borna virus

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    博尔纳病病毒1(BoDV-1)最近才被证明主要导致人类致命的脑炎。尽管它很罕见,bornavirus脑炎(BVE)可以被认为是由嗜神经病毒引起的脑炎感染的模型疾病,了解其病理机制至关重要。这项研究的目的是比较大脑炎症的程度和分布模式与临床病程,和单独的治疗程序。为此,这项研究包括7例致命BVE患者的自体脑材料。对组织进行全淋巴细胞标记CD45、BoDV-1核蛋白以及神经胶质标记GFAP和小神经胶质标记Iba1的免疫组织化学染色。将切片数字化并计数CD45阳性细胞和BoDV-1阳性细胞。对于GFAP和Iba1,确定半定量评分。此外,我们以标准化的方式检索并总结了有关个体临床疗程和治疗的详细信息.淋巴细胞分布的分析显示了个体间的模式。相比之下,当观察BoDV-1阳性的神经胶质细胞和神经元时,脑干中大量的病毒参与是显而易见的。七名患者中有三名接受了早期高剂量类固醇治疗,与在病程后期接受类固醇治疗的患者相比,这导致中枢神经组织的淋巴细胞浸润显着降低,生存期更长。这项研究强调了早期大剂量免疫抑制治疗在BVE中的潜在重要性。我们的发现暗示了一个有希望的治疗选择,应该在未来的观察性或前瞻性治疗研究中得到证实。
    ABSTRACTBorna disease virus 1 (BoDV-1) was just recently shown to cause predominantly fatal encephalitis in humans. Despite its rarity, bornavirus encephalitis (BVE) can be considered a model disease for encephalitic infections caused by neurotropic viruses and understanding its pathomechanism is of utmost relevance. Aim of this study was to compare the extent and distribution pattern of cerebral inflammation with the clinical course of disease, and individual therapeutic procedures. For this, autoptic brain material from seven patients with fatal BVE was included in this study. Tissue was stained immunohistochemically for pan-lymphocytic marker CD45, the nucleoprotein of BoDV-1, as well as glial marker GFAP and microglial marker Iba1. Sections were digitalized and counted for CD45-positive and BoDV-1-positive cells. For GFAP and Iba1, a semiquantitative score was determined. Furthermore, detailed information about the individual clinical course and therapy were retrieved and summarized in a standardized way. Analysis of the distribution of lymphocytes shows interindividual patterns. In contrast, when looking at the BoDV-1-positive glial cells and neurons, a massive viral involvement in the brain stem was noticeable. Three of the seven patients received early high-dose steroids, which led to a significantly lower lymphocytic infiltration of the central nervous tissue and a longer survival compared to the patients who were treated with steroids later in the course of disease. This study highlights the potential importance of early high-dose immunosuppressive therapy in BVE. Our findings hint at a promising treatment option which should be corroborated in future observational or prospective therapy studies.ABBREVIATIONS: BoDV-1: Borna disease virus 1; BVE: bornavirus encephalitis; Cb: cerebellum; CNS: central nervous system; FL: frontal lobe; GFAP: glial fibrillary acid protein; Hc: hippocampus; Iba1: ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; Iba1act: general activation of microglial cells; Iba1nod: formation of microglial nodules; IL: insula; Me: mesencephalon; Mo: medulla oblongata; OL: occipital lobe; pASS: per average of 10 screenshots; patearly: patients treated with early high dose steroid shot; patlate: patients treated with late or none high dose steroid shot; Po: pons; So: stria olfactoria; Str: striatum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的心理神经免疫学研究为严重精神障碍(SMD)的病因和发病机制提供了新的见解。轻度脑炎(ME)假说是几年前以人类博尔纳病病毒感染为例提出的,一组SMD患者,主要来自广泛的精神分裂症和情感谱,可能患有轻度神经炎症,由于可用的诊断方法难以诊断,因此仍未发现。最近,在神经病学中,我们在发现一组新出现的中枢神经系统(CNS)自身抗体的背景下,描述了一个新出现的患有各种神经综合征的自身免疫性脑炎(AE)亚组.同样在精神病学中,自身免疫性精神病(AP)的共识标准是针对出现CNS自身抗体并伴有孤立的精神症状和(轻度)神经炎症的临床旁发现的患者。这实际上也符合先前提出的ME标准。然而,在单个SMD病例中确定体内轻度神经炎症仍然是一个主要的临床挑战,并且进一步的ME病例仍未被诊断的可能性似乎是合理的可能性。在本文中,对SMD中轻度神经炎症的研究和临床诊断以及心理神经免疫学和神经精神病学的一般和跨学科观点进行了严格的回顾。根据实验和临床研究的结果,重新考虑了目前对神经炎症性疾病的疾病分类。包括“经典”脑炎在内的临床状态的精细分级列表,AE,AP/ME,和新提出的术语,如副炎症,应激诱导的副炎症和神经进展,并介绍了它们各自与神经变性的关系,这可能有助于进一步研究SMD中轻度神经炎症的可能致病作用。超越,以病因学为重点的ME亚型分类,如自身免疫性ME或感染性ME,似乎需要鉴别诊断和个体化治疗。以AP的实际诊断和治疗为例,概述了与SMD有关的轻度神经炎症机制的临床诊断现状。未来研究的想法,以揭示轻度神经炎症在SMD因果关系中的贡献,以及预期新的免疫调节的困难,讨论了精准医学意义上的抗感染或抗炎治疗原则。
    Recent psychoneuroimmunology research has provided new insight into the etiology and pathogenesis of severe mental disorders (SMDs). The mild encephalitis (ME) hypothesis was developed with the example of human Borna disease virus infection years ago and proposed, that a subgroup SMD patients, mainly from the broad schizophrenic and affective spectrum, could suffer from mild neuroinflammation, which remained undetected because hard to diagnose with available diagnostic methods. Recently, in neurology an emerging new subgroup of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) cases suffering from various neurological syndromes was described in context with the discovery of an emerging list of Central Nervous System (CNS) autoantibodies. Similarly in psychiatry, consensus criteria of autoimmune psychosis (AP) were developed for patients presenting with CNS autoantibodies together with isolated psychiatric symptoms and paraclinical findings of (mild) neuroinflammation, which in fact match also the previously proposed ME criteria. Nevertheless, identifying mild neuroinflammation in vivo in the individual SMD case remains still a major clinical challenge and the possibility that further cases of ME remain still under diagnosed appears an plausible possibility. In this paper a critical review of recent developments and remaining challenges in the research and clinical diagnosis of mild neuroinflammation in SMDs and in general and in transdisciplinary perspective to psycho-neuro-immunology and neuropsychiatry is given. Present nosological classifications of neuroinflammatory disorders are reconsidered with regard to findings from experimental and clinical research. A refined grading list of clinical states including \"classical\" encephalitis, AE, AP/ME,and newly proposed terms like parainflammation, stress-induced parainflammation and neuroprogression, and their respective relation to neurodegeneration is presented, which may be useful for further research on the possible causative role of mild neuroinflammation in SMDs. Beyond, an etiology-focused subclassification of ME subtypes, like autoimmune ME or infectious ME, appears to be required for differential diagnosis and individualized treatment. The present status of the clinical diagnosis of mild neuroinflammatory mechanisms involved in SMDs is outlined with the example of actual diagnosis and therapy in AP. Ideas for future research to unravel the contribution of mild neuroinflammation in the causality of SMDs and the difficulties expected to come to novel immune modulatory, anti-infectious or anti-inflammatory therapeutic principles in the sense of precision medicine are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Like other pathogens that readily persist in animal hosts, members of the Bornaviridae family have evolved effective mechanisms to evade the innate immune response. The prototype of this virus family, Borna disease virus employs an unusual replication strategy that removes the triphosphates from the 5\' termini of the viral RNA genome. This strategy allows the virus to avoid activation of RIG-I and other innate immune response receptors in infected cells. Here we determined whether the newly discovered avian bornaviruses (ABV) might use a similar strategy to evade the interferon response. We found that de novo infection of QM7 and CEC32 quail cells with two different ABV strains was efficiently inhibited by exogenous chicken IFN-α. IFN-α also reduced the viral load in QM7 and CEC32 cells persistently infected with both ABV strains, suggesting that ABV is highly sensitive to type I IFN. Although quail cells persistently infected with ABV contained high levels of viral RNA, the supernatants of infected cultures did not contain detectable levels of biologically active type I IFN. RNA from cells infected with ABV failed to induce IFN-β synthesis if transfected into human cells. Furthermore, genomic RNA of ABV was susceptible to 5\'-monophosphate-specific RNase, suggesting that it lacks 5\'-triphospates like BDV. These results indicate that bornaviruses of mammals and birds use similar strategies to evade the host immune response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号