artificial intelligence (ai)

人工智能 (AI)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:人工智能(AI)的快速发展引发了人们对其在日常生活中不同领域的潜在用途的质疑。特别是在医学上,问题出现了聊天机器人是否可以用作临床决策或患者和医生教育的工具。为了在生育率的背景下回答这个问题,我们进行了一项测试,以确定当前的AI平台是否可以提供有关可以改善胚胎移植结局的方法的循证反应.
    方法:我们让9个流行的聊天机器人写了一篇300字的科学论文,概述改善胚胎移植结果的科学方法。然后,我们收集了响应并提取了每个聊天机器人建议的方法。
    结果:在总共43项建议中,可以分为19个类似的类别,只有3/19(15.8%)是循证实践,7/9(77.8%)聊天机器人中的“超声引导胚胎移植”,“单胚胎移植”在4/9(44.4%)和“使用软导管”在2/9(22.2%),而一些有争议的反应,如“植入前基因检测”频繁出现(6/9聊天机器人;66.7%),以及其他有争议的建议,如“子宫内膜容受性测定”,“辅助孵化”和“延时培养箱”。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,人工智能还不能在生育领域给出基于证据的建议,特别是关于胚胎移植,因为绝大多数答复都是科学上没有支持的建议。因此,患者和医生都应警惕根据chatbot建议指导不孕症的治疗。Chatbot结果可能会随着时间的推移而改善,特别是如果从经过验证的医疗数据库进行培训的话;但是,这必须进行科学检查。
    OBJECTIVE: The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has raised questions about its potential uses in different sectors of everyday life. Specifically in medicine, the question arose whether chatbots could be used as tools for clinical decision-making or patients\' and physicians\' education. To answer this question in the context of fertility, we conducted a test to determine whether current AI platforms can provide evidence-based responses regarding methods that can improve the outcomes of embryo transfers.
    METHODS: We asked nine popular chatbots to write a 300-word scientific essay, outlining scientific methods that improve embryo transfer outcomes. We then gathered the responses and extracted the methods suggested by each chatbot.
    RESULTS: Out of a total of 43 recommendations, which could be grouped into 19 similar categories, only 3/19 (15.8%) were evidence-based practices, those being \"ultrasound-guided embryo transfer\" in 7/9 (77.8%) chatbots, \"single embryo transfer\" in 4/9 (44.4%) and \"use of a soft catheter\" in 2/9 (22.2%), whereas some controversial responses like \"preimplantation genetic testing\" appeared frequently (6/9 chatbots; 66.7%), along with other debatable recommendations like \"endometrial receptivity assay\", \"assisted hatching\" and \"time-lapse incubator\".
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that AI is not yet in a position to give evidence-based recommendations in the field of fertility, particularly concerning embryo transfer, since the vast majority of responses consisted of scientifically unsupported recommendations. As such, both patients and physicians should be wary of guiding care based on chatbot recommendations in infertility. Chatbot results might improve with time especially if trained from validated medical databases; however, this will have to be scientifically checked.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在正畸治疗中,准确评估上呼吸道容积和形态对于正确诊断和规划至关重要.锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)用于通过手动评估上气道容积,半自动,和自动气道分割方法。本研究通过将自动模型和半自动方法的结果与黄金标准手动方法进行比较来评估上呼吸道分割的准确性。
    方法:使用MONAI标签框架训练自动分割模型,以从CBCT图像中分割上呼吸道。一个开源程序,ITK-SNAP,用于半自动分割。两种方法的准确性均通过手动分割进行评估。评估指标包括骰子相似系数(DSC)、Precision,回想一下,95%Hausdorff距离(HD),和体积差异。
    结果:自动分割组的平均DSC评分为0.915±0.041,而半自动组的评分为0.940±0.021,表明两种方法的临床准确性均可接受。对95%HD的分析表明,半自动分割(0.997±0.585)比自动分割(1.447±0.674)更准确,更接近手动分割。体积比较显示,自动和手动分割之间没有统计学上的显着差异,口咽,咽喉气道容积.同样,这些地区的半自动和手动方法没有显著差异.
    结论:已经观察到,自动和半自动方法,利用开源软件,与手动分割有效对齐。实施这些方法可以通过允许在正畸实践中具有可比的准确性的更快,更容易的上气道分割来帮助决策。
    BACKGROUND: In orthodontic treatments, accurately assessing the upper airway volume and morphology is essential for proper diagnosis and planning. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used for assessing upper airway volume through manual, semi-automatic, and automatic airway segmentation methods. This study evaluates upper airway segmentation accuracy by comparing the results of an automatic model and a semi-automatic method against the gold standard manual method.
    METHODS: An automatic segmentation model was trained using the MONAI Label framework to segment the upper airway from CBCT images. An open-source program, ITK-SNAP, was used for semi-automatic segmentation. The accuracy of both methods was evaluated against manual segmentations. Evaluation metrics included Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Precision, Recall, 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD), and volumetric differences.
    RESULTS: The automatic segmentation group averaged a DSC score of 0.915±0.041, while the semi-automatic group scored 0.940±0.021, indicating clinically acceptable accuracy for both methods. Analysis of the 95% HD revealed that semi-automatic segmentation (0.997±0.585) was more accurate and closer to manual segmentation than automatic segmentation (1.447±0.674). Volumetric comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences between automatic and manual segmentation for total, oropharyngeal, and velopharyngeal airway volumes. Similarly, no significant differences were noted between the semi-automatic and manual methods across these regions.
    CONCLUSIONS: It has been observed that both automatic and semi-automatic methods, which utilise open-source software, align effectively with manual segmentation. Implementing these methods can aid in decision-making by allowing faster and easier upper airway segmentation with comparable accuracy in orthodontic practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在开发一种通过ECG波形分析监测和评估分娩疼痛的创新方法,利用机器学习技术监测子宫收缩引起的疼痛。
    方法:该研究于2020年1月至7月在国立台湾大学医院进行。我们从准备自然自发分娩(NSD)的女性中收集了6010个ECG样本的数据集。ECG数据用于开发基于ECG波形的伤害感受监测指数(NoM)。数据集分为训练集(80%)和验证集(20%)。多个机器学习模型,包括LightGBM,XGBoost,SnapLogistics回归,和SnapDecisionTree,进行了开发和评估。使用网格搜索和五次交叉验证执行超参数优化以增强模型性能。
    结果:LightGBM模型表现出优异的性能,AUC为0.96,准确度为90%,使其成为基于心电数据监测分娩疼痛的最优模型。其他型号,如XGBoost和SnapLogistics回归,也表现强劲,AUC值范围为0.88至0.95。
    结论:这项研究表明,机器学习算法与ECG数据的集成显着提高了分娩疼痛监测的准确性和可靠性。具体来说,LightGBM模型在分娩期间的连续疼痛监测中表现出卓越的精度和鲁棒性,具有扩展到更广泛的医疗保健环境的潜在适用性。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04461704。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop an innovative approach for monitoring and assessing labor pain through ECG waveform analysis, utilizing machine learning techniques to monitor pain resulting from uterine contractions.
    METHODS: The study was conducted at National Taiwan University Hospital between January and July 2020. We collected a dataset of 6010 ECG samples from women preparing for natural spontaneous delivery (NSD). The ECG data was used to develop an ECG waveform-based Nociception Monitoring Index (NoM). The dataset was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Multiple machine learning models, including LightGBM, XGBoost, SnapLogisticRegression, and SnapDecisionTree, were developed and evaluated. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using grid search and five-fold cross-validation to enhance model performance.
    RESULTS: The LightGBM model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.96 and an accuracy of 90%, making it the optimal model for monitoring labor pain based on ECG data. Other models, such as XGBoost and SnapLogisticRegression, also showed strong performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.88 to 0.95.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the integration of machine learning algorithms with ECG data significantly enhances the accuracy and reliability of labor pain monitoring. Specifically, the LightGBM model exhibits exceptional precision and robustness in continuous pain monitoring during labor, with potential applicability extending to broader healthcare settings.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04461704.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)目前是男性局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的一线治疗选择,至少10年的预期寿命,和治愈性治疗的候选人。我们进行了范围审查,以评估人工智能(AI)在PCaRARP中的作用。
    方法:使用EMBASE进行了全面的文献检索,PubMed,还有Scopus.只有英文论文被接受。使用PICOS(患者干预比较结果研究类型)模型;P:接受RARP的成年男性PCa;I:使用AI;C:无;O:术前计划改善和术后结果;S:前瞻性和回顾性研究。
    结果:包括17篇论文,处理手术切缘阳性/前列腺外延伸的预测,生化复发,患者的结果,术中叠加磁共振图像以识别和定位保留神经手术的病变,手术步骤的识别和标记,和手术质量。所有研究都发现使用AI的程序可以改善结果。
    结论:AI在RARP中的整合代表了外科实践中的变革进步,提高手术精度,加强决策过程和促进个性化的病人护理。这具有巨大的潜力,以改善手术结果和教学,减轻并发症。这应该与使用这种技术的机器人平台的当前实施成本相平衡。
    BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is currently a first-line treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer (PCa), at least 10 years of life expectancy, and candidate for curative treatment. We performed a scoping review to evaluate the role of artificial intelligence (AI) on RARP for PCa.
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using EMBASE, PubMed, and Scopus. Only English papers were accepted. The PICOS (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome Study type) model was used; P: adult men with PCa undergoing RARP; I: use of AI; C: none; O: preoperative planning improvement and postoperative outcomes; S: prospective and retrospective studies.
    RESULTS: Seventeen papers were included, dealing with prediction of positive surgical margins/extraprostatic extension, biochemical recurrence, patient\'s outcomes, intraoperative superimposition of magnetic resonance images to identify and locate lesions for nerve-sparing surgery, identification and labeling of surgical steps, and quality of surgery. All studies found improving outcomes in procedures employing AI.
    CONCLUSIONS: The integration of AI in RARP represents a transformative advancement in surgical practice, augmenting surgical precision, enhancing decision-making processes and facilitating personalized patient care. This holds immense potential to improve surgical outcomes and teaching, and mitigate complications. This should be balanced against the current costs of implementation of robotic platforms with such a technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大学生越来越多地采用人工智能(AI),特别是在药学教育中,引发了道德问题,并引发了关于负责任使用的辩论。减少工作量的潜力的承诺与准确性问题有关,算法偏差,以及缺乏人工智能教育和培训。本研究旨在了解药学学生对AI在药学教育中使用的观点。
    方法:这项研究使用了一个匿名的14个问题的调查,分布在第二,第三,和美国四所药学院的四年级药学学生。
    结果:共分析了171个反应。人口统计信息包括机构,类识别(P2,P3,P4),和年龄范围。关于AI的使用,43%的受访者不知道人工智能工具的局限性。许多受访者(45%)使用AI工具来完成任务。而42%的人认为这是学术不诚实。56%的人认为AI工具可以在道德上使用。学生对人工智能的看法各不相同,但许多人表示,它将成为药学教育和未来实践不可或缺的一部分。
    结论:这项研究强调了药学专业学生使用AI的细微差别。尽管人工智能方面的教育和培训有限,学生使用工具进行各种任务。这项调查提供了证据,表明药学专业的学生正在探索人工智能的使用,并可能从使用人工智能作为批判性思维补充的教育中受益。
    BACKGROUND: The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) among college students, particularly in pharmacy education, raises ethical concerns and prompts debates on responsible usage. The promise of the potential to reduce workload is met with concerns of accuracy issues, algorithmic bias, and the lack of AI education and training. This study aims to understand pharmacy students\' perspectives on the use of AI in pharmacy education.
    METHODS: This study used an anonymous 14-question survey distributed among second, third, and fourth-year pharmacy students at four schools of pharmacy in the United States.
    RESULTS: A total of 171 responses were analyzed. Demographic information included institution, class identification (P2, P3, P4), and age range. Regarding the use of AI, 43% of respondents were unaware of limitations of AI tools. Many respondents (45%) had used AI tools to complete assignments, while 42% considered it academic dishonesty. Fifty-six percent believed AI tools could be used ethically. Student perspectives on AI were varied but many expressed that it will be integral to pharmacy education and future practice.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the nuances of AI usage among pharmacy students. Despite limited education and training on AI, students utilized tools for various tasks. This survey provides evidence that pharmacy students are exploring the use of AI and would likely benefit from education on using AI as a supplement to critical thinking.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先进的生物信息学分析,如系统生物学(SysBio)和人工智能(AI)方法,包括机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL),越来越多地出现在干细胞(SC)研究中。关于这些事态发展及其全球影响的大致时间表仍然缺乏。我们根据2000年至2024年在PubMed上发表的文献,对SysBio和AI分析对SC研究和治疗开发的贡献进行了范围审查。我们发现,在2000年至2021年间,与所有三个搜索词相关的研究产出增加了8-10倍,自2010年以来,与人工智能相关的产量增加了10倍。自2010年以来,SysBio和AI的使用仍然在临床前基础研究中占主导地位,并且越来越多地用于临床导向的转化医学。与SysBio和AI相关的研究遍布全球,以美国为首的SysBio产量(美国,n=1487),英国(UK,n=1094),德国(n=355),荷兰(n=339),俄罗斯(n=215)法国(n=149)在人工智能相关研究中,美国(n=853)和英国(n=258)处于领先地位,其次是瑞士(n=69),荷兰(n=37)德国(n=19)。美国和英国在与AI/ML和AI/DL相关的SC出版物中最为活跃。SysBio在ESC研究中的突出使用最近被iPSC和MSC研究中AI的突出使用所取代。这项研究揭示了人工智能之间的全球演变和日益增长的交集,SysBio,和SC过去二十年的研究,在过去的十年里,这三个领域都有了大幅增长,人工智能相关研究也呈指数级增长。
    Advanced bioinformatics analysis, such as systems biology (SysBio) and artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), is increasingly present in stem cell (SC) research. An approximate timeline on these developments and their global impact is still lacking. We conducted a scoping review on the contribution of SysBio and AI analysis to SC research and therapy development based on literature published in PubMed between 2000 and 2024. We identified an 8-10-fold increase in research output related to all three search terms between 2000 and 2021, with a 10-fold increase in AI-related production since 2010. Use of SysBio and AI still predominates in preclinical basic research with increasing use in clinically oriented translational medicine since 2010. SysBio- and AI-related research was found all over the globe, with SysBio output led by the United States (US, n=1487), United Kingdom (UK, n=1094), Germany (n=355), The Netherlands (n=339), Russia (n=215), and France (n=149), while for AI-related research the US (n=853) and UK (n=258) take a strong lead, followed by Switzerland (n=69), The Netherlands (n=37), and Germany (n=19). The US and UK are most active in SCs publications related to AI/ML and AI/DL. The prominent use of SysBio in ESC research was recently overtaken by prominent use of AI in iPSC and MSC research. This study reveals the global evolution and growing intersection between AI, SysBio, and SC research over the past two decades, with substantial growth in all three fields and exponential increases in AI-related research in the past decade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    微生物燃料电池(MFC)是一种复杂而先进的系统,使用产外电微生物来产生生物能源。由于在混合物种生物电化学反应器(如MFC)中发生的复杂相互作用,因此在实验设置下预测性能结果具有挑战性。限制MFC性能的关键因素之一是微生物联盟的存在。传统上,在MFC中实施多个微生物联盟以确定最佳联盟。这种方法很费力,低效,浪费时间和资源。软计算技术可用性的增加允许开发替代策略,如人工智能(AI),尽管微生物菌株之间存在直接相关性,微生物联盟,MFC性能尚未建立。在这项工作中,开发了一种基于子空间k-近邻(SS-kNN)的新型通用AI模型,以从组成微生物中识别和预测最佳微生物群。SS-kNN模型用共享不同流出物性质的三十五个不同的微生物聚生体进行训练。化学需氧量(COD)降低,电压产生,胞外多糖(EPS)的生产,和电压产生的标准偏差(SD)被用作训练SS-kNN模型的输入特征。所提出的SS-kNN模型在训练期间提供100%的准确性,在使用从现有文献中获得的数据进行测试时提供85.71%的准确性。选定的联盟(如SS-kNN模型所预测的)的实施使MFC的COD降低能力比其组成微生物的COD降低能力提高了15.67%,这已通过实验验证。此外,为了防止气候变化的影响和减轻水污染,MFC技术的实施确保了清洁和绿色电力。因此,实现可持续发展目标(SDG)6、7和13。
    Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) are a sophisticated and advanced system that uses exoelectrogenic microorganisms to generate bioenergy. Predicting performance outcomes under experimental settings is challenging due to the intricate interactions that occur in mixed-species bioelectrochemical reactors like MFCs. One of the key factors that limit the MFC\'s performance is the presence of a microbial consortium. Traditionally, multiple microbial consortia are implemented in MFCs to determine the best consortium. This approach is laborious, inefficient, and wasteful of time and resources. The increase in the availability of soft computational techniques has allowed for the development of alternative strategies like artificial intelligence (AI) despite the fact that a direct correlation between microbial strain, microbial consortium, and MFC performance has yet to be established. In this work, a novel generic AI model based on subspace k-Nearest Neighbour (SS-kNN) is developed to identify and forecast the best microbial consortium from the constituent microbes. The SS-kNN model is trained with thirty-five different microbial consortia sharing different effluent properties. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction, voltage generation, exopolysaccharide (EPS) production, and standard deviation (SD) of voltage generation are used as input features to train the SS-kNN model. The proposed SS-kNN model offers an accuracy of 100% during training period and 85.71% when it is tested with the data obtained from existing literature. The implementation of selected consortium (as predicted by SS-kNN model) improves the COD reduction capability of MFC by 15.67% than that of its constituent microbes which is experimentally verified. In addition, to prevent the effects of climate change and mitigate water pollution, the implementation of MFC technology ensures clean and green electricity. Consequently, achieving sustainable development goals (SDG) 6, 7, and 13.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对处于危险中的器官(OAR)的手动轮廓是耗时的并且受到观察者之间的可变性的影响。如果能够产生临床上可接受的结果,则提出基于AI的自动轮廓作为这些问题的解决方案。这项研究调查了多个基于AI的自动轮廓系统在不同OAR分割中的性能。使用七个不同的基于AI的分割系统(放射治疗AI,LimbusAI版本1.5和1.6,Therapanacea,MIM,SiemensAI-RadCompanion和RadFormation)共42例具有不同解剖部位的临床病例。计算了专家轮廓和自动轮廓之间的体积和表面骰子相似系数以及最大Hausdorff距离(HD),以评估其性能。放射治疗AI在头部和颈部考虑的大多数测试结构中显示出比其他软件更好的性能。和大脑病例。没有特定的软件在肺部显示出优于其他软件的整体性能,乳房,骨盆和腹部病例。每个测试的AI系统都能够产生与专家的风险器官轮廓相当的轮廓,可用于临床。发现并报告了在小型和复杂解剖结构的情况下AI系统的性能降低,这表明,审查AI系统产生的每个轮廓用于临床用途仍然是至关重要的。这项研究还展示了一种比较轮廓软件选项的方法,该方法可以在诊所中复制或用于购买系统的持续质量保证。
    Manual contouring of organs at risk (OAR) is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. AI-based auto-contouring is proposed as a solution to these problems if it can produce clinically acceptable results. This study investigated the performance of multiple AI-based auto-contouring systems in different OAR segmentations. The auto-contouring was performed using seven different AI-based segmentation systems (Radiotherapy AI, Limbus AI version 1.5 and 1.6, Therapanacea, MIM, Siemens AI-Rad Companion and RadFormation) on a total of 42 clinical cases with varying anatomical sites. Volumetric and surface dice similarity coefficients and maximum Hausdorff distance (HD) between the expert\'s contours and automated contours were calculated to evaluate their performance. Radiotherapy AI has shown better performance than other software in most tested structures considered in the head and neck, and brain cases. No specific software had shown overall superior performance over other software in lung, breast, pelvis and abdomen cases. Each tested AI system was able to produce comparable contours to the experts\' contours of organs at risk which can potentially be used for clinical use. A reduced performance of AI systems in the case of small and complex anatomical structures was found and reported, showing that it is still essential to review each contour produced by AI systems for clinical uses. This study has also demonstrated a method of comparing contouring software options which could be replicated in clinics or used for ongoing quality assurance of purchased systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)已经改变了眼血管成像,揭示与各种系统性疾病相关的微血管变化。本文就其在糖尿病中的应用作一综述,高血压,心血管疾病,和神经退行性疾病。虽然OCTA提供了一个进入人体微脉管系统的宝贵窗口,解释这些发现可能很复杂。此外,由于其发现的相对非特异性,在OCTA中观察到的变化可能不是特定疾病所独有的,因此存在挑战。OCTA机器之间的变化,缺乏标准化的规范数据库进行比较,和潜在的图像伪影。尽管有这些限制,OCTA拥有巨大的未来潜力。该评论强调了有希望的进步,如OCTA图像的定量分析,集成人工智能以实现更快、更准确的解释,以及将OCTA与其他技术相结合的多模态成像,以更全面地表征眼部脉管系统。此外,OCTA在个性化医疗中的潜在未来作用,根据个人OCTA发现制定量身定制的治疗计划,早期疾病检测的社区筛查计划,还讨论了跟踪疾病随时间进展的纵向研究。总之,OCTA为提高我们对全身性疾病的理解和管理提供了重要的机会。解决当前的限制和追求这些令人兴奋的未来方向可以巩固OCTA作为诊断不可或缺的工具,监测疾病进展,并可能指导各种系统健康状况的治疗决策。
    Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has transformed ocular vascular imaging, revealing microvascular changes linked to various systemic diseases. This review explores its applications in diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. While OCTA provides a valuable window into the body\'s microvasculature, interpreting the findings can be complex. Additionally, challenges exist due to the relative non-specificity of its findings where changes observed in OCTA might not be unique to a specific disease, variations between OCTA machines, the lack of a standardized normative database for comparison, and potential image artifacts. Despite these limitations, OCTA holds immense potential for the future. The review highlights promising advancements like quantitative analysis of OCTA images, integration of artificial intelligence for faster and more accurate interpretation, and multi-modal imaging combining OCTA with other techniques for a more comprehensive characterization of the ocular vasculature. Furthermore, OCTA\'s potential future role in personalized medicine, enabling tailored treatment plans based on individual OCTA findings, community screening programs for early disease detection, and longitudinal studies tracking disease progression over time is also discussed. In conclusion, OCTA presents a significant opportunity to improve our understanding and management of systemic diseases. Addressing current limitations and pursuing these exciting future directions can solidify OCTA as an indispensable tool for diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and potentially guiding treatment decisions across various systemic health conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号