OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients rehabilitated using a single implant supporting a crown with a cantilever extension or two implants supporting two single crowns.
METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a systematic review of relevant literature published from 2000 was conducted in the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases. Moreover, a manual search was performed. A meta-analysis of the resulting data was carried out. Peri-implant marginal bone level, probing pocket depth, prevalence of technical and mechanical complications, implant survival rate, and prosthesis survival rate were assessed.
RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed a non-statistically significant change in the peri-implant marginal bone level and probing pocket depth in the cantilever group and revealed a non-significant prevalence of technical complications, showing a 27% rate in the cantilever group. The analysis of the prosthesis survival rate in the cantilever group showed a mean survival rate of 99% while the comparison of the implant survival between the two groups revealed an odds ratio of 0.50.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a single implant supporting a crown with a cantilever extension does not result in lower implant survival rate if compared with two implants supporting two single crowns. Moreover, a high prosthesis survival rate was observed in the cantilever group even if the high prevalence of complications should be carefully considered by the clinician.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to assess clinical trials that have examined the materials, design, and bonding of ceramic cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) as a potential option for replacing missing anterior teeth. The evaluation primarily focuses on the rate of restoration failure and clinical complications.
METHODS: A thorough search of databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted. The most recent search was performed in October 2023. Clinical studies that compared ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs with double retainers or cantilevered RBFDPs using different ceramic materials or bonding systems were included. The outcome measures considered were restoration failure and complication rates.
RESULTS: Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled data showed a statistically significant decrease in complication events when using cantilever designs compared with double retainer designs (p < 0.05); however, there were no differences found between the two designs in terms of restoration failure. The complication and failure rate of cantilever RBFDPs did not show a statistically significant difference with or without ceramic primer application before luting with phosphate monomer-containing luting resin (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs have lower complication rates compared with those with double retainers. The use of a ceramic primer prior to luting composite resin for ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs decreases the occurrence of complications and failures, although this effect was not statistically significant. Additional research is required to confirm these findings. Glass ceramic cantilever RBFDPs showed a decrease in success after 6 years, requiring ongoing monitoring, but both zirconia and glass-infiltrated alumina cantilever RBFDPs have demonstrated durability with excellent long-term success and survival rates for up to 10 and 15 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Cantilever ceramic RBFDPs in the anterior region are a less invasive and valuable treatment option, providing good esthetic results.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the presence of a mesial cantilever influences the biomechanical behavior and screw loosening in fixed partial dentures (FPDs) with a distally tilted implant in the atrophic posterior maxilla and where to best place the distal implant.
METHODS: Two configurations of implant-supported four-unit FPDs were modelled using finite element analysis. Five interabutment distances were considered. The stress and strain distributions in the implants, abutments, and prosthetic screws were verified under occlusal loading. The development of the axial force on the abutments and screws was also examined. Two-sample t-tests were used to identify differences (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: The von Mises stress distributions of the components in the two configurations were similar, as were the maximum plastic strains of the distal prosthetic screws, distal implants, and 30° abutments. The difference in the maximum plastic strains of the straight abutments was statistically significant. The preload of the 30° abutment screws was significantly reduced after the initial loading. In the absence of a mesial cantilever, the axial force on the straight abutments increased. However, when a mesial cantilever was used, the preload of the straight abutments was maintained, and the axial force on the prosthetic screws fluctuated less. The axial force fluctuation of the abutments gradually decreased as the interabutment distance increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Mesial cantilever usage had minimal effect on stress or strain distribution in FPD implants, abutments, or prostheses. However, it helped resist screw loosening. The distal screw access hole was preferably positioned close to the prosthetic end.

BACKGROUND: Clinical scenarios frequently present challenges when patients exhibit asymmetrical mandibular atrophy. The dilemma arises: should we adhere to the conventional All-on-4 technique, or should we contemplate placing vertically oriented implants on the side with sufficient bone mass? This study aims to employ three-dimensional finite element analysis to simulate and explore the biomechanical advantages of each approach.
METHODS: A finite element model, derived from computed tomography (CT) data, was utilized to simulate the nonhomogeneous features of the mandible. Three configurations-All-on-4, All-on-5-v and All-on-5-o were studied. Vertical and oblique forces of 200 N were applied unilaterally, and vertical force of 100 N was applied anteriorly to simulate different masticatory mechanisms. The maximum von Mises stresses on the implant and framework were recorded, as well as the maximum equivalent strain in the peri-implant bone.
RESULTS: The maximum stress values for all designs were located at the neck of the distal implant, and the maximum strains in the bone tissue were located around the distal implant. The All-on-5-o and All-on-5-v models exhibited reduced stresses and strains compared to All-on-4, highlighting the potential benefits of the additional implant. There were no considerable differences in stresses and strains between the All-on-5-o and All-on-5-v groups.
CONCLUSIONS: With the presence of adequate bone volume on one side and severe atrophy of the contralateral bone, while the \"All-on-4 concept\" is a viable approach, vertical implant placement optimizes the transfer of forces between components and tissues.

Preclinical drug screening for cardiac toxicity has traditionally relied on observing changes in cardiomyocytes\' electrical activity, primarily through invasive patch clamp techniques or non-invasive microelectrode arrays (MEA). However, relying solely on field potential duration (FPD) measurements for electrophysiological assessment can miss the full spectrum of drug-induced toxicity, as different drugs affect cardiomyocytes through various mechanisms. A more comprehensive approach, combining field potential and contractility measurements, is essential for accurate toxicity profiling, particularly for drugs targeting contractile proteins without affecting electrophysiology. However, previously proposed platform has significant limitations in terms of simultaneous measurement. The novel platform addresses these issues, offering enhanced, non-invasive evaluation of drug-induced cardiotoxicity. It features eight cantilevers with patterned strain sensors and MEA, enabling real-time monitoring of both cardiomyocyte contraction force and field potential. This system can detect minimum cardiac contraction force of ≈2 µN and field potential signals with 50 µm MEA diameter, using the same cardiomyocytes in measurements of two parameters. Testing with six drugs of varied mechanisms of action, the platform successfully identifies these mechanisms and accurately assesses toxicity profiles, including drugs not inhibiting potassium channels. This innovative approach presents a comprehensive, non-invasive method for cardiac function assessment, poised to revolutionize preclinical cardiotoxicity screening.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate survival and technical complications of two-unit posterior implant-supported cantilever made of monolithic zirconia on titanium-base abutments (Zr-TiB) vs. porcelain-fused-to-metal on castable gold abutments (PFM-GA) using two different implant connections, internal butt-joint (IBJ) and internal conical (IC).
METHODS: Forty-eight implants (4.3 mm diameter) were divided into four groups (n = 12) to support 2-unit mandibular premolar cantilevers with two different materials (Zr-TiB vs. PFM-GA) and two connection types (IBJ vs. IC). Tested groups were as follows: (1) IBJ/Zr-TiB; (2) IBJ/PFM-GA; (3) IC/Zr-TiB; and (4) IC/PFM-GA. Specimens were thermomechanical aged (1,200,000 cycles, 98 N, 5-55°C) with occlusal axial load on the pontic. Catastrophic and non-catastrophic events were registered, and removal torque values measured before and after aging. Specimens surviving aging were subjected to loading until failure. Survival, total complication rates, torque loss (%), and bending moments were calculated.
RESULTS: From 48 specimens, 38 survived aging. Survival rates significantly varied from 16.7% (IC/PFM-GA) to 100% (IBJ/Zr-TiB; IBJ/PFM-GA; IC/Zr-TiB) (p < .01). Internal conical connection revealed significantly higher torque loss (IC/ZrTiB - 67%) compared to internal butt-joint (IBJ/Zr-TiB - 44%; IBJ/PFM-GA - 46%) (p < .01). Bending moments were higher in internal butt-joint connections than in internal conical (p < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Two-unit posterior implant-supported cantilever FDPs replacing mandibular premolars composed of monolithic zirconia on titanium-base abutments demonstrated higher mechanical stability compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal on castable gold abutments in this in vitro study. The internal conical connection combined with porcelain-fused-to-metal on gold abutments revealed a high number of failures; therefore, their clinical use may be considered cautiously for this indication.

We report on theoretical and experimental investigation of parametric amplification of acoustically excited vibrations in micromachined single-crystal silicon cantilevers electrostatically actuated by fringing fields. The device dynamics are analyzed using the Mathieu-Duffing equation, obtained using the Galerkin order reduction technique. Our experimental results show that omnidirectional acoustic pressure used as a noncontact source for linear harmonic driving is a convenient and versatile tool for the mechanical dynamic characterization of unpackaged, nonintegrated microstructures. The fringing field\'s electrostatic actuation allows for efficient parametric amplification of an acoustic signal. The suggested amplification approach may have applications in a wide variety of micromechanical devices, including resonant sensors, microphones and microphone arrays, and hearing aids. It can be used also for upward frequency tuning.

OBJECTIVE: To simulate the replacement of a premolar with an implant-supported cantilever fixed dental prosthesis (ICFDP) and how the fracture load is affected by implant type, positioning within the zirconia blank, and aging protocol.
METHODS: Seventy-two ICFDPs were designed either within the enamel- or dentin layer of a 4Y-PSZ blank for bone-level and tissue-level titanium-zirconium implants. Fracture load was obtained on the cantilever at baseline (no aging) or after aging in a chewing simulator with the load applied within the implant axis (axial aging) or on the cantilever (12 groups with n = 6). A three-way ANOVA was applied (α = .05).
RESULTS: A three-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect on fracture load values of implant type (p = .006) and aging (p < .001) but not for the position within the zirconia blank (p = .847). Fracture load values significantly increased from baseline bone level (608 ± 118 N) and tissue level (880 ± 293 N) when the implants were aged axially, with higher values for tissue level (1065 ± 182 N) than bone level (797 ± 113 N) (p < .001). However, when the force was applied to the cantilever, fracture load values decreased significantly for tissue-level (493 ± 70 N), while values for bone-level implants remained stable (690 ± 135 N).
CONCLUSIONS: For ICFDPs, the use of bone-level implants is reasonable as catastrophic failures are likely to be restricted to the restoration, whereas with tissue-level implants, the transmucosal portion of the implant is susceptible to deformation, making repair more difficult.

The cantilevered fixed partial denture (CFPD) is gaining recognition as a sound method of replacing missing teeth in the posterior sector. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate that this type of restoration can be performed in a single appointment. A 39-year-old patient presented herself to the dental department; she showed agenesis of the two first maxillary premolars with a totally closed mesio-distal gap and a recent loss of the 2 s maxillary premolars. This case report concerns the replacement of the upper left second premolar. The patient was treated with a mesial CFPD resting on an \"onlay-like\" retainer on the first molar and replacing the missing premolar with a cantilevered pontic. The dimensions of the connection\'s cross-section were maximized as much as possible (>20 mm2). The restoration was designed and produced using chairside CAD-CAM from a milled-reinforced glass-ceramic block (Emax CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent). The aesthetic and functional integration of the prosthesis was successful. The patient was examined at 11 months for a follow-up. At this early stage, satisfactory dental hygiene was observed, associated with a smooth prosthetic fit, no periodontal inflammation, normal probing, and no abnormal dental mobility.

In this paper, we provide a systematic review of atomic force microscopy (AFM), a fast-developing technique that embraces scanners, controllers, and cantilevers. The main objectives of this review are to analyze the available technical solutions of AFM, including the limitations and problems. The main questions the review addresses are the problems of working in contact, noncontact, and tapping AFM modes. We do not include applications of AFM but rather the design of different parts and operation modes. Since the main part of AFM is the cantilever, we focused on its operation and design. Information from scientific articles published over the last 5 years is provided. Many articles in this period disclose minor amendments in the mechanical system but suggest innovative AFM control and imaging algorithms. Some of them are based on artificial intelligence. During operation, control of cantilever dynamic characteristics can be achieved by magnetic field, electrostatic, or aerodynamic forces.