目的:两节段颈椎前路椎体全切融合术(t-ACCF)和后开门椎板成形术(ODLP)均是治疗后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)的有效手术方法。以前的研究已经确定了不同的外科手术对上颈椎和下颈椎的不同影响(UCS,SCS),然而,没有关于t-ACCF和ODLP对枕骨-寰枢椎复合体影响的研究。因此,本研究的目的是比较接受t-ACCF和ODLP治疗的OPLL患者的枕骨-寰枢椎复合体矢状参数和运动范围(ROM)的变化.
方法:这是一项回顾性研究,包括2012年1月至2022年8月在我们机构接受t-ACCF或ODLP治疗OPLL的74例患者。术前,3个月,术后1年宫颈中性,屈伸,并拍摄侧屈X光片。矢状参数包括C2-7、C0-2、C0-1、C1-2、C2斜率的Cobb角,并测量ROM。使用JOA评估临床结果,VAS,术前和术后3个月和12个月的NDI评分。采用多元线性回归来确定影响UCS变化的因素。
结果:在ODLP组中,SCS(C2-7)Cobb角显著减小(12.85±10.0至7.68±11.27;p<0.05),与t-ACCF组相比,术后1年UCS(C0-2)Cobb角显着补偿(3.05±4.09vs0.79±2.62;p<0.01)。ODLP组的SCS和侧屈ROM比t-ACCF更好地维持(14.51±6.00vs10.72±3.79;6.87±4.56vs3.81±1.67;p<0.01)。C0-2,C0-1和C1-2ROM的代偿性增加在两组中都很明显,尤其是在ODLP组中。多元线性回归结果表明,只有手术方式是影响UCS的重要因素。
结论:相对于t-ACCF,ODLP中SCSCobb角的损失更明显,导致UCS和寰枢Cobb角显着的代偿性增加。UCS的ROM,寰枕,两组的寰枢关节均显著增加,这可能会加速枕骨-寰枢椎复合体的退行性变化,可能会导致长期较差的结果;其中,ODLP应该得到更多的关注。相比之下,t-ACCF可以更好地保持SCS和枕骨-寰枢椎复合体的正常曲率,但损失更多的ROM。
OBJECTIVE: Both two-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (t-ACCF) and posterior open-door laminoplasty (ODLP) are effective surgical procedures for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Previous studies have identified different effects of different surgical procedures on the upper and subaxial cervical spine (UCS, SCS), however, there are no studies on the effects of t-ACCF and ODLP on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the changes in sagittal parameters and range of motion (ROM) of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex in OPLL patients treated with t-ACCF and ODLP.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 74 patients who underwent t-ACCF or ODLP for the treatment of OPLL from January 2012 to August 2022 at our institution. Preoperative, 3-month, and 1-year postoperative cervical neutral, flexion-extension, and lateral flexion radiographs were taken. Sagittal parameters including Cobb angle of C2-7, C0-2, C0-1, C1-2, C2 slope, and the ROM were measured. The clinical outcome was assessed using the JOA, VAS, and NDI scores preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify factors influencing changes in UCS.
RESULTS: In the ODLP group, the SCS (C2-7) Cobb angle was significantly reduced (12.85 ± 10.0 to 7.68 ± 11.27; p < 0.05), and the UCS (C0-2) Cobb angle was significantly compensated for at 1 year postoperatively compared with the t-ACCF group (3.05 ± 4.09 vs 0.79 ± 2.62; p < 0.01). The SCS and lateral flexion ROM of the ODLP group was better maintained than t-ACCF (14.51 ± 6.00 vs 10.72 ± 3.79; 6.87 ± 4.56 vs 3.81 ± 1.67; p < 0.01). The compensatory increase in C0-2, C0-1, and C1-2 ROM was pronounced in both groups, especially in the ODLP group. The results of multiple linear regression showed that only the surgical procedure was a significant factor influencing UCS.
CONCLUSIONS: The loss of the SCS Cobb angle was more pronounced in ODLP relative to t-ACCF, resulting in a significant compensatory increase in UCS and atlantoaxial Cobb angle. The ROM of the UCS, atlantooccipital, and atlantoaxial joints was significantly increased in both groups, this may accelerate degenerative changes in the occipital-atlantoaxial complex, may leading to poorer outcomes in the long-term; of these, ODLP should receive more attention. In contrast, t-ACCF better maintains normal curvature of the SCS and occipito-atlantoaxial complex but loses more ROM.