.
CONCLUSIONS: A standardized EHR-integrated handoff report ensures the effectiveness and efficiency of intraoperative handoffs with its structured, consistent format that-promotes up-to-date and pertinent intraoperative information transfer; reduces opportunities for errors; and streamlines verbal communication. Handoff standardization can promote safe and high-quality intraoperative care.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of telemedicine by a patient\'s own primary care provider (PCP) versus another available PCP is understudied.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between primary care visit modality with timeliness and follow-up in-person healthcare, including variation by visits with the patient\'s own PCP versus another PCP.
METHODS: Cohort study including primary care visits in a large, integrated delivery system in 2022.
METHODS: Outcomes included timeliness (visit completed within 7 days of scheduling) and in-person follow-up (PCP visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations) within 7 days of the index PCP visit. Logistic regression measured the association between visit modality (in-person, video, and audio-only telemedicine) with the patient\'s own PCP or another PCP and outcomes, adjusting for characteristics.
RESULTS: Among 4,817,317 primary care visits, 59% were in-person, 27% audio-only, and 14% video telemedicine. Most (71.3%) were with the patient\'s own PCP. Telemedicine visits were timelier, with modality having a larger association for visits with patient\'s own PCP versus another PCP (P < 0.001). For visits with patient\'s own PCPs, return office visit rates were 1.2% for in-person, 5.3% for video, and 6.1% for audio-only. For another PCP, rates were 2.2% for in-person, 7.3% for video, and 8.1% for audio. Follow-up ED visits ranged from 1.4% (in-person) to 1.6% (audio-only) with own PCP, compared to 1.9% (in-person) to 2.3% (audio-only) with another PCP. Differences in return office and ED visits between in-person and telemedicine were larger for visits with another PCP compared to their own PCP (P < 0.001). Follow-up hospitalizations were rare, ranging from 0.19% (in-person with own PCP) to 0.32% (video with another PCP).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in return office and ED visits between in-person and telemedicine were larger when patients saw a less familiar PCP compared to their own PCP, reinforcing the importance of care continuity.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reduce the number of patients discharged without scheduled follow-up appointments by implementing lean management principles.
METHODS: Conducted at the Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Center in Muscat, Oman, the research utilized a one-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design to evaluate the impact of lean management interventions on the rate of patient discharges without follow-up appointments. Strategies such as the Kaizen principle, Gemba Walks, cross-functional collaboration, standard work procedures, and waste reduction were employed to enhance operational efficiency.
RESULTS: Spanning from Quarter 3 of 2022 to Quarter 2 of 2023, the study demonstrated a significant decrease in the percentage of patients discharged without planned follow-up appointments. The rate dropped from 9% in September 2022 to 0% in March 2023, with statistically significant differences observed (X2= 65.05, p value=<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: By effectively implementing lean management principles, this research successfully enhanced care continuity for oncology patients after being discharged.

UNASSIGNED: In Indonesia, drug resistance testing for TB largely relies on Xpert MTB/RIF, and it is unknown what proportion of drug-resistant (DR) TB is adequately diagnosed and treated.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cascade of care analysis on a cohort of presumptive rifampicin-resistant (RR) TB patients registered in 2015-2018 in a tertiary hospital in Indonesia. Estimated incidences of (presumptive) DR-TB cases were assumption-based using global reports. Data on diagnosis and consecutive cascades steps, including their timing were collected from national electronic registers, and medical records. We described a secondary cascade for patients receiving treatment not supported by phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST). Factors associated with delay and loss between diagnosis and treatment were identified using logistic regression.
UNASSIGNED: Less than a third of estimated incident TB cases at risk of DR-TB were identified as presumptive DR-TB case and tested, and 9.8% (982/10,065) of estimated true DR-TB cases was diagnosed. Of those diagnosed, only 45.1% (443/982) had treatment regimens supported by pDST results, but this did not significantly influence treatment outcomes. Only 25.5% (250/982) of diagnosed patients completed all steps of the cascade including successful treatment. Delays between diagnosis and treatment were substantial, and more common among those referred from a primary healthcare facility, and among those who were employed, living outside of Bandung, and reporting engagement with the private sector.
UNASSIGNED: The DR-TB care cascade in this urban setting in Indonesia is characterized by substantial attrition and delays. Strategies to increase access to DR-TB diagnosis accompanied by optimisation of clinical care could substantially improve outcomes and reduce onward transmission.
UNASSIGNED: Radboud university medical center and University of Otago.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence and define the profile of interlevel incidences (ININ) between primary care (PC) and hospital (HC).
METHODS: Multicenter cross-sectional descriptive study. SITE: Primary care.
METHODS: Professionals from a Health District and its reference hospitals.
METHODS: ININ are errors in communication between PC and HC professionals derived from administrative, pharmaceutical or clinical procedures not resolved during the formal interlevel communication processes, which requires a coordinated and validated response from the health care directions to not overload the family physician.
METHODS: ININ by category, hospital services and health centers, total and validated, relative to the total number of referrals, and the reason for the ININ.
RESULTS: We detected 2011 ININs (3.36%) among the 59.859 referrals, although only 1684 were validated (83.7%). Most were administrative (59.5%), followed by pharmaceutical (24.2%), clinical (10.2%) and reverse (6.1%). 41.3% of the clinical ININs were grouped around 5 hospital specialties, and 45.9% in 5 health centers. The main reasons for clinical ININ were non-prescription of the recommended pharmacological treatment in outpatient clinics or on hospital discharge (27.3%), request for referral to another hospital specialist (27.9%), or request to referral in person to patients who had already been referred by teleconsultation (17.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: 3.36% of interlevel referrals are accompanied by incidents and 83.7% are validated and processed. It is necessary to develop ININ management tools to guarantee safe healthcare and debureaucratize PC.

There are various challenges in discharging hospitalized patients with disabilities. Discharge process for individuals with disabilities is multifactorial and can vary from one health system to another. The current study is aimed to explore the factors contributing to delayed discharges and to determine the number of exceeded bed days and subsequent cost impact at a government rehabilitation facility in Saudi Arabia. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Rehabilitation Hospital of King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh. All the 2285 discharges from inpatient rehabilitation from August 2011 to March 2017 were included in the study. Patients with delayed discharge were identified. Information about the diagnosis and reasons for delayed discharge was obtained from the rehabilitation hospital bed utilization data. The cost impact was calculated based on the number of days patients stayed beyond the estimated length of stay for each diagnosis. Of the 2285 discharges, 531 (23.3%) were delayed. The most common clinical conditions of patients with delayed discharge included spinal cord injury (n = 168, 31.6%) and traumatic brain injury (n = 145, 27.3%). The factors that led to delayed discharges were medical complications (n = 352, 66.7%), organizational factors (n = 83, 15.7%), family factors (n = 46, 8.7%), and external factors (n = 46, 8.7%). A total of 21 817 hospital bed days were exceeded, with an approximate estimated cost of 80 million Saudi Arabian Riyals. Early rehabilitation and enhancement of the discharge process may significantly decrease delayed discharge rates. Strategies need to be adapted to identify patients at risk of delayed discharge based on the factors highlighted in this study. Development of long-term care capacity, community services, and optimizing family and social support can promote timely discharge.

UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 is a global health issue with widespread impact around the world, and many countries initiated lockdowns as part of their preventive measures. We aim to quantify the duration of delay in discharge to community from Community Hospitals, as well as quantify adverse patient outcomes post discharge pre and during lockdown period.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a before-after study comparing the length of stay in Community Hospitals, unscheduled readmissions or Emergency Department attendance, patients\' quality of life using EQ5D-5l, number and severity of falls, in patients admitted and discharged before and during lockdown period.
UNASSIGNED: The average length of stay in the lockdown group (27.77 days) were significantly longer than that of the pre-lockdown group (23.76 days), p = 0.003. There were similar proportions of patients with self-reported falls post discharge between both groups. Patients in the pre-lockdown group had slightly better EQ-5D-5l Index score at 0.55, compared to the lockdown study group at 0.49. Half of the patients in both groups were referred to Community Care Services on discharge.
UNASSIGNED: Our study would help in developing a future systematic preparedness guideline and contingency plans in times of disease outbreak and other similar public health emergencies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate care retention among Veterans with serious mental illness (SMI) who were lost to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care for at least one year and subsequently returned to VHA care via the SMI Re-Engagement program, an outreach program for Veterans with SMI who are lost-to-care.
METHODS: For the 410 Veterans with SMI who returned to care via SMI Re-Engagement between April 4th, 2016 and January 31, 2018, we assessed VHA in-person and telehealth utilization (overall, primary care, mental health care) for two years following the date of return to care.
RESULTS: Care retention was common: 70.2% of Veterans had at least one encounter in each year of the two-year follow-up period and an additional 22.7% had at least one encounter during one of the two years. During the two-year follow-up period, 72.4% of Veterans had at least one primary care encounter and 70.7% of Veterans had at least one mental health care encounter. Adjusted binomial logistic regression analyses found a return-to-care encounter in primary care (OR = 2.70; 95% CI: 1.34, 5.42) predicted primary care retention, and a return-to-care encounter in mental health care (OR = 4.01; 95% CI: 2.38, 6.75) predicted mental health care retention.
CONCLUSIONS: Most Veterans who return to care via the SMI Re-Engagement program remain in VHA care for the subsequent two years.