aspiration pneumonitis

吸入性肺炎
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    支气管食管瘘(BEF)是一种罕见的,但具有临床意义,其特征是支气管树和食道之间的异常连接。我们介绍了一名25岁的女性,最初出现吸入性肺炎的症状,随后被诊断为BEF。归因于低分化鳞状细胞癌。尽管最初尝试通过食管支架置入进行姑息干预,持续的症状促使进一步调查,揭示潜在的恶性肿瘤。这个案例强调了与BEF相关的诊断挑战,特别是当涉及恶性肿瘤时,并强调多学科方法在优化患者预后方面的重要性。早期识别,全面评估,全面的肿瘤管理对于解决BEF带来的临床复杂性至关重要。需要进一步的研究才能更好地了解这种罕见但具有临床意义的疾病的病理生理学和最佳管理策略。
    Bronchoesophageal fistula (BEF) is a rare, yet clinically significant, condition characterized by an abnormal connection between the bronchial tree and the esophagus. We present the case of a 25-year-old female who initially presented with symptoms of aspiration pneumonitis and was subsequently diagnosed with BEF, attributed to poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Despite initial attempts at palliative intervention through esophageal stent placement, persistent symptoms prompted further investigation, revealing the underlying malignancy. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges associated with BEF, particularly when malignancy is involved, and emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in optimizing patient outcomes. Early recognition, thorough evaluation, and comprehensive oncological management are essential in addressing the clinical complexities posed by BEF. Further research is warranted to better understand the pathophysiology and optimal management strategies for this rare but clinically significant condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    食管闭锁(EA)和气管食管瘘(TEF)都代表了一种罕见的先天性异常,这是气管食管器官发生异常的结果。虽然EA,不管有没有TEF,相对不常见,它代表了最常见的上消化道出生缺陷。根据Gross分类,食管闭锁和气管食管瘘在解剖学上分为五种类型(A型,B,C,D,E/H)。与E/H型一样,食道的连续性没有中断,症状发作因此延迟,因此诊断是困难的。吸入性肺炎是由吸入无菌胃内容物引起的化学损伤,而吸入性肺炎是,在某种程度上,一种感染过程,因为吸入的口咽分泌物富含细菌。本文旨在报告2例TEF受累的吸入性肺炎的婴儿尸检病例。主要的组织病理学发现是间质性肺炎。经过组织病理学检查,淋巴细胞,浆细胞,在肺泡壁上发现了巨噬细胞,与间质性肺炎的化学起源相容。未检测到嗜酸性粒细胞;因此,超敏反应引起的间质性肺炎被排除.两种情况下的死亡原因均为间质性肺炎。
    Both esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) represent a rather uncommon congenital abnormality that is the result of abnormal tracheoesophageal organogenesis. Although EA, with or without TEF, is relatively uncommon, it represents the most common upper gastrointestinal birth defect. Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula are anatomically classified into five types according to the Gross classification (types A, B, C, D, E/H). As in type E/H, the continuity of the esophagus is not interrupted, the symptom onset is consequently delayed, and therefore diagnosis is difficult. Aspiration pneumonitis is a chemical injury caused by inhaled sterile gastric contents, while aspiration pneumonia is, in part, an infectious process because the inhaled oropharyngeal secretions are rich in bacteria. This paper aims to report two infant autopsy cases of aspiration pneumonitis with TEF involvement. The main histopathological finding was interstitial pneumonitis. Upon histopathological examination, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages were discovered on the alveolar walls, which were compatible with the chemical origin of interstitial pneumonitis. No eosinophils were detected; therefore, hypersensitivity-originating interstitial pneumonitis was ruled out. The cause of death in both cases was interstitial pneumonitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Case Reports
    吸入性肺炎是由病原菌定植的口咽部分泌物吸入引起的炎症性肺部疾病。吸入性肺炎的准确诊断可能具有挑战性,和脑脊液(CSF)鼻漏通常被忽略为一种罕见的误吸原因。在这个案例报告中,我们介绍了一名48岁的男性患者,他经历了6个月的右侧鼻腔透明的水样分泌物流,伴有干咳为主要症状。通过对临床症状的综合评估,鼻窦成像,鼻内窥镜检查,和相关的实验室测试,推测诊断为外伤性筛状钢板骨折伴脑脊液鼻漏。胸部成像显示双肺有絮凝的毛玻璃阴影。排除病毒性肺炎后,鼻内镜下修复颅底缺损。患者的干咳和鼻漏症状在手术后1周内消失,肺炎在术后2周内表现出显着的改善和完全缓解。尽管没有特征性症状和明显的吸入因素,由筛状钢板骨折引起的慢性CSF鼻漏最终被确定为患者吸入性肺炎的主要病因。这个罕见的病例强调了将外伤性CSF鼻漏视为不常见的误吸原因的重要性,这可以提高医生的意识,并关注不太常见的误吸病因。这种意识可以有助于更准确的诊断和早期手术干预,特别是在2019年冠状病毒疾病大流行的背景下。
    Aspiration pneumonitis is an inflammatory lung disease caused by the inhalation of oropharyngeal secretions colonized by pathogenic bacteria. Accurate diagnosis of aspiration pneumonitis can be challenging, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea is often overlooked as a rare cause of aspiration. In this case report, we present the case of a 48-year-old male patient who experienced right-sided nasal flow of clear watery secretions for 6 months, accompanied by a dry cough as the major symptom. Through comprehensive assessment of clinical symptoms, sinus imaging, nasal endoscopy, and relevant laboratory testing, a presumptive diagnosis of traumatic cribriform plate fracture with CSF rhinorrhea was made. Chest imaging revealed flocculent ground glass shadows in the bilateral lungs. After ruling out viral pneumonia, nasal endoscopic repair of the skull base defect was performed. The patient\'s dry cough and rhinorrhea symptoms resolved within 1 week after surgery, and the pneumonia showed significant improvement and complete resolution within 2 weeks postoperatively. Despite the absence of characteristic symptoms and evident inhalation factors, chronic CSF rhinorrhea caused by the cribriform plate fracture was ultimately identified as the primary etiology of the patient\'s aspiration pneumonitis. This rare case highlights the importance of considering traumatic CSF rhinorrhea as an uncommon cause of aspiration, which can enhance physicians\' awareness and focus on the less-common etiologies of aspiration. Such awareness can contribute to more accurate diagnosis and early operative intervention, particularly in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:Sugammadex对易感患者术后肺部并发症(PPC)的疗效,与新斯的明相比,仍然不确定。评估加泰罗尼亚手术患者的呼吸风险(ARISCAT)组研究人员提出了早期识别易感患者的风险指数,具有优秀的外部验证辨别能力。应用荟萃分析技术评估Sugammadex对具有ARISCAT定义的危险因素的患者的PPC的疗效。
    方法:该研究在PROSPERO注册,编号CRD42021261156。我们搜索了PubMed,Scopus,Embase,科克伦图书馆,GreyNet,和OpenGrey用于符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT),而不限制语言或发表年份。
    结果:纳入12个RCTs,包括1182名PPC易感患者。在接受sugammadex的易感患者中,观察到PPC的发生率大幅降低[RR0.66;95%CI(0.54,0.80),p<0.01],研究间异质性水平较低(I2=45.98%;H2=1.85)。在避免残余神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)方面也证明了类似的保护作用[RR0.25;95%CI(0.11,0.56);p<0.01],肺不张[RR0.74;95%CI(0.59,0.95);p=0.02],肺炎[RR0.49;95%CI(0.28,0.88);p=0.02],和呼吸衰竭[RR0.61;95%CI(0.39,0.96);p=0.03]。在不良事件方面没有观察到差异[RR0.85;95%CI(0.72,1.01);p=0.06]。
    结论:低到中等质量的证据表明,在具有ARISCAT定义的危险因素的患者中,Sugammadex在NMB逆转方面优于新斯的明在降低PPC和残留NMB的可能性方面具有优势。临床医生在治疗对PPC敏感的患者时可能会重新评估逆转剂的类型。
    The efficacy of sugammadex on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in susceptible patients, compared with neostigmine, remains indeterminate. The Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) Group Investigators proposed a risk index for the early identification of susceptible patients, with excellent externally validated discrimination ability. Meta-analytical techniques were applied to evaluate the efficacy of sugammadex on PPCs in patients with ARISCAT-defined risk factors.
    The study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42021261156. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane library, GreyNet, and OpenGrey for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without restricting the language or year of publication.
    Twelve RCTs consisting of 1182 patients susceptible to PPCs were included. A robust reduction was observed on the incidence of PPCs in susceptible patients who received sugammadex [RR 0.66; 95% CI (0.54, 0.80), p < 0.01], with a low level of between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 45.98%; H2 = 1.85). Similar protective effects were also proved in avoiding residual neuromuscular block (NMB) [RR 0.25; 95% CI (0.11, 0.56); p < 0.01], atelectasis [RR 0.74; 95% CI (0.59, 0.95); p = 0.02], pneumonia [RR 0.49; 95% CI (0.28, 0.88); p = 0.02], and respiratory failure [RR 0.61; 95% CI (0.39, 0.96); p = 0.03]. No difference was observed regarding adverse events [RR 0.85; 95% CI (0.72, 1.01); p = 0.06].
    Low to moderate quality of evidence demonstrated the edge of sugammadex over neostigmine for NMB reversal in reducing the likelihood of PPCs and residual NMB in patients with ARISCAT-defined risk factors. Clinicians may reassess the type of reversal agent when treating patients susceptible to PPCs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:误吸可导致吸入性肺炎(ASPNA)或吸入性肺炎等并发症。已支持使用降钙素原(PCT)测定法来帮助区分细菌和非细菌感染的病因。我们假设PCT水平在ASPNA与吸入性肺炎患者中存在显著差异。
    方法:本研究回顾性分析了2017年9月至2019年9月ICD-10诊断为ASPNA或吸入性肺炎的患者。228例患者符合标准,分为两组:吸入性肺炎(45例)或ASPNA(183例)。评估了初始和48小时的PCT。
    结果:吸入性肺炎队列中初始PCT水平正常的患者比例高于ASPNA队列(86.7%vs38.8%;P<0.0001)。
    结论:本研究提示PCT可能是帮助区分ASPNA和吸入性肺炎的有用工具。我们假设利用PCT水平以及当前的诊断标准将允许更适当的治疗和改善抗生素管理。
    OBJECTIVE: Aspiration can lead to complications such as aspiration pneumonia (ASPNA) or aspiration pneumonitis. Use of procalcitonin (PCT) assays has been supported to help differentiate between bacterial and nonbacterial etiologies for infection. We hypothesize PCT levels will differ significantly in patients with ASPNA versus aspiration pneumonitis.
    METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of ASPNA or aspiration pneumonitis from September 2017 to September 2019. 228 patients met criteria and were divided into two cohorts: aspiration pneumonitis (45 patients) or ASPNA (183 patients). Initial and 48-hour PCTs were assessed.
    RESULTS: The aspiration pneumonitis cohort had a higher percentage of patients with normal initial PCT levels than the ASPNA cohort (86.7% vs 38.8%; P < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests PCT could be a useful tool to help differentiate between ASPNA and aspiration pneumonitis. We postulate utilizing PCT levels alongside current diagnostic criteria would allow for more appropriate treatment and improved antibiotic stewardship.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    视频摘要.
    VIDEO ABSTRACT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:吸入性肺炎是一种肺部炎症性疾病,难以准确诊断。大量吸入口咽或胃内容物对吸入性肺炎的发展至关重要。在吸入性肺炎的诊断过程中,脑脊液(CSF)鼻漏的作用通常被低估为吸入性肺炎的罕见病因。
    方法:我们介绍一例右侧水样鼻漏4周,并伴有间歇性鼻后滴漏和干咳为主要症状的患者。结合临床症状,鼻窦的影像学检查,和鼻腔分泌物的实验室检查,她最初被诊断为自发性蝶窦脑膜脑膨出伴脑脊液鼻漏,术中内镜结果和术后病理也证实了这一诊断。入院时,她的胸部计算机断层扫描显示两肺有多个絮状毛玻璃密度阴影。在排除病毒性肺炎后,该患者接受了脑膜脑膨出的内镜切除术和颅底缺损的修复。鼻漏和干咳的症状消失了,术后1周肺炎好转,术后2个月治愈。尽管没有典型症状和明确的误吸危险因素,但最终发现自发性蝶窦脑膜脑膨出引起的持续CSF鼻漏是吸入性肺炎的主要病因。比如吞咽困难,咳嗽反射和反流疾病受损。
    结论:我们报告了一例罕见的由自发性蝶窦脑膜脑膨出伴脑脊液鼻漏引起的吸入性肺炎,这可以带来更多的关注和理解常见的误吸病因,以便更准确地诊断疾病和早期手术治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Aspiration pneumonitis is an inflammatory disease of the lungs which is difficult to diagnose accurately. Large-volume aspiration of oropharyngeal or gastric contents is essential for the development of aspiration pneumonitis. The role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea is often underestimated as a rare etiological factor for aspiration in the diagnosis process of aspiration pneumonitis.
    METHODS: We present a case of a patient with 4 weeks of right-sided watery rhinorrhea accompanied by intermittent postnasal drip and dry cough as the main symptoms. Combined with clinical symptoms, imaging examination of the sinuses, and laboratory examination of nasal secretions, she was initially diagnosed as spontaneous sphenoid sinus meningoencephalocele with CSF rhinorrhea, and intraoperative endoscopic findings and postoperative pathology also confirmed this diagnosis. Her chest computed tomography showed multiple flocculent ground glass density shadows in both lungs on admission. The patient underwent endoscopic resection of meningoencephalocele and repair of skull base defect after she was ruled out of viral pneumonitis. Symptoms of rhinorrhea and dry cough disappeared, and pneumonitis was improved 1 week after surgery and cured 2 months after surgery. Persistent CSF rhinorrhea caused by spontaneous sphenoid sinus meningoencephalocele was eventually found to be a major etiology for aspiration pneumonitis although the absence of typical symptoms and well-defined risk factors for aspiration, such as dysphagia, impaired cough reflex and reflux diseases.
    CONCLUSIONS: We report a rare case of aspiration pneumonitis caused by spontaneous sphenoid sinus meningoencephalocele with CSF rhinorrhea, which can bring more attention and understanding to the uncommon etiology for aspiration, so as to make more accurate diagnosis of the disease and early surgical treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    吸入性肺炎(AP)是社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的一种亚型,尤其是在没有误吸事件的情况下,仍未得到充分认可。另一个困难是区分AP和吸入性肺炎。从临床的角度来看,AP作为虚弱和高龄患者中严重和危及生命的呼吸道感染的潜在原因变得越来越重要,特别是那些需要住院治疗的CAP患者。此外,AP经常被诊断不足,并且缺乏对这种病理实体的明确定义。有不同的因素会增加误吸的风险,但其他影响口腔定植的常见因素,如营养不良,吸烟,口腔卫生差或口干,在AP的发病机制中也很重要,应予以考虑。虽然在最近目睹口咽部或胃内容物吸入的病例中诊断AP是毫无疑问的,我们在这里提出了AP的定义,其中还包括沉默的未观察到的愿望。出于这个原因,口咽抽吸的一种或多种危险因素的存在与口腔细菌定植的一种或多种危险因素的存在是必需的.基于专家意见提出的定义不仅统一了AP的诊断标准,而且还提供了设计易于应用的策略来防止口腔定植的可能性。
    Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is a sub-type of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) still poorly recognized especially in the absence of an aspiration event. A further difficulty is the differentiation between AP and aspiration pneumonitis. From a clinical perspective, AP is becoming increasingly relevant as a potential cause of severe and life-threatening respiratory infection among frail and very old patients, particularly among those with CAP requiring inpatient care. Moreover, AP is frequently underdiagnosed and a clear-cut definition of this pathological entity is lacking. There are different factors that increase the risk for aspiration, but other common factors influencing oral colonization such as malnutrition, smoking, poor oral hygiene or dry mouth, are also important in the pathogenesis of AP and should be considered. While there is no doubt in the diagnosis of AP in cases of a recent witnessed aspiration of oropharyngeal or gastric content, we here proposed a definition of AP that also includes silent unobserved aspirations. For this reason, the presence of one or more risk factors of oropharyngeal aspiration is required together with one or more risk factors for oral bacterial colonization. This proposed definition based on expert opinion not only unifies the diagnostic criteria of AP, but also provides the possibility to devise easily applicable strategies to prevent oral colonization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Patients with aspiration pneumonitis often receive empiric antibiotic therapy despite it being due to a non-infectious, inflammatory response.
    OBJECTIVE: To study the benefits of early antibiotic therapy in patients with suspected aspiration pneumonitis in an acute care hospital.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from Teine Keijinkai Hospital.
    METHODS: Adults aged over 18 years admitted with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonitis to the Department of General Internal Medicine or Emergency Department between January 1, 2008, and May 31, 2019. A diagnosis of aspiration pneumonitis was defined as a documented macro-aspiration event and a chest radiograph demonstrating new radiographic infiltrates.
    METHODS: Patients were classified into the \"early antibiotic treatment\" group and the \"no or late treatment\" group depending on whether they received antibiotic therapy for respiratory bacterial pathogens within 8 h of arrival. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, antibiotic-free days, duration of fever, readmission within one month, and incidence of complications.
    RESULTS: Of the 146 patients enrolled, 52 (35.6%) did not receive early antibiotic therapy, while the remaining 94 (64.4%) did. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality rates between the groups after adjustment for potential confounding variables using Cox proportional hazards analysis (hazard ratio 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-13.50, p = 0.20). Patients in the no or late treatment group had more antibiotic-free days (p < 0.001) and a shorter length of hospital stay among survivors (p = 0.040) than did those in the early antibiotic treatment group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to other secondary outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early antibiotic therapy for acute aspiration pneumonitis was not associated with in-hospital mortality, but was associated with a longer hospital stay and prolonged use of antibiotics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    如何引用这篇文章:SehgalIS,DhooriaS,AgarwalR.吸入性肺炎应常规进行弹性支气管镜检查:非Liquet。印度J暴击护理中心2021年;25(2):113-114。
    How to cite this article: Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Agarwal R. Should Flexible Bronchoscopy be Routinely Performed in Aspiration Pneumonitis: Non Liquet. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):113-114.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号