buddy

buddy
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    枫糖浆行业产生不合格的糖浆和糖沙作为副产品,这些都没有得到充分利用。在这项研究中,我们对这些产品的理化成分进行了全面分析,以评估其增值潜力。使用HPLC分析,我们使用Folin-Ciocalteu方法测量了糖和有机酸含量以及总多酚含量。此外,我们使用TIM-1模型评估了体外消化率。我们发现,Tropy和buddy降级糖浆的成分与标准枫糖浆相当,而糖砂的成分是高度可变的,碳水化合物含量为5.01mg/g至652.89mg/g,多酚含量为11.30µg/g至120.95µg/g。体外生物可利用性达到所有副产品总糖的70%。相对于标准枫糖浆,糖沙和糖浆的有机酸生物可获得性分别达到76%和109%,分别。消化过程中多酚生物可及性超过100%。这可以归因于有利的提取条件,复杂多酚形式和食品基质的分解。总之,我们的研究表明,糖沙和降级的枫糖浆表现出与标准枫糖浆相当的消化率。因此,它们具有作为多酚来源的潜力,用于工业发酵或牲畜饲料等应用的糖或有机酸。
    The maple syrup industry generates substandard syrups and sugar sand as by-products, which are underused. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the physicochemical composition of these products to assess their potential for valorization. Using HPLC analysis, we measured sugar and organic acid content as well as total polyphenol content using the Folin-Ciocalteu method. Additionally, we evaluated the in vitro digestibility using the TIM-1 model. We showed that the composition of ropy and buddy downgraded syrups is comparable to that of standard maple syrup, whereas sugar sand\'s composition is highly variable, with carbohydrate content ranging from 5.01 mg/g to 652.89 mg/g and polyphenol content ranging from 11.30 µg/g to 120.95 µg/g. In vitro bioaccessibility reached 70% of total sugars for all by-products. Organic acid bioaccessibility from sugar sand and syrup reached 76% and 109% relative to standard maple syrup, respectively. Polyphenol bioaccessibility exceeded 100% during digestion. This can be attributed to favorable extraction conditions, the breakdown of complex polyphenol forms and the food matrix. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that sugar sand and downgraded maple syrups exhibit digestibility comparable to that of standard maple syrup. Consequently, they hold potential as a source of polyphenols, sugar or organic acids for applications such as industrial fermentation or livestock feeds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估旨在改善体力活动的伙伴式干预的持续效果。
    方法:平行组,开放标签,随机对照试验。
    方法:三个成人日托中心。
    方法:65名社区居住的残疾老年人。
    方法:所有参与者都接受了为期12周的家庭锻炼计划。干预组(n=33)每周在成人日托中心接受一次5-10分钟的伙伴式干预。
    方法:主要结果是干预后24周随访时每天平均花费的“在家外散步”和“肌肉力量锻炼”时间。
    结果:在65名参与者中,每个小组都有一名参与者在节目开始前退出,通过12周的评估,干预组和对照组分别为4和5,和4和3的24周评估,分别。对24周后能够评估的47名参与者的协方差分析显示,干预组(n=24)的户外步行时间(分钟/天)明显长于对照组(n=23)在24周(干预组,73.5[66.1];对照组,42.7[45.5];P=0.030,f=0.38)。24周时两组肌力锻炼持续时间(min/day)无显著性差异(干预组,8.2[9.7];对照组,6.5[9.3];P=0.593,f=0.08)。
    结论:伙伴式干预增加了户外步行的持续时间,在干预结束后的12周内持续有效。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the sustained effects of a buddy-style intervention aiming to improve physical activity.
    METHODS: A parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled trial.
    METHODS: Three adult day-care centers.
    METHODS: Sixty-five community-dwelling older adults with disabilities.
    METHODS: All participants received a 12-week home-based exercise program. An intervention group (n = 33) received a 5-10 min buddy-style intervention once a week at an adult day-care center for older adults.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was the average daily time spent performing \"walking outside home\" and \"muscle strength exercises\" at 24 weeks follow-up post-intervention.
    RESULTS: Of the 65 participants, one participant in each group dropped out before the program began, 4 and 5 in the intervention and control groups by the 12-week assessment, and 4 and 3 by the 24-week assessment, respectively. Analysis of covariance of the 47 participants who were able to be assessed after 24 weeks revealed that outdoor walking time (min/day) was significantly longer in the intervention group (n = 24) than in the control group (n = 23) at 24 weeks (intervention group, 73.5 [66.1]; control group, 42.7 [45.5]; P = 0.030, f = 0.38). There was no significant difference in the duration of muscle strength exercises (min/day) between the two groups at 24 weeks (intervention group, 8.2 [9.7]; control group, 6.5 [9.3]; P = 0.593, f = 0.08).
    CONCLUSIONS: The buddy-style intervention increased the duration of outdoor walking, with a sustained effect up to 12 weeks after the end of the intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the preliminary effects of a buddy-style intervention to improve exercise adherence.
    METHODS: A parallel-group, open-label, pilot randomized controlled trial.
    METHODS: Adult day-care centers.
    METHODS: Sixty-five disabled older adults.
    METHODS: All participants underwent a 12-week home exercise program, and the intervention group received a 5-10 min buddy-style intervention between older adults in the intervention group once weekly at an adult day-care center.
    METHODS: Based on the exercise log calendar, the number of days of exercise was assessed for each of the three phases: 1-4 weeks, 5-8 weeks, and 9-12 weeks. Short physical performance battery was measured at baseline and after 12 weeks.
    RESULTS: Of the 590 screened older adults, 65 were recruited and 33 were assigned to the intervention group. One participant in each group withdrew before the program began, and four and five patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, dropped out by the 12-week assessment. Analysis of covariance of the 28 and 26 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, for whom exercise log calendars could be retrieved, showed that the intervention group (24.4/28 days) exercised significantly more days than the control group (20.6/28 days) at 9-12 weeks (P = 0.009). In the between-group effect of the intention-to-treat analysis of short physical performance battery, walking and standing test (P = 0.790, P = 0.829) were not significantly different, and balance test (P = 0.049) was significantly better in the control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was a preliminary effect of the buddy-style intervention to improve exercise adherence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    吸烟是最大的公共卫生威胁之一。智能手机应用程序为实时支持戒烟提供了新的有希望的机会。这项随机对照试验调查了一个应用程序的有效性,该应用程序鼓励个人在日常生活中在社交网络成员(好友)的帮助下戒烟。
    这项研究的目的是测试SmokeFree好友应用程序与对照组的有效性,对照组以自我报告的戒烟和一氧化碳(CO)验证的戒烟为主要结果,而每日吸烟的自我报告(CPD)为次要结果。
    共有162名吸烟的成年人参加了这种单盲活动,双臂,平行组,密集的纵向随机对照试验。大约在一个自我设定的戒烟日期(即,自我设定的退出日期前7天,之后20天)和6个月后,干预组和对照组的参与者在日终日记中报告每日戒烟和CPD.通过每日呼出CO评估验证每日禁烟。此评估是通过显示呼出CO的结果的应用程序进行的,从而解决了两组的自我监控问题。此外,干预组中的参与者使用了SmokeFree好友应用程序,一个多组件的应用程序,促进社会支持从一个朋友的选择。
    两组参与者从基线到6个月随访时CPD均显著降低。多水平分析显示,在戒烟日期和3周后,对自我报告和共同验证的每日禁烟没有显着干预作用。然而,干预组在戒烟日和3周后的CPD低于对照组。在戒烟日期后6个月,两组之间的任何结果指标均未发现显着差异。总的来说,观察到低应用程序参与度和低感知有用性。
    尽管对吸烟量有一些令人鼓舞的短期发现,SmokeFree好友应用程序在自我监测控制条件之外对戒烟没有有益的影响。未来的研究应该研究是否可以有效地刺激支持过程以及如何改善应用程序的使用以更好地实现这一目标。
    ISRCTN注册表11154315;https://www。isrctn.com/ISRCTN11154315.
    RR2-10.1186/s12889-019-7723-z。
    Tobacco smoking is one of the biggest public health threats. Smartphone apps offer new promising opportunities for supporting smoking cessation in real time. This randomized controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of an app that encourages individuals to quit smoking with the help of a social network member (buddy) in daily life.
    The objective of this study is to test the effectiveness of the SmokeFree buddy app compared with a control group with self-reported smoking abstinence and carbon monoxide (CO)-verified smoking abstinence as primary outcomes and self-reports of smoked cigarettes per day (CPD) as a secondary outcome.
    A total of 162 adults who smoked participated in this single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, intensive longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Around a self-set quit date (ie, 7 days before the self-set quit date and 20 days after) and 6 months later, participants of the intervention and control groups reported on daily smoking abstinence and CPD in end-of-day diaries. Daily smoking abstinence was verified via daily exhaled CO assessments. This assessment was administered via an app displaying results of exhaled CO, thus addressing self-monitoring in both groups. In addition, participants in the intervention group used the SmokeFree buddy app, a multicomponent app that facilitates social support from a buddy of choice.
    A significant reduction in CPD from baseline to the 6-month follow-up was observed among participants in both groups. Multilevel analyses revealed no significant intervention effect on self-reported and CO-verified daily smoking abstinence at the quit date and 3 weeks later. However, CPD was lower at the quit date and 3 weeks later in the intervention group than in the control group. No significant differences between groups were found for any outcome measures 6 months after the quit date. Overall, low app engagement and low perceived usefulness were observed.
    Despite some encouraging short-term findings on the amount of smoking, the SmokeFree buddy app did not have beneficial effects on smoking abstinence over and above the self-monitoring control condition. Future studies should examine whether and what support processes can be effectively stimulated and how app use can be improved to better achieve this goal.
    ISRCTN Registry 11154315; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11154315.
    RR2-10.1186/s12889-019-7723-z.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对脆弱的生活方式干预措施的实施知之甚少,社区居民。这项研究强调了不同的遵守领域,以解释有效交付的基于家庭的干预措施。
    80名体弱者(≥65岁)参加了体能训练,营养,和社会支持干预超过24周。为了评估遵守情况和进一步的组织,保留了一份详细的日志,以提供全面的文档,锻炼,和营养参数。
    从第1-12/13-24周,参与者的依从率(进行家庭访问/计划访问次数)达到84.0/80.5%。其中,59%的人进行了≥75%的提供的访问。年龄较大与较高的依从率相关。实现平均1.5(0.6)次/周(计划2次),平均持续1.5(0.9)小时(计划持续时间的154%)。每次访问,进行了1.2(0.6)次力量训练(计划值的60.5%)和0.5(0.3)次营养干预(47%)。十二个月后,4.2%的人仍然定期进行家访,25.0%的人偶尔进行家访。
    坚持不仅仅是“在那里”。坚持率和类别是描述复杂生活方式干预的实施的有限参数,因此,需要一份全面的文件。
    Little is known about the implementation of lifestyle interventions in frail, community-dwelling people. This study highlights different domains of adherence to explain an effectively delivered home-based intervention.
    Eighty prefrail and frail persons (≥65 years) participated in a physical training, nutritional, and social support intervention over 24 weeks. A detailed log book was kept for comprehensive documentation in order to assess adherence and further organizational, exercise, and nutritional parameters.
    Participants reached an adherence rate (performed home visits/number of planned visits) of 84.0/80.5% from week 1-12/13-24. Out of those, 59% carried out ≥75% of the offered visits. Older age was associated with a higher adherence rate. A mean of 1.5 (0.6) visits/week (2 were planned) were realized lasting for a mean of 1.5 (0.9) hours (154% of the planned duration). Per visit, 1.2 (0.6) circuits of strength training were performed (60.5% of the planned value) and 0.5 (0.3) nutritional interventions (47%). After twelve months, 4.2% still carried out the home visits regularly and 25.0% occasionally.
    Adherence is much more than \"being there\". Adherence rate and category are limited parameters to describe the implementation of a complex lifestyle intervention, therefore a comprehensive documentation is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    参加力量训练(ST)的老年人不到20%。ST参与的障碍包括不知道去哪里或没有人一起去。为了解决这些障碍,作者向老年人提供了同伴(已经参加ST的老年人)以支持他们的参与.这项试点随机对照试验的目的是确定参与ST时提供同伴的老年人是否更有可能在干预后4周参与ST。与那些单独接受ST的人相比。招募了51名ST参与者;40人完成了干预和干预后数据收集(78.4%)。向ST提供同行支持并没有显著增加ST参与(p=.775)。然而,随着时间的推移,两组的下肢力量和活动能力均有显著改善.继续ST计划的两组参与者(55%)在下肢力量和活动能力方面都有了显着改善。
    Fewer than 20% of older adults participate in strength training (ST). Barriers to ST participation include not knowing where to go or not having someone to go with. To address these barriers, the authors provided older adults with a peer (older person already participating in ST) to support their engagement. The aim of this pilot randomized controlled trial was to determine whether older adults who were provided with a peer when participating in ST were more likely to be participating in ST 4 weeks postintervention, compared with those receiving ST alone. Fifty-one ST participants were recruited; 40 completed the intervention and postintervention data collection (78.4%). Providing peer support with ST did not significantly increase ST participation (p = .775). However, both groups made significant improvements over time in lower-limb strength and mobility. Participants in either group who continued the ST program (55%) had made additional significant improvements in lower-limb strength and mobility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking remains one of the biggest public health threats. Smartphone apps offer new promising opportunities for supporting smoking cessation in real-time. The social context of smokers has, however, been neglected in smartphone apps promoting smoking cessation. This randomized controlled trial investigates the effectiveness of a smartphone app in which smokers quit smoking with the help of a social network member.
    METHODS: This protocol describes the design of a single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, intensive longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Participants of this study are adult smokers who smoke at least one cigarette per day and intend to quit smoking at a self-set quit date. Blocking as means of group-balanced randomization is used to allocate participants to intervention or control conditions. Both intervention and control group use a smartphone-compatible device for measuring their daily smoking behavior objectively via exhaled carbon monoxide. In addition, the intervention group is instructed to use the SmokeFree Buddy app, a multicomponent app that also facilitates smoking-cessation specific social support from a buddy over a smartphone application. All participants fill out a baseline diary for three consecutive days and are invited to the lab for a background assessment. They subsequently participate in an end-of-day diary phase from 7 days before and until 20 days after a self-set quit date. Six months after the self-set quit date a follow-up diary for three consecutive days takes place. The primary outcome measures are daily self-reported and objectively-assessed smoking abstinence and secondary outcome measures are daily self-reported number of cigarettes smoked.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study examining the effectiveness of a smoking cessation mobile intervention using the SmokeFree Buddy app compared to a control group in a real-life setting around a self-set quit date using a portable objective measure to assess smoking abstinence. Opportunities and challenges with running studies with smoking participants and certain design-related decisions are discussed.
    BACKGROUND: This trial was prospectively registered on 04/04/2018 at ISRCTNregistry: ISRCTN11154315 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Evaluation Study
    Buddy maple syrup is characterized by an unpleasant cabbage-like flavor occurring generally toward the end of the sap harvest season. Occurrence of buddy off-flavor leads to a decrease in syrup value and economic loss for the industry. It is therefore relevant to characterize the off-flavor in order to apply corrective treatments. HS-SPME combined with GC/MS was applied to analyze volatile aroma compounds in buddy maple syrup samples. Two novel volatile sulfur compounds were found in maple syrup: dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) and dimethyl trisulfide. A 3-alternative forced choice in ascending concentration of different buddy syrups diluted in good quality syrup was conducted in triplicate to assess buddy syrup concentration thresholds leading to detection and recognition of the off-flavor by 16 panelists while monitoring volatile aroma compounds in diluted samples. Results showed that DMDS was associated with the flavor defect. The recognition threshold concentration of buddy syrup varies depending on the syrup sample and the off-flavor can be detected in syrups containing very low DMDS content. Application of a continuous heat treatment on buddy syrups for 2 hr at 104.5 °C led to a removal of the buddy off-flavor as well as a significant reduction in DMDS content. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The results of this study provide a better understanding of the buddy off-flavor in maple syrup and the heat treatment applied allowed us to eliminate this defect and obtain a syrup with a better sensory quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    A 12-week pilot controlled trial of a physical activity (PA) buddy program was designed for women with young children. Conducted in January 2015 through March 2016, 49 women (mean age = 36.4 ± 4.8 years) were randomized to one of two groups. Both conditions received an in-person session, weekly step goals based on their baseline number of steps, an accelerometer, and its mobile app. Only women assigned to the intervention group brought their buddies and exercised together at least once per week. Buddies also received an accelerometer and its mobile app. Among 47 women who completed the study, we found no significant difference between groups in changes in the mean number of daily steps for the prior week (p = 0.56). When women were categorized into three groups based on change in buddies\' PA, those with inactive buddies had significantly less change in number of steps than those with an active buddy and those in the control group (p < 0.018). Those with an active buddy also had higher friend social support scores for PA than the other two groups (p = 0.05). Thus, to improve PA, creating a social environment in which women associate with active individuals may be necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估同龄人提供计划或鼓励老年人进行体育锻炼并改善身体结果的有效性。同行评审1976年1月至2016年6月以英语发表的文章,根据预定义的纳入标准从六个数据库中检索。在可能的情况下,汇总结果并进行荟萃分析。审查中包括18篇文章,总共3492名干预参与者,平均年龄66.5岁,女性占67.1%.总的来说,研究质量为中高。干预措施主要包括抗性,灵活性和心血管训练,然而,有一个水上运动组。八项研究由同行提供,五项利用同行支持,其中包括建议和积极,但与运动干预没有直接关系。虽然18项研究中有16项报告了身体活动水平的改善和/或同伴参与带来的身体益处,荟萃分析的结果支持对照组的6分钟步行试验和定时-开始试验.这项审查的结果表明,涉及同龄人的锻炼计划可以促进和保持对锻炼计划的坚持。然而,关于同龄人是否对改善老年人的身体机能有积极作用,结果尚无定论。
    The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of peers to deliver programs or encourage older people to be physically active and improve physical outcomes. Peer reviewed articles published in English between January 1976 and June 2016, retrieved from six databases according to the predefined inclusion criteria were included. Where possible results were pooled and meta-analyses conducted. Eighteen articles were included in the review, a total of 3,492 intervention participants, average age 66.5 years and 67.1% were female. Overall, study quality was medium to high. Interventions mainly included resistance, flexibility and cardiovascular training, however there was one aquatic exercise group. Eight studies were delivered by peers and five utilised peer support, which included advice and being positive but was not directly linked to an exercise intervention. While 16 of the 18 studies reported improvement in levels of physical activity and/or noted physical benefits by peer involvement, the meta-analyses findings supported the control groups for the six-minute-walk-test and the timed-up-and-go test. Findings from this review suggest exercise programs involving peers can promote and maintain adherence to exercise programs. However, results were inconclusive as to whether peers have a positive effect on improving older people\'s physical function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号