ards (acute respiratory distress syndrome)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了评估通过时间二氧化碳描记术测量的死腔分数(VD/VT)的相关性,校正分钟体积(CMV)和通气比(VR)与需要有创机械通气的COVID-19患者的临床结果。
    方法:一个历史队列的观察性研究。
    方法:麦德林大学医院,哥伦比亚。
    方法:确诊为COVID-19的15岁及以上患者入住ICU,需要机械通气。
    方法:测量VD/VT,CMV,COVID-19患者的VR。
    方法:VD/VT,CMV,VR,人口统计数据,氧合指数和通气参数。
    结果:在研究期间,对1047例COVID-19机械通气患者进行分析,其中446人(42%)死亡。死亡患者的高龄和肥胖患病率较高,提升Charlson指数,更高的APACHEII和SOFA分数,以及机械通气第一天的VD/VT比率(幸存者为0.27,死者为0.31)和分钟通气量增加。多变量分析显示与住院死亡率有独立关联,较高的VD/VT(HR1.24;95CI1.003-1.525;p=0.046),年龄(HR1.024;95CI1.014-1.034;p<0.001),和发病时的SOFA评分(HR:1.036;95CI:1.001-1.07;p=0.017)。
    结论:在机械通气的COVID-19合并ARDS患者中,VD/VT与死亡率相关。这些发现表明,VD/VT测量可能是该疾病的严重程度标志。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation of dead space fraction (VD/VT) measured through time capnography, corrected minute volume (CMV) and ventilation ratio (VR) with clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.
    METHODS: Observational study of a historical cohort.
    METHODS: University hospital in Medellin, Colombia.
    METHODS: Patients aged 15 and above with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis admitted to the ICU and requiring mechanical ventilation.
    METHODS: Measurement of VD/VT, CMV, and VR in COVID-19 patients.
    METHODS: VD/VT, CMV, VR, demographic data, oxygenation indices and ventilatory parameters.
    RESULTS: During the study period, 1047 COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation were analyzed, of whom 446 (42%) died. Deceased patients exhibited a higher prevalence of advanced age and obesity, elevated Charlson index, higher APACHE II and SOFA scores, as well as an increase in VD/VT ratio (0.27 in survivors and 0.31 in deceased) and minute ventilation volume on the first day of mechanical ventilation. The multivariate analysis revealed independent associations to in-hospital mortality, higher VD/VT (HR 1.24; 95%CI 1.003-1.525; p = 0.046), age (HR 1.024; 95%CI 1.014-1.034; p < 0.001), and SOFA score at onset (HR: 1.036; 95%CI: 1.001-1.07; p = 0.017).
    CONCLUSIONS: VD/VT demonstrated an association with mortality in COVID-19 patients with ARDS on mechanical ventilation. These findings suggest that VD/VT measurement may serve as a severity marker for the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    持续窦性心动过速(pST)与危重患者的不良心血管事件有关。使用负性肌力药物对心率的药物控制已被证明是安全的,但在伴有右心室(RV)功能障碍的患者中可能具有潜在危险。伊伐布雷定,一种没有负面影响的药物,当需要适当的心率控制时,可能是该患者人群的潜在安全解决方案。一名17岁男性,有电子烟病史,出现急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和RV功能障碍,需要额外的身体生命支持(ECLS)。他患有PST。鉴于他的RV功能障碍,避免了β受体阻滞剂,伊伐布雷定被安全使用,并改善了他的pST。此病例证明了伊伐布雷定降低心率和避免使用β受体阻滞剂治疗RV功能障碍患者的疗效,这可能是有害的。伊伐布雷定可降低心率,而不会改变血液动力学参数。
    Persistent sinus tachycardia (pST) has been associated with adverse cardiovascular events in critically ill patients. Pharmacological control of heart rate with negative inotropic agents has proven to be safe but could be potentially dangerous in patients with concomitant right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Ivabradine, a medication devoid of negative inotropy, could be a potentially safe solution for this patient population when adequate heart rate control is desired. A 17-year-old male with a history of vaping developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and RV dysfunction, requiring extra corporal life support (ECLS). He suffered from pST. Given his RV dysfunction, a beta-blocker was avoided, and ivabradine was used safely with improvement of his pST. This case demonstrates the efficacy of ivabradine to reduce heart rate and avoid the use of beta-blockers for patients with RV dysfunction, which could be detrimental. Ivabradine was shown to lower the heart rate without altering hemodynamic parameters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)通常会出现广泛的并发症,包括呼吸窘迫,急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),和高凝状态导致的脑血管事件。肺内和肺外分流会使患者病程进一步复杂化。导致持续性低氧血症和矛盾的栓塞,导致可能危及生命的后果,需要一个全面的,患者护理的多学科方法。在这里,我们介绍了一个73岁的男性,他经历了严重的持续性低氧性呼吸衰竭,叠加耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)肺炎,和先前未诊断的卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的中风有助于他的临床表现。
    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often presents with a wide range of complications, including respiratory distress, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and hypercoagulable states with resultant cerebrovascular incidents. Intra- and extra-pulmonological shunts can further complicate patient courses, leading to persistent hypoxemia and paradoxical emboli, resulting in potentially life-threatening consequences, necessitating a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to patient care. Here we present the case of a 73-year-old male who experienced severe persistent hypoxemic respiratory failure, superimposed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia, and stroke with a previously undiagnosed patent foramen ovale (PFO) contributing to his clinical presentation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景肺血栓形成和血栓栓塞在COVID-19急性呼吸衰竭的生理紊乱中起着重要作用。替奈普酶溶栓对患者预后的影响尚不清楚。方法我们进行了随机,控制,双盲,在COVID-19急性呼吸衰竭患者中比较替奈普酶与安慰剂的II期试验(NCT04505592)。COVID-19急性呼吸衰竭患者以2:1的比例随机分配给替奈普酶0.25mg/kg或安慰剂。两组均接受治疗性肝素至少72小时。结果13例患者纳入试验。八名患者被随机分配给替奈普酶,五名患者被随机分配给安慰剂。28天,63%(n=5)的患者被分配到治疗组存活并且没有呼吸衰竭,而安慰剂组则为40%(n=2)(p=0.43)。28天的死亡率在治疗组中为25%(n=2),在对照组中为20%(n=1)(p=1.0)。与安慰剂组的60%(n=3)相比,治疗组中没有患者在28天出现肾衰竭(p=0.07)。大出血发生在治疗组的25%(n=2)和安慰剂组的20%(n=1);然而,两组患者均未出现颅内出血.结论替奈普酶联合肝素可改善COVID-19呼吸衰竭患者的预后。由于这项研究受到样本量小的限制,需要更大的验证性研究。
    Background Pulmonary thrombosis and thromboembolism play a significant role in the physiologic derangements seen in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure. The effect of thrombolysis with tenecteplase on patient outcomes is unknown. Methods We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase II trial comparing tenecteplase versus placebo in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory failure (NCT04505592). Patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory failure were randomized to tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or placebo in a 2:1 proportion. Both groups received therapeutic heparin for at least 72 hours. Results Thirteen patients were included in the trial. Eight patients were randomized to tenecteplase and five were randomized to placebo. At 28 days, 63% (n = 5) of patients assigned to the treatment group were alive and free from respiratory failure compared to 40% (n = 2) in the placebo arm (p = 0.43). Mortality at 28 days was 25% (n = 2) in the treatment arm and 20% (n = 1) in the control arm (p = 1.0). No patients in the treatment arm developed renal failure by 28 days compared to 60% (n = 3) in the placebo arm (p = 0.07). Major bleeding occurred in 25% (n = 2) of the treatment arm and 20% (n = 1) in the placebo arm; however, no patients in either arm experienced intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusions Tenecteplase with concomitant heparin may improve patient outcomes in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure. As this study was limited by a small sample size, larger confirmatory studies are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是一种与高死亡率相关的严重肺部疾病。体外膜氧合(ECMO)是一种对常规治疗无反应的严重ARDS患者的救命疗法。然而,接受ECMO的ARDS患者的最佳管理及其死亡率仍存在争议.因此,本系统综述旨在评估接受ECMO治疗的ARDS患者的死亡率并确定相关因素.该审查遵循了系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)2020指南的首选报告项目。在PubMed上进行了全面的文献检索,PubMedCentral(PMC),Medline,和Embase。根据我们的纳入和排除标准,过滤器,和关键术语,我们继续筛选文章。在评估了每篇文章与我们主题的相关性之后,进行了进一步筛查。对文章进行了质量评估,导致共纳入12篇文章供审查。主要结果集中在接受ECMO的ARDS患者的死亡率。次要结果探讨了死亡率的潜在贡献者,包括患者年龄,ARDS的根本原因,和开始ECMO时的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。死亡率表现出显著差异,从22%到62.6%不等。几个因素成为死亡率的潜在预测因子,包括患者年龄,合并症,ECMO治疗期间的并发症,和治疗相关变量。本系统综述为影响ECMO治疗ARDS患者死亡率的复杂因素提供了有价值的见解。理解这些因素对于指导临床实践和提高患者预后至关重要。虽然ECMO是ARDS患者的修复途径,未来的研究有必要进一步阐明这些复杂的相互作用,并完善ECMO治疗方案.
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe lung disease associated with a high mortality rate. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving therapy for severe ARDS patients who do not respond to conventional treatments. Nevertheless, the optimal management of ARDS patients undergoing ECMO and their mortality rates remain subjects of controversy. Thus, this systematic review aims to assess mortality rates in ARDS patients on ECMO and identify associated factors. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Medline, and Embase. In accordance with our inclusion and exclusion criteria, filters, and key terms, we proceeded to screen the articles. After assessing the relevance of each article to our topic, further screening was carried out. Quality assessment of the articles was conducted, resulting in the inclusion of a total of 12 articles for the review. The primary outcome focused on mortality rates among ARDS patients undergoing ECMO. Secondary outcomes explored potential contributors to mortality, including patient age, underlying cause of ARDS, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores at the initiation of ECMO. Mortality rates exhibited significant variation, ranging from 22% to 62.6%. Several factors emerged as potential predictors of mortality, encompassing patient age, comorbidities, complications during ECMO therapy, and treatment-related variables. This systematic review offers valuable insights into the intricate factors influencing mortality rates among ARDS patients on ECMO. A comprehension of these factors is essential to steer clinical practice and enhance patient outcomes. While ECMO serves as a restorative avenue for ARDS patients, future research is warranted to further elucidate these complex interactions and refine ECMO therapy protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS-CoV-2感染导致COVID-19,这已成为世界范围内的健康紧急情况。SARS-CoV-2通过与ACE2受体结合而感染细胞,并在其从内溶酶体逃逸后进入细胞质。一旦进入细胞质,该病毒复制并最终引起各种病理状况,包括由促炎细胞因子风暴引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。因此,内溶酶体和细胞因子风暴是抑制SARS-CoV-2感染和COVID-19的重要治疗靶点。这里,我们讨论了SARS-CoV-2感染的治疗目标以及可能有助于抑制SARS-CoV-2感染和病理状况COVID-19的可用药物。COVID-19大流行的紧迫性阻碍了新药的开发,对药物再利用的更多关注可能是寻找有效药物的最快方法。
    SARS-CoV-2 infection causes COVID-19, which has emerged as a health emergency worldwide. SARS-CoV-2 infects cells by binding to ACE2 receptors and enters into the cytoplasm following its escape from endolysosomes. Once in the cytoplasm, the virus replicates and eventually causes various pathological conditions including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that is caused by pro-inflammatory cytokine storms. Thus, endolysosomes and cytokine storms are important therapeutic targets to suppress SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. Here, we discuss therapeutic targets of SARS-CoV-2 infection and available drugs that could be helpful in the suppression of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathological condition COVID-19. The urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic precludes the development of new drugs and increased focus on drug repurposing might provide the quickest way to finding effective medicines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19是由新型人类冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2引起的严重呼吸道疾病。感染SARS-CoV-2的患者表现出异质性症状,这对实施适当的治疗和管理COVID-19患者及其COVID后并发症构成了实际障碍。因此,了解感染严重程度在宿主分子水平上的影响对于了解宿主反应和相应的精确管理至关重要。在目前的研究中,我们对公开的7例无症状和8例重症COVID-19患者进行了转录组学比较分析.采用主成分分析(PCA)的探索性数据分析显示了无症状和严重患者的不同簇。随后,与无症状样本相比,使用DESeq2的差异基因表达分析在重度样本中发现了1224个显著上调的基因(logFC≥1.5,p调整值<0.05)和268个显著下调的基因(logFC≤-1.5,p调整值<0.05).最终,基因集富集分析(GSEA)揭示了抗病毒和抗炎途径的上调,继发感染,铁稳态,贫血,心脏相关,等。;而,脂质代谢下调,适应性免疫反应,翻译,反复呼吸道感染,血红素生物合成途径,等。最后,这些发现提供了对严重COVID-19患者对其他健康合并症(包括非病毒病原体感染)的敏感性增强的见解,动脉粥样硬化,自身炎症性疾病,贫血,男性不育,等。由于生物过程的激活,与之相关的途径和分子功能。我们预计这项研究将有助于研究人员找到有效的治疗靶点,并最终帮助临床医生管理COVID-19患者及其后COVID-19效应。
    COVID-19 is a severe respiratory disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, a novel human coronavirus. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 exhibit heterogeneous symptoms that pose pragmatic hurdles for implementing appropriate therapy and management of the COVID-19 patients and their post-COVID complications. Thus, understanding the impact of infection severity at the molecular level in the host is vital to understand the host response and accordingly it\'s precise management. In the current study, we performed a comparative transcriptomics analysis of publicly available seven asymptomatic and eight severe COVID-19 patients. Exploratory data analysis employing Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed the distinct clusters of asymptomatic and severe patients. Subsequently, the differential gene expression analysis using DESeq2 identified 1224 significantly upregulated genes (logFC≥ 1.5, p-adjusted value <0.05) and 268 significantly downregulated genes (logFC≤ -1.5, p-adjusted value <0.05) in severe samples in comparison to asymptomatic samples. Eventually, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed the upregulation of anti-viral and anti-inflammatory pathways, secondary infections, Iron homeostasis, anemia, cardiac-related, etc.; while, downregulation of lipid metabolism, adaptive immune response, translation, recurrent respiratory infections, heme-biosynthetic pathways, etc. Conclusively, these findings provide insight into the enhanced susceptibility of severe COVID-19 patients to other health comorbidities including non-viral pathogenic infections, atherosclerosis, autoinflammatory diseases, anemia, male infertility, etc. owing to the activation of biological processes, pathways and molecular functions associated with them. We anticipate this study will facilitate the researchers in finding efficient therapeutic targets and eventually the clinicians in management of COVID-19 patients and post-COVID-19 effects in them.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脓毒症与内皮细胞(EC)功能障碍有关,增加血管通透性和器官损伤,这可能会导致死亡,急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和急性肾衰竭(ARF)。目前尚无可靠的生物标志物来预测这些脓毒症并发症。最近的证据表明,循环细胞外囊泡(EV)及其含量caspase-1和miR-126可能在调节脓毒症血管损伤中起关键作用;然而,循环EV与脓毒症结局之间的关联在很大程度上仍然未知.
    我们从入院24小时内的败血症患者(n=96)和健康对照(n=45)获得了血浆样品。总计,从血浆样品中分离单核细胞或EC衍生的EV。跨上皮电阻(TEER)用作EC功能障碍的指标。检测到EV中的Caspase-1活性及其与败血症结局(包括死亡率)的关联。分析ARDS和ARF。在另一组实验中,在入院后第1天和第3天,从12例脓毒症患者和12例非脓毒症危重病对照的血浆样本中分离出总EV.从这些EV中分离RNA并进行下一代测序。miR-126水平与脓毒症结局如死亡率之间的关联,分析ARDS和ARF。
    患有循环EV并引起EC损伤(较低的跨内皮电阻)的脓毒症患者更有可能出现ARDS(p<0.05)。总电动汽车中更高的胱天蛋白酶-1活性,单核细胞或EC衍生的EV与ARDS的发展显着相关(p<0.05)。与健康对照组相比,ARDS患者ECEV中的MiR-126-3p水平显着降低(p<0.05)。此外,从第1天到第3天,miR-126-5p水平下降与死亡率增加有关,ARDS和ARF;而从第1天到第3天miR-126-3p水平的下降与ARDS的发展有关。
    循环电动汽车中caspase-1活性增强和miR-126水平下降与脓毒症相关的器官衰竭和死亡率相关。细胞外囊泡内容物可以作为脓毒症未来治疗方法的新型预后生物标志物和/或靶标。
    UNASSIGNED: Sepsis is associated with endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction, increased vascular permeability and organ injury, which may lead to mortality, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute renal failure (ARF). There are no reliable biomarkers to predict these sepsis complications at present. Recent evidence suggests that circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) and their content caspase-1 and miR-126 may play a critical role in modulating vascular injury in sepsis; however, the association between circulating EVs and sepsis outcomes remains largely unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: We obtained plasma samples from septic patients (n=96) within 24 hours of hospital admission and from healthy controls (n=45). Total, monocyte- or EC-derived EVs were isolated from the plasma samples. Transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) was used as an indicator of EC dysfunction. Caspase-1 activity in EVs was detected and their association with sepsis outcomes including mortality, ARDS and ARF was analyzed. In another set of experiments, total EVs were isolated from plasma samples of 12 septic patients and 12 non-septic critical illness controls on days 1, and 3 after hospital admission. RNAs were isolated from these EVs and Next-generation sequencing was performed. The association between miR-126 levels and sepsis outcomes such as mortality, ARDS and ARF was analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Septic patients with circulating EVs that induced EC injury (lower transendothelial electrical resistance) were more likely to experience ARDS (p<0.05). Higher caspase-1 activity in total EVs, monocyte- or EC-derived EVs was significantly associated with the development of ARDS (p<0.05). MiR-126-3p levels in EC EVs were significantly decreased in ARDS patients compared with healthy controls (p<0.05). Moreover, a decline in miR-126-5p levels from day 1 to day 3 was associated with increased mortality, ARDS and ARF; while decline in miR-126-3p levels from day 1 to day 3 was associated with ARDS development.
    UNASSIGNED: Enhanced caspase-1 activity and declining miR-126 levels in circulating EVs are associated with sepsis-related organ failure and mortality. Extracellular vesicular contents may serve as novel prognostic biomarkers and/or targets for future therapeutic approaches in sepsis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)经常在严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的情况下报道。我们工作的目的是评估急性透析使用对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间AKI患者死亡率的影响。
    方法:这是一项在非斯哈桑二世大学医院进行的回顾性研究,摩洛哥。从2020年7月到2021年12月,我们纳入了根据2012年肾脏疾病改善全球结果(KDIGO2012)标准定义的COVID-19急性肾损伤的所有患者。我们的病人超过18岁,SARS-CoV-2感染通过RT-PCR检测阳性或胸部CT扫描成像证实。终末期肾病(ESRD)患者和孕妇被排除在我们的研究之外。
    结果:研究期间在COVID-19病房住院的患者总数为2560例,其中重症监护病房206例。我们纳入了61例AKI患者,重症监护病房(ICU)的发病率为15.5%。百分之八十的病人入院时出现呼吸窘迫,这是协商的主要原因。1.6%的患者发现1期AKI,25.8%患有II期AKI,72.6%患有KDIGO3期AKI。AKI的主要病因为急性肾小管坏死。18例患者继发于感染的肺部严重受累;21例中度受累。在我们的研究中,我们的21例患者(34.4%)在ICU住院.我们的13例患者进行了插管(21.1%)。21例(34.4%)患者血流动力学不稳定,并服用了血管活性药物。我们的23例(37.7%)患者至少接受了一次常规急性血液透析,平均持续时间为2.1小时±0.9(1-3.5)。指示为过载(27%),严重代谢性酸中毒(1.6%),威胁性高钾血症(1.6%),和症状性尿毒症(62%)。进展以两名患者恢复基线肾功能为标志,其中35个在放电时得到部分改善,24名患者没有改善。我们记录的死亡率为34.4%(n=21)。在单变量分析中,我们比较了人口统计,临床,临床旁,透析组和非透析组的透析特性。不稳定之间存在显着差异,透析组的插管患者和ICU住院患者,p值分别为p=0.0001、p=0.0001和p=0.01。我们注意到透析组的死亡人数多于非透析组;这种差异具有统计学意义,p值为0.005。在多变量分析中,在校正其他辅助因素的同时,采用逻辑回归模型检验透析与COVID-19死亡率之间的关系.最终模型未显示透析与死亡率之间的显著关联(p=0.150,OR:2.578[0.710-9.364])。唯一保持独立显著的因素是入住重症监护病房(p=0.004,OR:6.732[1.847-24.540])。
    结论:AKI是COVID-19患者经常遇到的并发症,尤其是在ICU住院的患者。在SARS-CoV-2感染的背景下,使用至少1次透析似乎代表与AKI相关的额外死亡风险.
    BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequently reported in the setting of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) infection. The aim of our work is to evaluate the impact of acute dialysis use on mortality in patients with AKI during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted in the Hassan II University Hospital of Fez, Morocco. From July 2020 to December 2021, we included all patients admitted to a COVID-19 unit with acute kidney injury defined according to Kidney Disease Improvement Global Outcomes 2012 (KDIGO 2012) criteria. Our patients were older than 18 years, and SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by a positive RT-PCR test or thoracic CT scan imaging. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and pregnant women were excluded from our study.
    RESULTS: The total number of patients hospitalized in the COVID-19 unit during the study period was 2560, including 206 in an intensive care setting. We included 61 patients with AKI, with an incidence in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting of 15.5%. Eighty percent of patients had respiratory distress on admission, which was the main reason for consultation. Stage 1 AKI was found in 1.6% of patients, 25.8% had stage II AKI, and 72.6% had KDIGO stage 3 AKI. The main etiology of AKI was acute tubular necrosis. Lung involvement secondary to infection was severe in 18 patients; 21 had moderate involvement. In our study, twenty-one of our patients (34.4%) were hospitalized in an ICU. Thirteen of our patients were intubated (21.1%). Twenty-one (34.4%) patients were hemodynamically unstable and were put on vasoactive drugs. Twenty-three (37.7%) of our patients received at least one session of conventional acute hemodialysis with an average duration of 2.1 hours ± 0.9 (1-3.5). The indication was overload (27%), severe metabolic acidosis (1.6%), threatening hyperkalemia (1.6%), and symptomatic hyperuremia (62%). The evolution was marked by a return to baseline renal function in two patients, partial improvement in 35 of them at discharge, and no improvement in 24 patients. We recorded a death rate of 34.4% (n=21). In a univariate analysis, we compared the demographic, clinical, paraclinical, and dialytic characteristics of the dialysis and non-dialysis groups. There was a significant difference between unstable, intubated patients and those hospitalized in the ICU in the dialysis group, with respective p-values of p=0.0001, p=0.0001, and p=0.01. We noticed there were more deaths in the dialysis group than in the non-dialysis group; this difference was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.005. In multivariate analysis, a logistic regression model was performed to test the relationship between dialysis and COVID-19 mortality while adjusting for other co-factors. The final model did not show a significant association between dialysis and mortality (p = 0.150, OR: 2.578 [0.710-9.364]). The only factor that remained independently significant was admission to the intensive care unit (p = 0.004, OR: 6.732 [1.847-24.540]).
    CONCLUSIONS: AKI is a frequently encountered complication in patients with COVID-19, especially those hospitalized in the ICU. In the context of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, the use of at least one dialysis session seems to represent an excess risk of mortality related to AKI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19导致不同器官包括肺的病理性改变,肾脏,肝脏,等。,尤其是那些屈服的人。尽管已知有合并症的患者的临床结果与没有合并症的患者不同-关于组织病理学水平的差异知之甚少。
    目的:比较免疫功能低下(Gr1)的COVID-19患者的病态组织病理学变化,恶性肿瘤(Gr2),或患有心脏代谢疾病(高血压,糖尿病,或冠状动脉疾病)(Gr3)。
    方法:从肺部进行死后组织采样(MITS),肾,心,在死亡后两小时内使用活检枪和肝脏。常规(H&E染色)和特殊染色(AFB,SM,除免疫组织化学外,还进行了PAS)。
    结果:共有100例患者接受了MITS,纳入了92例数据(免疫功能受损:27例,不适:18例,心脏代谢状况:71例)。在肺组织病理学中,毛细血管充血在恶性肿瘤患者中更多,而其他人则像弥漫性肺泡损伤,微血栓,肺细胞增生,等是均匀分布的。在肝脏组织病理学中,结构变形在免疫受损而脂肪变性中显著不同,门静脉炎症,Kupffer细胞肥大,融合坏死分布均匀。与其他组相比,患有心脏代谢疾病的患者有更高的急性肾小管损伤趋势。心脏没有明显的组织病理学差异。
    结论:某些组织病理学特征在具有致命结局的COVID-19患者的不同组(Gr1、2和3)中存在显著差异。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    COVID-19 causes morbid pathological changes in different organs including lungs, kidneys, liver, and so on, especially in those who succumb. Though clinical outcomes in those with comorbidities are known to be different from those without-not much is known about the differences at the histopathological level. To compare the morbid histopathological changes in COVID-19 patients between those who were immunocompromised (Gr 1), had a malignancy (Gr 2), or had cardiometabolic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery disease) (Gr 3), postmortem tissue sampling (minimally invasive tissue sampling [MITS]) was done from the lungs, kidney, heart, and liver using a biopsy gun within 2 hours of death. Routine (hematoxylin and eosin) and special staining (acid fast bacilli, silver methanamine, periodic acid schiff) was done besides immunohistochemistry. A total of 100 patients underwent MITS and data of 92 patients were included (immunocompromised: 27, malignancy: 18, cardiometabolic conditions: 71). In lung histopathology, capillary congestion was more in those with malignancy, while others like diffuse alveolar damage, microthrombi, pneumocyte hyperplasia, and so on, were equally distributed. In liver histopathology, architectural distortion was significantly different in immunocompromised; while steatosis, portal inflammation, Kupffer cell hypertrophy, and confluent necrosis were equally distributed. There was a trend towards higher acute tubular injury in those with cardiometabolic conditions as compared to the other groups. No significant histopathological difference in the heart was discerned. Certain histopathological features were markedly different in different groups (Gr 1, 2, and 3) of COVID-19 patients with fatal outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号