boot swabs

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是比较收获前的监测策略,方法是评估林区的三种不同采样方法,以确定每种采样方法的病原体回收率和来自牛的传入病原体流行率,以告知植物内决策。收集了5个月的样本,2022年2月至6月,位于内布拉斯加州东部的收获和加工设施。取样方法包括(I)粪便拍打,(ii)靴子拭子,和(iii)MicroTally拭子。在研究期间共收集329个样品(粪便拍子:n=105,靴拭子:n=104,和MicroTally拭子:n=120)。特定的媒体组合,培养温度为42°C,和孵育时间点(18-24小时)用于每个基质和沙门氏菌的流行,使用BAX系统实时PCR测定法评估大肠杆菌O157:H7和6种非O157产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)。总的来说,研究结果得出结论,靴拭子是牛栏区病原体检测的有效采样方法。与粪便拍打(67.6%)和MicroTally拭子(77.5%)方法相比,在统计学上更有可能检测到沙门氏菌(p<0.05)。对于大肠杆菌O157:H7和STEC-O26、O121、O45和O103患病率,靴拭子在检测这些病原体方面(p<0.05)明显优于MicroTally拭子(OR=3.16-11.95),并且采样方法与粪便样本具有可比性(OR=0.93-2.01,p>0.05)。最后,所有三种采样方法检测到大肠杆菌O111和O145的患病率非常低;因此,未进行进一步分析.靴子拭子采样方法受到了强烈的青睐,因为它们需要很少的培训来实施,便宜,他们不需要太多的抽样劳动力;因此,将是一种简单有效的采样方法,可以在行业内实施,以评估收获前的病原体患病率。
    The objective of this study was to compare preharvest monitoring strategies by evaluating three different sampling methods in the lairage area to determine pathogen recovery for each sampling method and incoming pathogen prevalence from the cattle to inform in-plant decision making. Samples were gathered over a 5-month period, from February to June 2022, at a harvesting and processing facility located in Eastern Nebraska. Sampling methods included (i) fecal pats, (ii) boot swabs, and (iii) MicroTally swab. A total of 329 samples were collected over the study period (fecal pats: n = 105, boot swabs: n = 104, and MicroTally swabs: n = 120). Specific media combinations, an incubation temperature of 42°C, and incubation timepoints (18-24 h) were utilized for each matrix and the prevalence of Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and six non-O157 Shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC) was evaluated using the BAX system Real-Time PCR assay. Overall, results from the study concluded that boot swabs were an effective sampling method for pathogen detection in the cattle lairage area. Boot swabs (97.1%) were statistically more likely to detect for Salmonella (p < 0.05) when compared to fecal pats (67.6%) and MicroTally swab (77.5%) methods. For E. coli O157:H7 and STEC - O26, O121, O45, and O103 prevalence, boot swabs were significantly better at detecting for these pathogens (p < 0.05) than MicroTally swabs (OR = 3.16 - 11.95) and a comparable sampling method to fecal pats (OR = 0.93 - 2.01, p > 0.05). Lastly, all three sampling methods detected a very low prevalence for E. coli O111 and O145; therefore, no further analysis was conducted. The boot swab sampling method was strongly favored because they require little training to implement, are inexpensive, and they do not require much sampling labor; therefore, would be a simple and effective sampling method to implement within the industry to evaluate pathogen prevalence preharvest.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Poultry meat contaminated with Campylobacter, a major bacterial cause of foodborne gastroenteritis worldwide, is considered the primary source of human campylobacteriosis. Thus, reduction or elimination of Campylobacter in poultry production will have a significant impact on food safety and public health. Despite the significant progress made over the last decades, many puzzles remain about the epidemiology of Campylobacter on poultry farms, hampering the development of an effective control strategy. This longitudinal study was conducted to determine the prevalence and genetic diversity of Campylobacter in a U.S. commercial broiler production farm system. Cecal contents (15 samples/flock) and boot swabs (3 samples/flock) were collected from approximately 6-wk-old birds from 406 conventional broiler flocks reared in 53 houses on 15 farms (located within a relatively close geographic proximity and managed by the same poultry integrator) for up to eight consecutive production cycles and cultured for Campylobacter. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used to investigate the genetic diversity of the Campylobacter jejuni isolates recovered from the cecal contents. The prevalence of Campylobacter at the farm, house, and flock levels were found to be 93% (14/15), 79% (42/53), and 47% (192/406), respectively. Campylobacter prevalence varied remarkably among different farms and flocks, with some farms or houses testing consistently negative while others being positive all the time over the entire study period. Campylobacter isolation rate changed significantly by sample type (higher by cecal contents vs. boot swabs) and season/production cycle (higher in spring vs. other seasons). The majority (88%; 2364/2675) of the isolates were identified as C. jejuni, and almost all the rest (11%; 303/2675) were Campylobacter coli. Genotyping showed limited diversity within a flock and suggested persistence of some C. jejuni clones over multiple production cycles on the same farm. In conclusion, this study indicated that although Campylobacter prevalence was overall high, there were marked differences in the prevalence among the broiler flocks or farms tested. Future studies aimed at identification of potential risk factors associated with differential Campylobacter status are warranted in order to develop effective on-farm interventions.
    Estudio longitudinal sobre Campylobacter en parvadas comerciales de pollo de engorde criados convencionalmente en los Estados Unidos: prevalencia y diversidad genética. Los productos cárnicos de origen avícola contaminado con Campylobacter, que es una importante causa bacteriana de gastroenteritis transmitida por alimentos en todo el mundo, se consideran la principal fuente de campilobacteriosis humana. Por lo tanto, la reducción o eliminación de Campylobacter en la producción avícola tendrá un impacto significativo en la seguridad alimentaria y en la salud pública. A pesar de los importantes avances realizados en las últimas décadas, persisten muchos enigmas sobre la epidemiología de Campylobacter en las granjas avícolas, lo que obstaculiza el desarrollo de una estrategia de control eficaz. Este estudio longitudinal se realizó para determinar la prevalencia y la diversidad genética de Campylobacter en un sistema de granja de producción comercial de pollos de engorde en los Estados Unidos. Se recogieron contenidos cecales (15 muestras/parvada) y cubre botas de arrastre (tres muestras/parvada) de aves de aproximadamente seis semanas de edad de 406 parvadas de pollos de engorde convencionales criadas en 53 casetas de 15 granjas (ubicadas dentro de una proximidad geográfica relativamente cercana y manejadas por el mismo integrador avícola) durante ocho ciclos de producción consecutivos y con cultivo para Campylobacter. Se utilizó electroforesis en gel de campo con pulsasiones para investigar la diversidad genética de los aislados de Campylobacter jejuni recuperados del contenido cecal. Se encontró que la prevalencia de Campylobacter a nivel de granja, caseta y parvada era del 93% (14/15), 79% (42/53) y 47% (192/406), respectivamente. La prevalencia de Campylobacter varió notablemente entre diferentes granjas y rebaños, y algunas granjas o casetas dieron resultados consistentemente negativos mientras que otras dieron positivo todo el tiempo durante todo el período del estudio. La tasa de aislamiento de Campylobacter cambió significativamente según el tipo de muestra (mayor con muestras de contenido cecal en comparación con los cubre botas de arrastre) y la estación/ciclo de producción (mayor en primavera frente a otras estaciones). La mayoría (88%; 2364/2675) de los aislados se identificaron como C. jejuni, y casi todo el resto (11%; 303/2675) fueron Campylobacter coli. La genotipificación mostró una diversidad limitada dentro de una parvada y sugirió la persistencia de algunos clones de C. jejuni durante múltiples ciclos de producción en la misma granja. En conclusión, este estudio indicó que, aunque la prevalencia de Campylobacter fue alta en general, hubo marcadas diferencias en la prevalencia entre las parvadas o granjas de pollos de engorde analizadas. Se justifica la conducción de estudios futuros destinados a identificar posibles factores de riesgo asociados con el estado diferencial de Campylobacter para desarrollar intervenciones efectivas en las granjas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Finalyse,T4噬菌体,是一种收获前干预措施,利用噬菌体的组合,通过破坏进入商业屠宰场的收获准备牛的皮上的细菌来减少传入的大肠杆菌O157:H7的流行。这项研究的目的是评估Finalyse的疗效,作为收获前的干预,减少病原体,特别是大肠杆菌O157:H7,在牛皮和巢穴环境中,以整体减少传入的病原体负荷。超过5个采样事件,使用25mL预水合缓冲蛋白胨水(BPW)拭子采集总共300个复合生皮样品,在皮革清洗干预之前和之后收集,一开始,中间,和生产日结束(n=10拭子/采样点/时间点)。在生产日结束时,还同时采集了171个靴子拭子样品,方法是以预定的“Z”模式从笔的前面走到后面,以监测来自3个不同位置的笔地板环境。使用BAX®系统实时PCR测定分析病原体的流行率。在噬菌体施用后,在生皮上没有观察到沙门氏菌和/或任何产生志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC)的显著减少(p>0.05)。在整个研究中,大肠杆菌O157:H7和O111的患病率非常低;因此,未进行进一步分析.然而,靴拭子监测显示在围栏地板环境中大肠杆菌O157:H7、O26和O45显著减少(p<0.05)。在商业牛肉加工设施的莱尔区使用Finalyse作为收获前干预措施时,这种噬菌体未能减少肉牛生皮上的大肠杆菌O157:H7,由于患病率较低;然而,一些STEC在巢穴环境中减少,应用噬菌体的地方。总的来说,关于Finalyse的有效性及其在肉牛生皮上减少大肠杆菌O157:H7的能力,没有形成绝对的结论,因为皮革的患病率很低。
    Finalyse, a T4 bacteriophage, is a pre-harvest intervention that utilizes a combination of bacteriophages to reduce incoming Escherichia coli O157:H7 prevalence by destroying the bacteria on the hides of harvest-ready cattle entering commercial abattoirs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Finalyse, as a pre-harvest intervention, on the reduction in pathogens, specifically E. coli O157:H7, on the cattle hides and lairage environment to overall reduce incoming pathogen loads. Over 5 sampling events, a total of 300 composite hide samples were taken using 25 mL pre-hydrated Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) swabs, collected before and after the hide wash intervention, throughout the beginning, middle, and end of the production day (n = 10 swabs/sampling point/timepoint). A total of 171 boot swab samples were also simultaneously taken at the end of the production day by walking from the front to the back of the pen in a pre-determined \'Z\' pattern to monitor the pen floor environment from 3 different locations in the lairage area. The prevalence of pathogens was analyzed using the BAX® System Real-Time PCR Assay. There were no significant reductions observed for Salmonella and/or any Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) on the hides after the bacteriophage application (p > 0.05). Escherichia coli O157:H7 and O111 hide prevalence was very low throughout the study; therefore, no further analysis was conducted. However, boot swab monitoring showed a significant reduction in E. coli O157:H7, O26, and O45 in the pen floor environment (p < 0.05). While using Finalyse as a pre-harvest intervention in the lairage areas of commercial beef processing facilities, this bacteriophage failed to reduce E. coli O157:H7 on the hides of beef cattle, as prevalence was low; however, some STECs were reduced in the lairage environment, where the bacteriophage was applied. Overall, an absolute conclusion was not formed on the effectiveness of Finalyse and its ability to reduce E. coli O157:H7 on the hides of beef cattle, as prevalence on the hides was low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Salmonellosis is the second most reported gastrointestinal infection in humans after campylobacteriosis and a common cause of foodborne outbreaks in the European Union (EU). In addition to consumption of contaminated animal-based foods, such as poultry, beef and eggs, pork is an important source of human salmonellosis outbreaks; therefore, Salmonella (S.) control should start in the early stages of pig production. To be able to implement effective control measures to reduce the risk of pigs being infected by Salmonella, it is important to identify the serovars circulating on farm within the different stages of production, including as early as sow and piglet breeding. The aim of the present study was to assess the Salmonella status of sow farms either producing their own finishers or delivering piglets to fattening farms with a known high serological prevalence identified within the QS Salmonella monitoring system. Overall, 97 (92.4%) of 105 investigated piglet-producing farms across Germany tested positive in at least one sample. Salmonella was detected in 38.2% of the sock and 27.1% of the environmental swab samples. S. Typhimurium was the most frequent serovar. In conclusion, sock and environmental swab samples are well suited for non-invasive Salmonella detection in different production units in farrowing farms. To establish a holistic Salmonella control program, all age classes of pig production should be sampled to enable intervention and implementation of countermeasures at an early stage if necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The control of Johne\'s disease requires the identification of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP)-positive herds. Boot swabs and liquid manure samples have been suggested as an easy-to-use alternative to sampling individual animals in order to diagnose subclinical Johne\'s disease at the herd level, but there is a need to evaluate performance of this approach in the field. Using a logistic regression model, this study aimed to calculate the threshold level of the apparent within-herd prevalence as determined by individual faecal culture, thus allowing the detection of whether a herd is MAP positive. A total of 77 boot swabs and 75 liquid manure samples were taken from 19 certified negative and 58 positive dairy herds. Faecal culture, three different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods and the combination of faecal culture with PCR were applied in order to detect MAP. For 50% probability of detection, a within-herd prevalence threshold of 1·5% was calculated for testing both matrices simultaneously by faecal culture and PCR, with the threshold increased to 4·0% for 90% probability of detection. The results encourage the use of boot swabs or liquid manure samples, or a combination both, for identifying MAP-positive herds and, to a certain extent, for monitoring certified Johne\'s disease-negative cattle herds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of different combinations of sample type, transport medium and culture methods for the recovery of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli from broiler flocks at primary production. Boot swabs moistened with one of four different transport media [maximum recovery diluent (n=120), Exeter broth (EX) (n=120), buffered peptone water (n=120) and modified semi-solid Cary-Blair (n=120)], caecal samples (n=40) and faecal samples (n=120) from 40 broiler flocks were compared and sensitivity estimates obtained using a Bayesian model. Samples were cultured onto mCCDA before and after enrichment in EX and incubated microaerobically at 41.5°C. Campylobacter suspect colonies were identified to the species level by multiplex PCR. Results from the Bayesian model indicated that boot swabs after enrichment had higher sensitivity (90-94%) than caecal contents before or after enrichment (84% and 89%, respectively) and faecal samples after enrichment (82%) for the detection of Campylobacter spp., although these differences were not statistically significant. Enrichment significantly increased the sensitivity of boot swab and caecal samples for detection of Campylobacter spp. and C. jejuni, respectively. However, the enrichment of caecal samples resulted in a significant decrease in the sensitivity of these samples for detection of C. coli. There was much greater variation in the sensitivity estimates of the methods for detecting C. coli than for C. jejuni, and the ranking of methods was different between the two species. Boot swabs gave the best sensitivity values for detection of C. jejuni, and enrichment culture of faecal samples was the most sensitive method for detection of C. coli.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号