bioceramic root canal sealers

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估最近的生物陶瓷系统的适应性和穿透深度能力,包括在BC点存在下的常规EndoSequence(BC)与HiFlow(BCH)封闭剂。用冷压实或热压实技术(n=9)对总共54颗单根牙齿进行了仪器和封闭,使用任何一个BC,BCH,或AHPlus(AHP)结合BC点。适应,薄膜厚度,和间隙/空隙通过扫描电子显微镜评估。通过拉曼光谱评估密封剂/牙本质界面,和深度穿透通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜进行评估。根据正态检验,数据通过方差分析或Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-WhitneyU检验进行统计学分析,p<0.05。BCH封口机显示出显着最薄的薄膜,流量最大(p>0.001),当经受温压实技术时,进一步改进。此外,它表现出紧密的适应性,并深度渗透到神经根牙本质中,形成标签状结构。拉曼光谱还表明与牙本质表面紧密接触。使用具有BC点的BC密封剂表现出均匀的,单单元闭塞,用冷或热的技术。此外,使用BCH密封器的热压实技术实现了与标签状结构相关的无间隙界面,表现出整体现象。
    This study aimed to assess the adaptability and penetration depth capacity of recent bioceramic systems, including regular EndoSequence (BC) versus HiFlow (BCH) sealers in the presence of BC points. A total of 54 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and obturated with either the cold or warm compaction technique (n = 9), using either BC, BCH, or AH Plus (AHP) combined with BC points. The adaptation, film thickness, and gaps/voids were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The sealer/dentin interface was evaluated by Raman spectroscopy, and depth penetration was evaluated by a confocal laser scanning microscope. According to the normality test, the data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests at p < 0.05. BCH sealer showed the significantly thinnest film with the greatest flow (p > 0.001), with further improvement when subjected to the warm compaction technique. Moreover, it exhibited close adaptation with deep penetration into radicular dentin, forming a tag-like structure. The Raman spectra also indicated close contact with the dentin surface. The use of BC sealer with BC points exhibited homogenous, single-unit obturation, either with a cold or warm technique. Furthermore, the use of the warm compaction technique with BCH sealer achieved a gap-free interface associated with tag-like structures, which exhibit the monoblock phenomenon.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究评估了四种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂(RCS)在体内的细胞毒性。斑马鱼的胚胎特征,比如死亡率,生存,孵化,和一般形态,用作评估细胞毒性的参数。
    RCS,即GuttaFlowBioseal,MTAFillapex,CeraSeal生物陶瓷,和iRootSP,根据制造商的指导方针进行混合。通过将设定的RCS浸入E3溶液的1X稀释液中来制备提取液。然后,将提取液输送到培养皿中,在培养皿中允许斑马鱼胚胎发育.在受精后24、48、72和96小时评估细胞毒性。
    Kruskal-Wallis测试表明,除了GuttaFlowBioseal,死亡率,生存,其余三个生物陶瓷RCSs的斑马鱼胚胎孵化与阴性对照差异显著(P<0.05)。死亡率也有明显差异,生存,斑马鱼胚胎在GuttaFlowBioseal和其他三个RCS之间的孵化(P<0.05)。
    GuttaFlowBioseal的细胞毒性小于其他生物陶瓷RCS;MTAFillapex,CeraSeal生物陶瓷根管封闭剂,和iRootSP根管封闭剂表现出相当的细胞毒性。
    UNASSIGNED: This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of four bioceramic root canal sealers (RCSs) in vivo. The embryonic zebrafish characteristics, such as mortality, survival, hatching, and general morphology, served as the parameters for assessing cytotoxicity.
    UNASSIGNED: The RCSs, namely GuttaFlow Bioseal, MTA Fillapex, CeraSeal Bioceramic, and iRoot SP, were mixed according to the manufacturer\'s guidelines. The extract solution was prepared by immersing the set RCS into 1X dilution of E3 solution. Then, the extract solution was delivered into a Petri dish where zebrafish embryos were allowed to develop. Cytotoxicity was evaluated 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after fertilization.
    UNASSIGNED: The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that except for GuttaFlow Bioseal, the mortality, survival, and hatching of zebrafish embryos for the remaining three bioceramic RCSs were significantly different from the negative controls (P<0.05). Significant differences were also evident in the mortality, survival, and hatching of zebrafish embryos between GuttaFlow Bioseal and three other RCSs (P<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: GuttaFlow Bioseal was less cytotoxic than other bioceramics RCSs; MTA Fillapex, CeraSeal Bioceramic root canal sealer, and iRoot SP root canal sealer exhibited comparable cytotoxicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号