Splice site recognition is essential for defining the transcriptome. Drugs like risdiplam and branaplam change how U1 snRNP recognizes particular 5\' splice sites (5\'SS) and promote U1 snRNP binding and splicing at these locations. Despite the therapeutic potential of 5\'SS modulators, the complexity of their interactions and snRNP substrates have precluded defining a mechanism for 5\'SS modulation. We have determined a sequential binding mechanism for modulation of -1A bulged 5\'SS by branaplam using a combination of ensemble kinetic measurements and colocalization single molecule spectroscopy (CoSMoS). Our mechanism establishes that U1-C protein binds reversibly to U1 snRNP, and branaplam binds to the U1 snRNP/U1-C complex only after it has engaged a -1A bulged 5\'SS. Obligate orders of binding and unbinding explain how reversible branaplam interactions cause formation of long-lived U1 snRNP/5\'SS complexes. Branaplam is a ribonucleoprotein, not RNA duplex alone, targeting drug whose action depends on fundamental properties of 5\'SS recognition.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is treated by increasing the level of Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) protein through correction of SMN2 exon 7 skipping or exogenous expression of SMN through gene therapy. Currently available therapies have multiple shortcomings, including poor body-wide distribution, invasive delivery, and potential negative consequences due to high doses needed for clinical efficacy. Here we test the effects of a combination treatment of a splice-correcting antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) Anti-N1 with the small compounds risdiplam and branaplam. We show that a low-dose treatment of Anti-N1 with either compound produces a synergistic effect on the inclusion of SMN2 exon 7 in SMA patient fibroblasts. Using RNA-Seq, we characterize the transcriptomes of cells treated with each compound as well as in combination. Although high doses of each individual treatment trigger widespread perturbations of the transcriptome, combination treatment of Anti-N1 with risdiplam and branaplam results in minimal disruption of gene expression. For individual genes targeted by the 3 compounds, we observe little to no additive effects of combination treatment. Overall, we conclude that the combination treatment of a splice-correcting ASO with small compounds represents a promising strategy for achieving a high level of SMN expression while minimizing the risk of off-target effects.

Branaplam is a splicing modulator previously under development as a therapeutic agent for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 and Huntington\'s disease. Branaplam increased the levels of survival motor neuron protein in preclinical studies and was well tolerated in early clinical studies; however, peripheral neurotoxicity was observed in a preclinical safety study in juvenile dogs. The aim of this study was to determine whether serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations in dogs could serve as a monitoring biomarker for branaplam-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. A 30-week time-course investigative study in dogs treated with vehicle control (negative control), neurotoxic pyridoxine (positive control), or branaplam was conducted to assess neuropathology, nerve morphometry, electrophysiological measurements, gene expression profiles, and correlation to NfL serum concentrations. In branaplam-treated animals, a mild to moderate nerve fiber degeneration was observed in peripheral nerves correlating with increased serum NfL concentrations, but there were no observed signs or changes in electrophysiological parameters. Dogs with pyridoxine-induced peripheral axonal degeneration displayed clinical signs and electrophysiological changes in addition to elevated serum NfL. This study suggests that NfL may be useful as an exploratory biomarker to assist in detecting and monitoring treatment-related peripheral nerve injury, with or without clinical signs, associated with administration of branaplam and other compounds bearing a neurotoxic risk.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is 1 of the leading causes of infant mortality. SMA is mostly caused by low levels of Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) protein due to deletion of or mutation in the SMN1 gene. Its nearly identical copy, SMN2, fails to compensate for the loss of SMN1 due to predominant skipping of exon 7. Correction of SMN2 exon 7 splicing by an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), nusinersen (Spinraza™), that targets the intronic splicing silencer N1 (ISS-N1) became the first approved therapy for SMA. Restoration of SMN levels using gene therapy was the next. Very recently, an orally deliverable small molecule, risdiplam (Evrysdi™), became the third approved therapy for SMA. Here we discuss how these therapies are positioned to meet the needs of the broad phenotypic spectrum of SMA patients.

Introduction: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is one of the most common inherited neuromuscular disorders. It causes progressive muscle weakness and results in significant disability. Until recently, there were no drugs available for the treatment of SMA. Several phase 1-3 studies, including three double-blind randomized placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy of disease-modifying approaches including gene replacement therapy, antisense oligonucleotides, and splicing modifiers.Areas covered: This article covers the publically available data on therapeutic strategies that address the underlying cause of SMA and clinical data available on approved treatments and drugs in the pipeline.Expert opinion: The newer therapeutic options in SMA have a good safety profile and deliver a therapeutic benefit in most patients. It is essential that the recommended standards of care are delivered along with the drugs for the best outcomes. No biomarkers to distinguish responders from non-responders are available; it is important that biomarkers be identified. Early treatment is essential for the maximum efficacy of the newly available treatments.

Recent advances in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have dramatically altered prognosis. Rather than a rapidly lethal disease, SMA type 1, the most severe form with the earliest onset of SMA, has become a disease in which long-term event-free survival with the acquisition of important motor milestones is likely. Prognosis for patients with SMA type 2 has shifted from slow and progressive deterioration to long-term stability. Nevertheless, there is a large heterogeneity in terms of clinical response to currently available treatments, ranging from absence of response to impressive improvement. The only factor identified that is predictive of treatment success is the age of the patient at the initiation of treatment, which is closely related to disease duration. The aim of this paper is to review available evidence that support early intervention using currently available treatment approaches.