BACKGROUND: In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) provide similar results to drug-coated balloons (DCBs) but are inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES) at 1 year. However, the long-term efficacy of BVS in these patients remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in patients with ISR.
METHODS: RIBS VI (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment; NCT02672878) and RIBS VI Scoring (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment With Scoring Balloon; NTC03069066) are prospective multicenter studies designed to evaluate the results of BVS in patients with ISR (N = 220). The inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical to those used in the RIBS IV (ISR of DES) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Drug-eluting Stents: Drug-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239940) and RIBS V (ISR of bare-metal stents) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239953) randomized trials (including 249 ISR patients treated with DCBs and 249 ISR patients treated with DES). A prespecified comparison of the long-term results obtained with these treatment modalities (ie, DES, DCBs, and BVS) was performed.
RESULTS: Clinical follow-up at 3 years was obtained in all (100%) 718 patients. The 3-year target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was 14.1% (vs 12.9% after DCBs [not significant], and 5.2% after DES [HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.47-5.36; P = 0.001]). In a landmark analysis (>1 year), the target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was higher than after DES (adjusted HR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.15-10.08) and DCBs (adjusted HR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.14-9.70). Very late vessel thrombosis was also more frequent with BVS (BVS: 1.8%, DCBs: 0.4%, DES: 0%; P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, late clinical results of DES are superior to those obtained with DCBs and BVS. Beyond the first year, DCBs are safer and more effective than BVS.

UNASSIGNED: Although the technology of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) aroused the peak of interest a few years ago and currently remains available only as part of experimental research, patients who have had BVS implanted should be still carefully monitored to detect possible long-term complications.
UNASSIGNED: We present the case of a 47-year-old man who had received BVS implantation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Six years later, computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) demonstrated in-segment restenosis in between two newly formed coronary aneurysms at the site of the implanted BVS. The patient received successful optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous intervention with a new metallic drug-eluting stent implantation.
UNASSIGNED: Our case demonstrates that coronary aneurysms can be well characterized with CTCA and are often incidentally discovered as they cause no symptoms. The incidence of coronary aneurysm at the site of a previously implanted BVS is not defined, and little is known about the pathophysiology and evolution of these lesions. Therefore, the decision to proceed with conservative management or intervention must be tailored to the clinical conditions of the patient, the anatomy, the rapidity of growth, and the possible thrombotic burden.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is still the main drawback of heart transplantation (HTx) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a palliative measure because of the high incidence of failure.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) as potential novel therapeutic tool for the treatment of coronary stenoses in CAV.
METHODS: This is a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, open-label study (CART, NCT02377648), that included patients affected by advanced CAV treated with PCI and second-generation ABSORB BRS (Abbott Vascular). The primary endpoint was the incidence of 12-month angiographic in-segment scaffold restenosis (ISSR). Secondary endpoints were the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 12- and 36-month follow-up and the incidence of ISSR at 36 months. A paired intracoronary imaging analysis at baseline and follow-up was also performed.
RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017 35 HTx patients were enrolled and treated for 44 coronary lesions with 51 BRSs. The primary endpoint occurred in 13.5% of the lesions (5/37), with a cumulative ISSR rate up to 3 years of 16.2% (6/37). Angiographic lumen loss was 0.40 ± 0.62 mm at 12 months and 0.53 ± 0.57 mm at 36 months. Overall survival rate was 91.4% and 74.3%, and MACEs incidence 14.2% and 31.4% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. At the paired intracoronary imaging analysis, a significant increase of the vessel external elastic membrane area in the treated segment and some progression of CAV proximally to the BRS were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: BRS-based PCI for the treatment of CAV is feasible and safe, with an ISSR incidence similar to what reported in retrospective studies with drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) provide the prospect of restoring the anatomic and physiologic characteristics of the vascular wall.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the long-term outcomes of BRS-based coronary intervention in a young population with diffuse and severe coronary atherosclerotic disease (CAD) and to compare the long-term evolution of treated segments versus the natural progression of untreated non-flow limiting stenoses.
METHODS: Observational, single-center cohort study that prospectively included patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of ABSORB BRS (Abbott Vascular). The clinical endpoint was the incidence of device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) up to 5 years follow-up. A subgroup of patients with baseline intracoronary imaging assessment of long lesions and/or multivessel disease underwent elective angiographic (70 patients, 129 lesions) and intracoronary imaging (55 patients, 102 lesions) follow-up. Paired intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative flow reserve (QFR) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2017, 159 patients (mean age 54.0 ± 11.1) with native CAD were treated with BRS on 247 lesions. Patients were mainly at their first cardiac event, mostly acute coronary syndromes (86.5%). At the median follow-up time of 56 months [41-65], DoCE occurred in 15/159 (9.4%) patients, while non-target vessel-oriented composite endpoint occurred in 16 patients (10.4%). A significant atherosclerotic progression was detected on residual non-flow limiting plaques as per IVUS and QFR assessment, while no significant change was detected in the treated segment.
CONCLUSIONS: Mild-to-moderate asymptomatic CAD progressed significantly at 5-year despite OMT. BRS-treated segments had a less aggressive progression at 5-year despite more severe and symptomatic CAD at baseline.

BACKGROUND: We have demonstrated that bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) for ACC/AHA type C lesions was associated with higher risks of long-term target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target lesion failure (TLF). We determined the specific time after which higher risks of BVS for type C lesions are reduced in a longer-term follow-up.
METHODS: We analyzed data of 457 patients (59 ± 12 years, 87% male) with 714 BVS implanted for 529 lesions and a median follow-up of 56.4 (48.6-62.6) months. Patients with BVS for at least one type C lesion (N = 177) at index intervention and all non-type C lesions (N = 280) were compared for TLF (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, TLR). We specified the interactions between the non-type C versus type C group and the event-free survival times dichotomized at 24, 30, 32, 33, 36, and 39 months respectively.
RESULTS: The type C group had more multivessel disease (86% versus 65%, p < 0.001), left anterior descending artery treated (68% versus 53%, p = 0.002), intravascular imaging used (48% vs. 25%, p < 0.001), and BVS (2.3 ± 0.9 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, p < 0.001) implanted with a longer total length (57 ± 21 vs. 29 ± 8 mm, p < 0.001). The TLR or TLF was higher (both log-rank p < 0.05) in the type C than in the non-type C group. However, the risks of TLR (hazard ratio: 3.6, 95% CI = 1.1-11.6) and TLF (hazard ratio: 3.8, 95% CI = 1.2-12.1) for type C lesions only remained higher until 24 months post-BVS implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: BVS provides a longer-term advantage, particularly for type C lesions with the majority requiring long stenting.

Biodegradable poly (l-lactic acid) (PLLA), a bio safe polymer with a large elastic modulus, is widely used in biodegradable medical devices. However, because of its poor mechanical properties, a PLLA strut must be made twice as thick as a metal strut for adequate blood vessel support. Therefore, the mechanical properties of a drug-eluting metal-based stents (MBS) and a bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were evaluated and their safety and efficacy were examined via a long-term rabbit iliac artery model.
The surface morphologies of the MBSs and BVSs were investigated via optical and scanning electron microscopy. An everolimus-eluting (EE) BVS or an EE-MBS was implanted into rabbit iliac arteries at a 1.1:1 stent-to-artery ratio. Twelve months afterward, stented iliac arteries from each group were analyzed via X-ray angiography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and histopathologic evaluation.
Surface morphology analysis of the EE coating on the MBS confirmed that it was uniform and very thin (4.7 μm). Comparison of the mechanical properties of the EE-MBS and EE-BVS showed that the latter outperformed the former in all aspects (radial force (2.75 vs. 0.162 N/mm), foreshortening (0.24% vs. 1.9%), flexibility (0.52 vs. 0.19 N), and recoil (3.2% vs. 6.3%). At all time points, the percent area restenosis was increased in the EE-BVS group compared to the EE-MBS group. The OCT and histopathological analyses indicate no significant changes in strut thickness.
BVSs with thinner struts and shorter resorption times should be developed. A comparable long-term safety/efficacy evaluation after complete absorption of BVSs should be conducted.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials comparing the first-generation absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a drug-eluting stent showed a moderate but significant increase in the rate of 3-year major adverse cardiac events and scaffold thrombosis, followed by a decrease in adverse events after 3 years.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the 5-year outcomes of patients treated with at least one absorb BVS and included in the FRANCE ABSORB registry.
METHODS: All patients treated in France with an absorb BVS were prospectively included in a large nationwide multicentre registry. The primary efficacy outcome was the occurrence of 5-year major adverse cardiac events. Secondary efficacy outcomes were the rates of 5-year target vessel revascularization and definite/probable scaffold thrombosis.
RESULTS: Between September 2014 and April 2016, 2,070 patients were included in 86 centres (mean age 55±11 years; 80% men; 49% with acute coronary syndrome). The rates of 1-, 3- and 5-year major adverse cardiac events were 3.9%, 9.4% and 12.1%, respectively (including cardiac death in 2.5% and target vessel revascularization in 10.4%). By multivariable analysis, diabetes, oral anticoagulation, the use of multiple Absorb BVSs and the use of a 2.5mm diameter absorb BVS were associated with 5-year major adverse cardiac events. The rates of 1-, 3- and 5-year definite/probable scaffold thrombosis were 1.5%, 3.1% and 3.6%, respectively. By multivariable analysis, older age, diabetes, anticoagulation at discharge and the use of a 2.5mm diameter absorb BVS were associated with 5-year scaffold thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Absorb BVS implantation was associated with low rates of 1-year major adverse cardiac events, which increased significantly at 3-year follow-up. There was a clear decrease in the rates of scaffold thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events after 3 years.

UNASSIGNED: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common method of treatment for patients with coronary artery disease. One of the most common complications during the PCI procedure is coronary artery dissection. It usually requires an additional action to assure the patency of the treated vessel.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of the publication is to describe the occurrence of coronary artery dissection after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. This selected type of PCI procedure is especially interesting because precise target vessel measurement before BVS implantation is required for optimal determination of scaffold size.
UNASSIGNED: Based on angiographic data gathered in the POLAR ACS Registry, we assessed the frequency of dissections, their localization, and severity. Based on data regarding patients\' demographic, clinical status, and details regarding treatment strategy, the factors that could have an influence on the dissection occurrence were identified.
UNASSIGNED: A group of 100 patients included in the analyses. Group A consisted of 9 patients. This group was defined as patients in whom the significant dissection occurred after the BVS implantation. Group B comprised 91 patients. Both groups were very similar according to demographic data. The frequency of predilatation was similar; post-dilatation was performed more often in group A but without statistical significance. The presence of calcification in the target lesion was an independent factor of dissection during the index PCI procedure.
UNASSIGNED: The occurrence of significant dissection can be effectively treated, and the good angiographic results of this treatment immediately after the initial procedure translate into good clinical results in longer follow-up.

Numerous studies have reported clinical endpoints following coronary revascularization using bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS), while information about the impact on health-related quality of life is sparse. In this analysis of the German-Austrian ABSORB RegIstRy, the 2 year results concerning quality of life development in a large cohort of patients treated with BVS were reported.
Data were collected at baseline as well as 30 days, 6 and 24 months after coronary revascularization using BVS. The EQ-5D score, EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) were determined for each time point. Patients were categorized according to the indication for coronary revascularization [acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stable angina pectoris (SAP), silent myocardial ischemia (SMI), or other]. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors that predict above-average scores two years after implantation.
Data from 1317 patients in 88 centres were included. Reasons for revascularization were: ACS (n = 643), SAP (n = 443), SMI (n = 52), and other (n = 179). Mean EQ-5D was significantly increased after six months, while a value comparable to baseline was found two years after implantation. EQ VAS and four of five dimensions of SAQ were significantly improved over baseline at all follow-up surveys. Particularly strong improvements were seen in SAQ scores angina frequency and quality of life. Binary regressions showed different statistically significant predictors in the respective models.
Following coronary revascularization with BVS strong decrease in self-reported angina frequency and increase of self-reported quality of life were observed with continuous improvements over two years of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02066623.

Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) emerged as an alternative to conventional stents with a fundamental idea, to avoid a permanent metallic cage with all its harmful effects on the vessel. The Absorb BVS was the first widely studied device with the promising concept of performing a percutaneous coronary intervention, giving the necessary initial support to maintain vessel integrity and avoid acute vessel thrombosis. After a period, complete resorption of the device without leaving in the vessel any metallic structure would theoretically offer several benefits as the reduction of the inflammatory response and recovering normal vasomotor function, recovering access of jailed side-branches and segments for surgical revascularization, and the reduction of very late stent thrombosis derived from late acquired malapposition. However, cumulative evidence from the different absorb randomized trials (ABSORB II, ABSORB III, ABSORB China, ABSORB Japan) raised significant concerns, due to an elevated rate of scaffold thrombosis, target lesion failure and target vessel failure, when compared to contemporary everolimus drug-eluting stents. Several mechanisms arose explaining scaffold failure; some were strictly related to the device itself, and others related to the operator and the lesion itself. Newer generation BRS are under development targeting the main limitations of the ABSORB BVS, mainly focusing on reducing strut thickness, improving the mechanical structure with faster resorption times, and a better crossing profile. The story of BRS is not over yet, with ongoing refinements in the quest for the ideal stent.