bleeding risk

出血风险
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗血小板药,特别是P2Y12受体抑制剂,是临床上预防和治疗血栓性疾病的关键药物。然而,长期使用它们会给心血管疾病患者带来严重的出血风险。无论出血是由药物本身引起的,还是由于外科手术或外伤引起的,需要迅速逆转抗血小板药物在循环中的作用是必不可少的;然而,目前没有这样的代理。为了满足这一需求,在这里,我们描述了一种使用细胞膜包裹纳米颗粒(CM-NP)快速逆转P2Y12抑制剂的策略.CM-NP是用衍生自293T细胞的膜制造的,所述膜被基因工程化以过表达P2Y12受体。我们的研究结果支持CM-NP作为治疗与P2Y12受体抑制剂相关的出血并发症的策略的潜力。提供了一种方法来提高这些药物在临床环境中使用的安全性。
    Antiplatelet agents, particularly P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, are critical medicines in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic diseases in the clinic. However, their long-term use introduces a significant risk of bleeding in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Whether the bleeding is caused by the drug itself or due to surgical procedures or trauma, the need to rapidly reverse the effects of antiplatelet agents in the circulation is essential; however, no such agents are currently available. To address this need, here we describe a strategy that uses cell-membrane-wrapped nanoparticles (CM-NPs) for the rapid reversal of P2Y12 inhibitors. CM-NPs are fabricated with membranes derived from 293T cells genetically engineered to overexpress the P2Y12 receptor. Our findings support the potential of CM-NPs as a strategy for managing bleeding complications associated with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, offering an approach to improve the safety in the use of these drugs in clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小参考血管直径(RVD)是冠状动脉支架置入术后缺血事件的预测因子。在高出血风险(HBR)排除长期双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的患者中,小血管疾病(SVD)患者构成了一个特别高危的亚组.这里,我们评估了耐用聚合物的结果,冠状动脉唑他莫司洗脱支架(ZES)用于治疗1个月DAPT的HBRSVD患者。
    在未来,多中心OnyxONE(一个月DAPT)清除研究,纳入了在30天停止DAPT的ZES治疗的HBR患者1506例。RVD≤2.5mm(SVD组,由血管造影核心实验室确定)与无SVD的患者进行比较。主要终点是1至12个月之间的心脏死亡或心肌梗死的复合终点。
    对489例(32.5%)患者进行了小血管直径治疗。SVD患者更可能是女性,之前经历过经皮介入,与没有SVD的患者相比,患有多支冠状动脉疾病。病变无显著差异,装置,或组间程序上的成功。SVD患者和无SVD患者的主要终点Kaplan-Meier率估计分别为8.5%和6.8%。分别(P=.425)。在任何次要终点均未发现显着差异。SVD患者和无SVD患者的Kaplan-Meier支架内血栓形成率分别为0.6%和0.8%,分别(P=.50)。
    在接受ZES和1个月DAPT治疗的HBR患者中,SVD患者12个月缺血和出血结局良好,与较大口径血管的患者相当。
    UNASSIGNED: Small reference vessel diameters (RVDs) are a predictor of ischemic events after coronary stenting. Among patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) precluding long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), those with small vessel disease (SVD) constitute an especially high-risk subgroup. Here, we evaluated the results of a durable-polymer, coronary zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) for the treatment of patients with SVD at HBR with 1-month DAPT.
    UNASSIGNED: In the prospective, multicenter Onyx ONE (One-Month DAPT) Clear study, 1506 patients at HBR treated with a ZES that discontinued DAPT at 30 days were included. The clinical outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of lesions with an RVD of ≤2.5 mm (SVD group, as determined by the angiographic core laboratory) were compared with patients without SVD. The primary end point was the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction between 1 and 12 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Small vessel diameter treatment was performed in 489 (32.5%) patients. Patients with SVD were more likely to be women, have undergone a previous percutaneous intervention, and have multivessel coronary artery disease than patients without SVD. There were no significant differences in lesion, device, or procedural success between the groups. The Kaplan-Meier rate estimate of the primary end point was 8.5% and 6.8% in patients with SVD and those without SVD, respectively (P = .425). No significant differences were found in any secondary end point. The Kaplan-Meier rate of stent thrombosis was 0.6% and 0.8% in patients with SVD and those without SVD, respectively (P = .50).
    UNASSIGNED: Among patients at HBR treated with a ZES and 1-month DAPT, those with SVD had favorable 12-month ischemic and bleeding outcomes, which were comparable with those of patients with larger caliber vessels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:确定选择性血管成形术后双重抗血小板治疗的最安全持续时间,以减少出血事件而不对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)产生不良影响,仍然是一个挑战。方法:在这个研究者发起的,单中心队列研究,我们确定了在2015年1月至2019年11月期间接受PCI治疗新发冠心病的所有患者均为稳定型心绞痛.我们比较了双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的1个月和12个月持续时间,以确定大出血的主要结局是否有任何差异。次要结局是以患者为导向的全因死亡率复合终点;任何心肌梗死,中风,或血运重建;以及该复合终点的各个组成部分。使用Cox回归模型和累积风险图分析数据。结果:共分析了1025例患者,其中340人接受了1个月的DAPT,685人接受了12个月的DAPT。两组之间的大出血没有差异(2.6%vs.分别为2.5%)。关于单变量cox回归分析,无特征是大出血的预测因素.1个月DAPT组中99.7%的患者接受DCB治疗。而12个月DAPT组的93%接受了DES治疗。在以患者为导向的复合MACE方面,两组之间没有差异(11%与12%,分别)或任何单独的组成部分。在倾向评分匹配分析之后,这些结果没有改变。结论:DAPT持续1个月,99.7%的患者接受了DCB治疗,与12个月的DAPT相比,在大出血或MACE方面没有差异。
    Background/Objectives: The need to determine the safest duration of dual antiplatelet therapy duration after elective angioplasty to reduce bleeding events without an adverse effect on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains a challenge. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, single-centre cohort study, we identified all patients who underwent PCI for de novo coronary disease for stable angina between January 2015 and November 2019. We compared 1-month and 12-month durations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to determine if there was any difference in the primary outcome of major bleeding. The secondary outcome was a patient-oriented composite endpoint of all-cause mortality; any myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularisation; and the individual components of this composite endpoint. Data were analysed using Cox regression models and cumulative hazard plots. Results: A total of 1025 patients were analysed, of which 340 received 1 month of DAPT and 685 received 12 months of DAPT. There was no difference in major bleeding between the two groups (2.6% vs. 2.5% respectively). On univariable cox regression analysis, no characteristics were predictors of major bleeding. A proportion of 99.7% of patients in the 1-month DAPT arm were treated with a DCB strategy, whilst 93% in the 12-month DAPT group were treated with a DES. There was no difference between the two groups with regards to the composite patient-oriented MACE (11% vs. 12%, respectively) or any individual component of this. These results were unchanged after propensity score matched analysis. Conclusions: A 1-month duration of DAPT, for which 99.7% of patients were treated with a DCB strategy, appears safe and effective when compared with a 12-month duration of DAPT with no difference in major bleeding or MACE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    文献中的几项研究表明,与非瓣膜性心房颤动相关的栓塞中有90%起源于左心耳。目前,在文献中,高出血和高心源性栓塞风险患者的左心耳经皮封堵术或手术排除术是一种行之有效的方法。临床实践和指南。了解不同的左心耳封堵技术是必要的,以根据患者的解剖结构和术前影像学评估个性化的程序。在这篇综述中,作者将评估不同的左心耳闭合系统以及不同的术前和术中成像方法。
    Several studies in literature have shown that 90% of emboli related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation originate from left atrial appendage. Percutaneous closure or surgical exclusion of left atrial appendage in patients with high bleeding and high cardioembolic risk is currently a well established procedure in literature, clinical practice and guidelines. Knowledge of different techniques of left atrial appendage closure is necessary to individualize the procedure according to the patient anatomy and pre-procedural imaging evaluations. In this review the authors will evaluate different left atrial appendage closure systems and the different pre and intra procedural imaging methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    癌症相关血栓形成(CAT)是一种破坏性的癌症并发症,可显著影响患者的健康和生活。CAT的发病率约为20%,每5名癌症患者中就有1名将每年发展成CAT。的确,CAT可以促进肺栓塞和深静脉血栓形成,导致发病率和死亡率增加,从而显著影响生存率。CAT还可以引起抗癌治疗的延迟或停止,这可能导致患者缺乏治疗效果和高昂的费用,机构,和社会。目前的指南提倡直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)作为CAT的一线抗凝剂选择。与低分子量肝素(LMWHs)相比,DOAC的优势在于它们通常具有口服给药途径,不需要实验室监测,并具有更可预测的抗凝作用。然而,在血小板减少症患者中,肾功能衰竭,或者那些接受有潜在药物-药物相互作用的抗癌方案的人,LMWH仍然是护理的支柱。目前抗凝剂的主要局限性与出血风险(BR)有关,对于DOAC和LMWH。具体来说,DOAC与胃肠道和泌尿生殖系统癌症中的高BR相关。在这个充满挑战的场景中,abelacimab,抗因子XI剂,由于其“止血节省”效果,可以代表CAT管理的可行选择。abelacimab的安全概况可用于患有活动性恶性肿瘤和CAT的患者,因为经常需要长期抗凝治疗。两项正在进行的国际III期试验(Aster和Magnolia)将abelacimab与标准护理(即,CAT患者的阿哌沙班和CAT和高BR患者的达肝素,分别)。Abelacimab是一种新的,有吸引力的抗凝剂,用于CAT的管理,特别是在有静脉血栓栓塞和高BR的活动性癌症患者的阴险和危重情况下。这篇叙述性综述的目的是讨论DOAC和LMWH在CAT治疗中表现的最新证据,并关注abelacimab在CAT及其有希望的相关临床试验中的潜在作用。
    Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a devastating complication of cancer that can significantly impact a patient\'s health and life. The incidence of CAT is approximately 20%, and 1 in 5 cancer patients will develop CAT annually. Indeed, CAT can promote pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, leading to increased morbidity and mortality that dramatically impact survival. CAT can also provoke delay or discontinuation of anticancer treatment, which may result in a lack of treatment efficacy and high costs for patients, institutions, and society. Current guidelines advocate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as the first-line anticoagulant option in CAT. Compared to low-molecular-weight-heparins (LMWHs), DOACs are advantageous in that they typically have an oral route of administration, do not require laboratory monitoring, and have a more predictable anticoagulant effect. However, in patients with thrombocytopenia, renal failure, or those receiving anticancer regimens with potential for drug-drug interactions, LMWH is still the mainstay of care. The main limitation of current anticoagulant agents is related to bleeding risk (BR), both for DOACs and LMWHs. Specifically, DOACs have been associated with high BR in gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers. In this challenging scenario, abelacimab, an anti-factor XI agent, could represent a viable option in the management of CAT due to its \"hemostasis sparing\" effect. The safe profile of abelacimab could be useful in patients with active malignancy and CAT, as long-term anticoagulant therapy is often required. Two ongoing international phase III trials (Aster and Magnolia) compare abelacimab with the standard of care (i.e., apixaban in patients with CAT and dalteparin in those with CAT and high BR, respectively). Abelacimab is a new and attractive anticoagulant for the management of CAT, especially in the insidious and critical scenario of active cancer patients with venous thromboembolism and high BR. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the updated evidence on the performance of DOACs and LMWHs in the treatment of CAT and to focus on the potential role of abelacimab in CAT and its promising associated clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经皮肾活检(PKB)使肾脏病学家能够做出治疗各种肾脏疾病的明智决定;然而,应考虑出血并发症的风险,考虑到肾脏的血管。许多研究报道了PKB后出血事件的危险因素。然而,而尿N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)是肾脏疾病严重程度的有用生物标志物,关于尿NAG是否与出血风险相关的问题知之甚少.
    方法:回顾性研究了2018年10月至2023年10月在国防科技大学医院接受PKB的患者的病历。血红蛋白(Hb)丢失≥1g/dL定义为出血事件。
    结果:在213名患者中,110(51.6%)是男性,中位年龄为56岁(四分位距40-71)。PKB最常见的诊断是IgA肾病(N=72;34.0%)。54例患者(25.3%)在PKB后出现Hb损失≥1g/dL,活检前的尿NAG/Cr水平能够预测出血事件,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积为0.65(p=0.005)。使用35U/gCr的最佳截止值,通过多元logistic回归分析发现尿NAG/Cr是独立的危险因素(比值比3.21,95%置信区间1.42-7.27,p=0.005).即使在调整了以前报告的风险因素后,尿NAG/Cr比值升高仍然是一个有统计学意义的变量.与病理结果相比,只有肌肉小动脉多层弹性层的严重程度与尿NAG/Cr水平(p=0.008)和出血事件(p=0.03)相关.
    结论:尿NAG不仅成功预测了肾脏疾病的严重程度,而且还预测了PKB后的出血事件。肾脏中的动脉硬化可能是这些出血事件增加的潜在机制。
    BACKGROUND: A percutaneous kidney biopsy (PKB) allows nephrologists to make informed decisions for treating various kidney diseases; however, the risk of bleeding complications should be considered, given the vascularity of the kidney. Many studies have reported risk factors for bleeding events after a PKB. However, while urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) is a useful biomarker of kidney disease severity, little is known about whether or not urinary NAG is related to the bleeding risk.
    METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent a PKB at the National Defense Medical College Hospital between October 2018 and October 2023 were retrospectively studied. Hemoglobin (Hb) loss ≥ 1 g/dL was defined as a bleeding event.
    RESULTS: Of the 213 patients, 110 (51.6%) were men, and the median age was 56 years old (interquartile range 40-71). The most frequent diagnosis on a PKB was IgA nephropathy (N = 72; 34.0%). Fifty-four patients (25.3%) experienced Hb loss ≥ 1 g/dL after a PKB, and urinary NAG/Cr levels before the biopsy were able to predict a bleeding event, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.65 (p = 0.005). Using the optimal cutoff value of 35 U/gCr, urinary NAG/Cr was found to be an independent risk factor by multiple logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 3.21, 95% confidence interval 1.42-7.27, p = 0.005). Even after adjusting for previously-reported risk factors, the elevated urinary NAG/Cr ratio remained a statistically significant variable. Compared with the pathological findings, only the severity of multilayered elastic laminae of the small muscular artery was associated with both urinary NAG/Cr levels (p = 0.008) and bleeding events (p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: Urinary NAG successfully predicted not only the severity of kidney disorders but also bleeding events after a PKB. Arteriosclerosis in the kidneys may be the mechanism underlying these increased bleeding events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)现在是治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的主要方法。由于其特殊的程序有效性和安全性,TAVI已扩展到包括手术风险较低的患者,因此,现在包括接受这种治疗的不同患者群体。然而,长期结果还取决于二级血管预防的最佳药物治疗,以抗血栓治疗为基石。利用来自多个随机对照试验的数据,目前的指南通常推荐单一抗血栓治疗,对于无房颤或有房颤的患者,采用单一抗血小板治疗(SAPT)或口服抗凝治疗(OAC),分别。然而,这种模式的个性化,以及特定的案例使用,可能需要基于个体患者特征和并行手术。这篇综述旨在讨论支持TAVI治疗患者抗血栓治疗的证据。标准化治疗的适应症,以及个性化治疗方法的具体考虑。
    Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) now represents the mainstay of treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Owing to its exceptional procedural efficacy and safety, TAVI has been extended to include patients at lower surgical risk, thus now encompassing a diverse patient population receiving this treatment. Yet, long-term outcomes also depend on optimal medical therapy for secondary vascular prevention, with antithrombotic therapy serving as the cornerstone. Leveraging data from multiple randomized controlled trials, the current guidelines generally recommend single antithrombotic therapy, with either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone in those patients without or with atrial fibrillation, respectively. Yet, individualization of this pattern, as well as specific case uses, may be needed based on individual patient characteristics and concurrent procedures. This review aims to discuss the evidence supporting antithrombotic treatments in patients treated with TAVI, indications for a standardized treatment, as well as specific considerations for an individualized approach to treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言接受左心耳闭塞(LAAO)的患者出血或血栓栓塞事件的风险增加。同时,在房颤患者的危险分层中,生物标志物越来越重要.我们旨在评估LAAO后血液学标志物和临床特征与血栓栓塞和出血事件发生的关系。方法七个植入中心回顾性收集血液标志物(即血小板计数(PC),平均血小板体积(MPV),和纤维蛋白原)在LAAO之前。收集预先确定的血栓栓塞和主要出血结果,并使用Cox回归分析评估与术前血液学标志物和临床特征的关联。结果总计,纳入1315例患者(74±9岁,36%女性,CHA2DS2-VASc4.3±1.5,HAS-BLED3.3±1.1)。总随访时间为2682例患者年,LAAO后发生了77起血栓栓塞事件和107起主要出血事件。基线PC是每50*109增量显示与血栓栓塞事件相关信号的唯一生物标志物(HR1.18,95%CI:1.00-1.39)。p=0.056)。血栓事件发生率,包括装置相关血栓,在较高的PC四分位数内增加。血栓栓塞与年龄(HR1.05,95%CI:1.00-1.10,每年增加)和既往血栓栓塞(HR2.08,95%CI:1.07-4.03)相关,但是没有多变量分析中的生物标志物。没有观察到任何血液学标志物与大出血的关联。LAAO后的大出血与先前的大出血有关(HR5.27,95%CI:2.71-10.22),肾脏疾病(HR1.93,95%CI:1.17-3.18)和双重抗血小板治疗的出院(HR1.71,95%CI:1.05-2.77)。结论大多数血栓事件发生在PC的最高四分位数。但在我们的分析中未观察到任何血液学标志物与血栓栓塞或大出血的相关性.在多变量分析中,高龄和既往血栓栓塞与血栓栓塞相关.先前大出血,肾脏疾病和DAPT出院是LAAO术后大出血的多变量预测因子.
    BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are at increased risk for bleeding or thromboembolic events. Concurrently, biomarkers are of growing importance in risk stratification for atrial fibrillation patients. We aimed to evaluate the association of hematological markers and clinical characteristics with the occurrence of thromboembolic and bleeding events following LAAO.
    METHODS: Seven implanting centers retrospectively gathered data on hematological markers (i.e., platelet count [PC], mean platelet volume [MPV], and fibrinogen) prior to LAAO. Prespecified thromboembolic and major bleeding outcomes were collected and the association with pre-procedural hematological markers and clinical characteristics was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.
    RESULTS: In total, 1,315 patients were included (74 ± 9 years, 36% female, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.3 ± 1.5, HAS-BLED 3.3 ± 1.1). Over a total follow-up duration of 2,682 patient years, 77 thromboembolic events and 107 major bleeding events occurred after LAAO. Baseline PC was the only biomarker showing a signal for a relation to thromboembolic events (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39) per 50*109 increment, p = 0.056). Thrombotic event rates, including device-related thrombus, increased within higher PC quartiles. Thromboembolism was associated with age (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.10, per year increase) and prior thromboembolism (HR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.07-4.03), but with none of the biomarkers in multivariate analysis. No association of any of the hematological markers with major bleeding was observed. Major bleeding following LAAO was associated with prior major bleeding (HR 5.27, 95% CI: 2.71-10.22), renal disease (HR 1.93, 95% CI: 1.17-3.18), and discharge on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.05-2.77).
    CONCLUSIONS: Most thrombotic events occurred in the highest PC quartile, but no association of any of the hematological markers with thromboembolism or major bleeding was observed in our analysis. In multivariate analysis, older age and prior thromboembolism were associated with thromboembolism. Prior major bleeding, renal disease and discharge on DAPT were multivariate predictors of major bleeding after LAAO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心力衰竭的血流动力学特征为充血和/或终末器官灌注不足,并与发病率和死亡率增加有关。基础病理生理学,比如神经激素的激活,加剧心力衰竭并导致其他器官的功能恶化。我们一直在进行临床研究,以研究心力衰竭的病理生理学并发现预后因素。在这篇评论文章中,我们报告了心力衰竭临床研究的结果和意义.
    Heart failure is hemodynamically characterized as congestion and/or end-organ hypoperfusion, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Underlying pathophysiology, such as neuro-hormonal activation, exacerbates heart failure and leads to functional deterioration of other organs. We have been conducting clinical research to study the pathophysiology of heart failure and discover prognostic factors. In this review article, we report the results and implications of our clinical research on heart failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脊柱转移需要手术的患者的年龄,主要是65岁以上的人,由于癌症治疗的改善而上升。手术干预的目标是急性神经功能缺损和不稳定。抗凝剂的使用越来越多,尤其是老年人,但在管理出血并发症方面构成挑战。该研究检查了术前抗凝/抗血小板使用与脊柱转移手术中出血风险之间的相关性。这对于优化患者预后至关重要。
    方法:在我科2010年至2023年的一项回顾性研究中,对脊柱肿瘤手术患者进行了分析。数据包括人口统计,神经状况,外科手术,术前抗凝血剂/抗血小板使用,术中/术后凝血管理,和再出血的发生率。凝血管理包括失血评估,凝血因子给药,和术后液体平衡监测。入院时记录实验室参数,preop,posop,和放电。
    结果:290例脊柱转移瘤患者接受手术治疗,主要是男性(63.8%,n=185),中位年龄为65岁。术前,24.1%(n=70)接受口服抗凝剂或抗血小板治疗。30天内,再出血率为4.5%(n=9),与术前抗凝状态无关(p>0.05)。术前神经功能缺损(p=0.004)与再出血风险和手术治疗水平之间存在相关性,与较少的水平与较高的术后出血发生率相关(p<0.01)。
    结论:无论患者的术前抗凝状态如何,脊柱转移癌的手术干预似乎都是安全的。然而,仍然必须为每位患者定制术前计划和准备,强调细致的风险-效益分析和优化围手术期护理。
    BACKGROUND: The age of patients requiring surgery for spinal metastasis, primarily those over 65, has risen due to improved cancer treatments. Surgical intervention targets acute neurological deficits and instability. Anticoagulants are increasingly used, especially in the elderly, but pose challenges in managing bleeding complications. The study examines the correlation between preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet use and bleeding risks in spinal metastasis surgery, which is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
    METHODS: In a retrospective study at our department from 2010 to 2023, spinal tumor surgery patients were analyzed. Data included demographics, neurological status, surgical procedure, preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet use, intra-/postoperative coagulation management, and the incidence of rebleeding. Coagulation management involved blood loss assessment, coagulation factor administration, and fluid balance monitoring post-surgery. Lab parameters were documented at admission, preop, postop, and discharge.
    RESULTS: A cohort of 290 patients underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastases, predominantly males (63.8%, n = 185) with a median age of 65 years. Preoperatively, 24.1% (n = 70) were on oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy. Within 30 days, a rebleeding rate of 4.5% (n = 9) occurred, unrelated to preoperative anticoagulation status (p > 0.05). A correlation was found between preoperative neurologic deficits (p = 0.004) and rebleeding risk and the number of levels treated surgically, with fewer levels associated with a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding (p < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention for spinal metastatic cancer appears to be safe regardless of the patient\'s preoperative anticoagulation status. However, it remains imperative to customize preoperative planning and preparation for each patient, emphasizing meticulous risk-benefit analysis and optimizing perioperative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号