Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening, often immune-mediated disease that affects 2-13 persons per million per year. Hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and end-organ damage due to the formation of microthrombi are characteristic of TTP. ADAMTS13 is a disintegrin, metalloproteinase, cleaving protein of von Willebrand factor (VWF) that processes the VWF multimers to prevent them from interacting with platelets and, in turn, to microvascular thrombosis. Prompt diagnosis of TTP is critical yet challenging. Thrombotic microangiopathies have similar clinical presentation. Measurement of ADAMTS13 activity helps in the differential diagnosis. Less than 10% ADAMTS13 activity is indicative of TTP. Laboratory ADAMTS13 activity assays include incubating the test plasma with the substrate (full-length VWM multimers) and detection with direct or indirect measurement of the cleavage product. The purpose of this study is to examine the diagnostic potential, advantages, and weaknesses of the ADAMTS13 potency in TTP.

BACKGROUND: A recent Phase 2/3 study in Japanese patients showed that caplacizumab was effective in treating immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), with a low rate of iTTP recurrence. ADAMTS13 activity is monitored weekly during caplacizumab treatment to guide discontinuation of caplacizumab and consequently avoid exacerbations or relapse. The aim of this study was to assess changes in ADAMTS13 activity/inhibitor levels during caplacizumab treatment in this patient population.
METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the Phase 2/3 study in Japanese patients was conducted. Patients ≥ 18 years old with confirmed iTTP received 10 mg of caplacizumab daily in conjunction with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunosuppression for 30 days post-TPE. Outcomes included time to recovery of ADAMTS13 activity, ADAMTS13 activity level at treatment end, incidence of ADAMTS13 inhibitor re-elevation (ie, inhibitor boosting) during treatment, time to platelet count recovery, number of days of TPE, and safety. Outcomes according to presence of inhibitor boosting were also assessed.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients had confirmed iTTP and were included in this analysis. Median (95% confidence interval) time to recovery of ADAMTS13 activity to ≥ 10%, ≥ 20%, and ≥ 60% was 14.6 (5.9-24.8), 18.5 (5.9-31.8), and 47.5 (18.5-60.9) days, respectively. Median (range) ADAMTS13 activity level at caplacizumab treatment end was 62.0% (29.0-101.0). Nine patients had ADAMTS13 inhibitor boosting. Delayed response of ADAMTS13 activity was observed in patients with inhibitor boosting. The median time to platelet count response and median number of TPE days were shorter in patients with inhibitor boosting compared with patients without inhibitor boosting. Rituximab was administered to almost all patients with inhibitor boosting (88.9%), after completion of TPE. Patients without inhibitor boosting who were treated with rituximab received it prior to completion of TPE. Only one patient experienced a recurrence, which occurred shortly after caplacizumab discontinuation due to an adverse event.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with iTTP, caplacizumab with TPE and immunosuppression may reduce the risk of ADAMTS13 inhibitor boosting if rituximab is administered early in the iTTP treatment period. Early administration of rituximab in addition to caplacizumab may prevent iTTP recurrence with inhibitor boosting.
BACKGROUND: NCT04074187.

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and ischemic end-organ injury due to microvascular platelet-rich thrombi. iTTP pathophysiology is based on a severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, the specific von Willebrand factor (vWF)-cleaving protease, due to anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies. Early diagnosis and treatment reduce the mortality. Frontline therapy includes daily plasma exchange (PEX) with fresh frozen plasma replacement and immunosuppression with corticosteroids. Caplacizumab has recently been added to frontline therapy. Caplacizumab is a nanobody that binds to the A1 domain of vWF, blocking the interaction of ultra-large vWF multimers with the platelet and thereby preventing the formation of platelet-rich thrombi. Caplacizumab reduces mortality due to ischemic events, refractoriness, and exacerbations after PEX discontinuation. Until now, the criteria for response to treatment mainly took into account the normalization of platelet count and discontinuation of PEX; with the use of caplacizumab leading to rapid normalization of platelet count, it has been necessary to redefine the response criteria, taking into account also the underlying autoimmune disease. Monitoring of ADAMTS13 activity is important to identify cases with a low value of activity (<10IU/L), requiring the optimization of immunosuppressive therapy with the addition of Rituximab. Rituximab is effective in patients with refractory disease or relapsing disease. Currently, the use of Rituximab has expanded, both in frontline treatment and during follow-up, as a pre-emptive approach. Some patients do not achieve ADAMTS13 remission following the acute phase despite steroids and rituximab treatment, requiring an individualized immunosuppressive approach to prevent clinical relapse. In iTTP, there is an increased risk of venous thrombotic events (VTEs) as well as arterial thrombotic events, and most occur after platelet normalization. Until now, there has been no consensus on the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients on caplacizumab because the drug is known to increase bleeding risk.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a fatal thrombotic disease caused by a marked decrease in the activity of ADAMTS13, a von Willebrand factor cleaving protease. In congenital TTP, ADAMTS13 activity is decreased by an abnormality in ADAMTS13, and in acquired TTP, by anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibody. Death from thrombosis in the acute phase has been an issue with conventional treatment of acquired TTP by plasma exchange or immunosuppressive therapy. However, the advent of caplacizumab, an anti-VWF nanobody, has made it possible to suppress thrombus formation and is expected to improve survival rates. In addition, some case series have shown the efficacy of caplacizumab without plasma exchange for acquired TTP, and this approach is being investigated in clinical trials. Fresh-frozen plasma is transfused to supply ADAMTS13 for congenital TTP, but frequent transfusions over a long period of time can lead to problems such as infection and allergic reactions. Novel therapies such as recombinant ADAMTS13 products and gene therapy are now under development, and show promise for future clinical use.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare disease that is part of a vast spectrum of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). Despite the rarity of TTP, clinicians must maintain a high suspicion of this disease. The condition is characterized by fever, low platelets, hemolytic anemia, renal abnormalities, and neurological dysfunction. However, all these symptoms are not necessarily present in all the patients. In this review, we describe a case of a 51-year-old female who presented to the emergency department (ED) with chief complaints of dizziness and lightheadedness, subsequently leading to a diagnosis of TTP, caused as a result of COVID-19. This review raises awareness so that there is early recognition of any hematological manifestations associated with COVID-19, reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. Due to the unpredictability of COVID-19 and its complications, robust research is needed to understand the mechanism and determine which patients are more at risk for adverse outcomes.

Background: The therapeutic management of immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) has recently benefited from the introduction of caplacizumab, an agent directed at the inhibition of platelet aggregation. This real-world analysis investigated the epidemiology and the demographic and clinical characteristics of iTTP patients in Italy before and after caplacizumab introduction in 2020. Methods: Hospitalized adults with iTTP were included using the administrative databases of healthcare entities covering 17 million residents. Epidemiological estimates of iTTP considered the 3-year period before and after caplacizumab introduction. After stratification by treatment with or without caplacizumab, iTTP patients were characterized for their baseline features. Results: The annual incidence before and after 2020 was estimated in the range of 4.3-5.8 cases/million and 3.6-4.6 cases/million, respectively. From 2018 to 2022, 393 patients with iTTP were included, and 42 of them were treated with caplacizumab. Caplacizumab-treated patients showed better clinical outcomes, with tendentially shorter hospital stays and lower mortality rates (no treated patients died at either 1 month or 3 months after caplacizumab treatment initiation, compared to 10.5% and 11.1% mortality rates at 1 and 3 months, respectively, of the untreated ones). Conclusions: These findings may suggest that caplacizumab advent provided clinical and survival benefits for patients with iTTP.

European real-world data indicate that front-line treatment with caplacizumab is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with delayed caplacizumab treatment. The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with an immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) episode treated with front-line versus delayed caplacizumab in the US. This retrospective cohort analysis of a US hospital database included adult patients (≥18 years) with an acute iTTP episode (a diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy and ≥1 therapeutic plasma exchange [TPE] procedure) from January 21, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Unadjusted baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared between patients who received front-line versus delayed (<2 vs ≥2 days after TPE initiation) caplacizumab treatment. Out of 39 patients, 16 (41.0%) received front-line and 23 (59.0%) received delayed treatment with caplacizumab. Baseline characteristics and symptoms were similar between the two groups. Patients who received front-line caplacizumab treatment had significantly fewer TPE administrations (median: 5.0 vs 12.0); and a significantly shorter hospital stay (median: 9.0 days vs 16.0 days) than patients receiving delayed caplacizumab therapy. Both of these were significantly lower in comparison of means (t-test P < .01). Median inpatient costs (inclusive of caplacizumab costs) were 54% higher in the delayed treated patients than in the front-line treated patients (median: $112 711 vs $73 318). TPE-specific cost was lower in the front-line treated cohort (median: $6 989 vs $10 917). In conclusion, front-line treatment with caplacizumab had shorter hospitalizations, lower healthcare resource utilization, and lower costs than delayed caplacizumab treatment after TPE therapy.

UNASSIGNED: Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare and life-threatening disorder. Caplacizumab has been the latest drug incorporated into the initial treatment of acute episodes, allowing for faster platelet recovery and a decrease in refractoriness, exacerbation, thromboembolic events, and mortality. However, caplacizumab is also associated with a bleeding risk and higher treatment costs, which prevent many centers from using it universally.
UNASSIGNED: Studies that included iTTP and/or caplacizumab to date were selected for this review using PubMed and MEDLINE platforms. We describe outcomes in the pre-caplacizumab era and after it, highlighting the benefits and risks of its use early in frontline, and also pointing out special situations that require careful management.
UNASSIGNED: It is clear that the availability of caplacizumab has significantly and favorably impacted the management of iTTP patients. Whether this improvement is cost-effective still remains uncertain, and data on long-term sequelae and different healthcare systems will help to clarify this point. In addition, evidence of the bleeding/thrombotic risk of iTTP patients under this drug needs to be better addressed in future studies.

Thrombocytopenia with concomitant anemia is a serious condition with a high mortality risk. Destruction of platelets, i.e., thrombocytopenia, can be secondary to either auto-antibodies (immune-mediated) or mechanical destruction (non-immune-mediated). The Coombs test is a widespread tool to differentiate between the two categories, resulting in different specific treatment approaches for each diagnosis. A peripheral blood smear can also help make the diagnosis; for instance, in cases of mechanical destruction such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), the red blood cell (RBC) shape looks fragmented, forming schistocytes. In rare instances, TTP can present with both schistocytes and a positive Coombs test, challenging the diagnosis of TTP. TTP is a hematological emergency requiring appropriate anticipation and the initiation of treatment prior to the confirmatory ADAMTS-13 test results. Mild forms of TTP can be managed with glucocorticoids and therapeutic plasma exchange. Refractory cases need more aggressive additional treatment with caplacizumab and rituximab. Caplacizumab is an expensive medication that is usually reserved for use after confirmation of a TTP diagnosis. The advantage of caplacizumab lies in its targeted mechanism of action against the A1 domain of the von Willebrand multimers that are normally destructed by the ADAMTS-13 enzyme. Here, we present a young female patient with confirmed TTP, and the initial diagnosis was challenged by the presence of antibodies with the Coombs test. Very little research has studied this rare instance and the appropriate treatment. Our case will save many future lives, as clinicians should be more aggressive in treating refractory TTP with a positive Coombs test.

暂无摘要。