burn wound infection

烧伤创面感染
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    烧伤是一大负担,感染导致的高死亡率。金黄色葡萄球菌是烧伤伤口感染的主要病原体,由于抗生素耐药性和生物膜形成,可能难以治疗。抗生素的替代方法是使用噬菌体,感染和杀死细菌的病毒。我们调查了噬菌体治疗烧伤伤口感染的疗效,在猪和新开发的人类离体皮肤模型中。在这两种模型中,参考抗生素治疗(夫西地酸)和噬菌体治疗的疗效被确定为单一治疗,连续治疗,和预防。两种模型均显示在单次噬菌体处理后细菌负荷减少。增加噬菌体治疗的频率增加了人类离体皮肤模型中的噬菌体功效。但在猪模型中没有.在这两种模型中,用噬菌体预防可提高治疗效果。在所有情况下,噬菌体处理优于夫西地酸处理。两种模型都允许研究烧伤伤口中的噬菌体细菌动力学。总的来说,噬菌体治疗优于抗生素控制,突显了噬菌体治疗烧伤伤口感染的潜力。尤其是预防性使用。
    Burn wounds are a major burden, with high mortality rates due to infections. Staphylococcus aureus is a major causative agent of burn wound infections, which can be difficult to treat because of antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation. An alternative to antibiotics is the use of bacteriophages, viruses that infect and kill bacteria. We investigated the efficacy of bacteriophage therapy for burn wound infections, in both a porcine and a newly developed human ex vivo skin model. In both models, the efficacy of a reference antibiotic treatment (fusidic acid) and bacteriophage treatment was determined for a single treatment, successive treatment, and prophylaxis. Both models showed a reduction in bacterial load after a single bacteriophage treatment. Increasing the frequency of bacteriophage treatments increased bacteriophage efficacy in the human ex vivo skin model, but not in the porcine model. In both models, prophylaxis with bacteriophages increased treatment efficacy. In all cases, bacteriophage treatment outperformed fusidic acid treatment. Both models allowed investigation of bacteriophage-bacteria dynamics in burn wounds. Overall, bacteriophage treatment outperformed antibiotic control underlining the potential of bacteriophage therapy for the treatment of burn wound infections, especially when used prophylactically.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:感染仍然是烧伤患者发病和死亡的主要原因。烧伤伤口表面在热损伤后最初是无菌的,但最终被微生物定植。烧伤伤口被认为是在伤口和结痂中存在高浓度微生物时感染的。烧伤伤口感染可导致表皮成熟延迟,较高的疤痕形成,还有败血症.然而,烧伤患者通常由于受伤后全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的表现而被错误分类为脓毒症,尽管存在或不存在感染。
    方法:这是对麦纳麦Salmaniya医疗中心烧伤病房患者医疗记录的回顾性回顾,巴林,在2018年和2020年之间。人口统计数据,总体表面积(TBSA),初始温度,白细胞计数,淋巴细胞百分比,中性粒细胞百分比,并获得所有受试者的伤口培养物。进行Logistic回归分析以通过上述参数比较伤口感染的存在或不存在。
    结果:在412例中,68.2%为男性患者,研究人群的平均年龄为25.1岁(标准差(SD)=20.7)。金黄色葡萄球菌是所有研究人群中最普遍的生物体(n=31)(34.4%)。金黄色葡萄球菌是五岁以下患者中最常见的细菌,而铜绿假单胞菌是65岁以上成年人中最常见的细菌。未发现TBSA是伤口感染的良好预测因子。初始温度与伤口培养之间没有统计学上的显着关系(p值=0.056)。然而,逻辑回归显示,初始温度使伤口培养阳性的可能性增加了近三倍。
    结论:白细胞计数,淋巴细胞百分比,和中性粒细胞百分比在预测烧伤创面感染方面在临床上并不可靠。然而,初始温度可能是一个有用的预测。需要进一步的研究来确定烧伤伤口感染的可靠临床参数。
    BACKGROUND: Infection remains a chief cause of morbidity and mortality among burn patients. The burn wound surface is initially sterile after a thermal injury but eventually gets colonized by microorganisms. A burn wound is considered infected upon the presence of high concentrations of microorganisms in the wound and scab. Burn wound infections can lead to a delay in epidermal maturation, higher scar formation, and sepsis. However, burn patients are commonly misclassified as septic due to the manifestation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after their injury, despite the presence or absence of an infection.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective review of medical records of patients admitted to the burn unit in Salmaniya Medical Complex in Manama, Bahrain, between the years 2018 and 2020. Demographic data, total body surface area (TBSA), initial temperature, white blood cell count, lymphocyte percentage, neutrophil percentage, and wound cultures were obtained for all subjects. Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the presence or absence of wound infection by the aforementioned parameters.
    RESULTS: Of 412 cases, 68.2% were male patients, with a mean age for the studied population of 25.1 years (standard deviation (SD)=20.7). Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent organism across all of the study population (n=31)(34.4%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent organism in patients under the age of five, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism among adults older than 65 years of age. TBSA was not found to be a good predictor of wound infection. There was no statistically significant relation between initial temperature and wound culture (p-value=0.056). However, logistic regression revealed that the initial temperature increases the likelihood of positive wound culture by almost three times.
    CONCLUSIONS: White blood cell count, lymphocyte percentage, and neutrophil percentage were not clinically reliable in predicting burn wound infection. However, initial temperature might be a helpful predictor. Further research is needed to identify reliable clinical parameters of burn wound infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鲍曼不动杆菌属于ESKAPE组。由于其获得和发展对多种抗生素的耐药机制的能力,它被世界卫生组织列为关键优先群体,并且是全球关注的问题。美国的数据显示每年有500人死亡。该细菌的抗性机制包括酶途径,如β-内酰胺酶,碳青霉烯酶,和氨基糖苷修饰酶,渗透率降低,和外排泵的过表达。鲍曼不动杆菌已被证明拥有外排泵,被归类为MATE家族的成员,RND和MFS超家族,和SMR运输机。我们工作的目的是评估从烧伤患者中分离出的鲍曼不动杆菌临床菌株中外排泵的分布及其调节基因表达。方法:来自墨西哥国家康复研究所的临床微生物学实验室,选择199株。通过肉汤微量稀释进行抗生素敏感性以确定最小抑制浓度。使用羰基氰化物3-氯苯酰腙(CCCP)和苯丙氨酸-精氨酸-萘甲酰胺(PAN)与阿米卡星联合进行外排泵抑制剂的表型测定。头孢他啶,亚胺培南,美罗培南和左氧氟沙星.对与外排泵相关的结构基因进行了搜索,和adeR的相对表达,ades,并对adeL基因进行了分析。结果:在199株菌株中,186显示多药耐药性(MDR)。氟喹诺酮类药物的耐药率最高,米诺环素和阿米卡星的耐药率相对降低(分别为1.5和28.1)。氟喹诺酮类药物的外排活性表现出最高的表型检测(从85%到100%),而IMP对PAβN的活性最低,为27%,对CCCP的活性最低,为43.3%。在adeS和adeL中观察到过表达,adeR表现出过表达。结论来自我们机构的鲍曼不动杆菌的临床菌株表现出外排泵作为抗性机制之一。
    Acinetobacter baumannii belongs to the ESKAPE group. It is classified as a critical priority group by the World Health Organization and a global concern on account of its capacity to acquire and develop resistance mechanisms to multiple antibiotics. Data from the United States indicates 500 deaths annually. Resistance mechanisms of this bacterium include enzymatic pathways such as ß-lactamases, carbapenemases, and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, decreased permeability, and overexpression of efflux pumps. A. baumannii has been demonstrated to possess efflux pumps, which are classified as members of the MATE family, RND and MFS superfamilies, and SMR transporters. The aim of our work was to assess the distribution of efflux pumps and their regulatory gene expression in clinical strains of A. baumannii isolated from burned patients. METHODS: From the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory at the Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra collection in Mexico, 199 strains were selected. Antibiotics susceptibilities were performed by broth microdilutions to determine minimal inhibitory concentrations. Phenotypic assays with efflux pump inhibitors were conducted using carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) and phenylalanine-arginine ß-naphthylamide (PAßN) in conjunction with amikacin, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem and levofloxacin. A search was conducted for structural genes that are linked to efflux pumps, and the relative expression of the adeR, adeS, and adeL genes was analyzed. RESULTS: Among a total of 199 strains, 186 exhibited multidrug resistance (MDR). Fluoroquinolones demonstrated the highest resistance rates, while minocycline and amikacin displayed comparatively reduced resistance rates (1.5 and 28.1, respectively). The efflux activity of fluorquinolones exhibited the highest phenotypic detection (from 85 to 100%), while IMP demonstrated the lowest activity of 27% with PAßN and 43.3% with CCCP. Overexpression was observed in adeS and adeL, with adeR exhibiting overexpression. Concluding that clinical strains of A. baumannii from our institution exhibited efflux pumps as one of the resistance mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:烧伤后的坏死性烧伤伤口感染很少见。关于这些案件的文献也很少。除非得到适当的管理,否则这些感染会危及生命和肢体。它们也构成了重大的重建挑战,特别是在缺乏微血管能力的环境中。该报告描述了一种肢体保存策略,用于威胁腿部坏死性感染,并导致烧伤。采用了创新的方法,利用腓骨近端切除手术,双蒂局部推进皮瓣和分裂厚度植皮。
    方法:一名26岁的女性患者在三天内因燃烧木炭导致的右腿接触烧伤后,出现在我们的烧伤病房。入学的第二天,患者的伤口外观发生了明显的变化,导致坏死性肌炎的诊断。紧急清创术是为了保护肢体。后续成功,尽管次优,尽管烧伤单位缺乏微血管手术能力,但仍实现了重建。
    结论:本病例报告和文献综述描述了一种罕见的危及肢体的坏死性烧伤创面感染。使用简单但很少描述的重建技术解决了缺陷带来的重大重建挑战。还强调了肢体保存在LMIC中的重要性。
    结论:使用简单的重建技术可以达到保留肢体的目标,尽管缺乏微血管功能。
    BACKGROUND: Necrotizing burn wound infections following burn injuries are rare. Literature on these cases is also scarce. These infections are life- and limb- threatening unless properly managed. They also pose significant reconstructive challenge, especially in settings lacking microvascular capability. This report describes a limb preservation strategy for limb-threatening necrotizing infection of the leg that complicated a burn injury. Innovative approach was used, utilizing proximal fibular ostectomy, bipedicled local advancement flap and split thickness skin graft.
    METHODS: A 26-year-old female patient presented to our burn unit after sustaining a contact burn injury from a burning charcoal to her right lateral leg within three days. On the second day of admission, the patient developed significant changes in the appearance of the wound, leading to the diagnosis of necrotizing myofacitis. Emergent debridements were done with the aim of preserving the limb. Subsequent successful, albeit sub-optimal, reconstruction was also achieved despite the lack of microvascular surgical capability in the burn unit.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case report and literature review describes a rare limb-threatening necrotizing burn wound infection. The significant reconstructive challenge posed by the defect was addressed using a simple but rarely described reconstructive technique. The importance of limb preservation in LMIC is also emphasized.
    CONCLUSIONS: The goal of preserving a limb can be met by using a simple reconstructive technique, despite the lack of microvascular capabilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:铜绿假单胞菌(PA)的医院伤口感染是严重的并发症,通常是导致烧伤患者败血症死亡的原因。目的:高强度抗菌蓝光(aBL)治疗可能代表PA感染的替代疗法,并将在本研究中进行研究。方法:通过悬浮液测定法确定发光二极管阵列(450-460nm;300mW/cm2;15/30分钟;270/540J/cm2)对PA的抗菌作用。生物膜测定,和人皮肤伤口模型,并与局部施用3%柠檬酸(CA)和伤口冲洗溶液(Prontosan®;PRT)的15分钟进行比较。结果:aBL减少了细菌数量[2.51-3.56log10菌落形成单位(CFU)/mL],而PRT或CA治疗在悬浮试验中实现了4.64或6.60log10CFU/mL的降低.aBL减少了60-66%的生物膜形成。PRT或CA治疗显示减少25%或13%。这里,aBL减少了生物膜中的细菌数量(1.30-1.64log10CFU),但低于PRT(2.41log10CFU)或CA(2.48log10CFU)。在伤口皮肤模型中,aBL(2.21-2.33log10CFU)显示与PRT(2.26log10CFU)和CA(2.30log10CFU)相同程度的细菌减少。结论:aBL在短时间内表现出对PA和生物膜形成的显著抗菌功效。然而,ABL在伤口治疗中的临床应用需要有效的积极皮肤冷却和眼睛保护,这反过来可能会限制临床实施。
    Background: Nosocomial wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. Objective: High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. Methods: Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm2; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm2) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan®; PRT). Results: aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log10 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log10 CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log10 CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log10 CFU) or CA (2.48 log10 CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log10 CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log10 CFU) and CA (2.30 log10 CFU). Conclusions: aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:铜绿假单胞菌(PA)的医院伤口感染是严重的并发症,通常是导致烧伤患者败血症死亡的原因。高强度抗微生物蓝光(aBL)治疗可能是PA感染的替代疗法。方法:通过悬浮液测定法测定发光二极管(LED)阵列(450-460nm;300mW/cm2;15/30分钟;270/540J/cm2)对PA的抗菌作用。生物膜测定,和人皮肤伤口模型,并与局部施用3%柠檬酸(CA)和伤口冲洗溶液(Prontosan®;PRT)的15分钟进行比较。结果:aBL降低了细菌数量(2.51-3.56log10CFU/mL),而PRT或CA治疗在悬浮试验中实现了4.64或6.60log10CFU/mL的降低.aBL使生物膜形成减少60%-66%。PRT或CA治疗显示减少25%或13%。在这项研究中,aBL减少了生物膜中的细菌数量(1.30-1.64log10CFU),但程度低于PRT(2.41log10CFU)或CA(2.48log10CFU)。在伤口皮肤模型中,aBL(2.21-2.33log10CFU)显示与PRT(2.26log10CFU)和CA(2.30log10CFU)相同程度的细菌减少。结论:aBL在短时间内对PA和生物膜形成具有明显的抗菌作用。然而,ABL在伤口治疗中的临床应用需要有效的积极皮肤冷却和眼睛保护,这反过来可能会限制临床实施。
    Background: Nosocomial wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for septic mortality of burn patients. High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections. Methods: Antibacterial effects of an light-emitting diode (LED) array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm2; 15/30 min; 270/540J/cm2) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan®; PRT). Results: The aBL reduced the bacterial number (2.51-3.56 log10 CFU/mL), whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log10 CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. The aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60%-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. In this study, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log10 CFU), but to a lower extent than PRT (2.41 log10 CFU) or CA (2.48 log10 CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log10 CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log10 CFU) and CA (2.30 log10 CFU). Conclusions: The aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:铜绿假单胞菌(P.铜绿假单胞菌)是烧伤伤口定植的主要罪魁祸首,煽动严重的严重感染。在这项研究中,我们对从烧伤患者中分离出的难以治疗的广泛耐药铜绿假单胞菌(DT-XDR)进行了比较全基因组分析,以阐明基因组多样性,分子模式,负责赋予抗菌素耐药性和毒力的机制和基因。
    方法:P.铜绿假单胞菌SHNIBPS206从严重受伤的烧伤患者的感染烧伤伤口中分离出来。进行全基因组测序并用Prokka注释。序列类型,血清型,抗菌素耐药基因和机制,毒力基因,研究了金属抗性基因和CRISPR/Cas系统。稍后,进行pangenome分析以发现基因组多样性。
    结果:P.铜绿假单胞菌SHNIBPS206(MLST357,血清型O11)对包括碳青霉烯类在内的14种抗生素具有耐药性,并含有所有四类β内酰胺酶产生基因:A类(blaPME-1,blaVEB-9),B类(blaNDM-1),C类(blaPDC-11)和D类(blaOXA-846)。PorinD的突变分析给出了有价值的见解。几个外排泵,还检测了毒力和金属抗性基因。Pangenome分析揭示了铜绿假单胞菌不同菌株之间的高度基因组多样性。
    结论:据我们所知,这是来自孟加拉国的广泛耐药的ST357铜绿假单胞菌的第一份报告,这是一种流行的高风险铜绿假单胞菌克隆。需要进一步的研究和深入的全面研究来调查孟加拉国铜绿假单胞菌这种高风险克隆的患病率。
    OBJECTIVE: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) stands out as a key culprit in the colonization of burn wounds, instigating grave infections of heightened severity. In this study, we have performed comparative whole genome analysis of a difficult to treat extensively drug resistant P. aeruginosa isolated from a burn patient in order to elucidate genomic diversity, molecular patterns, mechanisms and genes responsible for conferring antimicrobial resistance and virulence.
    METHODS: P. aeruginosa SHNIBPS206 was isolated from an infected burn wound of a critically injured burn patient. Whole genome sequencing was carried out and annotated with Prokka. Sequence type, serotype, antimicrobial resistance genes and mechanisms, virulence genes, metal resistance genes and CRISPR/Cas systems were investigated. Later, pangenome analysis was carried out to find out genomic diversity.
    RESULTS: P. aeruginosa SHNIBPS206 (MLST 357, Serotype O11) was resistant to 14 antibiotics including carbapenems and harboured all four classes of beta lactamase producing genes: Class A (blaPME-1, blaVEB-9), Class B (blaNDM-1), Class C (blaPDC-11) and Class D (blaOXA-846). Mutational analysis of Porin D gave valuable insights. Several efflux pump, virulence and metal resistance genes were also detected. Pangenome analysis revealed high genomic diversity among different strains of P. aeruginosa.
    CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of an extensively drug resistant ST 357 P. aeruginosa from Bangladesh, which is an epidemic high-risk P. aeruginosa clone. Further research and in-depth comprehensive studies are required to investigate the prevalence of such high-risk clone of P. aeruginosa in Bangladesh.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是烧伤患者中最常见的病原体之一,发病率和死亡率很高。探讨MRSA在烧伤创面感染中的流行病学特征,我们对2013~2022年中国东南部烧伤创面感染患者分离出的MRSA进行了为期10年的回顾性研究.
    随机选择并招募了2013年至2022年烧伤患者中烧伤伤口感染的100株MRSA分离株(每年10株)。除了100例烧伤患者的临床资料外,MRSA分离株通过抗菌药物敏感性试验进行表征,检测毒素基因,和分子分型。
    从烧伤和入院到检测到MRSA的中位时间为13天和5天,分别。没有发现MRSA分离株对喹诺普汀/达福普汀有抗性,利奈唑胺,和万古霉素.毒素基因seg最常见(90%),其次是sea(70%)和eta(64%)。CC8(74%),ST239(70%),SCCmecIII(72%)是最常见的CC,ST,和SCCmec类型,分别。
    ST239-III(70%)是中国东南部烧伤患者烧伤伤口感染的MRSA中发现的主要克隆。从2018年到2022年,ST239-III的发现较少。最近5年观察到MRSA克隆的多样性高于2013年至2017年。
    UNASSIGNED: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most commonly encountered pathogens among burn patients incurring substantial morbidity and mortality. To investigate the epidemiology and features of MRSA in burn wound infections, we conducted a 10-year retrospective study on MRSA isolated from burn patients with burn wound infections from southeast China from 2013 to 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred MRSA isolates (10 isolates each year) from burn wound infection among burn patients from 2013 to 2022 were randomly selected and enrolled. In addition to the clinical data of the 100 burn patients, MRSA isolates were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility testing, detection of toxin genes, and molecular typing.
    UNASSIGNED: The median time from the onset of burns and admission to MRSA detected was 13 and 5 days, respectively. No MRSA isolate was found resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, and vancomycin. Toxin gene seg was found most frequently (90%) followed by sea (70%) and eta (64%). CC8 (74%), ST239 (70%), and SCCmec III (72%) were the most common CC, ST, and SCCmec types, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: ST239-III (70%) was the predominant clone found in MRSA from burn wound infection among burn patients in southeast China. ST239-III was less found from 2018 to 2022. A higher diversity of MRSA clones was observed in these recent 5 years than that from 2013 to 2017.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于过度炎症,烧伤伤口愈合继续构成重大挑战,感染的风险,和受损的组织再生。在这方面,我们开发了一种抗菌药物,抗氧化剂,和抗炎纳米复合材料(称为HPA),该复合材料将使用六氯环三磷腈的纳米系统和福乐定的天然多酚与银纳米颗粒(AgNP)结合在一起。HPA有效分散AgNPs,以减轻聚集引起的任何毒性,同时也显示了根皮素的药理活性。在伤口愈合的初始阶段,HPA从其表面迅速释放银离子以抑制细菌活性。此外,这些纳米颗粒对pH敏感,在酸性感染微环境中有效降解,逐渐释放根皮素。Phloretin的持续释放有助于清除受感染微环境区域中过度表达的活性氧,从而减少促炎细胞因子的上调。我们验证了抗菌活性,自由基清除,并通过体外实验对HPA的炎症因子进行调控。此外,我们在体内使用感染性烧伤小鼠模型评估了其效果。发现HPA促进伤口区域的胶原沉积和上皮形成。凭借其协同抗菌,抗氧化剂,和抗炎活性,以及良好的生物相容性,HPA作为用于烧伤伤口敷料的安全有效的多功能纳米平台显示出巨大的希望。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    Burn wound healing continues to pose significant challenges due to excessive inflammation, the risk of infection, and impaired tissue regeneration. In this regard, an antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory nanocomposite (called HPA) that combines a nanosystem using hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene and the natural polyphenol of Phloretin with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) is developed. HPA effectively disperses AgNPs to mitigate any toxicity caused by aggregation while also showing the pharmacological activities of Phloretin. During the initial stage of wound healing, HPA rapidly releases silver ions from its surface to suppress bacterial activity. Moreover, these nanoparticles are pH-sensitive and degrade efficiently in the acidic infection microenvironment, gradually releasing Phloretin. This sustained release of Phloretin helps scavenge overexpressed reactive oxygen species in the infected microenvironment area, thus reducing the upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The antibacterial activity, free radical clearance, and regulation of inflammatory factors of HPA through in vitro experiments are validated. Additionally, its effects using an infectious burn mouse model in vivo are evaluated. HPA is found to promote collagen deposition and epithelialization in the wound area. With its synergistic antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities, as well as favorable biocompatibilities, HPA shows great promise as a safe and effective multifunctional nanoplatform for burn injury wound dressings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    金黄色葡萄球菌(S.金黄色葡萄球菌)是烧伤伤口感染的最常见病原体,这往往导致高发病率和死亡率。然而,福建省对烧伤创面感染金黄色葡萄球菌的分子流行病学和抗菌药物敏感性的认识不足,中国。
    在2016年至2021年之间,从福建的烧伤伤口感染中收集了90株金黄色葡萄球菌,中国,其中耐甲氧西林(MRSA)菌株59株,耐甲氧西林(MSSA)菌株31株。这些被研究的分子特征,毒力基因,生物膜,和抗菌敏感性。采用多位点序列分型(MLST)对所有分离株进行基因分型,spa打字,agr打字,和SCCmec打字。进行常规PCR以检测毒力基因。通过组织培养板测定(TCP)评估生物膜形成能力。使用稀释法评估分离物的抗菌敏感性。
    总共,根据多位点序列分型(MLST)和spa分型鉴定出37种序列类型(ST)和34种葡萄球菌蛋白A(spa)类型(包括一种名为spa-t20720的新类型)。分别。CC8-ST239-t030-agrI-SCCmecIII(57.6%,34/59)和CC7-ST7-t091-agrI(16.1%,5/31)代表了MRSA和MSSA分离株的主要克隆,分别。抗生素敏感性测试发现,ST239和非ST239分离株之间的耐药率存在显着差异(p<0.05)。检测到12个毒力基因,其中最常见的是icaA和icaD(均为100%),其次是icaB和icaC(均为96.7%),icaR(95.6%),lukED(81.1%),卢卡(62.2%),pvl(50%),hlgBC(26.7%),和eta(4.4%)。此外,LukAB,hlgBC,agrI,和agrIII与烧伤严重程度显着相关(p<0.05)。MRSA分离株的可能性较小,与MSSA分离株相比,携带pvl,LukAB,和hlgBC(p<0.05)。一种新的温泉类型,t20720,被识别为包含pvl,luked,LukAB,hlgBC,icaA,icaB,icaC,icaD,和icaR基因并具有较强的生物膜形成能力。
    CC8-ST239-t030-agrI-SCCmecIII和CC7-ST-7-t091-agrI是福建烧伤创面感染的MRSA和MSSA分离株的普遍分子特征,中国,分别。新发现的spa-t20720分离株,携带广泛的毒力基因,具有很强的生物膜形成能力,需要特别的临床关注。
    UNASSIGNED: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the most common causative agent of burn wound infection, that often leads to high morbidity and mortality. However, there is not enough knowledge about the molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of S. aureus isolates from burn wound infections in Fujian, China.
    UNASSIGNED: Between 2016 and 2021, 90 S. aureus isolates were collected from burn wound infections in Fujian, China, including 59 methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains and 31 methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) strains. These were investigated for molecular characteristics, virulence genes, biofilms, and antimicrobial susceptibility. All the isolates were genotyped by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), spa typing, agr typing, and SCCmec typing. Conventional PCR was performed for the detection of virulence genes. Biofilm formation capacity was assessed by tissue culture plate assay (TCP). The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates was evaluated using the dilution method.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 37 sequence types (ST) and 34 Staphylococcal protein A (spa) types (including a new type named spa-t20720) were identified based on multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and spa typing, respectively. CC8-ST239-t030-agrI-SCCmecIII (57.6%,34/59) and CC7-ST7-t091-agrI (16.1%, 5/31) represented the main clone of MRSA and MSSA isolates, respectively. Antibiotic susceptibility testing identified a significant difference in resistance rates between ST239 and non-ST239 isolates (p < 0.05). Twelve virulence genes were detected, of which the most common were icaA and icaD (both 100%), followed by icaB and icaC (both 96.7%), icaR (95.6%), lukED (81.1%), lukAB (62.2%), pvl (50%), hlgBC (26.7%), and eta (4.4%). Moreover, lukAB, hlgBC, agrI, and agrIII were significantly correlated with burn severity (p < 0.05). MRSA isolates were less likely, compared with MSSA isolates, to carry pvl, lukAB, and hlgBC (p < 0.05). A new spa type, t20720, was identified that contains pvl, lukED, lukAB, hlgBC, icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD, and icaR genes and has strong biofilm formation ability.
    UNASSIGNED: CC8-ST239-t030-agrI-SCCmecIII and CC7-ST-7-t091-agrI were the prevalent molecular signatures of MRSA and MSSA isolates from burn wound infections in Fujian, China, respectively. The newly identified spa-t20720 isolate, which carries a wide range of virulence genes and has strong biofilm formation ability, requires special clinical attention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号