blunted affect

钝性影响
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在Kalhbaum对卡顿尼亚的第一个表征中,情绪症状,如情感和情绪的表达减少或受限,这被描述为迟钝的影响,与运动症状有关。在后来的几年里,情感域被排除在紧张症的概念之外,并且在各种诊断统计手册(DSM)版本的诊断标准中未被纳入.最近,一些作者提出了通过重新引入情感领域来重新评估卡顿尼亚概念的命题。这项研究的目的是检查紧张样行为(CLB)之间的相关性,比如情绪退缩,钝的影响,精神运动减慢,和炎症标志物,即中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比(NLR)和淋巴细胞/单核细胞比(LMR),在被诊断为精神分裂症的个体中。
    方法:25名精神分裂症患者(10名女性,15名男性)被招募,和简短的精神病学评定量表(BPRS)用于评估情绪戒断的严重程度,钝的影响,精神运动减慢。
    结果:相关性分析(Spearmanρ)揭示了迟钝的情感与精神运动减慢之间的直接关联(ρ=0.79,P=0.001),和CLB(情绪退缩,ρ=0.51,P=0.05;钝化影响ρ=0.58,P=0.05;运动迟缓,ρ=0.56,P=0.05)和LMR(ρ=0.53,P=0.05)。此外,病程(DOI)大于5年的患者与最近诊断为该病的患者相比,CLB和LMR较高.很可能,具有阳性症状以及处于疾病的前驱和活动期的患者与处于残留期的患者相比,具有不同的免疫特征,并且主要是阴性症状。
    结论:精神运动减慢和迟钝是两个显著相关的特征,代表了两面派的Janus.此外,精神分裂症持续时间越长,将它们聚集在CLB中更占优势,并且与不同的特定免疫激活模式相关.
    BACKGROUND: In Kalhbaum\'s first characterization of catatonia, the emotional symptoms, such as decreased or restricted expression of feelings and emotions, which is described as blunted affect, are related to the motor symptoms. In later years, the affective domain was excluded from the concept of catatonia and was not included among the diagnostic criteria in the various Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM) versions. In recent times, some authors have proposed the proposition of reevaluating the notion of catatonia through the reintroduction of the affective domain. The objective of this study was to examine the correlation between catatonic-like behavior (CLB), such as emotional withdrawal, blunted affect, and psychomotor slowing, and inflammatory markers, namely the neutrophil/lymphocytes ratio (NLR) and lymphocytes/monocytes ratio (LMR), in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.
    METHODS: A sample of 25 patients with schizophrenia (10 females, 15 males) was recruited, and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was used to assess the severity of emotional withdrawal, blunted affect, and psychomotor slowing.
    RESULTS: The correlation analysis (Spearman ρ) revealed a robust direct association between blunted affect and psychomotor slowing (ρ = 0.79, P = 0.001), and a significant direct correlation between CLB (emotional withdrawal, ρ = 0.51, P = 0.05; blunted affect ρ = 0.58, P = 0.05; motor retardation, ρ = 0.56, P = 0.05) and LMR (ρ = 0.53, P = 0.05). In addition, patients with a duration of illness (DOI) older than five years had a higher presence of CLB and a higher LMR than patients with a more recent diagnosis of the disease. Likely, patients with positive symptoms and in the prodromal and active stages of the disease have a different immune profile than patients in the residual stage and with a predominance of negative symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Psychomotor slowing and blunted affect are two significantly related features, representing the two-faced Janus of immobility. Furthermore, aggregating them in CLB is more predominant the longer the duration of schizophrenia and is associated with different a specific pattern of immune activation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的因素分析证据支持两个因素(动机和快乐,MAP;表达减少,EXP)和五因素(快感缺失,asociality,废除,钝的影响,alogia)阴性症状的概念化。然而,目前尚不清楚这两种阴性症状潜在结构的概念化是否与外部相关因素有不同的关联.当前的研究通过检查已知与阴性症状具有关键关系的变量的关联来评估两因素和五因素结构的外部相关性:特质影响,失败主义的表演信念,神经认知,和基于社区的心理社会功能。参与者包括总共245名被诊断为精神分裂症的门诊患者,他们在短期阴性症状量表上进行了评级,并在临床稳定期间完成了一系列其他措施。这些额外措施包括正面和负面影响时间表,Defeatist表演信念量表,数学共识认知电池,和功能等级。皮尔逊相关性表明BNSS分数和外部相关性之间的关联模式不同。MAP与积极情感和社会心理功能的更强关联表明了对双因素模型的支持,与神经认知的EXP相比。研究关联程度不同的显著性检验表明,二维阴性症状结构掩盖了五个阴性症状域与神经认知和社会/职业社区功能之间的独特相关关系,并捕获了与特质影响相关的独特模式。模糊情感与注意力/警惕之间的更强关联显示了对五因素模型的支持,和更强的联系之间的自愿行为,快感缺失,和具有心理社会功能的社会性。结果为阴性症状的二维和五域模型以及阴性症状的分层二维五域模型提供了支持。研究结果可能会对《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》的诊断标准和描述产生影响(第5版。;DSM-5),以及阴性症状的可能治疗目标。
    Recent factor analytic evidence supports both two-factor (motivation and pleasure, MAP; diminished expression, EXP) and five-factor (anhedonia, asociality, avolition, blunted affect, alogia) conceptualizations of negative symptoms. However, it is unclear whether these two conceptualizations of the latent structure of negative symptoms have differential associations with external correlates. The current study evaluated external correlates of the two- and five-factor structures by examining associations with variables known to have critical relations with negative symptoms: trait affect, defeatist performance beliefs, neurocognition, and community-based psychosocial functioning. Participants included a total of 245 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia who were rated on the Brief Negative Symptom Scale and completed a battery of additional measures during periods of clinical stability. These additional measures included the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Defeatist Performance Beliefs scale, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and Level of Function Scale. Pearson correlations indicated differential patterns of associations between the BNSS scores and the external correlates. Support for the two-factor model was indicated by a stronger association of MAP with positive affect and psychosocial functioning, compared to EXP with neurocognition. Significance tests examining a differential magnitude of associations showed that the two-dimension negative symptom structure masked unique correlational relationships among the five negative symptom domains with neurocognition and social/vocational community functioning and captured unique patterns of correlation with trait affect. Support for the five-factor model was shown by a stronger association between Blunted Affect with Attention/Vigilance, and stronger associations between Avolition, Anhedonia, and Asociality with psychosocial functioning. Results offer support for both the two-dimension and five-domain model of negative symptoms as well as a hierarchical two-dimensions-five-domains model of negative symptoms. Findings may have implications for diagnostic criteria and descriptions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5), as well as possible treatment targets of negative symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自1980年代以来,对精神分裂症阴性症状的研究重新受到关注。客观映射科学知识的科学计量分析,随着近期趋势的变化,目前缺乏。我们于2021年12月17日使用相关关键字搜索了WebofScienceCoreCollection(WOSCC)。使用R-bibliometrix和CiteSpace进行分析。我们检索了1966年至2022年之间发布的27,568篇参考文献。观察到科学兴趣呈指数级上升,从1990年到2010年,出版物的年均增长率为16.56%。检索到的共同引用的参考网络呈现了24个具有良好结构网络的不同集群(Q=0.7921;S=0.9016)。确定了两个不同的主要研究趋势:阴性症状的概念化和治疗研究。阴性症状研究的最新趋势包括证据综合,非药物治疗,和计算精神病学。科学计量分析通过识别智力转折点论文和新兴趋势,为阴性症状研究的变化提供了有用的总结。这些结果将为系统评价提供信息,荟萃分析,并产生新的假设。
    Research on negative symptoms of schizophrenia has received renewed interest since the 1980s. A scientometric analysis that objectively maps scientific knowledge, with changes in recent trends, is currently lacking. We searched the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on December 17, 2021 using relevant keywords. R-bibliometrix and CiteSpace were used to perform the analysis. We retrieved 27,568 references published between 1966 and 2022. An exponential rise in scientific interest was observed, with an average annual growth rate in publications of 16.56% from 1990 to 2010. The co-cited reference network that was retrieved presented 24 different clusters with a well-structured network (Q=0.7921; S=0.9016). Two distinct major research trends were identified: research on the conceptualization and treatment of negative symptoms. The latest trends in research on negative symptoms include evidence synthesis, nonpharmacological treatments, and computational psychiatry. Scientometric analyses provide a useful summary of changes in negative symptom research across time by identifying intellectual turning point papers and emerging trends. These results will be informative for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and generating novel hypotheses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阴性症状是精神分裂症(SZ)功能损害的强预测因子。不幸的是,对阴性症状的潜在机制了解甚少,可用的治疗方法效果最低.当前的研究评估了新的假设,即阴性症状与内隐认知努力监测障碍有关,该障碍在需要持续分配认知控制的任务期间表现出来。患有SZ(n=33)和健康对照(CN;n=29)的门诊患者完成了适应性需求选择任务(DST),其中受试者在隐含地对认知任务之间做出选择,然后在努力需求上明确地做出差异。SZ小组在内隐选择条件下避免高努力认知任务的可能性降低,但在明确任务要求时能够避免努力。内隐认知努力监测缺陷与阴性症状的表达维度的更严重程度相关,但不是动机和快乐维度。根据新颖的认知资源消耗理论,解释了表现力减弱与内隐认知努力监测缺陷之间的关联。因此,由于难以隐含地监视正在进行的认知努力,并随着任务需求的波动而动态调整努力支出,因此具有SZ的个人可能会变得缺乏表现力。
    Negative symptoms are a strong predictor of functional impairment in schizophrenia (SZ). Unfortunately, mechanisms underlying negative symptoms are poorly understood and available treatments are minimally effective. The current study evaluated the novel hypothesis that negative symptoms are associated with an implicit cognitive effort monitoring impairment that manifests during tasks requiring sustained allocation of cognitive control. Outpatients with SZ (n = 33) and healthy controls (CN; n = 29) completed an adapted Demand Selection Task (DST) in which subjects made choices between pairs of cognitive tasks that were implicitly and then explicitly made discrepant in effort demands. The SZ group demonstrated a reduced probability of avoiding the high effort cognitive task in the implicit choice condition but were able to become effort avoidant when the demands of the task were made explicit. Implicit cognitive effort monitoring deficits were associated with greater severity of the expressivity dimension of negative symptoms, but not the motivation and pleasure dimension. The association between diminished expressivity and implicit cognitive effort monitoring deficits is interpreted in light of a novel cognitive resource depletion theory, whereby individuals with SZ may become less expressive due to difficulty implicitly monitoring ongoing cognitive effort exertion and dynamically adjusting effort expenditure as task demands fluctuate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:异常显着性是一种众所周知的与精神分裂症精神病症状的发展和维持相关的结构。然而,只有少数研究将异常显著性作为一种特征进行了调查,没有研究调查五个异常显着性域与精神病症状之间的关联。我们旨在探讨异常显着性及其领域在临床缓解和未缓解患者的精神病性维度上的作用。
    方法:根据阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)缓解标准,将102例诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍的患者样本分为两组:缓解和未缓解。探索了由PANSS评估的精神病症状学和由异常显著性量表(ASI)测量的异常显著性的差异。最后,进行了PANSS和ASI之间的相关性分析。
    结果:在未缓解的患者中,ASI评分明显较高。阳性症状(即妄想,概念混乱,和幻觉行为)和一般精神病理学(即姿势举止,不寻常的思想内容)与异常显着性分量表“感官锐化”相关,“情绪增强”和“认知增强”以及ASI总分。阴性症状(迟钝的情感和社交退缩)与“认知增强”之间出现了显着相关性。最后,谈话缺乏自发性与“情绪增强”和“认知增强”的分量表有关,以及ASI总分。
    结论:这些初步结果支持精神分裂症中异常突出与精神病性症状之间存在关联的假设。需要进一步的研究,特别是在显着性处理的潜在机制中,除了社会和环境因素和认知变量。
    BACKGROUND: Aberrant salience is a well-known construct associated with the development and maintenance of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia. However, only a few studies have investigated aberrance salience as a trait, with no study investigating the association between the five aberrant salience domains and psychotic symptoms. We aimed to explore the role of aberrant salience and its domains on psychotic dimensions in both clinically remitted and non-remitted patients.
    METHODS: A sample of 102 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders was divided according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) remission criteria into two groups: remitted and non-remitted. Differences regarding psychotic symptomatology assessed by the PANSS and aberrant salience measured by the Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) were explored. Finally, a correlation analysis between the PANSS and the ASI was run.
    RESULTS: Significantly higher ASI scores were evident among non-remitted patients. Positive symptoms (i.e. delusions, conceptual disorganization, and hallucinatory behaviour) and general psychopathology (i.e. postural mannerisms, unusual thought content) were correlated to the aberrant salience subscales \'sharpening of senses\', \'heightened emotionality\' and \'heightened cognition\' and with the ASI total score. Significant correlations emerged between negative symptoms (blunted affect and social withdrawal) and \'heightened cognition\'. Finally, lack of spontaneity of conversation was related to the subscales \'heightened emotionality\' and \'heightened cognition\', as well as to the ASI total score.
    CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results support the hypothesis of an association between aberrant salience and psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia. Further research is needed, especially into the mechanisms underlying salience processing, in addition to social and environmental factors and cognitive variables.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    钝性面部疾病是严重精神疾病(SMI)的诊断组成部分,并与许多负面结果有关。然而,迟钝的面部情感是一个鲜为人知的现象,没有已知的治疗或治疗方法。更好地理解其表型表达的关键步骤涉及澄清哪些面部表情以特定方式以及在什么情况下被改变。目前的文献表明,患有SMI的个体表现出减少的积极面部表情,但很典型,甚至在实验室任务期间增加了负面的面部表情。虽然这些文献围绕着一般趋势融合在一起,关于哪些面部表情是非典型的成分以及这些成分如何与临床评分的严重程度增加相关,我们有更多的细微差别。本项目利用计算机化的面部分析来测试临床医生评估的迟钝的影响是否由持续时间的减少驱动,强度,或在结构化临床访谈中积极表情与其他面部表情的频率。检查符合SMI标准的稳定门诊患者(N=59)。面部表情通常不会随临床诊断而变化。总的来说,临床评估的迟钝情绪与阳性表达无关,但与惊讶减少和愤怒增加有关,悲伤,和恐惧的表情。不完整的影响并不是缺乏表现力,在操作上定义它的精度提高对于发现其原因和维护因素至关重要。我们的讨论集中在这项努力上,以及更广泛地推进钝化面部情感的数字表型。
    Blunted facial affect is a transdiagnostic component of Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and is associated with a host of negative outcomes. However, blunted facial affect is a poorly understood phenomenon, with no known cures or treatments. A critical step in better understanding its phenotypic expression involves clarifying which facial expressions are altered in specific ways and under what contexts. The current literature suggests that individuals with SMI show decreased positive facial expressions, but typical, or even increased negative facial expressions during laboratory tasks. While this literature has coalesced around general trends, significantly more nuance is available regarding what components facial expressions are atypical and how those components are associated with increased severity of clinical ratings. The present project leveraged computerized facial analysis to test whether clinician-rated blunted affect is driven by decreases in duration, intensity, or frequency of positive versus other facial expressions during a structured clinical interview. Stable outpatients meeting criteria for SMI (N = 59) were examined. Facial expression did not generally vary as a function of clinical diagnosis. Overall, clinically-rated blunted affect was not associated with positive expressions, but was associated with decreased surprise and increased anger, sadness, and fear expressions. Blunted affect is not a monolithic lack of expressivity, and increased precision in operationally defining it is critical for uncovering its causes and maintaining factors. Our discussion focuses on this effort, and on advancing digital phenotyping of blunted facial affect more generally.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阴性症状研究经常使用单一综合评分作为症状严重程度的指标,并作为临床试验的主要终点。因素分析和外部验证研究不支持这种做法,而是提出了多维结构。当前的研究使用结构方程模型(SEM)来比较阴性症状的竞争维度模型,以确定最佳捕获生物学差异的潜在维度的数量,心理,以及已知与阴性症状相关的临床变量。
    三个独立研究(总共n=632)比较了一维,双因素,五因素,以及与认知相关的阴性症状的等级概念化,精神病理学,和社区功能(研究1);特质情绪体验和失败主义表现信念(研究2);以及使用质子磁共振波谱量化的前扣带皮质中的谷氨酸和γ-氨基丁酸水平(研究3)。
    无论阴性症状度量还是外部验证器,SEM都偏爱五因素和分层模型,而不是一维和两因素模型。五个维度——快感缺失,asociality,废除,钝的影响,被证明是独立域或受二阶维度-动机,愉悦和情感表达影响的一阶域至关重要。两个较宽的维度有时掩盖了五个较窄领域特有的重要关联。个人行为,快感缺失,并且钝化的影响显示了研究样本中与外部变量的最特定领域的关联。
    五个领域和一个分层模型反映了与外部变量相关的阴性症状的最佳概念化。临床试验应考虑将两个维度作为主要终点,将五个域作为次要终点。
    Negative symptom studies frequently use single composite scores as indicators of symptom severity and as primary endpoints in clinical trials. Factor analytic and external validation studies do not support this practice but rather suggest a multidimensional construct. The current study used structural equation modeling (SEM) to compare competing dimensional models of negative symptoms to determine the number of latent dimensions that best capture variance in biological, psychological, and clinical variables known to have associations with negative symptoms.
    Three independent studies (total n = 632) compared unidimensional, two-factor, five-factor, and hierarchical conceptualizations of negative symptoms in relation to cognition, psychopathology, and community functioning (Study 1); trait emotional experience and defeatist performance beliefs (Study 2); and glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in the anterior cingulate cortex quantified using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Study 3).
    SEM favored the five-factor and hierarchical models over the unidimensional and two-factor models regardless of the negative symptom measure or external validator. The five dimensions-anhedonia, asociality, avolition, blunted affect, and alogia-proved vital either as stand-alone domains or as first-order domains influenced by second-order dimensions-motivation and pleasure and emotional expression. The two broader dimensions sometimes masked important associations unique to the five narrower domains. Avolition, anhedonia, and blunted affect showed the most domain-specific associations with external variables across study samples.
    Five domains and a hierarchical model reflect the optimal conceptualization of negative symptoms in relation to external variables. Clinical trials should consider using the two dimensions as primary endpoints and the five domains as secondary endpoints.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Studies attempting to deconstruct the heterogeneity of schizophrenia and the attenuated psychosis syndrome consistently find that negative symptoms are a core dimension that is distinct from other aspects of the illness (e.g., positive and disorganized symptoms). Negative symptoms are also highly predictive of poor community-based functional outcomes, suggesting they are a critical treatment target. Unfortunately, pharmacological and psychosocial treatments for negative symptoms have demonstrated limited effectiveness. To address this critical unmet therapeutic need, the NIMH sponsored a consensus development conference to delineate research priorities for the field and stimulate treatment development. A primary conclusion of this meeting was that next-generation negative symptom rating scales should be developed to address methodological and conceptual limitations of existing instruments. Although second-generation rating scales were developed for adults with schizophrenia, progress in this area has lagged behind for youth at clinical-high risk (CHR) for developing psychosis (i.e. those meeting criteria for a prodromal syndrome). Given that negative symptoms are highly predictive of the transition to diagnosable psychotic illness, enhancing our ability to detect negative symptoms in CHR youth is paramount. The current paper discusses conceptual and methodological limitations inherent to existing scales that assess negative symptoms in CHR youth. The theoretical and clinical implications of these limitations are evaluated. It is concluded that new scales specifically designed to assess negative symptoms in CHR youth are needed to accurately chart mental illness trajectories and determine when, where, and how to intervene. Recent efforts to develop next-generation measures designed specifically for CHR youth to meet this urgent need in the field are discussed. These new approaches offer significant progress for addressing issues inherent to earlier scales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阴性症状是精神分裂症的特征,与许多结果密切相关。一系列工作试图确定同质的阴性症状亚组-一种可以促进机械理解和精准医学的策略。然而,我们对临床精神病高危人群(CHR)阴性症状亚组的了解有限.这里,我们使用聚类分析方法调查了大量CHR样本(N=244)中不同的阴性症状.在(1)精神分裂症文献中常见的和/或(2)可能与CHR个体特别相关的外部验证器上比较了亚组,告知早期预防和预测。我们观察到4个不同的阴性症状亚组,包括(1)症状严重程度较低的个体,(2)情感缺陷,(3)自愿损害,和(4)全球海拔。对外部验证者的分析表明,具有整体损伤和意志缺陷的个体表现出更多的临床病理。此外,Volition小组认可了更多的混乱,焦虑,与情绪组相比,抑郁症状和功能障碍。这些数据表明CHR个体有独特的阴性症状,与精神分裂症的研究相一致,表明动机缺陷可能是该症状维度的核心。此外,观察到的CHR相关外部验证者的差异可能有助于为早期识别和治疗工作提供信息。
    Negative symptoms are characteristic of schizophrenia and closely linked to numerous outcomes. A body of work has sought to identify homogenous negative symptom subgroups-a strategy that can promote mechanistic understanding and precision medicine. However, our knowledge of negative symptom subgroups among individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis is limited. Here, we investigated distinct negative symptom profiles in a large CHR sample (N = 244) using a cluster analysis approach. Subgroups were compared on external validators that are (1) commonly observed in the schizophrenia literature and/or (2) may be particularly relevant for CHR individuals, informing early prevention and prediction. We observed 4 distinct negative symptom subgroups, including individuals with (1) lower symptom severity, (2) deficits in emotion, (3) impairments in volition, and (4) global elevations. Analyses of external validators suggested a pattern in which individuals with global impairments and volitional deficits exhibited more clinical pathology. Furthermore, the Volition group endorsed more disorganized, anxious, and depressive symptoms and impairments in functioning compared to the Emotion group. These data suggest there are unique negative symptom profiles in CHR individuals, converging with studies in schizophrenia indicating motivational deficits may be central to this symptom dimension. Furthermore, observed differences in CHR relevant external validators may help to inform early identification and treatment efforts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阴性症状在精神病的前驱和首发阶段普遍存在,并且高度预测不良的临床结果(例如,转换和运作的责任)。然而,在疾病的早期阶段,阴性症状的潜在结构尚不清楚。确定早期精神病(EP)阴性症状的潜在结构对于早期识别至关重要。预防,和治疗努力。在目前的研究中,验证性因素分析用于评估与4种理论推导模型相关的潜在结构:1。1因素模型,2.具有表达(EXP)和动机和快乐(MAP)因素的双因素模型,3.5个国家精神卫生研究所(NIMH)共识发展会议领域的5个因素模型(钝化影响,alogia,快感缺失,废除,和相关性),和4。具有反映EXP和MAP的2个二阶因子的分层模型,以及反映5个共识域的5个一阶因子。参与者包括164名符合前驱综合征标准的临床高风险(CHR)患者和377名在简短阴性症状量表上进行评级的EP患者。结果表明,1因子和2因子模型对数据的拟合度较差。5因素和分层模型提供了极好的拟合,五因素模型优于分层模型。这些发现表明,与精神分裂症的慢性期相似,阴性症状的潜在结构最好与CHR和EP人群中的5个共有域相关。对早期识别的影响,预防,和治疗进行了讨论。
    Negative symptoms are prevalent in the prodromal and first-episode phases of psychosis and highly predictive of poor clinical outcomes (eg, liability for conversion and functioning). However, the latent structure of negative symptoms is unclear in the early phases of illness. Determining the latent structure of negative symptoms in early psychosis (EP) is of critical importance for early identification, prevention, and treatment efforts. In the current study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate latent structure in relation to 4 theoretically derived models: 1. a 1-factor model, 2. a 2-factor model with expression (EXP) and motivation and pleasure (MAP) factors, 3. a 5-factor model with separate factors for the 5 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) consensus development conference domains (blunted affect, alogia, anhedonia, avolition, and asociality), and 4. a hierarchical model with 2 second-order factors reflecting EXP and MAP, as well as 5 first-order factors reflecting the 5 consensus domains. Participants included 164 individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) who met the criteria for a prodromal syndrome and 377 EP patients who were rated on the Brief Negative Symptom Scale. Results indicated that the 1- and 2-factor models provided poor fit for the data. The 5-factor and hierarchical models provided excellent fit, with the 5-factor model outperforming the hierarchical model. These findings suggest that similar to the chronic phase of schizophrenia, the latent structure of negative symptom is best conceptualized in relation to the 5 consensus domains in the CHR and EP populations. Implications for early identification, prevention, and treatment are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号