BACKGROUND: The distinction between normal and high blood pressure remains a debated topic, with varying guidelines on when to start medication. Contemporary guidelines advocate for the initiation of antihypertensive therapy in individuals who present with high-normal blood pressure, particularly those exhibiting elevated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores. Despite these recommendations, there is a notable lack of direct evidence supporting the efficacy of treating high-normal blood pressure to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
METHODS: The PRINT-TAHA9 trial, a unicentric, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel clinical study, seeks to explore the effects of intensive blood pressure control on MACE in participants with high-normal blood pressure. We will enroll 1620 adults aged 18 years and above with a systolic blood pressure range of 130-140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure under 90 mmHg, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score exceeding 7.5%. The study will be executed in five distinct phases, with each phase enrolling between 300 and 400 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group receiving antihypertensive medication (amlodipine/valsartan) and a low-salt/low-fat diet or to the control group receiving a similar diet. Follow-up visits are scheduled every 6 months over a 3-year period to monitor blood pressure, evaluate medication adherence, document any adverse events, and adjust the intervention as necessary. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis will be employed to examine the disparities between the two arms.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite guidelines promoting early treatment of elevated blood pressure, the debate continues due to insufficient evidence that such interventions significantly reduce the occurrence of MACE. This trial seeks to address this critical evidence gap.
BACKGROUND: The PRINT-TAHA9 trial was registered in October 2019 with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT.ir) under the registration number IRCT20191002044961N1. https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/43092 .

The late-breaking science presented at the 2023 scientific session of the American Heart Association paves the way for future pragmatic trials and provides meaningful information to guide management strategies in coronary artery disease and heart failure (HF). The dapagliflozin in patient with acute myocardial infarction (DAPA-MI) trial showed that dapagliflozin use among patients with acute MI without a history of diabetes mellitus or chronic HF has better cardiometabolic outcomes compared with placebo, with no difference in cardiovascular outcomes. The MINT trial showed that in patients with acute MI and anemia (Hgb < 10 g/dL), a liberal transfusion goal (Hgb ≥ 10 g/dL) was not superior to a restrictive strategy (Hgb 7-8 g/dL) with respect to 30-day all-cause death and recurrent MI. The ORBITA-2 trial showed that among patients with stable angina and coronary stenoses causing ischemia on little or no antianginal therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention results in greater improvements in anginal frequency and exercise times compared with a sham procedure. The ARIES-HM3 trial showed that in patients with advanced HF who received a HeartMate 3 levitated left ventricular assist device and were anticoagulated with a vitamin K antagonist, placebo was noninferior to daily aspirin with respect to the composite endpoint of bleeding and thrombotic events at 1 year. The TEAMMATE trial showed that everolimus with low-dose tacrolimus is safe in children and young adults when given ≥ 6 months after cardiac transplantation. Providing patients being treated for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with specific out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for multiple medication options at the time of the clinical encounter may reduce \'contingency planning\' and increase the extent to which patients are taking the medications decided upon. The primary outcome, which was cost-informed decision-making, defined as the clinician or patient mentioning costs of HFrEF medication, occurred in 49% of encounters with the checklist only control group compared with 68% of encounters in the OOP cost group.

BACKGROUND: The target blood pressure (BP) value is unclear for diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of strict BP control or \'on treatment\' BP on clinical outcomes in patients with DKD.
METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of the prespecified secondary outcomes of the FimAsartaN proTeinuriA SusTaIned reduCtion in comparison with losartan in diabetic chronic kidney disease (FANTASTIC) trial, a randomized multicenter double-blind phase III trial. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 19 years with DKD. We assigned 341 participants with DKD to BP control strategy (standard-systolic BP [SBP] < 140 mmHg versus strict-SBP < 130 mmHg). The outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular events and renal events. Separate analyses were performed to compared the risk of outcome according to achieved average BP levels.
RESULTS: A total of 341 participants were included in the analysis. Over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, cardiovascular/renal events were observed in 25 (7.3%) participants. Mean (SD) SBPs in the standard and strict BP control group were 140.2 (11.6) and 140.2 (11.9) mmHg, respectively. The strict BP control group did not show significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular/renal events (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.60-2.92]). In the post-hoc analyses using achieved BP, achieved average SBP of 130-139 mmHg resulted in reduced risk of cardiovascular/renal events (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.67) compared to achieved average SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, whereas further reduction in achieved average SBP < 130 mmHg did not impart additional benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DKD, targeting a SBP of less than 130 mmHg, as compared with less than 140 mmHg, did not reduce the rate of a composite of cardiovascular and renal events. Achieved SBP of 130-139 mmHg was associated with a decreased risk for the primary outcome in patients with DKD.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTirals.gov Identifier: NCT02620306, registered December 3, 2015. ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02620306 ).

UNASSIGNED: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are recommended for the treatment of heart failure due to their cardioprotective effects, despite primarily being used as antidiabetic medications. However, the comparative profile of two antidiabetic drugs, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor remains unclear.
UNASSIGNED: This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor drugs.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov using appropriate Medical Subject Headings terms from inception until February 23, 2023. The outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model for hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve studies were included after systematic screening, with a sample size of 745,688 for sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and 769,386 for dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor. The mean age in each group was 61.1 (8.52) and 61.28 (9.25) years, respectively. Upon pooling the included articles with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, the primary outcome of all-cause death demonstrated an hazard ratio of 0.64 (0.57, 0.70), I 2: 65.54%, p < 0.001, and major adverse cardiovascular events yielded an hazard ratio of 0.76 (0.65, 0.86), I 2: 87.83%, p < 0.001. The secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction with an hazard ratio of 0.84 (0.78, 0.90), I 2: 47.64%, p < 0.001, stroke with an hazard ratio of 0.81 (0.75, 0.87), I 2: 36.78%, p < 0.001, and hospitalization with an hazard ratio of 0.62 (0.53, 0.70), I 2: 83.32%, p < 0.001.
UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that compared to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, initiating treatment with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors provides cardiovascular disease protection and may be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes.

UNASSIGNED: The latest guidelines from ACC/AHA define hypertension at systolic blood pressure (SBP) 130-139 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 80-89 mmHg in contrast to guidelines from ESC/ESH defining hypertension at SBP ≥ 140 mmHg or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg. The aim was to determine whether the ACC/AHA definition of hypertension identifies persons at elevated risk for future cardiovascular outcome.
UNASSIGNED: In a Danish prospective cardiovascular study, 19,721 white men and women aged 20-98 years were examined up to five occasions between 1976 and 2015. The population was followed until December 2018. The ACC/AHA definition of the BP levels were applied: Normal: SBP <120 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg, Elevated: SBP 120-129 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg, Stage 1: SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg, Stage 2: SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg. Absolute 10-year risk was calculated taking repeated examinations, covariates, and competing risk into account.
UNASSIGNED: For all outcomes, the 10-year risk in stage 1 hypertension did not differ significantly from risk in subjects with normal BP: The 10-year risk of cardiovascular events in stage 1 hypertension was 14.1% [95% CI 13.2;15.0] and did not differ significantly from the risk in normal BP at 12.8% [95% CI 11.1;14.5] (p = 0.19). The risk was highest in stage 2 hypertension 19.4% [95% CI 18.9;20.0] and differed significantly from normal BP, elevated BP, and stage 1 hypertension (p < 0.001). The 10-year risk of cardiovascular death was 6.6% [95% CI 5.9;7.4] in stage 1 hypertension and did not differ significantly from the risk in normal BP at 5.7% [95% CI 4.1;7.3] (p = 0.33).
UNASSIGNED: Stage 1 hypertension as defined by the ACC/AHA guidelines has the same risk for future cardiovascular events as normal BP. In contrast, the definition of hypertension as suggested by ESC/ESH identifies patients with elevated risk of cardiovascular events.
Until 2017, there was worldwide agreement on defining hypertension at systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg.In 2017, the American Cardiology Societies (ACC and AHA) lowered the threshold for defining hypertension at SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg.Lowering the threshold might make healthy persons sick if the thresholds do not identify persons at high risk.Unnecessary medical treatment is associated with high economic cost for the health care systems.We wanted to explore whether applying the American BP definition in a Scandinavian population identified persons with elevated risk for cardiovascular disease.As part of the Copenhagen City Heart study, 19,721 men and women aged 20-98 years were followed from 1976.They went through up to five examinations between 1976 and 2018 including BP measurements.We applied the American BP thresholds and followed the persons until death or 2018.In Denmark all citizens have a unique identification number which is linked to all health care contacts and administrative registers.We used advanced statistical methods and linked the BP measurements with the data for cardiovascular disease and death date from the Danish registries for each person.The results showed that the American definition of hypertension has same risk for future cardiovascular disease as the definition of normal BP.This means that healthy persons will be diagnosed with hypertension if the US guidelines were applied in Denmark.

BACKGROUND: The predictive role of blood pressure variability for all-cause mortality and fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events has been described in the general population and in patients with diabetes, independently of mean BP. Although systolic blood pressure variability has been proposed as an informative measure for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease, its role in kidney transplant recipients is still debatable.
RESULTS: We performed a retrospective, observational, monocentric analysis of all kidney transplant recipients in follow-up at the outpatient Nephrology Clinic of San Martino Hospital from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, who underwent kidney transplantation >12 months. The primary outcome was a fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure). Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability was expressed as the SD of systolic blood pressure values recorded at baseline and 3 months up to 18 months. Among the 272 patients (mean age, 64±13; 63% men) included in the present analyses, for each increase of 2.7 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure SD, the risk for events increased 3-fold (hazard ratio [HR], 3.1 [95% CI, 1.19-7.88]; P=0.02), and patients in the highest tertile of systolic blood pressure SD showed a 4-fold increased risk (HR, 4.1 [95% CI, 1.34-12.43]; P=0.01). This relationship was maintained even after incremental adjustment for time-averaged pulse pressure, age, diabetes, and prior cardiovascular event (HR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.1-10.0]; P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term blood pressure variability represents a risk factor for cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients, even independently by several confounding factors including blood pressure load.

UNASSIGNED: Left main (LM) coronary artery disease (CAD) is a severe condition that can lead to severe outcomes. Treatment options include medication, coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent advancements in PCI techniques position it as a viable alternative to CABG for LM revascularisation.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective observational study evaluated outcomes after PCI for LM CAD, encompassing in-hospital and post-discharge mortality, in a single-centre registry in Vietnam.
UNASSIGNED: Our research involved 59 patients who underwent PCI for LM lesions, with an average age of 66.7 ±1.5 years, who were divided into two groups based on presentation diagnosis - acute coronary syndrome or chronic coronary syndrome. After PCI, one individual was diagnosed with contrast-induced nephropathy and one with cardiac shock. There were two cases of in-hospital mortality in the acute coronary syndrome group and one in the chronic coronary syndrome group giving a rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) of 5.1%. After a 12-month follow-up, the MACCE rate increased to 18.6%. Triple vessel coronary artery disease and troponin I elevation exhibited significant associations with adverse in-hospital outcomes (p<0.05).
UNASSIGNED: PCI for LM coronary artery disease is considered a safe treatment option, demonstrating relatively favourable in-hospital and mid-term outcomes. It presents a viable alternative for patients in need of revascularisation, particularly in cases where CABG is not the preferred choice. Clinical indicators, such as triple vessel coronary artery disease and elevated troponin I levels, may serve as predictors of adverse outcomes during hospitalisation.

Background/Objectives: Prognostic biomarkers may provide information about the patient\'s cardiovascular outcomes. However, there are doubts regarding how high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) impacts patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). The main objective is to evaluate whether high hs-CRP levels predict a worse prognosis in patients with CHD. Methods: Observational and prospective cohort study. Adult CHD patients and controls were matched for age and sex. Results: In total, 434 CHD patients (cases) and 820 controls were studied. The median age in the CHD patients was 30 (18-62) years and 256 (59%) were male. A total of 51%, 30%, and 19% of patients with CHD had mild, moderate, and great complexity defects, respectively. The body mass index [1.07 (1.01-1.13), p = 0.022)], diabetes mellitus [3.57 (1.07-11.97), p = 0.039], high NT-pro-BNP levels [1.00 (1.00-1.01), p = 0.021], and low serum iron concentrations [0.98 (0.97-0.99), p = 0.001] predicted high hs-CRP levels (≥0.3 mg/dL) in patients with CHD. During a follow-up time of 6.81 (1.17-10.46) years, major cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 40 CHD patients, showing the Kaplan-Meier test demonstrated a worse outcome among patients with hs-CRP levels above 0.3 mg/dL (p = 0.012). Also, hs-CRP showed statistical significance in the univariate Cox regression survival analysis. However, after adjusting for other variables, this significance was lost and the remaining predictors of MACE were age [HR 1.03 (1.01-1.06), p = 0.001], great complexity defects [HR 2.46 (1.07-5.69), p = 0.035], and an NT pro-BNP cutoff value for heart failure > 125 pg/mL [HR 7.73 (2.54-23.5), p < 0.001]. Conclusions: Hs-CRP obtained statistical significance in the univariate survival analysis. However, this significance was lost in the multivariate analysis in favor of age, CHD complexity, and heart failure.

BACKGROUND: While clinical features of KCNJ5-mutated aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) have been reported, evidence of its clinical outcomes is lacking. We aimed to synthesize available literature about the associations between KCNJ5 mutation with cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes among patients with APA.
METHODS: In this systematic review of observational studies, MEDLINE and Embase were searched through August 2022. Two independent authors screened the search results and extracted data from eligible observational studies investigating cardiovascular or metabolic outcomes between KCNJ5-mutated APAs and KCNJ5-non-mutated APAs. Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions was used to assess the quality of the included studies.
RESULTS: A total of 573 titles/abstracts were screened and after the expert opinion of the literature, full text was read in 20 titles/abstracts, of which 12 studies were included. Across 3 studies comparing the baseline or change in the cardiac function between KCNJ5-mutated APAs and KCNJ5-non-mutated APAs, all studies reported the association between impaired cardiac functions and KCNJ5 mutation status. Among 6 studies evaluating the cure of hypertension after surgery, all studies showed that KCNJ5 mutation was significantly associated with the cure of hypertension. In quality assessment, 7 studies were at serious risk of bias, while the remaining studies were at moderate risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provided evidence of the significant association between KCNJ5 mutation and unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism. Further research is needed to improve the quality of evidence on this topic and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the potential burden of KCNJ5 mutation.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a growing disease worldwide, including Korea. This is an important condition that affects patient outcome. To provide optimal management for mineral disturbance, vascular calcification, and bone disease in ESRD patients, the Korean dialysis cohort for mineral, vascular calcification, and fracture (ORCHESTRA) study was conducted by enrolling Korean dialysis patients.
METHODS: Sixteen university-affiliated hospitals and one Veterans\' Health Service Medical Center participated in this study. This prospective cohort study enrolled approximately 900 consecutive patients on dialysis between May 2019 and January 2021. Enrolled subjects were evaluated at baseline for demographic information, laboratory tests, radiologic imaging, and bone mineral densitometry (BMD) scans. After enrollment, regular assessments of the patients were performed, and their biospecimens were collected according to the study protocol. The primary outcomes were the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, invasive treatment for peripheral artery disease, and osteoporotic fractures. The secondary outcomes were hospitalization for cerebrovascular disease or progression of abdominal aortic calcification. Participants will be assessed for up to 3 years to determine whether primary or secondary outcomes occur.
RESULTS: Between May 2019 and January 2021, all participating centers recruited 900 consecutive dialysis patients, including 786 undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and 114 undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). The mean age of the subjects was 60.4 ± 12.3 years. Males accounted for 57.7% of the total population. The mean dialysis vintage was 6.1 ± 6.0 years. The HD group was significantly older, had a longer dialysis vintage, and more comorbidities. Overall, the severity of vascular calcification was higher and the level of BMD was lower in the HD group than in the PD group.
CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study focused on chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder and aimed to provide clinical evidence to establish optimal treatment guidelines for Asian dialysis patients.