Non-typhoidal Salmonella typically presents with gastroenteritis. However, an invasive Salmonella infection, which may be typically seen in immunocompromised patients, has a propensity for aortic involvement, especially in patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis. Here we present a 60-year-old female with multiple comorbid conditions and currently on immunosuppressants for rheumatoid arthritis, who presented with nausea, vomiting, and fever of three weeks duration and was found to have Salmonella bacteremia. Blood cultures were positive for Salmonella enterica. Computed tomography (CT) abdomen with contrast was concerning for mycotic aortitis. The patient underwent endovascular repair of an aortic ulcer and was treated with a six-week course of ceftriaxone. Mycotic aneurysm is a rare but potentially fatal complication of invasive Salmonella infection. It occurs typically in older men with atherosclerotic risk factors. It mostly presents as fever, back pain, and/or abdominal pain. Our patient was a middle-aged female who presented with non-specific symptoms. CT angiogram is the diagnostic modality of choice and treatment may require surgical vascular repair and long-term antibiotics. A high level of suspicion is needed to diagnose Salmonella-related mycotic aneurysm/aortitis. Early diagnosis and treatment may improve the mortality.

An aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare complication of aortic surgery but can cause potentially lethal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. A patient presented with an AEF secondary to emergency endovascular repair of a contained penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer rupture of the thoracic aorta and was successfully treated with endoscopic closure using fibrin glue. As endovascular repair becomes increasingly common, a greater incidence of AEFs should be anticipated and the treatment options better described.

Penetrating aortic ulcer (AU) is defined as localized disruption of the intimal layer of the aortic wall, resulting in a crater-like lesion outpouching from the vessel contour. AU is a generic term which encompasses a constellation of entities with different etiologies and prognoses and may be a complication of infective, inflammatory, traumatic, iatrogenic, atherosclerotic processes or intramural hematoma. One of the most challenging scenarios of AU for a differential diagnosis, but also for treatment implications, is when they are associated with acute aortic syndrome. Despite advances in the field of aortic disease, lack of consensus defining these lesions and the significant semantic confusion in the medical literature of the acronym PAU (for penetrating aortic ulcer but also for penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer) have given rise to controversy in guidelines and expert consensus, leading to the same treatment being recommended for entities with different etiology and prognosis. Moreover, in the medical literature, most diagnoses were mainly based on imaging techniques which identified AU regardless of clinical symptoms, surrounding imaging findings or dynamic morphologic changes. In this Review, we provide the latest insight into the differential diagnosis between AU, also called penetrating aortic ulcers, based on clinical context and the newest imaging characteristics to aid treatment decision-making.

Aortitis is a rare condition and easily overlooked. It is defined as infectious or non-infectious inflammation of the aortic wall. This report describes two cases of aortitis, demonstrating the diagnostic difficulty and how diagnostic delay could have been reduced if early radiology had been performed. Due to the nature of aortitis, patient outcome can be improved considerably by timely diagnosis and treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Aortitis is rarely suspected due to its vague symptoms, but diagnosis is aided by computed tomography (CT) of the thorax and abdomen.A delay in aortitis diagnosis can be life threatening; however, early radiology can ensure timely diagnosis and considerably improve patient outcome.Aortitis should always be suspected in cases with immunosuppression and systemic Salmonella infection, and a CT of the thorax and abdomen should be performed.

OBJECTIVE: In order to investigate techniques and outcomes of pararenal penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) repair, a retrospective cohort study was performed.
METHODS: Over the 6 year study period, 12 patients treated for a pararenal PAU were included. Outcome measures included technical success, survival, and peri-operative complications, as well as stent patency.
RESULTS: Treatment modalities included hybrid procedures with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and bypass grafting, chimney EVAR (Ch-EVAR), and fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR). Four of the 12 patients were symptomatic, and eight patients underwent elective surgery. The technical success rate was 100%. Symptom resolution was recorded in all symptomatic patients immediately post-operatively. Complications encountered included one type I endoleak in a patient who underwent Ch-EVAR, and one case of post-operative stroke, paralysis, and death in a patient who underwent FEVAR. No adverse events were recorded in the remaining 10 patients. The PAU protrusion distance was significantly greater in symptomatic patients. Perforation and leakage were more prevalent in patients with pre-operative abdominal or back pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging results of endovascular treatment of pararenal PAUs were observed. One major and fatal complication was encountered, which underlines the complexity and risks of the techniques. Another patient required re-intervention owing to an endoleak following off label use of covered stents for Ch-EVAR. FEVAR, which generally requires a custom made graft, was increasingly applied over the study period, potentially because of an increased awareness of this distinct pathology allowing for elective procedure planning. Ch-EVAR and hybrid procedures were predominantly used in symptomatic patients, whereas FEVAR was the preferred elective treatment option.

TWe present the case of a 64 years old male patient who had recently suffered an infective aortic valve endocarditis (Streptococcus agalactiae) complicated by embolic arthritis of the right hip. Initial echocardiography revealed moderate aortic insufficiency developed on a tricuspid aortic valve with a small vegetation (5 mm × 4 mm) on the left coronary cusp. Furthermore, an aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta (maximal diameter, 54 mm) was noted. Other heart valves and left ventricular function were considered normal. The patient completed a 4 weeks course of antibiotherapy, and the right hip arthritis was treated by drainage and synovectomy. The patient was subsequently referred to surgery on an outpatient basis for the aneurysm of the ascending aorta. Preoperative computed tomography showed localized aortic dissection of the tubular ascending aorta characterized by an intimal tear without medial hematoma but excentric bulging of the aortic wall. This lesion was initially considered a penetrating ulcer of the aortic wall The operative specimen allowed to make differential diagnosis with a penetrating aortic ulcer by showing that the lesion did not develop within an atherosclerotic plaque. However, downstream extension of the dissection was probably limited by the presence of transmural calcifications on its distal side. The patient underwent successful complete aortic root replacement using a stentless Freestyle bioprosthesis with Dacron graft extension as reported previously.

Aortic aneurysm and acute aortic syndrome are not uncommon conditions. Management of acute aortic dissection and related syndromes requires a multidisciplinary approach with input from the patient, clinician, imager, surgeon, and anesthesiologist. This requires an integrated evaluation of pathophysiology, anatomy, and severity to enable appropriate therapy. This review includes discussion of essential anatomy of the aortic valve and the aorta that determines the candidacy for surgical repair. It also includes discussion of various imaging modalities, particularly echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance angiography. The relative benefits and demerits of each of these techniques are reviewed. This paper is intended to help guide management decisions for patients with acute aortic dissection and related syndromes.