BACKGROUND: A more precise identification of mucinous cysts will lower the likelihood of needless pancreatic surgery. Pancreatic cyst fluid (PCF) contains glucose and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), which serve as biomarkers to differentiate mucinous from non-mucinous pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of combined CEA and glucose levels in PCF for distinguishing mucinous from non-mucinous PCNs preoperatively.
METHODS: After receiving approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee of Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, a cross-sectional validation research was carried out. All patients ≥18 years of age who had undergone pancreatic surgery or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for a pancreatic cystic lesion and for whom PCF was acquired were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if there was no PCF available, if they had been diagnosed with an extrapancreatic illness (such as ampullary adenoma), or if they could not be excluded due to pancreatic cancer generated from PCN. Diagnoses were pathologically confirmed. We performed measurements for CEA and glucose in PCF. CEA and glucose were measured using an Architect i2000SR analyzer (Abbott, Lake County, IL) and AU 5800 Beckman Coulter (Brea, CA), respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: PCF was obtained from 100 patients, of whom 54 (54%) had mucinous PCN and 46 (46%) had non-mucinous PCN. When CEA (cut-off ≥ 151 ng/ml) and glucose levels (cut-off ≤ 50 mg/dL) were combined, the results showed 46% sensitivity and 92% specificity. However, when CEA (cut-off ≥ 17 ng/ml) or glucose testing (cut-off ≤ 50 mg/dL) was used separately, the results showed 82% sensitivity and 73% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined CEA and glucose testing in PCF demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous PCNs, suggesting its potential utility in preoperative diagnosis.

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare and challenging type of thyroid cancer originating from parafollicular cells (C cells) that produce calcitonin. Diagnosing and monitoring this carcinoma can be complex due to its unique biomarkers. Procalcitonin (PCT), a precursor of calcitonin, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are important markers for MTC. Elevated PCT levels, particularly when they remain high post-infection treatment, and elevated CEA levels are significant indicators for suspecting MTC. This report emphasises the diagnostic and prognostic importance of these biomarkers in MTC, highlighting their roles in detecting and monitoring disease progression. Integrating PCT and CEA measurements into routine clinical practice can enhance detection, provide understanding of therapeutic responses and aid in the effective management of MTC.
CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin (PCT) is a more stable and reliable biomarker than calcitonin for diagnosing and monitoring medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).Elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels effectively monitor MTC progression, especially when calcitonin levels are inconsistent.Incorporating PCT and CEA measurements into routine practice enhances MTC management, providing reliable biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring.

Organic-inorganic hybrid nanocomposites (OIHN), with tailored surface chemistry, offer ultra-sensitive architecture capable of detecting ultra-low concentrations of target analytes with precision. In the present work, a novel nano-biosensor was fabricated, acquainting dynamic synergy of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) decorated hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets (hBNNS) for detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Extensive spectroscopic and microscopic analyses confirmed the successful hydrothermal synthesis of cross-linked rGO-hBNNS nanocomposite. Uniform micro-electrodes of rGO-hBNNS onto pre-hydrolyzed ITO were obtained via electrophoretic deposition (EPD) technique at low DC potential (15 V). Optimization of antibody incubation time, pH of supporting electrolyte, and immunoelectrode preparation was thoroughly investigated to enhance nano-biosensing efficacy. rGO-modified hBNNS demonstrated 29% boost in electrochemical performance over bare hBNNS, signifying remarkable electro-catalytic activity of nano-biosensor. The presence of multifunctional groups on the interface facilitated stable crosslinking chemistry, increased immobilization density, and enabled site-specific anchoring of Anti-CEA, resulting in improved binding affinity. The nano-biosensor demonstrated a remarkably low limit of detection of 5.47 pg/mL (R2 = 0.99963), indicating exceptional sensitivity and accuracy in detecting CEA concentrations from 0 to 50 ng/mL. The clinical evaluation confirmed its exceptional shelf life, minimal cross-reactivity, and robust recovery rates in human serum samples, thereby unraveling the potential for early, highly sensitive, and reliable CEA detection.

UNASSIGNED: Combining multiple tumor markers increases sensitivity for lung cancer diagnosis in the cost of false positive. However, some would like to check as many as tumor markers in the fear of missing cancer. We though to propose a panel of fewer tumor markers for lung cancer diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with suspected lung cancer who simultaneously underwent all six tests [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA), squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen (SCC), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), and sialyl Lewis-X antigen (SLX)] were included. Tumor markers with significant impact on the lung cancer in a logistic regression model were included in our panel. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared between our panel and the panel of all six.
UNASSIGNED: We included 1,733 [median 72 years, 1,128 men, 605 women, 779 (45%) confirmed lung cancer]. Logistic regression analysis suggested CEA, CYFRA, and NSE were independently associated with the lung cancer diagnosis. The panel of these three tumor markers [AUC =0.656, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.630-0.682, sensitivity 0.650, specificity 0.662] had better (P<0.001) diagnostic performance than six tumor markers (AUC =0.575, 95% CI: 0.548-0.602, sensitivity 0.829, specificity 0.321).
UNASSIGNED: Compared to applying all six markers (at least one marker above the upper limit of normal), the panel with three markers (at least one marker above the upper limit of normal) led to a better predictive value by lowering the risk of false positives.

UNASSIGNED: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been routinely used as a postoperative monitoring biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Emergingly, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-molecular residual disease (MRD) detection is a well-established prognostic marker, with better positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). However, the actual clinical efficiency of CEA in MRD context remain unknown. Hence, we conducted this study for direct comparison of CEA and MRD.
UNASSIGNED: Two cohorts were analyzed in this study. To investigate the prognostic and predictive value of CEA, we retrospective enrolled NSCLC patient stage IA2-IIIA (8th tumor-node-metastasis staging system) with longitudinal CEA between 2018 and 2019. We also performed a paired comparison of CEA and MRD in our previous published cohort. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated using the R package \"epiR\". McNemar\'s test was used to analyze the paired data. Statistical differences were set at a P value <0.05.
UNASSIGNED: In the retrospective cohort, the sensitivity of longitudinal CEA was only 0.49 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.60]. Even for patients with progressively elevated CEA levels, 32% of them still remained disease-free, with PPV of 0.68 (0.49-0.83) and NPV of 0.81 (0.77-0.85). Furthermore, we then compared CEA and MRD values in a previously described MRD cohort. As expected, CEA levels could not stratify the risk of recurrence in detectable versus undetectable MRD populations.
UNASSIGNED: MRD is superior to CEA in postoperative monitoring. there is insufficient evidence to support its use as postoperative monitoring tumor marker.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) are rare malignancies, which may have unique presentations. The diagnostic process predominantly relies on immunohistochemical analysis. While tumor markers are extensively utilized in diagnosing and monitoring GI malignancies, their specific role in NETs has not been fully explored. This case describes an 83-year-old male presenting with jaundice and general weakness. Diagnostic imaging through MRI and CT angiography (CTA) revealed a nodular texture on the liver\'s surface suggesting cirrhosis. The presence of elevated tumor markers, specifically carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), raised suspicions of malignancy. A subsequent liver biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of small-cell high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma accompanied by reactive fibrosis. As per our knowledge, this case is the first recorded instance of a liver neuroendocrine tumor (NET) exhibiting elevated levels of both CEA and CA 19-9, with no abnormalities detected in the gallbladder, biliary tree, and bowel in the MRI with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and CTA. This is an atypical presentation of a liver NET, mimicking cirrhotic liver morphology, and underscores the potential diagnostic relevance of tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9 in such cases.

A novel label-free electrochemical immunosensor was prepared for the detection of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as biomarkers of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). A nanocomposite of gold nanoparticles, molybdenum trioxide, and chitosan (Au-MoO3-Chi) was layer-by-layer assembled on the porous graphene (PG) modified a dual screen-printed electrode using a self-assembling technique, which increased surface area and conductivity and enhanced the adsorption of immobilized antibodies. The stepwise self-assembling procedure of the modified electrode was further characterized morphologically and functionally. The electroanalytical detection of biomarkers was based on the interaction between the antibody and antigen of each marker via linear sweep voltammetry using ferrocyanide/ferricyanide as an electrochemical redox indicator. Under optimized conditions, the fabricated immunosensor showed linear relationships between current change (ΔI) and antigen concentrations in two ranges: 0.0025-0.1 U mL-1 and 0.1-1.0 U mL-1 for CA19-9, and 0.001-0.01 ng mL-1 and 0.01-1.0 ng mL-1 for CEA. The limits of detection (LOD) were 1.0 mU mL-1 for CA19-9 and 0.5 pg mL-1 for CEA. Limits of quantitation (LOQ) were 3.3 mU mL-1 for CA19-9 and 1.6 pg mL-1 for CEA. The selectivity of the developed immunosensor was tested on mixtures of antigens and was then successfully applied to determine CA19-9 and CEA in human serum samples, producing satisfactory results consistent with the clinical method.

UNASSIGNED: As a commonly used biomarker in rectal cancer (RC), the prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment CEA/tumor volume in RC.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included patients who underwent pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with histologically confirmed primary rectal adenocarcinoma from November 2012 to April 2018. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups according to the median values of CEA/Diapath (CEA to pathological diameter), CEA/DiaMRI (CEA to MRI tumor diameter), and CEA/VolMRI (CEA to MRI tumor volume). Cox regression analysis was utilized to determine the prognostic value of CEA, CEA/Diapath, CEA/DiaMRI, and CEA/VolMRI. Stepwise regression was used to establish nomograms for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Predictive performance was estimated by using the concordance index (C-index) and area under curve receiver operating characteristic (AUC).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 343 patients [median age 58.99 years, 206 (60.06%) males] were included. After adjusting for patient-related and tumor-related factors, CEA/VolMRI was superior to CEA, CEA/Diapath, and CEA/DiaMRI in distinguishing high-risk from low-risk patients in terms of DFS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.83; P=0.010] and OS (HR =1.67; P=0.048). Subanalysis revealed that CEA/VolMRI stratified high death risk in CEA-negative individuals (HR =2.50; P=0.038), and also stratified low recurrence risk in CEA-positive individuals (HR =2.06; P=0.024). In the subanalysis of stage II or III cases, the highest HRs and the smallest P values were observed in distinguishing high-risk from low-risk patients according to CEA/VolMRI in terms of DFS (HR =2.44; P=0.046 or HR =2.41; P=0.001) and OS (HR =1.96; P=0.130 or HR =2.22; P=0.008). The nomograms incorporating CEA/VolMRI showed good performance, with a C-index of 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.79] for DFS and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.80) for OS.
UNASSIGNED: Higher CEA/VolMRI was associated with worse DFS and OS. CEA/VolMRI was superior to CEA, CEA/Diapath, and CEA/DiaMRI in predicting DFS and OS. Pretreatment CEA/VolMRI may facilitate risk stratification and treatment decision-making.

UNASSIGNED: Recent studies have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have potential benefits in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subgroups, while the clinicopathological characteristics associated with PD-L1 expression have not been well established. The purpose of this study was to detect the expression level of PD-L1 in tumor tissues of patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and analyze its possible relationship with clinicopathological characteristics, so as to identify the predictors of PD-L1 expression.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study was conducted by analyzing the clinicopathological and imaging characteristics of hospitalized advanced lung ADC patients with PD-L1 available data and admitted to the respiratory department of our hospital. The expression level of PD-L1 in fresh-frozen tumor tissue samples of 136 advanced ADC patients was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The patients were divided into positive and negative groups based on a cut-off of 1% PD-L1 expression level. Subsequently, the significant correlation between PD-L1 levels and clinicopathological features were evaluated. The predictive performance of clinicopathological characteristics on PD-L1 expression was evaluated and the optimal cut-off values were identified by plotting the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
UNASSIGNED: The expression level of PD-L1 was related to sex, clinical stage, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron specific enolase (NSE), white blood cell (WBC), and tumor (T) and metastasis (M) stage. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the CEA, NSE, T stage, and WBC were independent predictors of PD-L1 positive expression in lung ADC patients. The ROC curve suggested the model combining CEA with NSE [area under the curve (AUC) =0.815] could better predict the expression levels of PD-L1. The optimal cut-off values for identifying advanced lung ADC patients with PD-L1 positive were CEA ≤13.38 ng/mL and NSE ≤42.35 ng/mL, with sensitivity and specificity of 85.4% and 55.6%, and 92.7% and 32.1%, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Some commonly used clinicopathological features are related to the histological expression of PD-L1. The serum CEA, NSE, T stage, and WBC values can be used as indicators to predict the expression level of PD-L1 in advanced lung ADC, and are used as predictors to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs before treatment.

Oncologic disorders, such as lung adenocarcinoma, can intricately interplay with the coagulation cascade, often leading to thromboembolic events, of which deep vein thrombosis (DVT) stands out prominently. In this report, we present a unique case of a 50-year-old non-smoking Jordanian male who exhibited bilateral DVT as an unexpected preliminary manifestation of an aggressive lung adenocarcinoma. Although the patient did not possess common risk factors for DVT, the bilateral presentation drew attention to the possibility of an underlying malignancy. Subsequent investigations revealed a stage 4 primary lung adenocarcinoma. This case underscores the imperative of maintaining a broad differential in cases of DVT, especially when presenting bilaterally and without evident etiology. Such early detection and intervention, accompanied by collaborative medical strategies and specialized care, can play a pivotal role in enhancing patient prognosis and survival rates. This case exemplifies the potential of DVT, particularly when bilateral, as a harbinger of a more sinister underlying pathology like lung adenocarcinoma.