blood loss

失血
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:必须权衡化学预防(CPX)药物预防静脉血栓栓塞的益处和潜在风险。关于CPX在有或没有融合的椎板切除术后的疗效的现有文献是有限的,没有明确的共识来告知准则。
    目的:本研究评估了CPX与腰椎椎板切除术伴融合术和不伴融合术后手术并发症之间的关系。
    方法:对一家大型学术机构的患者进行回顾性研究。
    方法:对2018年至2020年接受腰椎椎板切除术伴或不伴腰椎融合术的患者的病历进行了人口统计学分析,手术特点,CPX代理商,术后并发症,硬膜外血肿,和伤口引流。接受CPX的患者(n=316)与未接受CPX的患者(n=316)在倾向评分匹配后通过t检验进行比较,和CPX患者进一步分层融合状态。
    结果:CPX组的体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会的评分较高。静脉血栓栓塞的发生率,硬膜外血肿,感染,术后切开引流,输血,伤口裂开,再次手术与CPX无关。潮湿的敷料更频繁,CPX的平均排水天数更长。CPX的术后总并发症发生率和住院时间(LOS)更大。融合亚组的Charlson合并症指数较低,美国麻醉医师协会的等级较低,更年轻,有更多的女人,并接受了更多的微创椎板切除术。虽然估计失血,手术时间,融合组的LOS明显更大,术中和术后并发症发生率无差异。
    结论:腰椎椎板切除术后伴或不伴融合的CPX与硬膜外血肿发生率的增加无关,伤口并发症,或再次操作。接受CPX的患者术后心脏并发症较多,但外科医生可能更有可能为高危患者开CPX.他们也有更高的肠梗阻和潮湿的敷料,更大的LOS,和更长的排水持续时间。接受腰椎椎板切除术伴CPX融合术的患者往往风险较低,但失血更多,手术时间,LOS,心脏并发症,和血肿/血清瘤比未接受融合的患者。
    结论:这项回顾性研究比较了接受化学预防和未接受化学预防的腰椎椎板切除术患者的手术并发症。化疗预防与硬膜外血肿发生率的增加无关,伤口并发症,或再次操作,但它与术后心脏并发症和肠梗阻的发生率较高有关。
    方法:
    BACKGROUND: The benefit of chemoprophylaxis (CPX) agents in preventing venous thromboembolism must be weighed against potential risks. Current literature regarding the efficacy of CPX after laminectomies with or without fusion is limited, with no clear consensus to inform guidelines.
    OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the association between CPX and surgical complications after lumbar laminectomy with and without fusion.
    METHODS: Retrospective study of patients at a single large academic institution.
    METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent lumbar laminectomies with or without lumbar fusion from 2018 to 2020 were reviewed for demographics, surgical characteristics, CPX agents, postoperative complications, epidural hematomas, and wound drainage. Patients receiving CPX (n = 316) were compared with patients not receiving CPX (n = 316) via t test following propensity score matching, and patients on CPX were further stratified by fusion status.
    RESULTS: The CPX group had higher body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists grades. Rates of venous thromboembolism, epidural hematomas, infections, postoperative incision and drainage, transfusions, wound dehiscence, and reoperation were not associated with CPX. Moist dressings were more frequent, and average days of drain duration were longer with CPX. Overall postoperative complication rate and length of stay (LOS) were greater with CPX. The fusion subgroup had a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, had a lower American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, was younger, had more women, and underwent more minimally invasive laminectomies. While estimated blood loss, operative times, and LOS were significantly greater in the fusion group, there was no difference in rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: CPX after lumbar laminectomies with or without fusion was not associated with increased rates of epidural hematomas, wound complications, or reoperation. Patients receiving CPX had more postoperative cardiac complications, but it is possible that surgeons were more likely to prescribe CPX for higher-risk patients. They also had higher rates of ileus and moist dressings, greater LOS, and longer length of drain duration. Patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy with fusion on CPX tended to be lower risk yet incurred greater blood loss, operative times, LOS, cardiac complications, and hematomas/seromas than patients not undergoing fusion.
    CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study compared surgical complications of lumbar laminectomies in patients who received chemoprophylaxis vs patients who did not. Chemoprophylaxis was not associated with increased rates of epidural hematomas, wound complications, or reoperation, but it was associated with higher rates of postoperative cardiac complications and ileus.
    METHODS:
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胎盘植入谱(PAS)可能是主要发病的原因,其最佳管理仍存在争议。这项研究的目的是将传统的一步手术与两步手术方法进行比较,在两步手术方法中,胎盘留在原位,并延迟第二次最终手术以最大程度地减少失血。方法:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,包括2007年至2023年接受PAS治疗的所有患者。手术期间所需的红细胞(RBC)单位数是比较这两种方法的主要结果。结果:共纳入43例病例。其中20例采用延迟的两步手术方法进行了治疗,而23人接受了一步手术。两步和一步手术的术中估计失血中位数为2000毫升和2800毫升,分别(p=0.095)。在两步手术方法中,手术期间输注的红细胞单位的中位数显著较低(p=0.049),需要4个以上红细胞单位的比值比为0.28(95%-CI:0.08~0.98,p=0.043).剖腹产和第二次手术之间的间隔较长,显示出减少失血的趋势(p=0.065),并且与手术期间所需的RBC单位数量显着减少有关(p=0.019)。结论:在我们的队列中,两步手术治疗PAS是安全的,并且可能导致输血减少。将胎盘留在原位并延迟最终手术是传统剖宫产子宫切除术的可能替代方法。
    Background: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) can be the cause of major morbidity and its optimal management is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the traditional one-step surgery with a two-step surgical approach in which the placenta is left in situ and the second final operation is delayed to minimise blood loss. Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study including all patients managed for PAS between 2007 and 2023. The number of units of red blood cells (RBCs) needed during surgery was the primary outcome used to compare these two approaches. Results: A total of 43 cases were included in this analysis. Twenty of these were managed with the delayed two-step surgical approach, whereas 23 received one-step surgery. The median estimated blood loss during surgery was 2000 mL and 2800 mL for two-step and one-step surgery, respectively (p = 0.095). In the two-step surgical approach, the median number of RBC units transfused during surgery was significantly lower (p = 0.049) and the odds ratio for needing more than four units of RBCs was 0.28 (95%-CI: 0.08-0.98, p = 0.043). A longer interval between the caesarean section and the second operation showed a trend toward lower blood loss (p = 0.065) and was associated with a significantly lower number of RBC units needed during surgery (p = 0.019). Conclusions: Two-step surgery for the treatment of PAS was safe in our cohort and could lead to a reduction in blood transfusion. Leaving the placenta in situ and delaying the final operation represents a possible alternative to traditional caesarean hysterectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    氨甲环酸(TXA)由于具有减少失血的潜力而在脊柱手术中获得了普及。然而,对其安全性和有效性的担忧仍然存在。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估TXA在脊柱手术中减少失血的功效及其安全性。
    在电子数据库中对评估TXA在脊柱外科中使用的随机对照试验和前瞻性研究进行了全面搜索。主要结果是术中和总估计失血量(EBL),次要结局包括TXA使用相关并发症的发生率和类型.采用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。
    13项研究纳入荟萃分析,涉及1,213名参与者。TXA的使用与两种术中的显着减少相关(平均差异:-46.56mL[-73.85,-19.26],p<0.01])和总EBL(平均差:-210.17mL[-284.93,-135.40],p<0.01),同时也降低了输血的需要(风险比:0.68[0.51,0.90],p<0.01)。在脊柱手术中使用TXA时,血栓性并发症的发生率和类型没有显着差异。亚组分析显示,器械和融合手术以及不同剂量的TXA的结果一致。
    TXA可有效减少脊柱手术中的术中和整体失血,而不会增加并发症的风险。这些发现支持使用TXA改善患者预后。然而,由于纳入研究的异质性,应谨慎行事。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并探索潜在的长期并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained popularity in spinal surgery because of its potential to reduce blood loss. However, concerns regarding its safety and efficacy remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss and its safety profile in spinal surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies evaluating the use of TXA in spinal surgery. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and total estimated blood loss (EBL), and the secondary outcomes included the incidence and types of complications associated with TXA use. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirteen studies involving 1,213 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The use of TXA was associated with significant reductions in both intraoperative (mean difference: -46.56 mL [-73.85, -19.26], p<0.01]) and total EBL (mean difference: -210.17 mL [-284.93, -135.40], p<0.01) while also decreasing the need for blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.68 [0.51, 0.90], p<0.01). No significant difference was found in the incidence and types of thrombotic complications when TXA was used in spinal surgery. Subgroup analysis showed consistent results in instrumentation and fusion surgery and different doses of TXA.
    UNASSIGNED: TXA is effective in reducing intraoperative and overall blood loss in spinal surgery without increasing the risk of complications. These findings support the use of TXA to improve patient outcomes. However, caution should be exercised because of the heterogeneity among the included studies. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore potential long-term complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:内镜手术是保留乳头和乳晕的有效技术,以及前哨淋巴结活检和乳房植入物重建。然而,与内窥镜手术相关的技术挑战限制了其广泛采用.
    方法:在正常的单孔内窥镜手术中,超声刀通过牵开器进入。在我们修改的程序中,在乳房下方的侧缘做了一个5毫米的小切口,作为超声手术刀的第二入口,这被称为“海贵1号洞”。术前、术后失血等指标,手术时间,收集术后引流量。使用Studentt检验比较参数之间的差异。
    结果:在\“Haigui-1孔\”的帮助下进行内窥镜手术,以最小的疤痕保留了乳房美学。此外,“海桂-1孔”手术大大缩短了手术时间,术中出血,与普通单孔内镜手术相比,术后引流量。
    结论:“海贵1洞”程序,其中包括增加第二个入口以提高超声刀的可操作性,值得进一步推广。
    OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic surgery is an effective technique for preserving the nipple and areola, as well as for sentinel lymph node biopsy and breast implant reconstruction. However, the technical challenges associated with endoscopic surgery have limited its widespread adoption.
    METHODS: In the normal single-port endoscopic surgery, the ultrasonic knife was accessed through the retractor. In our modified procedure, a tiny 5 mm incision was made at the lateral margin underneath the breast, serving as the second entry port for the ultrasonic scalpel, which was referred to as the \"Haigui-1 hole\". Preoperative and postoperative indicators such as blood loss, operative time, and postoperative drainage volume were collected. Differences between parameters were compared using Student\'s t test.
    RESULTS: Endoscopic surgery with the assistance of the \"Haigui-1 hole\" led to preserved breast aesthetics with minimal scarring. Moreover, \"Haigui-1 hole\" surgery significantly reduced the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative drainage volume compared to normal single-port endoscopic surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: The \"Haigui-1 hole\" procedure, which involves the addition of a second entrance to improve the maneuverability of the ultrasonic knife, is worthy of further promotion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:全膝关节置换术(TKA)期间失血和输血过多的危险因素尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定失血过多的危险因素,并建立术后输血的预测模型。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括329例接受TKA的患者,他们被随机分配到训练集(n=229)或测试集(n=100)。使用单变量和多变量线性回归分析来确定过度失血的危险因素。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来确定输血的危险因素。采用R软件建立预测模型。使用校准曲线评估模型的准确性和稳定性,一致性指数,和受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线分析。
    结果:失血过多的危险因素包括使用止血带的时机,排水的使用,术前ESR,纤维蛋白原,HCT,ALB,和游离脂肪酸水平。列线图中的预测因素包括使用止血带的时机,排水的使用,TXA的使用,术前ESR,HCT,和白蛋白水平。训练集的ROC曲线下面积为0.855(95%CI,0.800至0.910),测试集为0.824(95%CI,0.740至0.909)。训练集和测试集的一致性指标值分别为0.855和0.824。
    结论:确定了TKA期间和之后失血过多的危险因素,并设计了一个令人满意和可靠的列线图模型来预测术后输血的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: The risk factors for excessive blood loss and transfusion during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain unclear. The present study aimed to determine the risk factors for excessive blood loss and establish a predictive model for postoperative blood transfusion.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 329 patients received TKA, who were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 229) or a test set (n = 100). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for excessive blood loss. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine risk factors for blood transfusion. R software was used to establish the prediction model. The accuracy and stability of the models were evaluated using calibration curves, consistency indices, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
    RESULTS: Risk factors for excessive blood loss included timing of using a tourniquet, the use of drainage, preoperative ESR, fibrinogen, HCT, ALB, and free fatty acid levels. Predictors in the nomogram included timing of using a tourniquet, the use of drainage, the use of TXA, preoperative ESR, HCT, and albumin levels. The area under the ROC curve was 0.855 (95% CI, 0.800 to 0.910) for the training set and 0.824 (95% CI, 0.740 to 0.909) for the test set. The consistency index values for the training and test sets were 0.855 and 0.824, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for excessive blood loss during and after TKA were determined, and a satisfactory and reliable nomogram model was designed to predict the risk for postoperative blood transfusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)是治疗退行性关节疾病的金标准,但它有很大的失血风险,可能需要输血。实施各种技术以减少需要同种异体输血(ABT)的可能性。为此,本研究旨在评估氨甲环酸(TXA)减少初次TKA后失血的有效性.
    这项研究是一项随机对照研究,于2021年7月至2022年9月在大马士革进行了100例初次全膝关节置换术,对每位患者进行了六个月的随访。将患者随机分为两组。我们比较了术中,术后,total,以及隐性失血和围手术期并发症。
    我们观察到两组之间的总计算有统计学上的显着差异,隐藏,术后失血.然而,这种差异在临床上似乎并不显著,因为我们没有发现两组之间异体输血的显著差异。关于并发症,TXA组创面浅表感染5例,深静脉血栓形成6例。相比之下,对照组创面浅表感染8例,深静脉血栓形成5例。
    我们的研究表明,TXA在经验丰富的外科医生手中的原发性单侧全膝关节置换术中的作用可能被高估了。失血减少似乎没有临床意义,也不影响输血率。
    UNASSIGNED: Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold standard treatment for degenerative joint disease, but it carries a significant risk of blood loss that may require transfusion. Various techniques are implemented to reduce the possibility of the need for allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). To this end, this study aims to assess the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) in decreasing blood loss following primary TKA.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is a randomized controlled study of 100 cases of primary total knee arthroplasty conducted in Damascus from July 2021 to September 2022, followed up with every patient for six months. The patients were randomized into two groups. We compared intraoperative, postoperative, total, and hidden blood loss and perioperative complications.
    UNASSIGNED: We observed a statistically significant difference between the two groups in total calculated, hidden, and postoperative blood loss. However, this difference does not seem clinically significant, as we didn\'t find a significant difference in allogeneic blood transfusion between the groups. Regarding complications, the TXA group had five cases of superficial wound infection and six cases of deep venous thrombosis. In contrast, the control group had eight cases of superficial wound infection and five cases of deep venous thrombosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study suggests that the role of TXA in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty in the hands of an experienced surgeon might be overrated. The reduced blood loss did not seem to have clinical importance and didn\'t affect the transfusion rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在观察氨甲环酸(TXA)在腰椎后路双节段椎间融合术(PLIF)中的止血和抗炎作用。本研究包括53例接受双节段PLIF治疗的腰椎疾病患者的数据。观察组在全麻后皮肤切开前15min单剂量静脉注射TXA(1g/100mL)。对照组不接受TXA。观察指标包括术后活化部分凝血酶原时间(APTT),凝血酶时间(PT),凝血酶时间(TT),纤维蛋白原(FIB),血小板(PLT),术后下肢深静脉血栓形成,手术时间,术中出血量,术后引流量,输血率,术后住院时间,红细胞(RBC),血红蛋白(HB),血细胞比容(HCT),C反应蛋白(CRP),和红细胞沉降率(ESR)在1日,第四,Seven,手术后的最后一天测试。所有患者均顺利完成手术,术后无下肢深静脉血栓形成。术后APTT无统计学差异,PT,TT,FIB,PLT,手术时间,术后住院时间两组比较(p>0.05)。术中出血量,术后引流量,观察组输血率均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。RBC差异无统计学意义,HB,HCT,CRP,和ESR在1号两组之间,第四,Seven,和手术后最后一天测试(p>0.05)。双节段PLIF静脉给予TXA不影响凝血功能,可减少出血量,术后引流量,输血率。此外,不影响术后炎症反应。
    This study aims to observe the hemostatic and anti-inflammatory effects of intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in dual segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The data of 53 patients with lumbar disease treated with double-segment PLIF were included in this study. The observation group was received a single-dose intravenous of TXA (1 g/100 mL) 15 min before skin incision after general anesthesia. The control group was not received TXA. The observation indicators included postoperative activated partial prothrombin time (APTT), thrombin time (PT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen (FIB), platelets (PLT), and postoperative deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, transfusion rate, postoperative hospital stay, red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) on the 1st, 4th, 7th, and last tested day after surgery. All patients successfully completed the operation, and there was no deep vein thrombosis after operation. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative APTT, PT, TT, FIB, PLT, surgical time, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). The intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, and transfusion rate in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in RBC, HB, HCT, CRP, and ESR between the two groups on the 1st, 4th, 7th, and last tested day after surgery (p > 0.05). Intravenous administration of TXA in dual segment PLIF does not affect coagulation function and can reduce bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, and transfusion rate. Moreover, it does not affect the postoperative inflammatory response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)可有效治疗终末期血友病性髋关节病。鉴于血友病的独特特征,围手术期出血仍然是THA患者的重大风险.氨甲环酸(TXA),一种有效的抗纤维蛋白溶解剂,可能有利于血友病(PWH)患者的THA结果。本研究旨在探讨关节腔内注射TXA治疗PWH围手术期出血的临床疗效,并评估其额外的临床获益。
    方法:回顾性研究包括2015年1月至2021年12月在研究中心接受THA的PWH数据。共有59人被纳入研究,分为TXA组(n=31)和非TXA组(n=28)。我们比较了各种参数,包括总失血量(TBL),可见失血(VBL),隐匿性失血(OBL),术中凝血因子VIII(FVIII)消耗,围手术期FVIII总消耗量,血红蛋白(HB),红细胞沉降率(ESR),C反应蛋白(CRP),住院时间,住院费用,手术长度,总蛋白质,活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT),D-二聚体,关节肿胀率,髋关节活动范围(ROM),视觉模拟量表(VAS),两组患者Harris髋关节功能量表(HHS)评分。随访评估持续24个月。采用Studentt检验进行统计分析。
    结果:这项研究表明,关节内TXA可有效降低TBL(1248.19±439.88mL,p<0.001),VBL(490.32±344.34mL,p=0.003),和OBL(757.87±381.48mL,p=0.004)在接受THA的PWH中。TXA在降低POD1,POD7和POD14的VAS评分以及POD1,POD7,POD14和出院时的关节肿胀率方面显示出有效性(p<0.05)。此外,TXA组在所有随访时间点都获得了更高的HHS评分(p<0.05),表现出优越的髋关节活动度,术后炎症水平较低,在手术过程中减少因子VIII的消耗,术后营养损失较少。两组住院时间无统计学差异,住院费用,手术持续时间,和凝血指标。
    结论:关节内注射TXA减少了接受THA的PWH围手术期出血,同时还改善了关节活动度,术后康复,和生活质量。这可以为PWH中TXA的未来应用提供价值。
    OBJECTIVE: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) effectively treats end-stage hemophilic hip arthropathy. Given hemophilia\'s unique characteristics, perioperative bleeding remains a significant risk for patients undergoing THA. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an efficient antifibrinolytic agent, may benefit the outcomes of THA for patients with hemophilia (PWH). This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy of intra-articular injection of TXA in treating perioperative bleeding in PWH and assess its additional clinical benefits.
    METHODS: The retrospective study comprised data of PWH who received THA from January 2015 to December 2021 in the research center. A total of 59 individuals were included in the study, divided into a TXA group (n = 31) and a non-TXA group (n = 28). We compared various parameters, including total blood loss (TBL), visible blood loss (VBL), occult blood loss (OBL), intraoperative coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) consumption, perioperative total FVIII consumption, hemoglobin (HB), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, length of surgery, total protein, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer, rate of joint swelling, hip joint range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), and Harris hip joint function scale (HHS) between the two groups. Follow-up assessments were conducted for up to 24 months. A Student\'s t test was utilized for the statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: This study demonstrated that intra-articular TXA effectively reduced TBL (1248.19 ± 439.88 mL, p < 0.001), VBL (490.32 ± 344.34 mL, p = 0.003), and OBL (757.87 ± 381.48 mL, p = 0.004) in PWH who underwent THA. TXA demonstrated effectiveness in reducing VAS scores on POD1, POD7, and POD14 and joint swelling rates on POD1, POD7, POD14, and at discharge (p < 0.05). Additionally, the TXA group achieved higher HHS ratings at all follow-up time points (p < 0.05), showing superior hip joint mobility, lower postoperative inflammation levels, reduced factor VIII consumption during surgery, and less postoperative nutritional loss. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, surgery duration, and coagulation indicators.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular injection of TXA reduces perioperative bleeding in PWH undergoing THA while also improving joint mobility, post-operative rehabilitation, and quality of life. This may provide value for the future application of TXA in PWH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于广泛的软组织解剖,脊柱手术与大量失血有关,骨减压,延长手术时间。过度出血可能需要输血,从而增加输血不良反应的风险。因此,减少围手术期出血对脊柱外科医生降低术后发病率很重要.氨甲环酸(TXA)是一种合成的抗纤维蛋白溶解药物,这有助于减少大型手术围手术期的失血。关于这种药物在所有方式的脊柱手术中的功效的证据是不充分的。因此,本研究旨在确定TXA对大型脊柱手术围手术期失血的疗效。在一项前瞻性研究中,包括两组手术概况相似的患者,这些患者被张贴在各种方式的脊柱开放手术中。一组接受1克静脉内TXA,而另一组则没有。术中和术后评估包括记录手术水平,手术持续时间,失血评估,术中和/或术后输血,并在24小时结束时收集在手术引流中的血液。术中失血,术中输血的频率,术后血红蛋白下降,发现接受TXA的患者的手术引流输出显着降低。在脊柱手术中,TXA可有效减少术中失血,术中输血和术后Hb下降的需要。此外,TXA在两组之间显着减少了手术引流输出。
    Spine surgeries are associated with significant blood loss due to the extensive soft tissue dissection, bony decompression, and prolonged surgical time. Excessive bleeding may require blood transfusions and thereby increase the risk of adverse transfusion reactions. Therefore, minimizing peri-operative bleeding is important for spine surgeons to reduce post-operative morbidity. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic anti-fibrinolytic drug, which helps in reducing perioperative blood loss in major surgeries. The evidence on the efficacy of this agent in all manner of spine surgeries is not sufficient. Hence this study was conducted to determine the efficacy of TXA on perioperative blood loss in major spinal surgeries. In a prospective study, two groups of patients with similar surgical profiles who were posted for all manner of open spine surgeries were included. One group received one gram of intravenous TXA while the others did not. Intra- and post-operative assessments included noting levels of surgery, duration of surgery, assessment of blood loss, intra- and/or post- operative blood transfusion, and blood collected in surgical drain at the end of 24 h. The intra-operative blood loss, frequency of intra-operative blood transfusion, post-operative Hemoglobin drop, and surgical drain output were found to be significantly lower in patients who received TXA. In spine surgeries, TXA was found to be effective in reducing intra-operative blood loss, need for intra-operative blood transfusion and post-operative Hb drop. Also, TXA had reduced surgical drain output significantly between the two groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:股骨颈骨折构成了一个公共健康问题,原因是在老龄化人群中发病率和死亡率显著相关。围手术期失血会增加这种发病率。失血,以及手术方法对它的影响,仍然评价不佳。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性比较研究,以便:1)根据患者是否使用前路或后路手术比较总失血量,2)比较输血率,这两组之间的手术时间和住院时间,3)分析位错率。
    目的:股骨颈骨折髋关节置换术后前入路的总失血量增加,与后路相比。
    方法:这项回顾性单中心对比研究纳入了2020年12月至2021年6月间137例人工髋关节置换术患者,排除了7例患者。分析了130例患者:69例(53.1%)通过前休特入路(AA)手术,61例(46.9%)通过后摩尔入路(PA)手术。总失血量分析采用OSTHEO公式收集围手术期“隐性”失血量。还分析了早期脱位(少于6个月)的风险。
    结果:两组总失血量相似,AA:1626±506mLvs.PA:1746±692mL(p=0.27)。两组之间的输血率也相似,AA:23.2%与PA:31.1%(p=0.31)以及住院时间,AA:8.5±3.2对比PA:8.2±3.3天(p=0.54)。PA组的手术时间较短(Δ=10.3±14.1分钟(p<0.001)),当患者接受AA的PA手术时,早期脱位的风险更大:9.8%vs.PA:1.4%(p=0.03)。
    结论:本研究未显示入路(前路或后路)对总失血量的影响。两组之间的输血率和住院时间相似,手术时间稍短,但在麻醉相关风险较高的人群中,后路半髋关节置换术后早期脱位的风险更大。
    方法:III,连续系列的比较研究。
    BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures constitute a public health problem due to significant associated morbidity and mortality amongst the ageing population. Perioperative blood loss can increase this morbidity. Blood loss, as well as the influence that the surgical approach exerts on it, remains poorly evaluated. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in order to: (1) compare total blood loss depending on whether the patients were operated on using an anterior or posterior approach, (2) compare the transfusion rates, operating times and hospital stays between these two groups and, (3) analyze dislocation rates.
    OBJECTIVE: Total blood loss is greater from an anterior approach following a hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, compared to the posterior approach.
    METHODS: This retrospective single-center comparative study included 137 patients operated on by hip hemiarthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021, and seven patients were excluded. One hundred and thirty patients were analyzed: 69 (53.1%) had been operated on via the anterior Hueter approach (AA) and 61 (46.9%) via the posterior Moore approach (PA). The analysis of total blood loss was based on the OSTHEO formula to collect perioperative \"hidden\" blood loss. The risk of early dislocation (less than 6 months) was also analyzed.
    RESULTS: Total blood loss was similar between the two groups, AA: 1626±506mL versus PA: 1746±692mL (p=0.27). The transfusion rates were also similar between the two groups, AA: 23.2% versus PA: 31.1% (p=0.31) as well as the duration of hospitalization, AA: 8.5±3.2 versus PA: 8.2±3.3 days (p=0.54). The operating time was shorter in the PA group (Δ=10.3±14.1minutes [p<0.001]) with a greater risk of early dislocation when the patient was operated on by PA with AA: 9.8% versus PA: 1.4% (p=0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study does not demonstrate any influence of the approach (anterior or posterior) on total blood loss. Transfusion rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups with a slightly shorter operating time but a greater risk of early dislocations after posterior hemiarthroplasty in a population at high anesthesia-related risk.
    METHODS: III, comparative study of continuous series.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号