臂丛神经产伤(BPBI)是一种相对常见的疾病,对后来忍受功能障碍的儿童构成了重大挑战。这种综合的文献计量分析试图定量评估现有的BPBI文献,揭示作者身份,合作,出版趋势,和关键词分析,既为医学界提供信息,又促进未来的研究增长。对WebofScience数据库的彻底搜索产生了1986年至2022年之间发布的712个相关文档。该分析利用了Biblioshiny(K-SynthSrl,那不勒斯,意大利)对于文献计量数据,与VOSviewer(科学技术研究中心,莱顿大学,荷兰)和TextRazor(TextRazor有限公司,伦敦,英国)用于关键字分类。文献的年均增长率为7.94%,平均文件年龄为12年。合作努力表明9.6%的国际合作作者,与美国显著领先的全球合作。顶级制作作者包括杨,Kozin,还有Clarke,被引用最多的作者是克拉克,沃特斯,还有Curtis.诸如《小儿骨科和整形外科与重建外科杂志》之类的期刊成为文献的主要贡献者。关键词分析阐明了流行的类别,如“社会”和“健康”,“强调了BPBI研究的多面性。这项文献计量分析的发现突出了BPBI研究的动态和协作格局,强调迫切需要继续作出贡献,以解决现有的知识差距,加强全球合作,并促进对这种复杂状况的理解和治疗。除了定量指标,这项研究作为研究人员的指南针具有特别重要的意义,从业者,和政策制定者投资于BPBI。通过提供对有影响力的作者的见解,机构,和新兴趋势,这种分析是一种宝贵的资源,指导未来的研究工作,促进跨学科合作,并最终有助于改善受BPBI影响的个人的结果。这项研究的重要性不仅在于其信息内容,而且在于其催化集体努力改善治疗方式的潜力。促进预防措施,并提高那些应对BPBI挑战的人的整体护理质量。
Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a relatively common condition that poses a significant challenge to children who endure functional impairments later on. This comprehensive bibliometric analysis sought to quantitatively evaluate the existing literature on BPBI, shedding light on authorship, collaboration, publication trends, and keyword analysis to both inform the medical community and foster future research growth. A thorough search of the Web of Science database yielded 712 relevant documents published between 1986 and 2022. The analysis utilized Biblioshiny (K-Synth Srl, Naples, Italy) for bibliometric data, alongside VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands) and TextRazor (TextRazor Ltd., London, UK) for keyword categorization. The literature had an average annual growth rate of 7.94%, with an average document age of 12 years. Collaborative efforts demonstrated 9.6% international co-authorship, with the United States prominently leading global collaborations. Top producing authors included Yang, Kozin, and Clarke, while the most cited authors were Clarke, Waters, and Curtis. Journals such as the Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery emerged as key contributors to the literature. Keyword analysis illuminated prevalent categories like \"society\" and \"health,\" underscoring the multifaceted nature of BPBI research. The findings from this bibliometric analysis highlight the dynamic and collaborative landscape of BPBI research, emphasizing the pressing need for continued contributions to address existing gaps in knowledge, enhance global collaboration, and advance the understanding and treatment of this complex condition. Beyond quantitative metrics, this study holds particular significance in its role as a compass for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers invested in BPBI. By offering insights into influential authors, institutions, and emerging trends, this analysis serves as a valuable resource, guiding future research endeavors, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and ultimately contributing to improved outcomes for individuals affected by BPBI. The importance of this study lies not only in its informative content but also in its potential to catalyze a collective effort toward refining treatment modalities, promoting preventative measures, and enhancing the overall quality of care for those navigating the challenges of BPBI.