basic echocardiography

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    初级保健有望成为广泛采用现场护理超声(POCUS)的最新领域。POCUS为临床环境中遇到的常见病症的有效诊断和治疗提供了许多益处。本文回顾了POCUS基础知识,并提供了使用POCUS进行肌肉骨骼引导注射和心脏临床评估的证据和最佳实践,肺,腹主动脉,下肢深静脉,软组织感染,和异物。
    Primary care is poised to become the latest field to widely adopt Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS). POCUS offers many benefits for efficient diagnosis and treatment of common conditions encountered in the clinical setting. This article reviews POCUS basics and presents evidence and best practices for the use of POCUS for musculoskeletal-guided injection and clinical evaluation of the heart, lungs, abdominal aorta, lower extremity deep veins, soft tissue infection, and foreign bodies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于缺乏关于纵向基础重症监护超声心动图(BCCE)培训的高质量研究,专家意见指南指导了BCCE能力教育标准和过程。然而,由于指南制定过程中的方法论缺陷,现有指南缺乏精确的细节。
    使用证据和专家意见,制定关于BCCE培训的方法上稳健的指南,详细说明每个步骤的具体标准,我们使用经过验证的AGREE-II工具的原理进行了修改的Delphi过程.根据系统评价,选择了以下领域:纵向BCCE课程的组成部分;图像采集和图像解释的合格等级标准;形成性/总结性评估和最终能力过程.在2020年4月至2021年5月期间,共有21名BCCE专家参加了四轮比赛。第一轮和第二轮使用了五份基于网络的问卷,包括用于向个别小组成员提出问题的分支逻辑软件。在第3轮(视频会议)中,小组以投票方式最终确定了建议。在期刊同行评审过程中,第四轮是作为基于网络的问卷进行的。在每一轮之后,每个项目的一致性阈值确定为项目纳入≥80%,项目排除≤30%.
    在第1轮和第2轮之后,就114个项目中的62个达成了协议。对于49个未解决的项目,在第3轮中增加了12个项目,有56个达成协议,还有5个项目尚未解决。达成共识,纵向BCCE培训必须包括入门培训,指导形成性培训,能力总结性评估,和最后的认知评估。需要多轮的项目包括二维视图,多普勒,心输出量,M模式测量,最小扫描次数,和合格等级标准。关于图像采集和图像解释质量的客观标准,小组同意维持形成性和终结性评估的相同标准,将BCCE的发现分为主要和次要,以及标准化的错误方法,准备进行终结性评估的标准,和监督选项。
    总之,本专家共识声明提出了关于纵向BCCE培训的全面循证建议.然而,这些建议需要前瞻性验证.
    With the paucity of high-quality studies on longitudinal basic critical care echocardiography (BCCE) training, expert opinion guidelines have guided BCCE competence educational standards and processes. However, existing guidelines lack precise detail due to methodological flaws during guideline development.
    To formulate methodologically robust guidelines on BCCE training using evidence and expert opinion, detailing specific criteria for every step, we conducted a modified Delphi process using the principles of the validated AGREE-II tool. Based on systematic reviews, the following domains were chosen: components of a longitudinal BCCE curriculum; pass-grade criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation; and formative/summative assessment and final competence processes.
    Between April 2020 and May 2021, a total of 21 BCCE experts participated in four rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 used five web-based questionnaires, including branching-logic software for directed questions to individual panelists. In round 3 (videoconference), the panel finalized the recommendations by vote. During the journal peer-review process, Round 4 was conducted as Web-based questionnaires. Following each round, the agreement threshold for each item was determined as ≥ 80% for item inclusion and ≤ 30% for item exclusion.
    Following rounds 1 and 2, agreement was reached on 62 of 114 items. To the 49 unresolved items, 12 additional items were added in round 3, with 56 reaching agreement and five items remaining unresolved. There was agreement that longitudinal BCCE training must include introductory training, mentored formative training, summative assessment for competence, and final cognitive assessment. Items requiring multiple rounds included two-dimensional views, Doppler, cardiac output, M-mode measurement, minimum scan numbers, and pass-grade criteria. Regarding objective criteria for image-acquisition and image-interpretation quality, the panel agreed on maintaining the same criteria for formative and summative assessment, to categorize BCCE findings as major vs minor and a standardized approach to errors, criteria for readiness for summative assessment, and supervisory options.
    In conclusion, this expert consensus statement presents comprehensive evidence-based recommendations on longitudinal BCCE training. However, these recommendations require prospective validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The use of basic transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in critically ill and older surgical patients can change patient management and improve outcomes after noncardiac surgery. The authors hypothesized that educating the future generation on basic TEE skills by an intense two-month rotation will help them achieve basic TEE certification by the National Board of Echocardiography (NBE) and facilitate good use of their skills for patient care during their practice.
    METHODS: This is a descriptive report of graduating anesthesiology residents who completed two months basic TEE rotation at the authors\' residency program between 2013 and 2019. The authors report the clinical training goals, NBE testamur and certification status, and a survey report on the use of basic TEE skills in their practice SETTINGS: University medical center.
    METHODS: Residents who completed two months basic TEE rotation during their Clinical Anesthesia (CA)-3 year.
    METHODS: None.
    RESULTS: Of a total of 115 residents, 67 (58%) elected basic TEE rotation. The NBE basic TEE certification and testamur status were achieved by 12 (21%) and 14 (24%) eligible residents, respectively. Residents (n = 43) personally performed 73 ± 21 (mean ± standard deviation) and reviewed 72 ± 28 (mean ± standard deviation basic TEE studies before graduation. The survey indicated that 63.4% of residents trained in basic TEE did not use their skills in their practice.
    CONCLUSIONS: Two months\' basic TEE rotation was able to fulfill its educational goals (testamur status and clinical training) but fell short on achieving NBE certification rate and its ultimate impact on practice and patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The formulation of expert opinion guidelines has several sources of bias that may adversely affect their quality. To minimize bias, guideline creators must use rigorous methodology. There has been no appraisal of the methodologic quality of basic critical care echocardiography (BCCE) training/education guidelines.
    OBJECTIVE: What is the methodologic quality of expert guidelines/recommendations on BCCE training?
    METHODS: The review was performed by a multidisciplinary team including intensive care specialists, a hospital scientist, a trainee, a nurse sonographer, and a public health expert. Four databases (PubMed, OVID-Embase, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were searched on July 31, 2020, to identify guidelines on BCCE training/education. Every guideline was assessed subjectively for the degree of detail of the recommendations and assessed objectively by using the AGREE-II critical appraisal tool for clinical practice guidelines to generate a scaled domain score. A score ≥ 75% in every domain was the cut off for guidelines to be used without modifications.
    RESULTS: From 4,288 abstracts screened, 24 guidelines met the inclusion criteria. Very few guidelines made clear recommendations regarding introductory courses: physics (n = 6 [25%]), instrumentation (n = 5 [20.8%]), image acquisition theory (n = 6 [25%]), course curriculum (n = 5 [[20.8%]), pre-course/post-course tests (n = 1 [4.2%]), minimum course duration (n = 6 [25%]), or trainer qualifications (n = 5 [20.8%]). Very few provided clear recommendations for longitudinal competence programs: clinically indicated scans (n = 8 [33.3%]), logbook (n = 14 [58.3%]), image storage (n = 9 [37.5%]), formative assessment (n = 6 [25%]), minimum scan numbers (n = 14 [58.3%]), image acquisition competence (n = 3 [12.5%]), image interpretation competence (n = 2 [8.3%]), and credentialing/certification (n = 3 [12.5%]). Five guidelines (20.8%) attained a scaled overall AGREE-II score ≥ 75%. One guideline (4.2%) attained scores ≥ 75% in every domain.
    CONCLUSIONS: The methodologic appraisal of BCCE-training guidelines showed widespread deficiencies in guideline formulation processes. The impact of these deficiencies on the validity of the recommendations requires further evaluation in longitudinal studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Competence in point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is widely recommended by several critical care societies. Despite numerous introductory short courses, very few doctors attain PoCUS competence because of the challenges in establishing longitudinal competence programs.
    To evaluate the methodologic quality of the literature on basic PoCUS competence processes in critical care.
    A systematic review to identify manuscripts meeting predefined inclusion criteria was performed using three medical databases (PubMed, OVID Embase, and Web of Science); using extra references from original articles, review articles, and expert panel guidelines; and by directly contacting authors for further information if required. The objectives, domains, and inclusion and exclusion criteria of the review were determined during discussions between experienced PoCUS educators. Data extraction and analyses were performed independently by three reviewers.
    Of the 5,408 abstracts extracted, 42 met the inclusion criteria for longitudinal PoCUS competence. Each study was described along four broad categories: general information, study design, and trainee characteristics; description of introductory course; description of longitudinal competence program; and grading of overall methodologic quality on a 4-point Likert scale. Thirty-nine studies (92.9%) were from a single center. Most studies lacked important details on study methodology such as prior ultrasound experience, pre- and postcourse tests, models for hands-on sessions, ratio of instructors to trainees, competence assessment criteria, number of scans performed by individual trainees, and formative and summative assessments. The studies were rated as follows: poor = 19 (45.2%), average = 15 (35.7%), good = 4 (9.5%), and excellent = 4 (9.5%).
    Ther is very little high-quality evidence on PoCUS competence. To help frame policy guidelines to improve PoCUS education, there is a need for well-designed longitudinal studies on PoCUS competence.
    PROSPERO database; No.: CRD42018094033; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    In 2014, basic critical care echocardiography (BCCE) competence became a mandatory requirement for trainees registered with the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). To determine the proportion of CICM intensive care units (ICUs) that conduct a BCCE competence program and to learn about the barriers/challenges and successful strategies, we conducted a survey of intensivists working in ICUs accredited by CICM for basic/advanced training in Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore, Ireland and India. Following consultations with content experts and a trial phase to improve clarity and minimise ambiguity, an 11-point questionnaire survey was sent to one intensivist from every CICM-accredited ICU by several methods. Participation was voluntary. Consent was implied. No incentives were offered. Results are reported as numbers and percentages. Of the 104 ICUs surveyed, 99 (95.1%) responded, with 75 (75.8%) having no BCCE teaching whatsoever. In the remaining 24 (24.2%) ICUs, the teaching process was widely variable. Only 5/99 (5.1%) ICUs provided a structured BCCE competence program through which trainees performed and archived BCCE scans, maintained a logbook and underwent formative and summative assessments for credentialling. Six more ICUs provided formative assessment but relied on external bodies for competence assessment. Overall, 20/99 (20.2%) ICUs allowed trainees to perform unsupervised scans for clinical management, even if they were not BCCE competent. Nineteen intensivists perceived management errors due to misinterpretation of echocardiographic findings. Very few CICM-accredited ICUs offer a structured BCCE competence program. To fulfil the objective of universal BCCE competence, potential solutions are presented.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号