BACKGROUND: Despite the rarity of appendiceal tumors, research in this field has intensified, resulting in a growing number of studies and published papers. Surprisingly, no comprehensive bibliometric analysis has specifically addressed appendiceal tumors.
OBJECTIVE: To offer a thorough analysis of the current landscape and future trends in appendiceal tumor research.
METHODS: In our bibliometric analysis studies, we explored the Web of Science Core Collection database. The bibliographic details of the chosen publications were automatically converted and analyzed using the bibliometric package in the R environment. Additionally, we employed VoSviewer to create cooperation network maps for countries, institutions, and authors, as well as clustering maps for keywords. Furthermore, CiteSpace, another software tool, was utilized to build dual-map overlays of journals and analyze references with citation bursts.
RESULTS: Our study included 780 English-language articles published after 2010. The number of related publications and citations has increased in the past decade. The United States leads in this area, but there is a need to improve cooperation and communication among countries and institutions. Co-occurrence analysis also revealed close collaboration among different authors. Annals of Surgical Oncology was the most influential journal in this field. Analysis of references with high co-citations and references with citation bursts, consistent with analysis of keywords and hotspots, indicated that current research primarily centers on the classification and management of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and consequent pseudomyxoma peritonei. Despite the abundance of clinical studies, a greater number of in-depth basic research studies should be conducted.
CONCLUSIONS: Current research on appendiceal tumors focuses on classification and management of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Enhanced collaboration and basic research are vital for further advancement.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma (AGCA) is a newly proposed cancer type in the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours in 2019. We experienced this rare form of appendiceal primary neoplasm.
METHODS: An 85-year-old male presented a positive fecal occult blood test. A series of imagings revealed a type 1 tumor, located on the appendiceal orifice. The subsequent biopsy made the diagnosis of signet-ring cell carcinoma. Consequently, he underwent the laparoscopic-assisted ileocecal resection. Initially, the tumor was suspected to be a Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC). There was a discrepancy between the histological and immunostaining findings: the tumor cells exhibited morphological similarities to GCCs, however displayed limited staining upon immunostaining. Ultimately, we concluded that the tumor should be classified as AGCA, by following WHO 5th Edition. AGCA represents a newly categorized subtype of adenocarcinomas. Because of our preoperative suspicion of malignancy, we performed tumor resection with regional lymph node dissection, despite the fact that most appendiceal malignant tumors are typically identified after an appendectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: We experienced a case that provides valuable insights into the comprehension of AGCA, a recently established pathological entity in the WHO 5th Edition. This article is an acceptable secondary publication of a case report that appeared in Azuma et al. (J Jpn Surg Assoc 83:1103-1108, 2022).

UNASSIGNED: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is established in the management of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), selected cases of peritoneal mesothelioma, and resectable colorectal or ovarian peritoneal metastases in Western countries. However, the efficacy and feasibility of these techniques are not well established in the Asian population, and little has been reported on long-term survival outcomes for surgically resected PMP patients.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of short- and longer-term outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for PMP in a newly established peritoneal malignancy unit in Japan between 2010 and 2016.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 105 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC and 57 maximal tumor debulking (MTD) for pseudomyxoma peritonei. In the CRS group, the primary tumor was appendiceal in 94 patients (90%) followed by ovarian and colorectal. Major postoperative complications occurred in 22/105 patients (21%) with one in-hospital mortality (0.9%). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates for the CRS group were 74.2% and 50.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed unfavorable histology to be the significant predictor of reduced overall and disease-free survival. Completeness of cytoreduction, CA19-9, and CA125 were also associated with disease-free survival.
UNASSIGNED: This is the first report on long-term outcomes and survival analysis of CRS and HIPEC for PMP in the Asian population. CRS and HIPEC can be conducted with reasonable safety and favorable survival in a new center. Complete tumor removal and histological type are the strongest prognostic factors for both overall and disease-free survival.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal tumors are rare neoplasms detected in about 2 % of appendicectomies. The clinical presentation is often unspecific, varying from unspecific abdominal pain or presenting as an acute appendicitis or being asymptomatic.
METHODS: We present a case of a patient presenting as an acute appendicitis with a mucocele, and then classified as HAMN. The patient was treated with initial laparoscopic approach and then conversion in laparotomy with appendectomy. Histology demonstrated a high grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm limited to submucosa (pT3), with concomitant acute phlegmonous appendicitis. The patient was subsequently sent to a referral center where a right hemicolectomy with HIPEC was performed.
CONCLUSIONS: HAMN is a rare entity, only recently classified as a new kind of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. Due to the supposed higher aggressivity, HAMN must be treated as an appendiceal adenocarcinoma. The treatment of this rare entity is not yet well standardized, because of the rarity of this disease.
CONCLUSIONS: HAMN is a very rare tumor. In the emergency setting, it is mandatory to avoid rupture of the appendix, to minimize the risk of developing pseudomyxoma peritonei. Pathology is essential for further decisions in these patients and plays a very important role in treatment and prognosis.

The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the digestive system distinguishes four categories of appendiceal tumors (ATs): serrated lesions and polyps, mucinous neoplasms, adenocarcinomas, and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The differential diagnosis of ATs can be challenging in medical practice, due to their rarity and lack of data from randomized controlled trials on a large, diverse group of patients. ATs are usually noted in specimens obtained during appendectomies due to clinical acute appendicitis. In the European population, most ATs (65%) occur over the age of 50 and among women (56.8%). According to histological type, 54.6% are neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); 26.8% cystic, mucinous, and serous neoplasms; and 18.6% adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS). On pathologic analysis, most AT findings are benign lesions or small NENs that do not require further therapeutic measures. The presence of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (AMN) can lead to pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). While the multimodal treatment for abdominal malignancies has evolved over the past several decades, the clinical workup and treatment of ATs remain a challenge. Therefore, this review aims to describe the diagnostic possibilities, molecular-based diagnosis, staging, differences in the treatment process, and prognostic factors associated with ATs.

BACKGROUND: Goblet cell adenocarcinoma is an extremely rare tumor in which the same cells exhibit both mucinous and neuroendocrine differentiation. It is considered more aggressive compared to conventional carcinoids and more likely to cause metastasis.
METHODS: We report a case of goblet cell adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastases. A 62-year-old man underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Intraoperatively, inflammatory white pus and a small amount of dirty ascites were observed in the lower abdomen with severely inflamed appendix. Histopathological examination of the specimen collected during appendectomy revealed goblet cell adenocarcinoma with a positive surgical margin. One month later, additional ileal resection was planned. Laparoscopic examination revealed disseminated nodules throughout the abdominal cavity. Therefore, the patient underwent resection of the peritoneal nodules. The peritoneal specimens confirmed the histopathological findings. Thus we diagnosed the patient with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: In cases wherein white pus is observed during surgery for acute appendicitis, considering the possibility of dissemination, collecting samples for histopathological examination, and initiating early treatment are crucial.

A 71-year-old woman was found to have submucosal tumor-like lesion on colonoscopy (CS) before gastric surgery, and computed tomography (CT) showed a 12-mm structure at the base of the appendix. The lesion could not be clearly detected on CT nine months later, but it had enlarged again on CT one year later; therefore, CS and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) were performed. The lesion was determined to be cystic with viscous contents, and laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed. This is the first report of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) diagnosed by a histopathologic examination of a resected specimen showing shrinkage and re-expansion of the appendix.

Appendiceal neoplasms (ANs) are rare tumors that are often discovered incidentally during histopathological examinations. The increasing incidence of ANs is a critical issue in the non-operative management of acute appendicitis. This study aimed to document the temporal trends over a 12-year period by analyzing the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and histopathological features of ANs.
Health records of patients who underwent appendectomy from 2011 to 2022 were examined. Demographic and clinical data, laboratory results, imaging findings, and histopathological features were documented. The characteristics of both ANs and non-neoplastic cases were evaluated.
A total of 22,304 cases were identified, of which 330 (1.5%) were diagnosed with ANs. The odds ratio for ANs increased with age, with the highest odds ratio observed in patients aged 70 or older. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis showed that age and appendiceal diameter were significant predictors of ANs. An optimal age cut-off point of 28.5 years was determined, yielding a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 64%. For appendiceal diameter, the optimal cut-off was found to be 9.5 mm, exhibiting a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 56%.
Although the incidence of ANs remains relatively low, a steady increase has been observed over the past decade. The increasing rate of ANs raises concerns regarding non-surgical management options. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering ANs as a potential diagnosis in older patients and in patients with an appendix diameter greater than 9.5 mm. These findings may have implications for treatment and management.

暂无摘要。

Description Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix is a rare neoplasm with histological features of both neuroendocrine and adenocarcinomas. The combination of its aggressive behavior, infrequent occurrence, and variable clinical presentation convolutes the management of this tumor. We report the case of a 75-year-old female presenting with acute appendicitis. A laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. The pathology report showed goblet cell carcinoid at the base of the appendix with involvement of the proximal surgical margins. At her postoperative visit, the patient\'s pathology report and options for management were reviewed, and the patient agreed to proceed with a right hemicolectomy 8-10 weeks after her appendectomy.