背景:虚拟现实自行车(VRC)是模拟户外自行车,具有旋转测力计踏板的虚拟现实(VR)中风景的变化。风景变化的速度,也就是视觉流速,可以根据相同的踏板转速进行换档。
目的:本研究使用VRC研究了不同视觉流速对骑自行车者心理生理反应的影响。
方法:要求参与者在四种条件下以其最大运动负荷的30%循环20分钟:(1)无VR的自行车测力计(对照),(2)正常视觉流速下的VRC(VRC-normal),(3)VRC在VRC-normal(VRC-slow)的视觉流速的0.5倍时,和(4)VRC处于VRC-normal(VRC-fast)的视觉流速的1.5倍。四个条件的顺序在平衡设计中随机化。在运动期间记录心率和感知的劳累等级。参与者使用体育活动享受量表(PACES)对他们对任务的享受进行评分。通过比较视觉流速条件(VRC-慢速,VRC-正常,和VRC-fast),并比较VRC和自行车测力计(VRC-正常和控制)。
结果:共有24名参与者参加了研究。在PACES评分中观察到显著的主要效应(F(2,46)=20.129,p<0.001,部分η2=0.467)。在PACES的事后测试中,在以下组合中发现了显着差异:VRC-正常>VRC-慢速(p=0.005);VRC-快速>VRC-正常(p=0.003);和VRC-快速>VRC-慢速(p<0.001)。在改良的Borg下肢疲劳量表中,时间因子(F(2,46)=134.048,p<0.001,部分η2=0.854)和交互效应(F(4,92)=3.156,p=0.018,部分η2=0.121)存在显著差异。在修改后的博格量表的事后测试中,在以下组合中发现了显着趋势:VRC-正常>VRC-快速(p=0.068)和VRC-慢速>VRC-快速(p=0.083)。
结论:结果表明,较慢的视觉流速可能会降低运动的乐趣,而更快的视觉流速可能会使运动感觉不那么疲劳,更愉快。
BACKGROUND: Virtual reality cycling (VRC) is simulated outdoor cycling with changes in scenery in virtual reality (VR) with rotating ergometer pedals. The speed at which the scenery changes, which is the visual flow velocity, can shift according to the same pedal rotation speed.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of different visual flow velocities on the psychophysiological responses of cyclists using the VRC.
METHODS: Participants were asked to cycle for 20 min at 30% of their maximum exercise load under four conditions: (1) bicycle ergometer without VR (control), (2) VRC at normal visual flow velocity (VRC-normal), (3) VRC at 0.5 times the visual flow velocity of VRC-normal (VRC-slow), and (4) VRC at 1.5 times the visual flow velocity of VRC-normal (VRC-fast). The order of the four conditions was randomized in a counterbalanced design. The heart rate and rating of perceived exertion were recorded during the exercise. Participants graded their enjoyment of the task using the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES). The measured data were analyzed by comparing the visual flow velocity conditions (VRC-slow, VRC-normal, and VRC-fast), and comparing the VRC and bicycle ergometer (VRC-normal and control).
RESULTS: A total of 24 participants were enrolled in the study. There was a significant main effect observed in the PACES score (F(2,46)=20.129, p<0.001, partial η2=0.467). In the post-hoc test for the PACES, significant differences were found in the following combinations: VRC-normal > VRC-slow (p=0.005); VRC-fast > VRC-normal (p=0.003); and VRC-fast > VRC-slow (p<0.001). In the modified Borg scale for lower-limb fatigue, there were significant differences in time factor (F(2,46)=134.048, p<0.001, partial η2=0.854) and interaction effects (F(4,92)=3.156, p=0.018, partial η2=0.121). In the post-hoc test for the modified Borg scale, significant trends were found in the following combinations: VRC-normal > VRC-fast (p=0.068) and VRC-slow > VRC-fast (p=0.083).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a slower visual flow velocity may reduce the enjoyment of exercise, whereas a faster visual flow velocity may make the exercise feel less fatigued and more enjoyable.