OBJECTIVE: The hemodynamic assessment of patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) using noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring may be unreliable without pulsatile blood flow. The primary goal of this study is to examine the association between intraoperative blood pressure monitoring gaps of 10 min or greater and LVAD type in patients undergoing noncardiac surgeries with NIBP monitors at induction.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort.
METHODS: Single institution, academic university hospital.
METHODS: One-hundred fifteen patients undergoing 187 noncardiac surgeries without arterial lines at induction.
METHODS: Noncardiac surgery.
METHODS: The primary outcome was the association of blood pressure monitoring gaps, which were defined as ten minutes or greater, and LVAD type including the HeartMate 2 (HM2; Abbott, Chicago, IL) and the HeartMate 3 (HM3; Abbott, Chicago, IL), as evaluated by multivariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: After adjusting for patient characteristics, HM3 was associated with lower odds of monitoring gaps (p = 0.02). Additionally, the odds of a monitoring gap were higher in patients with morbid obesity (p = 0.04) and in surgical duration longer than 180 min (p = 0.001). In the post-hoc analysis, morbid obesity, general anesthesia, and prolonged surgeries were found to be associated with increased odds of arterial line placement after induction (p = 0.05, p = 0.007, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a HM2 undergoing noncardiac surgery had nearly three-fold higher odds of blood pressure monitoring gaps of 10 min or greater compared to patients with a HM3. Morbid obesity and prolonged surgical duration were also associated with a significant increase in monitoring gaps. Morbid obesity, general anesthesia, and longer surgical duration were found to have a greater odds of arterial line placement after induction. These results may help anesthesiologists determine the appropriateness of NIBP in patients with LVADs undergoing noncardiac surgeries.

Deviations from normal blood pressure (BP) during general anesthesia have been clearly linked to several adverse outcomes. Measuring BP accurately is therefore critically important for producing excellent outcomes in health care. Normal BP does not necessarily guarantee adequate organ perfusion however and adverse events have occurred even when BP seemed adequate. Invasive blood pressure monitoring has recently evolved beyond merely measuring BP. Arterial line-derived pulse contour analysis is used now to assess both cardiac output and stroke volume variation as indices of adequate intravascular volume. Confirmation of acceptable cardiac output with data derived from invasive intra-arterial catheters has become very important when managing high-risk patients. Newer devices that measure BP continuously and non-invasively in the digital arteries via a finger cuff have also become available. Many clinicians contemplate now if these new devices are ready to replace invasive monitoring with an arterial catheter. Unlike non-invasive devices, intra-arterial catheters allow frequent blood sampling. This makes it possible to assess vital parameters like pH, hemoglobin concentration, ionized calcium, potassium, glucose, and arterial partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide frequently. Non-invasive continuous BP measurement has been found to be unreliable in critically ill patients, the elderly, and patients with calcified arteries. Pulse contour-derived estimates of cardiac output and stroke volume variation have been validated better with data derived from arterial lines than that from the newer finger cuff monitors. Significant advances have been recently made with non-invasive continuous BP monitors. Invasive monitoring with an arterial line however remains the gold standard for measuring BP and assessing pulse contour analysis-derived hemodynamic variables in critically ill patients. In the future, non-invasive continuous BP monitors will likely replace intermittent oscillometers in the operating room and the postoperative period. They will however not eliminate the need for arterial catheterization in critically ill patients.

A patient self-discontinues arterial line resulting in retention of arterial catheter. The retained catheter was identified on bedside ultrasound and the patient required radial artery exploration and removal of catheter under general anesthesia. We describe potential contributing factors and solutions to catheter design and placement as well as next steps once a retained catheter has been identified.

The primary purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the development of arterial line-related limb ischemia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The authors also sought to characterize and report the outcomes of patients who developed arterial line-related limb ischemia.
Retrospective cohort study.
A single academic tertiary referral ECMO center.
Consecutive patients who were treated with ECMO over 6 years.
Use of arterial line.
A total of 278 consecutive ECMO patients were included, with 19 (7%) patients developing arterial line-related limb ischemia during the ECMO run. Postcannulation Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.32), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95), and adjusted Vasopressor Dose Equivalence (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) scores were independently associated with the development of arterial line-associated limb ischemia. A SOFA score of ≥17 at the time of ECMO cannulation had an 80% sensitivity and 87% specificity for predicting arterial line-related limb ischemia.
Arterial line-related limb ischemia is much more common in ECMO patients than in the typical intensive care unit setting. The SOFA score may be useful in identifying which patients may be at risk for arterial line-related limb ischemia. As this was a single-center retrospective study, these results are inherently exploratory, and prospective multicenter studies are necessary to validate these results.

To assess success of peripheral arterial line (PAL) placement after implementing a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) program in a neonatal intensive care unit. This was a retrospective chart review of infants who underwent successful PAL placement from January 2019 to March 2021. Outcomes included first-attempt success and the number of attempts with and without the use of POCUS. Among 80 PALs, 36% were POCUS-guided. All POCUS-guided lines were placed by providers with < 5 years neonatology experience. Among infants ≥ 2.5 kg, the use of POCUS was associated with fewer attempts compared to non-POCUS PAL placement (1 vs. 2, p = 0.035).     Conclusions: Use of POCUS for PAL placement was associated with fewer attempts for successful placement in infants ≥ 2.5 kg by providers with less neonatology experience compared with traditional method. What is Known: • Arterial line placement in neonates has been traditionally done by palpation and can be technically challenging. • POCUS is an emerging tool in the NICU with increasing number of less clinically experienced providers in the NICU having access to ultrasound. What is New: • Use of POCUS by less experienced clinicians for arterial line placement resulted in fewer attempts compared to the traditional landmark-based approach in a cohort of neonates.

BACKGROUND: Timely vascular access is critical, as hemorrhage is the number one cause of death on the battlefield. Anecdotal evidence in the Military Health System identified an operationally relevant procedural skills gap in vascular access, and data exist in civilian literature showing high rates of iatrogenic injuries when lack of robust procedural opportunity exists. Multiple pre-deployment training courses are available for surgical providers, but no comprehensive pre-deployment vascular access training exists for non-surgical providers.
METHODS: This mixed-method review aimed to find relevant, operationally focused, vascular access training publications. A literature review was done to identify both relevant military clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and full text articles. Reviewers also investigated available pre-deployment trainings for both surgeons and non-surgeons in which course administrators were contacted and details regarding the courses were described.
RESULTS: We identified seven full-text articles and four CPGs. Two existing surgical training programs and Army, Navy, and Air Force pre-deployment training standards for non-surgeons were evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: A cost-effective and accessible pre-deployment curriculum utilizing reviewed literature in a \"learn, do, perfect\" structure is suggested, building on pre-existing structures while incorporating remotely accessible didactics, hands-on practice with portable simulation models, and live-feedback training.

Invasive pressure monitors are ubiquitous in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. This technology allows beat-to-beat assessment of central venous, pulmonary, and arterial blood pressures during surgery, procedural interventions, and critical care. Education is commonly focused on the procedural aspects and the complications associated with the initial placement of these monitors without instruction on the technical concepts required for obtaining accurate data. Anesthesiologists must understand the fundamental concepts on which measurements are made to effectively use invasive pressure monitors, including pulmonary artery catheters, central venous catheters, intra-arterial catheters, external ventricular drains, and spinal or lumbar drains. This review will address important gaps in knowledge surrounding leveling and zeroing of invasive pressure monitors, emphasizing the impact of varied practice patterns on patient care.

暂无摘要。

To evaluate the utility, outcomes, and cost of arterial line placement in a single institution cohort of patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
A retrospective chart review was performed at a large tertiary care center from July 2018 through January 2021. Hospital costs and cost-effective analysis was performed on patients with and without arterial line placement. Means with standard deviations were used to report continuous variables, while numbers and percentages were utilized to describe categorical variables. T-tests and Chi-square tests compared categorical and continuous variables across study cohorts, respectively. Multivariable analyses were used to examine the association between A-line placement and outcomes as mentioned above adjusting for the effect of other co-variables.
Among the 296 included patients, 138 (46.6%) had arterial lines. No preoperative patient characteristic predicted arterial line placement. Rates of complications and re-admissions were not statistically significant between the two groups. Arterial line use was associated with higher volumes of intraoperative fluid administration, as well as a longer hospital length of stay. Total cost and operative time did not significantly differ between cohorts, but arterial line placement increased variability of these factors.
The use of arterial lines in patients undergoing RALP is not necessarily guideline-driven and does not decrease the rate of perioperative complications. However, it is associated with longer length of stay and increases variability in charge. These data show that the surgical team and anesthesia team should critically evaluate the need for arterial line placement in patients undergoing RALP.

Vascular access in severely injured pediatric trauma patients is associated with time-critical circumstances and low incidences, whereas only scarce literature on procedure performance is available. The purpose of this study was to analyze the performance of different vascular access procedures from the first contact at the scene until three hours after admission. Intubated pediatric trauma patients admitted from the scene to a single Level I trauma center between 2008 and 2019 were analyzed regarding intravenous (IV) and intraosseous (IO) accesses, central venous catheterization (CVC) and arterial line placement. Sixty-five children with a median age of 14 years and median injury severity score of 29 points were included, of which 62 (96.6%) underwent successful prehospital IV or IO access by emergency medical service (EMS) physicians, while it failed in two children (3.1%). On emergency department (ED) admission, IV cannulas of prehospital EMS had malfunctions or were dislodged in seven of 55 children (12.7%). IO access was performed in 17 children without complications, and was associated with younger age, higher injury severity and higher mortality. Fifty-two CVC placements (58 attempts) and 55 arterial line placements (59 attempts) were performed in 45 and 52 children, respectively. All CVC and arterial line placements were performed in the ED, operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU). Ten mechanical complications related to CVC placement (17.8%) and seven related to arterial line placement (10.2%) were observed, none of which had outcome-relevant consequences. This case series suggests that mechanical issues of vascular access may frequently occur, underlining the need for special preparedness in prehospital, ED, ICU and OR environments.