avatrombopag

Avatrombopag
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    接受异基因造血干细胞移植(alloHSCT)的患者有发展为持续性血小板减少症的风险。这里,我们描述了用avatrombopag治疗,血小板生成素受体激动剂,在患有慢性疾病的儿科患者中,严重,输血依赖性血小板减少症(<10×103/µL),尽管接受romiplostim治疗,但alloHSCT后仍持续存在,另一种血小板生成素受体激动剂.在授予富有同情心的使用研究性新药授权后,开始了avatrombopag治疗,和病人的血小板计数增加。迄今为止,患者维持血小板计数>100×103/µL.没有不良事件或药物毒性的报告,他已经恢复了他之前的alloHSCT活动.
    Patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) are at risk for developing persistent thrombocytopenia. Here, we describe treatment with avatrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, in a pediatric patient with chronic, severe, transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia (<10 × 103/µL) post-alloHSCT that was persistent despite treatment with romiplostim, another thrombopoietin receptor agonist. Following the granting of a compassionate use investigational new drug authorization, avatrombopag treatment was initiated, and the patient\'s platelet count increased. To date, the patient has maintained a platelet count >100 × 103/µL. No adverse events or medication toxicities have been reported, and he has resumed his pre-alloHSCT activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-Ras;romiplostim/eltrombopag/avatrombopag)在成年免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)患者的临床试验中显示出高有效率(59-88%)和良好的安全性。在儿科队列中,romiplostim和eltrombopag观察到类似的疗效和安全性结果。TPO-RA的连续治疗显示出长期使用的持久反应,长达3年。TPO-RA的影响通常被认为是瞬时的,由于血小板计数在短时间(约2周)后趋于下降至基线值,除非继续治疗。几个小组报告了成功停止TPO-RA而不需要伴随治疗。这被称为持续缓解脱离治疗(SROT)。TPO-RA的短期和中期治疗可能会降低我们医疗保健系统的成本,更重要的是,可以减少可能与连续TPO-RA治疗相关的潜在副作用。迄今为止,儿科ITP患者的TPO-RA逐渐减少和停止的问题很少受到关注。鉴于儿科ITP的自发缓解率远高于成人ITP,我们认为TPO-RA在患有ITP的儿科患者中的SROT的可能性是该疾病亚型中被忽视但非常相关的问题.
    Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-Ras; romiplostim/eltrombopag/avatrombopag) have demonstrated high efficacy rates (59-88%) and a good safety profile in clinical trials with adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Similar efficacy and safety results have been observed with romiplostim and eltrombopag in paediatric cohorts. Continuous treatment with TPO-RAs has shown durable responses with long-term use, up to 3 years. The effect of TPO-RAs was generally considered transient, as platelet counts tended to drop to baseline values after a short period of time (about 2 weeks), unless treatment was maintained. Several groups have reported successful discontinuation of TPO-RAs without the need for concomitant treatments. This is referred to as sustained remission off treatment (SROT). Both short- and medium-term treatment with TPO-RAs may reduce costs to our healthcare systems and, more importantly, may reduce the potential side effects that may be associated with continuous TPO-RA treatment. The issue of tapering and discontinuation of TPO-RAs in paediatric patients with ITP has received little attention to date. Given that paediatric ITP has much higher rates of spontaneous remission than ITP in adults, we consider that the possibility of SROT of TPO-RAs in paediatric patients with ITP is a neglected but very relevant issue in this subtype of the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Eltrombopag(EPAG),血小板生成素受体激动剂,已被批准用于治疗重型再生障碍性贫血(SAA)联合免疫抑制治疗(IST)。然而,EPAG含有典型的联苯结构,导致肝功能受损.
    从2020年10月至2023年6月,20名对EPAG不耐受或难治性的SAA患者被纳入中国东部贫血协作组(ChiCTR2100045895)的多中心前瞻性注册。
    8名对EPAG无效的患者,六个患有肾脏损伤,9例肝功能异常(2例合并肝肾损害)转用avatrombopag(AVA)治疗,AVA治疗的中位持续时间为6(3-24)个月.17例(85%)达到三系血液学反应(HR):完全缓解(CR)3例(15%),良好的部分缓解(GPR)4例(20%),部分缓解(PR)10例(50%),3例(15%)无反应(NR)。中位反应时间为1.7(0.5-6.9)个月,其中16例(94%)在6个月内获得缓解,17例(100%)在12个月内获得缓解。9例(50%)取得输血独立。AVA转化治疗与较高的中性粒细胞计数相关(0.8×109/Lvs2.2×109/L,p=0.0003),血小板计数(11×109/Lvs39×109/L,p=0.0008),血红蛋白计数(59g/Lvs98g/L,p=0.0002),红细胞计数(1.06×1012/Lvs2.97×1012/L,p=0.001),与治疗前相比,网织红细胞绝对计数(31.99×109/Lvs67.05×109/Lp=0.0004)均显着升高。转换为AVA治疗后,肝肾功能指标均维持在正常范围内,没有发生AVA相关的2级或更高的不良事件,并且没有发生血栓性事件.
    对于EPAG不耐受或难治性的SAA患者,转换为AVA是最佳选择。
    http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=125480,标识符ChiCTR2100045895。
    UNASSIGNED: Eltrombopag (EPAG), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, was approved for the treatment of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) combined with immunosuppressive therapy (IST). However, EPAG contains a typical biphenyl structure, which causes liver function damage.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty patients with SAA who were intolerant or refractory to EPAG were enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry of the Chinese Eastern Collaboration Group of Anemia (ChiCTR2100045895) from October 2020 to June 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight patients who were ineffective to EPAG, six with kidney impairment, and nine with abnormal liver function (two with concomitant liver and kidney impairment) were converted to avatrombopag (AVA) therapy with the median duration of AVA treatment was 6 (3-24) months. 17 cases (85%) achieved trilineage hematological response (HR): complete remission (CR) in 3 cases (15%), good partial remission (GPR) in 4 cases (20%), partial remission (PR) in 10 cases (50%), and no response (NR) in 3 cases (15%). The median time to response was 1.7 (0.5-6.9) months, with 16 cases (94%) achieving response within six months and 17 cases (100%) within 12 months. 9 cases (50%) achieved transfusion independence. AVA converted treatment was associated with higher neutrophil counts (0.8×109/L vs 2.2×109/L, p=0.0003), platelet counts (11×109/L vs 39×109/L, p=0.0008), hemoglobin count (59g/L vs 98g/L, p=0.0002), red cell count (1.06×1012/L vs 2.97×1012/L, p=0.001), and absolute reticulocyte count (31.99 ×109/L vs 67.05×109/L p=0.0004) were all significantly elevated compared with the pre-treatment level. After the conversion to AVA therapy, liver and kidney function indexes were maintained within the normal range, no AVA related grade 2 or higher adverse events occurred, and no thrombotic events occurred.
    UNASSIGNED: The conversion to AVA was an optimal choice for patients with SAA who were EPAG intolerant or refractory.
    UNASSIGNED: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=125480, identifier ChiCTR2100045895.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着其在血小板减少症治疗中的应用越来越多,avatrombopag的相关不良事件(AE)对其临床应用提出了重大挑战。本研究旨在通过使用真实世界的证据来全面研究与avatrombopag相关的AE。我们在美国食品和药物管理局的不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中策划了从2018年第一季度到2023年第四季度的avatrombopag的AE报告。使用用于首选术语和系统器官类别的监管活动的医学词典对AE进行编码。报告的赔率比,比例报告比率,贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络,和多项目Gamma-PoissonShrinker用于研究avatrombopag与AE报告之间的关系。在FAERS数据库中的9,060,312例报告病例中,1211份报告将avatrombopag列为“主要可疑”药物。不相称性分析确定了17个器官系统中的44个首选项符合四种算法中至少一种的标准。最常报告的不良事件是血小板计数减少(20.2%),头痛(16.7%),血小板计数增加(11.9%),血小板计数异常(6.3%),挫伤(2.7%),肺栓塞(2.3%),深静脉血栓形成(2.1%)。意外的不良事件,如季节性过敏,鼻漏,抗磷脂综合征,耳朵不适,并且还观察到了光视。排除其他严重后果,住院(34.6%)是最常见的严重结局,其次是死亡(15.4%)。大多数报告的不良事件发生在开始avatrombopag治疗的前2天内,中位发病时间为60天。我们通过临床使用avatrombopag确定了新的和意外的AE,我们的结果可能为临床监测和识别与avatrombopag相关的风险提供有价值的信息。
    With its increasing use in the treatment of thrombocytopenia, avatrombopag\'s associated adverse events (AEs) pose a major challenge to its clinical application. This study aims to comprehensively study AEs associated with avatrombopag by using real-world evidence. We curated AE reports for avatrombopag from the first quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2023 in the US Food and Drug Administration\'s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. AEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities of Preferred Terms and System Organ Classes. The reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item Gamma-Poisson Shrinker were used to investigate the relationship between avatrombopag and AE reports. Among 9,060,312 reported cases in the FAERS database, 1211 reports listed avatrombopag as \"primary suspected\" drug. Disproportionality analysis identified 44 preferred terms across 17 organ systems met the criteria for at least one of the four algorithms. The most commonly reported AEs were platelet count decreased (20.2%), headache (16.7%), platelet count increased (11.9%), platelet count abnormal (6.3%), contusion (2.7%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%), and deep vein thrombosis (2.1%). Unexpected AEs such as seasonal allergy, rhinorrhea, antiphospholipid syndrome, ear discomfort, and photopsia were also observed. Excluding the other serious outcomes, hospitalization (34.6%) was the most frequently reported serious outcome, followed by death (15.4%). Most reported AEs occurred within the first 2 days of initiating avatrombopag therapy, and the median onset time was 60 days. We identified new and unexpected AEs with clinical use of avatrombopag, and our results may provide valuable information for clinical monitoring and identifying risks associated with avatrombopag.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血小板输注难治性(PTR)是血液学患者的一种危及生命且难以治疗的疾病。血小板生成素受体激动剂如avatrombopag促进血小板产生并调节免疫不耐受。然而,其在PTR中的应用尚未得到广泛研究。
    我们的目的是比较难治性PTR患者的最佳可用疗法(BAT)和avatrombopag(Ava)治疗之间的血小板反应(PR)以及出血事件和死亡率。
    南方医院共纳入71例难治性PTR患者。静脉免疫球蛋白,类固醇,对BATs组30例患者进行人白细胞抗原匹配的血小板输注。Ava组包括41例患者。
    回顾性收集难治性PTR患者的数据。主要终点是PR(定义为连续7天没有血小板输注支持的情况下,血小板计数增加到50×109/L)。次要终点包括血小板输注独立率,累积血小板输注单位,世界卫生组织出血等级,不良事件,总生存期(OS),和无出血事件生存率(EFS)。
    在Ava组和BATs组中,有75.6%和13.3%的难治性PTR患者在3个月内达到PR。从第7天开始,Ava组的中位血小板计数显着升高。Ava组血小板输注独立率高于BATs组。Ava组的累积血小板输注单位中位数低于BATs组。与BATs组相比,Ava组的OS和无出血事件EFS率在3个月内有所改善。Cox比例风险回归分析显示,Ava治疗是OS和EFS的保护因素。由于不耐受,未观察到原发性疾病进展或avatrombopag终止。
    我们的研究表明,avatrombopag是难治性PTR患者的有效和安全的治疗选择。
    Avatrombopag在血小板输注难治性PTR中是血液系统疾病患者的一个具有挑战性的临床问题,其增加了早期死亡和住院费用。血小板生成素受体激动剂在治疗血小板减少症方面显示出鼓舞人心的作用。然而,很少有研究关注这些药物在PTR患者中的应用。在这项研究中,我们调查了71例PTR患者,其中30例患者接受了最好的治疗,41例患者接受avatrombopag治疗。我们发现avatrombopag增加血小板反应率,减少血小板输注依赖和严重出血事件的发生,以及改善PTR患者的总体生存率和无事件生存率。Avatrombopag也表现出良好的耐受性和安全性。我们首次报道avatrombopag是一种有效和安全的PTR治疗方法,这也可能有助于扩大TPO-RA的临床应用。
    UNASSIGNED: Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) is a life-threatening and intractable condition in hematological patients. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists such as avatrombopag promote platelet production and modulate immune intolerance. However, its application in PTR has not been extensively studied.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to compare the platelet response (PR) as well as bleeding events and mortality rate between the best available therapies (BATs) and avatrombopag (Ava) treatments in refractory PTR patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 71 refractory PTR patients were enrolled at Nanfang Hospital. Intravenous immunoglobulin, steroids, and human leucocyte antigen-matched platelet transfusions were administered to 30 patients in the BATs group. The Ava group included 41 patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Data of refractory PTR patients were retrospectively collected. The primary endpoint was PR (defined as an increase of platelet count to ⩾50 × 109/L without platelet transfusion support for 7 consecutive days). Secondary endpoints included platelet-transfusion independence rate, cumulative platelet transfusion units, World Health Organization bleeding grades, adverse events, overall survival (OS), and bleeding event-free survival (EFS).
    UNASSIGNED: There were 75.6% and 13.3% refractory PTR patients who reached PR within 3 months in Ava and BATs groups. The median platelet counts were significantly higher in Ava group from day 7. Platelet-transfusion independence rate in Ava was higher than BATs group. The median cumulative platelet transfusion unit in Ava was lower than that of BATs group. The OS and bleeding events-free EFS rate of Ava group improved within 3 months as compared to BATs group. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that Ava therapy was a protective factor for the OS and EFS. No primary disease progression or termination of avatrombopag was observed due to intolerability.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study suggests that avatrombopag is an effective and safe treatment option for refractory PTR patients.
    Avatrombopag in platelet transfusion refractoriness PTR is a challenging clinical issue in patients with hematologic disorders which increases early death and hospitalization costs. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists have shown inspiring effects in treating thrombocytopenia. However, there are few studies focused on the application of these drugs in PTR patients. In this study, we investigated 71 patients with PTR in which 30 patients received the best available therapies, while 41 patients received avatrombopag treatment. We found that avatrombopag increases platelet response rate, reduces platelet transfusions dependence and occurrence of severe bleeding events, as well as improves overall survival rate and event free survival in PTR patients. Avatrombopag also exhibited good tolerance and safety. We reported for the first time that avatrombopag was an effective and safe treatment in PTR, which may also help to expand the clinical application of TPO-RAs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    卡铂/聚乙二醇化脂质体多柔比星/贝伐单抗是复发性卵巢癌公认的标准抗癌治疗选择。然而,与该治疗方案相关的不良事件的发生限制了其继续临床应用.在这些不良事件中,获得性变核细胞性血小板减少症是一种罕见但往往可能危及生命的不良反应,并且对多种治疗方法不耐受。我们报告,第一次,阿瓦罗布巴格联合环孢素成功治疗卡铂/聚乙二醇化脂质体多柔比星/贝伐单抗诱导的获得性阿米迦勒血小板减少症1例,对糖皮质激素难治或不耐受,静脉注射免疫球蛋白,重组人血小板生成素,雄激素,甚至血小板生成素受体激动剂eltrombopag和herombopag。迄今为止,该病例表现为独立于输血的正常血小板计数.我们的发现表明,这种组合是获得性变核细胞血小板减少症的潜在和有价值的替代方法。
    Carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/bevacizumab is an accepted standard anti-cancer treatment option for recurrent ovarian cancer. However, the occurrence of adverse events associated with this therapeutic regimen limits its continued clinical use. Among these adverse events, acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia is a rare but often potentially life-threatening adverse effect, and is intolerant to multiple treatment approaches. We report, for the first time, the successful treatment using avatrombopag combined with cyclosporine in one case of carboplatin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/bevacizumab-induced acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia, which was refractory or intolerant to glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulin, recombinant human thrombopoietin, androgen, and even thrombopoietin receptor receptor agonist eltrombopag and herombopag. To date, this case manifests as normal platelet counts that are independent of transfusion. Our findings suggest that this combination is a potential and valuable alternative in acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Avatrombopag(AVA)是一种新型的血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RA),最近被批准作为成人免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的二线治疗方法;然而,缺乏其在儿童中的安全性和有效性数据。这里,我们证明了AVA作为ITP患儿二线治疗的有效性和安全性.一个多中心,回顾性,在2020年8月至2022年12月期间接受AVA治疗至少12周的持续性或慢性ITP患儿中进行了观察性研究,这些患儿对以前的治疗无反应或复发.结果是反应(定义为达到血小板计数≥30×109/L,血小板计数从基线增加两倍,没有出血),包括4周内的快速反应,12周和24周的持续缓解,出血控制和不良事件(AE)。纳入34名(18名男性)患者,平均年龄6.3(范围:1.9-15.3)岁。以前治疗类型的中位数为4(范围:1-6),41.2%的患者从其他TPO-RA转换。4周内,79.4%的患者达到了总体缓解(OR),完全缓解(CR,定义为血小板计数≥100×109/L且无出血)在67.7%的患者中,中位缓解时间为7(范围:1-27)天。12周时,或达到88.2%,76.5%的患者有CR,44%的患者有持续反应。24周时,对22/34(64.7%)获得缓解并随访24周的患者进行了评估;12/22(54.55%)获得持续缓解。在AVA治疗期间,中位血小板计数在第1周时增加,并在整个治疗期间维持.1-3级出血患者的比例从基线时的52.95%下降到12周时的2.94%。同时服用ITP药物从基线时的36.47%下降到12周时的8.82%,只有9例(26.47%)患者在12周内接受了23次抢救治疗。有61.8%的患者有59个AE:29.8%的患者有1级不良事件的通用术语标准,其余的患者有2级。这些研究结果表明,AVA作为二线治疗手段,可以在持续性或慢性ITP患儿中获得快速持续的反应,具有良好的临床出血控制和减少伴随的ITP治疗,没有明显的AE。
    Avatrombopag (AVA) is a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) that has been recently approved as a second-line therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults; however, its safety and efficacy data in children are lacking. Here, we demonstrated the efficacy and safety of AVA as second-line therapy in children with ITP. A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted in children with persistent or chronic ITP who did not respond to or relapsed from previous treatment and were treated with AVA for at least 12 weeks between August 2020 and December 2022. The outcomes were the responses (defined as achieving a platelet count ≥30 × 109/L, twofold increase in platelet count from baseline and absence of bleeding), including rapid response within 4 weeks, sustained response at weeks 12 and 24, bleeding control and adverse events (AEs). Thirty-four (18 males) patients with a mean age of 6.3 (range: 1.9-15.3) years were enrolled. The median number of previous treatment types was four (range: 1-6), and 41.2% patients switched from other TPO-RAs. Within 4 weeks, overall response (OR) was achieved in 79.4% patients and complete response (CR, defined as a platelet count ≥100 × 109/L and the absence of bleeding) in 67.7% patients with a median response time of 7 (range: 1-27) days. At 12 weeks, OR was achieved in 88.2%, CR in 76.5% and sustained response in 44% of patients. At 24 weeks, 22/34 (64.7%) patients who achieved a response and were followed up for 24 weeks were evaluated; 12/22 (54.55%) achieved a sustained response. During AVA therapy, median platelet counts increased by week 1 and were maintained throughout the treatment period. The proportion of patients with grade 1-3 bleeding decreased from 52.95% at baseline to 2.94% at 12 weeks, while concomitant ITP medications decreased from 36.47% at baseline to 8.82% at 12 weeks, with only 9 (26.47%) patients receiving rescue therapy 23 times within 12 weeks. There were 61.8% patients with 59 AEs: 29.8% with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1 and the rest with grade 2. These findings show that AVA could achieve a rapid and sustained response in children with persistent or chronic ITP as a second-line treatment, with good clinical bleeding control and reduction of concomitant ITP therapy, without significant AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与ABO主要不相容性的异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后的纯红细胞再生障碍(PRCA)的特征是输血依赖性贫血。在allo-HSCT之后还没有PRCA的标准治疗。
    方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,并报告了我们使用avatrombopag和较低剂量利妥昔单抗治疗5例主要ABO不相容allo-HSCT后PRCA患者的经验。
    结果:从72例患者中发现了5例PRCA,这些患者接受了严重或双向ABO错配的allo-HSCT。在我们的中心,第60天的累积发病率为6.9%(5/72)。所有供体和受体血型均为A+和O+,分别。在我们报告的前三个案例中,患者接受促红细胞生成素,血浆置换,和供体淋巴细胞输注,但都没有效果.低剂量利妥昔单抗(100mg/周)联合avatrombopag(40mg/天)治疗4周后,获得了良好的结果。根据上述经验,病例4和5在移植后3个月内分别给予低剂量利妥昔单抗和avatrombopag,治疗3周后观察到红细胞反应。我们的患者耐受低剂量利妥昔单抗和avatrombopag良好,并经历了快速疗效,中位持续时间为3周。此外,没有严重的感染或血小板增多需要调整剂量。
    结论:低剂量利妥昔单抗和avatrombopag可能是主要ABO不相容allo-HSCT后PRCA患者的有效治疗方法。如果常规促红细胞生成素治疗失败,则应在移植后至少90天治疗患者。
    BACKGROUND: Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with ABO major incompatibility is characterized by transfusion dependent anemia. No standard treatment existed for PRCA following allo-HSCT yet.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study, and reported our experience with the use of avatrombopag and lower dose rituximab to treat five patients with PRCA subsequent to major ABO-incompatible allo-HSCT.
    RESULTS: Five cases of PRCA were identified from 72 patients who underwent allo-HSCT with major or bidirectional ABO mismatch. Cumulative incidence at Day +60 was 6.9% (5/72) at our center. All donor and recipient blood groups were A+  and O+ , respectively. In the first three cases we reported, patients received erythropoietin, plasma exchange, and donor lymphocyte infusion, but none of them had any effect. After 4 weeks of treatment with low dose rituximab (100 mg/week) combined with avatrombopag (40 mg/day), favorable outcomes were obtained. According to the aforementioned experience, Cases 4 and 5 were administered low-dose rituximab and avatrombopag in 3 months after transplantation, and erythroid response was observed on 3 weeks after treatment. Our patients tolerated low-dose rituximab and avatrombopag well and experienced rapid efficacy, with a median duration of 3 weeks. Furthermore, no severe infection or thrombocytosis necessitated a dose adjustment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose rituximab and avatrombopag may be an effective treatment for patients with PRCA after major ABO-incompatible allo-HSCT. The patients should be treated at least 90 days post transplantation if conventional erythropoietin therapy fails.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血小板生成素-受体激动剂(TPO-RA)目前代表用于治疗免疫性血小板减少症的现有技术。它们不同的分子结构导致其药效学和药代动力学的差异。这篇叙述性综述旨在概述目前批准用于原发性免疫性血小板减少症的TPO-RA(romiplostim,eltrombopag,avatrombopag)和间歇性禁食对接受TPO-RA的成年患者的影响。
    检索文献时没有日期或语言限制,使用关键字的各种组合。药代动力学数据,药效学,功效,总结了TPO-RA的安全性和间歇性禁食的效果。
    在TPO-RA之间切换是解决一些相关限制的有用策略。Romiplostim和avatrombopag比eltrombopag具有优势,因为它们不需要任何饮食限制。在romiplostim和avatrombopag不可用的情况下,应该对患者进行适当的管理教育,可能的相互作用,和开始埃特罗波帕之前的饮食限制。
    UNASSIGNED: Thrombopoietin-receptor agonist (TPO-RAs) currently represent the state of art for treating immune thrombocytopenia. Their different molecular structures contribute to the difference in their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the current TPO-RAs approved for primary immune thrombocytopenia (romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag) and the effect of intermittent fasting in adult patients receiving TPO-RAs.
    UNASSIGNED: Literature was searched with no limits on date or language, using various combinations of keywords. Data on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of TPO-RAs and the effect of intermittent fasting were summarized.
    UNASSIGNED: Switching between TPO-RAs is a useful strategy to tackle some associated limitations. Romiplostim and avatrombopag have an advantage over eltrombopag as they do not require any dietary restrictions. In cases where romiplostim and avatrombopag are unavailable, patients should be educated on the appropriate administration, possible interactions, and dietary restrictions before initiating eltrombopag.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    化疗诱导的血小板减少症(CIT)是抗肿瘤治疗的常见并发症,导致抗肿瘤治疗剂量减少,治疗延误,停止治疗,和病态出血事件。尽管对CIT中的血小板生成生长因子进行了数十年的研究,目前没有可用的美国FDA或EMA批准的药物治疗CIT。然而,已经发表了大量的证据,评估了血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RA)在实体瘤患者中的治疗和预防CIT,TPO-RAsromiplostim和avatrombopag的关键研究正在进行中。在适当的患者人群中使用并正确使用时,TPO-RA可以在延长的时间内成功安全地管理CIT,并且明显的风险最小。这篇综合综述讨论了实体瘤患者TPO-RAinCIT的证据,为它们在临床中的使用提供了详细的指导,并讨论了CIT管理中正在进行的必要临床试验。
    Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of antineoplastic therapy, resulting in antineoplastic therapy dose reductions, treatment delays, treatment discontinuation, and morbid bleeding events. Despite several decades of research into thrombopoietic growth factors in CIT, there are presently no available U.S. FDA- or EMA-approved agents to treat CIT. However, a respectable body of evidence has been published evaluating the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for the management and prevention of CIT in patients with solid tumors, and critical studies are ongoing with the TPO-RAs romiplostim and avatrombopag. When employed in the appropriate patient population and used properly, TPO-RAs can successfully and safely manage CIT for extended periods of time with minimal apparent risks. This comprehensive review discusses the evidence for TPO-RAs in CIT in patients with solid tumors, provides detailed guidance for their use in the clinic, and discusses ongoing essential clinical trials in management of CIT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号