This article, the first in a 2-part review, aims to reinforce current literature on the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias and various evidence-based treatment approaches and clinical considerations in the acute care setting. Part 1 of this series focuses on atrial arrhythmias.
Arrhythmias are prevalent throughout the world and a common presenting condition in the emergency department (ED) setting. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and expected to increase in prevalence. Treatment approaches have evolved over time with advances in catheter-directed ablation. Based on historic trials, heart rate control has been the long-standing accepted outpatient treatment modality for AF, but the use of antiarrhythmics is often still indicated for AF in the acute setting, and ED pharmacists should be prepared and poised to help in AF management. Other atrial arrhythmias include atrial flutter (AFL), atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), which warrant distinction due to their unique pathophysiology and because each requires a different approach to utilization of antiarrhythmics. Atrial arrhythmias are typically associated with greater hemodynamic stability than ventricular arrhythmias but still require nuanced management according to patient subset and risk factors. Since antiarrhythmics can also be proarrhythmic, they may destabilize the patient due to adverse effects, many of which are the focus of black-box label warnings that can be overreaching and limit treatment options. Electrical cardioversion for atrial arrhythmias is generally successful and, depending on the setting and/or hemodynamics, often indicated.
Atrial arrhythmias arise from a variety of mechanisms, and appropriate treatment depends on various factors. A firm understanding of physiological and pharmacological concepts serves as a foundation for exploring evidence supporting agents, indications, and adverse effects in order to provide appropriate care for patients.

We aimed to determine the effects of isoproterenol on arrhythmia recurrence in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) patients treated with catheter ablation. The present randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on AVNRT patients candidates for radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The patients were randomly assigned to receive isoproterenol (0.5-4 μg/min) or not (control group) for arrhythmia re-induction after ablation. The results of the electrophysiological (EP) study, the ablation parameters, and the arrhythmia recurrence rate were recorded. We evaluated 206 patients (53 males and 153 females) with a mean (SD) age of 49.87 (15.5) years in two groups of isoproterenol (n = 103) and control (n = 103). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two studied groups in age, gender, EP study, and ablation parameters. The success rate of ablation was 100% in both groups. During ~16.5 months of follow-up, one patient (1%) in the isoproterenol group and four patients (3.8%) in the control group experienced AVNRT recurrence (HR = 0.245; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.043-1.418; p = .173). Based on the Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of arrhythmia recurrence during the follow-up period between the two studied groups (p = .129). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the arrhythmia\'s recurrence according to age, gender, junctional rhythm, type of AVNRT arrhythmia, and DAVN persistence after ablation. Although isoproterenol administration for arrhythmia re-induction after ablation did not alleviate the treatment outcomes and arrhythmia recurrence following RFA in AVNRT patients, further studies with a larger sample size and a longer duration of follow-up are necessary.

暂无摘要。

His bundle (HB) potentials vary in amplitude and duration in patients with and without slow pathways. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of HB potentials and to elucidate whether they can provide clues for identification of slow pathway (SP).
The present research prospectively studied the electrophysiological findings of 162 patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) due to slow-fast or fast-slow type and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). Maximal HB potential (HBmax, HB with the highest amplitude) among HB cloud was recorded in both groups. For AVNRT patients, the following were measured: (1) AH interval at the \"jump\" during programmed atrial stimulation (A2H2, taken as a reflection of SP conduction time); (2) Distance from HBmax to the successful SP ablation site (HBmax-ABL) and from HBmax to the ostium of coronary sinus (HBmax-CSO).
HBmax was 0.29 ± 0.10 mV in AVNRT patients, whereas it was 0.17 ± 0.05 mV in AVRT group (p < 0.0001). Likewise, the HBmax duration was 22 ± 5 ms in AVNRT group and 16 ± 3 ms in AVRT group (p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of HBmax amplitude in AVNRT patients was 0.86 and the optimal HBmax cut-off to predict AVNRT was ≥ 0.22 mV with a sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.84. HBmax-CSO was positively correlated with HBmax-ABL, and HBmax-ABL was positively correlated with A2H2.
HBmax amplitudes were higher and durations longer in patients with AVNRT, as compared to those with AVRT. Moreover, the distance between HBmax and successful ablation site was positively correlated with the SP conduction time and with the distance from HBmax to the CSO.

An accessory pathway (AP) could manifest its presence exclusively during an orthodromic supraventricular tachycardia or with preexcitation during sinus rhythm (SR). The manifestations of the presence of an AP depend on its ability to conduct antegradely from atrium (A) to ventricle (V), retrogradely (V to A), or both. AP retrograde conduction is necessary to establish an atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia circuit. If an AP can only conduct antegradely, it will function as a bystander AV connection during independent arrhythmias. The correct diagnosis of this condition is very important, as it will determine the immediate and long-term management.

暂无摘要。

Experience with catheter ablation of orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT) and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in young children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is limited. We report the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation of ORT and AVNRT in children with HLHS.
This was a retrospective review of patients with HLHS who underwent catheter ablation for reentrant supraventricular tachycardias (excluding atrial tachycardias) between 2005 and 2017 at a single center. Descriptive data including demographics, clinical history, procedural data, and outcomes were recorded. Ten children with HLHS underwent eleven catheter ablation procedures. Median age and weight at ablation were 2.7 years (range: 0.1-10.5) and 11.4 kg (range: 3.6-30.4), respectively. Tachycardia mechanism was AVNRT in four, ORT in five (two with preexcitation), and both in one. Acute procedural success was 100% and there was no spontaneous recurrence of tachycardia orpreexcitationin median 92 months (range: 21-175 months) follow-up. Five patients underwent subsequent EP studies at catheterization (intracardiac) or after surgery (via epicardial wires): three were noninducible, one after AVNRT ablation had inducible atrial tachycardia, and one after initial ORT ablation had inducible ORT at fenestration closure and underwent successful repeat ablation. Thus, long-term freedom from clinical tachycardia was 100% and from inducible AVNRT or ORT was 80%.
Transcatheter ablation for ORT and AVNRT in children with HLHS can be performed with excellent acute and long-term success without major complications.

暂无摘要。

Voltage mapping has been used previously for slow-pathway localization for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation. However, propagation mapping may be a technique to further improve the localization of the slow pathway. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the relationship of the propagation map to both the voltage mapping and successful site of ablation in patients who underwent ablation for AVNRT. All patients ≤20 years of age who underwent voltage mapping for AVNRT were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had congenital heart disease or inadequate voltage point density within the triangle of Koch (TK). During the study, a propagation map was evaluated from the prior voltage map, marking a \"wave collision\" at the site of atrial wave convergence. Patient and procedural information, the location of the wave collision, the site of successful ablation, and the appearance of the voltage map were evaluated. Ultimately, 39 patients aged from four years of age to 20 years of age were evaluated. Success was achieved in 100% of patients, with a recurrence rate of 2.8% and no long-term complications observed. The average procedure time was 127 min. Follow-up length averaged seven months post operation. Low-voltage areas, and a wave collision, were present in all patients. This wave collision was typically located within the TK. The median number of ablations required for successful outcome was two. The successful ablation lesion was typically located over a low-voltage area within 4 mm of the wave collision within the TK. In conclusion, we found in this retrospective evaluation that propagation mapping resulted in a wave collision within the TK, and that the successful ablation site in the majority of patients was near a low-voltage area within 4 mm, typically superiorly, to the wave collision within the TK.

暂无摘要。