bile tract cancer

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    单一免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)方案在治疗晚期胆管癌(BTC)方面的价值有限;因此,经常应用ICI联合治疗。本荟萃分析旨在评估ICI联合治疗晚期BTC的有效性和安全性。
    研究方案在PROSPERO(CRD42023452422)上注册。有关中位无进展生存期(PFS)的数据,中位总生存期(OS),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR),对相关研究中报告的≥3级不良事件(AE)进行汇总和分析,以确定ICI联合治疗的有效性和安全性.
    总共,该荟萃分析包括15项665名患者的研究。总体ORR和DCR分别为34.6%和77.6%,分别。总体中位PFS和OS分别为6.06个月[95%置信区间(CI):4.91-7.21]和12.11个月(95%CI:10.66-13.55),分别。除其他治疗外接受ICI联合治疗的患者具有显著延长的中值PFS和OS(z=9.69,p<0.001和z=16.17,p<0.001)。与作为非一线治疗的患者相比,作为一线治疗的患者具有显著更长的中值PFS和OS(z=11.19,p<0.001和z=49.17,p<0.001)。总体合并的≥3级AE率为38.2%(95%CI:0.268-0.497),不受ICI治疗是否与其他治疗或治疗线联合的影响。
    晚期BTC患者可能会从ICI联合治疗中受益,而不会出现其他不良事件。然而,仍然需要同时进行化疗或放疗才能获得更好的结果.
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/普华永道/,标识符CRD42023452422。
    UNASSIGNED: A single immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) regimen has limited value in treating advanced bile tract cancer (BTC); therefore, ICI combination therapy is often applied. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICI combination therapy for advanced BTC.
    UNASSIGNED: The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023452422). Data on the median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) reported in relevant studies were pooled and analyzed to determine the efficacy and safety of ICI combination therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 15 studies with 665 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The overall ORR and DCR were 34.6% and 77.6%, respectively. The overall median PFS and OS were 6.06 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.91-7.21] and 12.11 months (95% CI: 10.66-13.55), respectively. Patients receiving ICI combination therapy in addition to other therapies had a considerably prolonged median PFS and OS (z=9.69, p<0.001 and z=16.17, p<0.001). Patients treated as first-line treatment had a substantially longer median PFS and OS compared to patients treated as non-first-line treatment (z=11.19, p<0.001 and z=49.17, p<0.001). The overall pooled grade ≥3 AEs rate was 38.2% (95% CI: 0.268-0.497) and was not influenced by whether ICI therapy was combined with other treatments or not or the treatment line.
    UNASSIGNED: Advanced BTC patients may benefit from ICI combination treatment without additional AEs. However, concurrent chemotherapy or radiotherapy is still needed to achieve better outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023452422.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胰胆管合流异常(PBM)是一种先天性畸形。由PBM引起的胰液回流到胆道中在胆道癌(BTC)的发展中起着重要作用,如胆囊癌和胆管癌。先前的研究表明,PBM患者中BTC的发生率很高。然而,只有少数报告患者在诊断为PBM后出现BTC.我们报告了两名被诊断为PBM后发展为胆囊癌的患者的病例。他们拒绝治疗,仅在诊断为PBM后进行随访观察,并在观察数年后发展为胆囊癌。因此,应建议对所有PBM患者进行手术治疗,以防止BTC的发展。此外,长期的,关闭,定期随访对于促进未经治疗的PBM患者随后的BTC的早期诊断是必要的。
    Pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) is a congenital malformation. The reflux of pancreatic juice into the biliary tract caused by PBM plays a significant role in the development of biliary tract cancers (BTCs), such as gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Previous studies have demonstrated a high incidence of BTC in patients with PBM. However, there are only a few reports of patients who developed BTC after a diagnosis of PBM. We report the cases of two patients who developed gallbladder cancer after being diagnosed with PBM. They had refused treatment and were being managed with follow-up observation alone after the diagnosis of PBM and developed gallbladder cancer after several years of observation. Thus, surgical treatment should be recommended for all patients with PBM in order to prevent the development of BTC. Moreover, long-term, close, regular follow-up is necessary to facilitate the early diagnosis of subsequent BTC in patients with untreated PBM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆管癌是一种致命的癌症,包括非常异质的亚型,在所有角落都有有限的治疗库。然而,近年来,免疫治疗在晚期胆管癌一线治疗中取得了重大进展,顺铂-吉西他滨化疗后加用durvalumab显示生存获益.在第二行设置中,只有FOLFOX(5FU/亚叶酸-奥沙利铂)通过3期试验得到验证,然而,对生存的益处非常小;使用5FU和纳米脂质体伊立替康的新选择可能会在未来几年出现。在过去的十年中,晚期胆管癌分子谱分析的出现揭示了频繁的可靶向改变,如IDH1突变,FGFR2融合或重排,HER2扩增,BRAFV600E突变等。这一策略为一线治疗后仍然适合的患者开辟了个性化医疗的道路,一线使用靶向抑制剂构成了许多正在进行的改善患者护理的试验的巨大挑战。这篇综述揭示了非分子选择的晚期胆管癌的最新临床试验结果,提供了一个重点,系统的分子筛查应该如何结构,让患者获得个性化的医疗,以及在可行改变的情况下可获得的治疗选择的细节。
    Cholangiocarcinoma is a deadly cancer comprising very heterogenous subtypes with a limited therapeutic arsenal in all comers. However, recent significant advances were made with immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma, with the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy showing a survival benefit. In the second line setting, only FOLFOX (5FU/folinic acid-oxaliplatin) is validated by a phase 3 trial, yet with a very modest benefit on survival; new options using 5FU with nanoliposomal-irinotecan may emerge in the next few years. The advent of molecular profiling in advanced cholangiocarcinoma in the last decade revealed frequent targetable alterations such as IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAF V600E mutation and others. This strategy opened the way to personalised medicine for patients which are still fit after first-line treatment and the use of targeted inhibitors in first line constitutes a huge challenge with many ongoing trials to improve patients\' care. This review exposes the recent clinical trial findings in non-molecularly selected advanced cholangiocarcinoma, offers a focus on how systematic molecular screening should be structured to allow patients to access to personalised medicine, and details which are the therapeutic options accessible in case of actionable alteration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:胆道癌(BTC)即使对于局部癌症也具有有限的预后,强调多学科管理的重要性。NCCN指南推荐高危疾病的辅助化疗(CT)+/-放疗(RT)。我们分析了高危BTC手术后患者中种族和族裔类别与其他人口统计学因素之间的关联以及与NCCN指南的一致性。
    UNASSIGNED:从国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中确定了2004年至2015年接受手术并发现转移性淋巴结(LN)或手术切缘阳性(M)的BTC患者的受试者。我们将符合NCCN指南定义为接受手术+CT+/-RT,不符合指南定义为手术+/-RT。进行描述性研究和多变量逻辑回归分析。
    UNASSIGNED:共有3,792名患者被确定,其中大约一半为女性(55.4%),年龄在50-69岁之间(52.8%)。大多数是白人(76.3%),其次是黑人(10.6%),西班牙裔(8.5%),和亚洲(5.3%)。BTC包括肝外胆管癌(CCA)(48.6%),胆囊癌(43.5%),和肝内CCA(7.9%)。大多数患者进行了M-切除(71.9%),但也患有LN+疾病(88.0%)。种族之间的疾病表现没有显着差异(组织学分级,肿瘤分期)和手术结果(LN+,M+,医院再入院,和手术后90天死亡率)。与白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者不太可能投保(85.7%vs96.3%,p<0.001),并且不太可能在学术机构接受治疗(42.1%对52.1%,p=0.008)。总的来说,近三分之一(29.7%)的患者接受了非一致的NCCN指南护理,与白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者的非一致比例最高(36.1%vs28.7%,p=0.029)。在多变量分析中,西班牙裔种族(HR=1.51,95%CI:1.15-1.99)仍然与NCCN指南不一致显着相关。
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究表明,与白人患者相比,具有高风险BTC的西班牙裔患者接受NCCN一致治疗的可能性明显降低。需要更多的研究来确认和理解观察到的差异,并在系统层面指导有针对性的干预措施。
    UNASSIGNED: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) have a limited prognosis even for localized cancers, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary management. NCCN guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) +/- radiotherapy (RT) for high-risk disease. We analyzed the association between racial and ethnic category along with other demographic factors and concordance to NCCN guidelines among patients following surgery for high-risk BTC.
    UNASSIGNED: Subjects were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for BTC patients who underwent surgery and found to have metastatic lymph nodes (LN+) or positive surgical margins (M+) from 2004 to 2015. We defined concordance to NCCN guidelines as receiving surgery + CT +/- RT and non-concordance to the guidelines as surgery +/- RT. Descriptive studies and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 3,792 patients were identified with approximately half being female (55.4%) and between the ages of 50-69 (52.8%). Most were White (76.3%) followed by Black (10.6%), Hispanic (8.5%), and Asian (5.3%). The BTC included extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (48.6%), gallbladder cancer (43.5%), and intrahepatic CCA (7.9%). Most patients had an M- resection (71.9%) but also had LN+ disease (88.0%). There were no significant differences between racial groups in disease presentation (histological grade, tumor stage) and surgical outcomes (LN+, M+, hospital readmission, and 90 day post-surgery mortality). Hispanic patients as compared to White patients were less likely to be insured (85.7% vs 96.3%, p<0.001) and less likely to be treated at an academic facility (42.1% vs 52.1%, p=0.008). Overall, almost one-third (29.7%) of patients received non-concordant NCCN guideline care with Hispanic patients having the highest proportion of non-concordance as compared to Whites patients (36.1% vs 28.7%, p=0.029). On multivariate analysis, Hispanic ethnicity (HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.15-1.99) remained significantly associated with non-concordance to NCCN guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: This study indicates that Hispanic patients with high-risk BTC are significantly less likely to receive NCCN-concordant treatment in comparison to White patients. More research is needed to confirm and understand the observed disparities and guide targeted interventions at the system-level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在几种实体瘤中,采用lenvatinib联合pembrolizumab(LEP)联合治疗的治疗策略显示出相对较高的抗肿瘤反应;然而,LEP在难治性胆管癌(BTC)患者中的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。
    方法:这是一项单臂研究,用于初步评估LEP在既往全身治疗进展的患者中的疗效和耐受性。收集治疗前肿瘤组织以回顾性评估PDL1的表达状态。
    结果:32例患者接受LEP二线及以上治疗。总的来说,客观反应率(ORR)为25%,疾病控制率(DCR)为78.1%,临床获益率(CBR)为40.5%。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为4.9个月(95%CI:4.7-5.2个月),中位总生存期(OS)为11.0个月(95%CI:9.6-12.3个月).对于耐受性,未报告5级严重不良事件(AE).所有患者均有任何级别的AE,59.3%的患者出现3级不良事件,而只有1例患者经历了4级胃出血的AE。疲劳是最常见的AE,其次是高血压和转氨酶水平升高。PDL1表达的回顾性分析显示,PDL1阳性肿瘤细胞与改善的临床获益和生存结果相关。
    结论:LEP作为难治性BTC患者的非一线治疗方案是一种有希望的替代方案。此外,仍需要精心设计的具有对照组的前瞻性临床试验,以获得更多证据来证实该特定方案的有效性和安全性以及PDL1表达的作用.
    BACKGROUND: A therapeutic strategy involving combined treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LEP) has demonstrated a relatively high antitumor response in several solid tumors; however, the efficacy and safety of LEP in patients with refractory bile tract carcinoma (BTC) remains unknown.
    METHODS: This is a single-arm study for a preliminary assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of LEP in patients who experienced progression from prior systemic treatments. Pre-treatment tumor tissues were collected to retrospectively evaluate the expression status of PDL1.
    RESULTS: Thirty-two patients received second-line and above treatment with LEP. Overall, the objective response rate (ORR) was 25%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 78.1%, and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 40.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI: 4.7-5.2 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.6-12.3 months). For tolerability, no grade 5 serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. All patients had any-grade AEs, and 59.3% of the patients experienced grade 3 AEs, while only 1 patient experienced a grade 4 AE of stomach bleeding. Fatigue was the most common AE, followed by hypertension and elevated aminotransferase levels. Retrospective analysis for PDL1 expression revealed that PDL1 positive tumor cells were associated with improved clinical benefits and survival outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: LEP is a promising alternative as a non-first-line therapeutic regimen for patients with refractory BTC. Furthermore, well-designed prospective clinical trials with a control arm are still needed to obtain more evidences to confirm the efficacy and safety of this particular regimen as well as the role of PDL1 expression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号