antiviral prophylaxis

抗病毒预防
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and in patients receiving novel hematological therapies. Its impact on morbidity and mortality necessitates effective management strategies. Despite recent advances in diagnostics and treatment, unresolved questions persist regarding monitoring and treatment, prompting the need for updated recommendations.
    UNASSIGNED: A consensus was reached among a panel of experts selected for their expertise in CMV research and clinical practice. Key clinical areas and questions were identified based on previous surveys and literature reviews. Recommendations were formulated through consensus and graded using established guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: Recommendations were provided for virological monitoring, including the timing and frequency of CMV DNAemia surveillance, especially during letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis. We evaluated the role of CMV DNA load quantification in diagnosing CMV disease, particularly pneumonia and gastrointestinal involvement, along with the utility of specific CMV immune monitoring in identifying at-risk patients. Strategies for tailoring LMV prophylaxis, managing breakthrough DNAemia, and implementing secondary prophylaxis in refractory cases were outlined. Additionally, criteria for initiating early antiviral treatment based on viral load dynamics were discussed.
    UNASSIGNED: The consensus provides updated recommendations for managing CMV infection in hematological patients, focusing on unresolved issues in monitoring, prophylaxis, treatment, and resistance. These recommendations aim to guide clinical practice and improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Further research is warranted to validate these recommendations and address ongoing challenges in CMV management with emerging antiviral combinations, particularly in pediatric populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:疗养院居民面临呼吸道感染暴发的高风险,如流感和COVID-19。我们对随机对照试验进行了系统评价,确定哪些干预措施(除疫苗外)可有效减少养老院中急性呼吸道疾病(ARIs)的传播。
    方法:我们搜索了CINAHL,Medline,Embase和Cochrane用于预防护理院传播ARIs的干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)(不包括疫苗),到2023年4月。
    结果:共有21篇文章符合纳入标准。两种感染控制干预措施可显着减少呼吸道感染。奥司他韦显著降低实验室确诊流感的风险(OR0.39,95CI0.16-0.94,三项试验),和流感样疾病(OR0.50,95CI0.36-0.69),即使在接种疫苗的人群中。高剂量补充维生素D降低了ARIs的发生率(发生率比0.60;95CI0.38-0.94,一项试验)。其他九个维生素RCT,矿物,益生菌和草药补充剂没有显着影响。
    结论:通过教育干预措施以改善感染控制程序和工作人员的依从性,可以减少养老院中呼吸道感染的传播,通过在发现流感病例后不久进行抗病毒预防,并补充高剂量维生素D3。需要进一步的研究来证实高剂量维生素D3的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Care home residents are at high risk from outbreaks of respiratory infections, such as influenza and COVID-19. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, to determine which interventions (apart from vaccines) are effective at reducing transmission of acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs) in care homes.
    METHODS: We searched CINAHL, Medline, Embase and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to prevent transmission of ARIs in care homes (excluding vaccines), to April 2023.
    RESULTS: A total of 21 articles met inclusion criteria. Two infection control interventions significantly reduced respiratory infections. Oseltamivir significantly reduced risk of symptomatic laboratory-confirmed influenza (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.16-0.94, three trials), and influenza-like illness (OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.36-0.69), even in a vaccinated population. High dose vitamin D supplementation reduced incidence of ARIs (incidence rate ratio 0.60; 95%CI 0.38-0.94, one trial). Nine other RCTs of vitamin, mineral, probiotic and herbal supplements showed no significant effect.
    CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of respiratory infections in care homes can be reduced by educational interventions to improve infection control procedures and compliance by staff, by antiviral prophylaxis soon after a case of influenza has been detected, and by supplementation with high-dose Vitamin D3. Further research is needed to confirm the effect of high-dose Vitamin D3.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    同种异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)受者中的单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)感染构成了重大挑战,发病率较高,严重程度,以及由于T细胞介导的免疫力受损而出现对抗病毒药物抗性的风险。本文献综述集中于HSCT受者中阿昔洛韦难治性/耐药性HSV感染。这篇综述讨论了抗病毒预防的疗效,阿昔洛韦难治性/耐药性HSV感染的发生率,以及与这些感染相关的危险因素和潜在的预后影响的识别。此外,讨论了替代治疗方案。虽然阿昔洛韦预防在减少HSCT受者的HSV感染方面具有显着的益处,在某些情况下,总死亡率,人们对耐药HSV菌株的出现感到担忧。我们的系统评价报告,阿昔洛韦耐药HSV感染的中位发病率为16.1%,近年来呈上升趋势。尽管现有研究的局限性,出现HSV对阿昔洛韦耐药的潜在危险因素包括人类白细胞抗原(HLA)错配,骨髓性肿瘤和急性白血病,和移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)。有限的证据表明,患有阿昔洛韦难治性/耐药性HSV感染的同种异体HSCT受者的预后可能较差。替代治疗方法,比如Foscannet,西多福韦,局部西多福韦,优化阿昔洛韦剂量,和解旋酶-启动酶抑制剂提供了有希望的选择,但需要进一步的研究。总的来说,需要更大规模的研究来完善同种异体HSCT受者中阿昔洛韦难治性/耐药性HSV感染的预防和治疗策略,并确定高危人群.
    Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients pose significant challenges, with higher incidence, severity, and risk of emergence of resistance to antivirals due to impaired T-cell mediated immunity. This literature review focuses on acyclovir-refractory/resistant HSV infections in HSCT recipients. The review addresses the efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis, the incidence of acyclovir-refractory/resistant HSV infections, and the identification of risk factors and potential prognostic impact associated with those infections. Additionally, alternative therapeutic options are discussed. While acyclovir prophylaxis demonstrates a significant benefit in reducing HSV infections in HSCT recipients and, in some cases, overall mortality, concerns arise about the emergence of drug-resistant HSV strains. Our systematic review reports a median incidence of acyclovir-resistant HSV infections of 16.1%, with an increasing trend in recent years. Despite limitations in available studies, potential risk factors of emergence of HSV resistance to acyclovir include human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, myeloid neoplasms and acute leukaemias, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Limited evidences suggest a potentially poorer prognosis for allogeneic HSCT recipients with acyclovir-refractory/resistant HSV infection. Alternative therapeutic approaches, such as foscarnet, cidofovir, topical cidofovir, optimised acyclovir dosing, and helicase-primase inhibitors offer promising options but require further investigations. Overall, larger studies are needed to refine preventive and therapeutic strategies for acyclovir-refractory/resistant HSV infections in allogeneic HSCT recipients and to identify those at higher risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告了一例多发性骨髓瘤患者的播散性带状疱疹的致命病例,说明严重的风险免疫功能低下的人面临的病毒感染。通过将详细的病例报告与广泛的文献综述相结合,本文旨在阐明多发性骨髓瘤患者水痘-带状疱疹病毒感染的潜在易感因素。我们进一步评估带状疱疹的有效预防方案,旨在为临床医生提供改进的治疗策略。该案例强调了警惕的临床评估和量身定制的患者管理以减轻感染风险并提高患者预后的迫切需要。
    We report a fatal case of disseminated herpes zoster in a patient with multiple myeloma, illustrating the severe risks immunocompromised individuals face from viral infections. By combining a detailed case report with an extensive literature review, the paper seeks to shed light on the underlying susceptibility factors for varicella-zoster virus infection in multiple myeloma patients. We further evaluate effective prophylactic protocols for herpes zoster, aiming to equip clinicians with improved therapeutic strategies. The case underscores the critical need for vigilant clinical assessments and tailored patient management to mitigate infection risks and enhance patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在接受ocrelizumab的多发性硬化症(MS)患者中,乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)再激活的风险尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估在奥克瑞珠单抗MS患者的HBV血清阳性率和再激活风险,并评估抗病毒预防对HBV再激活的有效性。
    方法:在这个单中心,横断面研究,400名接受ocrelizumab的MS患者在基线时筛查HBV,并根据血清学结果实施抗病毒预防。患者监测HBV再激活,并对结果进行了分析。
    结果:在56(14%)患者的血清学与隐匿性或解决HBV感染相容,49(85.7%)定期接受抗病毒预防,并在随访期间没有HBV再激活。HBV的再激活发生在2的7(28.6%)患者谁没有接受抗病毒预防和一名患者谁没有坚持预防方案。所有患者再激活的抗-HBs水平低于100mIU/mL,中位滴度显着低于没有HBV再激活的患者(p=0.034)。
    结论:这项研究突出了14%的抗-HBc阳性,表明接受奥克瑞珠单抗的MS患者存在HBV再激活的潜在风险。这表明警惕监测和采取预防措施的重要性。我们的建议强调抗病毒预防,特别是低的抗-HBs患者,对他人采取先发制人的策略。
    BACKGROUND: The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation remains unclear in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab. We aimed to assess HBV seroprevalence and reactivation risk in MS patients on ocrelizumab and to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis against HBV reactivation.
    METHODS: In this single-center, cross-sectional study, 400 people with MS receiving ocrelizumab were screened for HBV at baseline and antiviral prophylaxis was implemented based on serological results. Patients were monitored for HBV reactivation, and outcomes were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Among 56 (14%) patients who had serology compatible with occult or resolved HBV infection, 49 (85.7%) received antiviral prophylaxis regularly and had no HBV reactivation during the follow-up. Reactivation of HBV occurred in 2 out of 7 (28.6%) patients who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis and in one patient who did not adhere to the prophylaxis regimen. All patients with reactivation had anti-HBs levels below 100 mIU/mL and the median titer was significantly lower than the patients with no HBV reactivation (p = 0.034).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a 14% anti-HBc positivity, indicating a potential risk for HBV reactivation in people with MS receiving ocrelizumab. This suggests the importance of vigilant monitoring and the implementation of prophylactic measures. Our recommendation emphasizes antiviral prophylaxis, particularly for patients with low anti-HBs, and a pre-emptive strategy for others.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    接受化疗或免疫抑制药物的慢性或过去/解决的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染患者的再激活风险是众所周知的可能性。根据规定治疗的HBV再激活的风险,给予核苷(t)侧类似物抗病毒预防的指征。尽管新药的出现在所有医学领域,在恶性血液病的背景下,最近几年的特点是几种药物类别和创新的细胞治疗。作为新疗法,关于HBV再激活率和是否开始抗病毒预防的决定的数据很少。此外,患者通常使用不同药物的组合治疗,因此,评估这些新疗法在增加HBV再激活风险方面的实际作用是困难的。现在有了第一批结果,但仍需进一步研究。慢性HBV感染患者[乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)阳性]均合理治疗。过去/已解决的HBV患者(HBsAg阴性)是不确定的实际领域,在预防和先发制人策略之间可能很难选择。
    The risk of reactivation in patients with chronic or past/resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection receiving chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs is a well-known possibility. The indication of antiviral prophylaxis with nucleo(t)side analogue is given according to the risk of HBV reactivation of the prescribed therapy. Though the advent of new drugs is occurring in all the field of medicine, in the setting of hematologic malignancies the last few years have been characterized by several drug classes and innovative cellular treatment. As novel therapies, there are few data about the rate of HBV reactivation and the decision of starting or not an antiviral prophylaxis could be challenging. Moreover, patients are often treated with a combination of different drugs, so evaluating the actual role of these new therapies in increasing the risk of HBV reactivation is difficult. First results are now available, but further studies are still needed. Patients with chronic HBV infection [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive] are reasonably all treated. Past/resolved HBV patients (HBsAg negative) are the actual area of uncertainty where it could be difficult choosing between prophylaxis and pre-emptive strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    巨细胞病毒(CMV)再激活是异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后危及生命的并发症。Letermovir(LMV)的引入似乎可以改善移植后的结果,然而,延迟性CMV再激活仍然是一个挑战.
    我们回顾性分析了在2019年至2023年之间接受HSCT后接受LMV作为CMV预防的93例成人CMV血清阳性接受者的数据。LMV起始剂量为每日480毫克,与环孢素A(CsA)共同给药的人每天减少到240毫克。移植后的前2个月,每周使用实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)测量血液中的CMVDNA,然后每两周一次,直到免疫抑制治疗结束。LMV持续到第+100天或CMV再激活。
    移植时受者年龄中位数为51岁(范围为20-71岁)。所有患者均接受外周血移植,主要用于骨髓性急性白血病(60%)。从移植到LMV开始的中位时间为3天(范围0-24)。55%的患者是从匹配的相关供体移植的,32%来自无关的供体,而13%接受单倍体HSCT。四名患者(4%)在LMV上有CMV“斑点”,然而药物仍在继续,重复检测结果为阴性.只有2名患者(2%)在LMV时重新激活CMV:在HSCT后第48天和第34天,分别。7名患者(7%)在HSCT后124天(范围118-152)出现迟发性CMV再激活,并成功接受更昔洛韦(GCV)治疗。未观察到CMV病。在LMV期间,有6例患者(6%)发生了III-IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)。LMV治疗没有副作用。
    LMV预防可有效预防CMV再激活,具有良好的安全性。CMV再激活主要发生在LMV停药后,因此,将预防持续时间延长至超过100天可能是有益的.
    Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Introduction of letermovir (LMV) seems to improve post-transplant outcomes, but delayed-onset CMV reactivation still remains a challenge. In this study, we report on our first experience with LMV prophylaxis in 93 CMV-seropositive adult patients receiving HSCT in our center.
    We retrospectively analyzed the data of 93 adult CMV-seropositive recipients receiving LMV as CMV prophylaxis after HSCT for hematological malignancies between 2019 and 2023. The starting LMV dose was 480 mg daily, reduced to 240 mg daily for those receiving cyclosporin A co-administration. CMV DNA in the blood was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction weekly for the first 2 months after transplantation, then every other week until the end of immunosuppressive treatment. LMV was continued to day +100 or to CMV reactivation.
    The median recipient age at the time of transplant was 51 (range: 20-71) years. All patients received grafts from peripheral blood, mostly for acute myeloid leukemia (60%). The median time from transplantation to LMV initiation was 3 (range: 0-24) days. While 55% of patients were transplanted from matched related donors, 32% had unrelated donors and 13% underwent haploidentical HSCT. Four patients (4%) had CMV “blips” while on LMV, but the drug was continued and repeated assays were negative. Only 2 patients (2%) experienced CMV reactivation while on LMV, on days 48 and 34 after HSCT, respectively. Seven patients (7%) developed late-onset CMV reactivation after a median of 124 days after HSCT (range: 118-152 days) and they were successfully treated with ganciclovir. CMV disease was not observed. Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease occurred in 6 patients (6%) during LMV treatment. LMV treatment was free of side effects.
    LMV prophylaxis was effective in preventing CMV reactivation with a favorable safety profile. CMV reactivation occurred mostly after LMV discontinuation; thus, extending the duration of prophylaxis beyond 100 days could be beneficial.
    Sitomegalovirüs (CMV) reaktivasyonu allojenik hematopoetik kök hücre transplantasyonu (HKHT) sonrasında hayatı tehdit eden bir komplikasyondur. Letermovir (LMV) kullanımının nakil sonrası sonuçları iyileştirdiği görülmektedir, ancak gecikmiş başlangıçlı CMV reaktivasyonu hala bir sorun olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, merkezimizde HKHT olan 93 CMV-seropozitif yetişkin hastada LMV profilaksisi ile ilgili ilk deneyimimizi bildiriyoruz.
    2019-2023 yılları arasında hematolojik maligniteler için HKHT sonrası CMV profilaksisi olarak LMV başlanan 93 yetişkin CMV-seropozitif alıcının verilerini retrospektif olarak analiz ettik. Başlangıç LMV dozu günde 480 mg olup siklosporin A ile birlikte uygulananlar için günde 240 mg’a düşürülmüştür. Kandaki CMV DNA’sı gerçek zamanlı polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu ile transplantasyondan sonraki ilk 2 ay boyunca haftada bir, daha sonra immünosupresif tedavinin sonuna kadar iki haftada bir ölçülmüştür. LMV profilaksisi +100. güne kadar veya CMV reaktivasyonuna kadar devam ettirilmiştir.
    Nakil sırasındaki ortanca alıcı yaşı 51 (aralık: 20-71) idi. Tüm hastalar, çoğunlukla miyeloid akut lösemi (%60) nedeniyle periferik kandan nakil yapılmıştır. Transplantasyondan LMV başlangıcına kadar geçen medyan süre 3 (aralık: 0-24) gündü. Hastaların %55’ine doku tipi uyumlu akraba vericilerden nakil yapılırken, %32’sine akraba olmayan vericiler ve %13’üne haploidentik HKHT uygulanmıştır. Dört hastada (%4) LMV kullanırken CMV “blips” görüldü, ancak ilaca devam edildi ve tekrarlanan testler negatif çıktı. Sadece 2 hastada (%2) LMV kullanırken, sırasıyla HKHT’den sonraki 34. ve 48. günlerde CMV reaktivasyonu görülmüştür. Yedi hastada (%7) HKHT’den ortanca 124 gün sonra (aralık: 118-152 gün) geç başlangıçlı CMV reaktivasyonu gelişmiş ve bu hastalar gansiklovir ile başarılı bir şekilde tedavi edilmiştir. Bu hastalarda CMV hastalığı gözlenmemiştir. LMV tedavisi sırasında 6 hastada (%6) grade III-IV akut graft-versus-host hastalığı meydana gelmiştir. LMV tedavisi boyunca yan etki görülmemiştir.
    LMV profilaksisi, olumlu bir güvenlik profili ile CMV reaktivasyonunu önlemede etkili olmuştur. CMV reaktivasyonu çoğunlukla LMV kesildikten sonra meydana gelmiştir; bu nedenle profilaksi süresinin 100 günün ötesine uzatılması faydalı olabilir.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    利用评估针对巨细胞病毒(CMV)的特异性T细胞介导的免疫的测定具有增强旨在预防和治疗器官移植中的CMV的个性化策略的潜力。与单纯依赖CMV血清状态相比,这包括移植过程中风险分层的改善,以及确定抗病毒预防的最佳持续时间,当无症状复制发生时,决定抗病毒治疗,估计复发的风险.在这次审查中,我们最初对移植后CMV的免疫控制的当前概念进行了概述.然后,我们总结了现有的有关在器官移植中使用免疫监测的临床经验的文献,对介入试验的结果特别感兴趣。目前的证据表明,细胞介导的免疫测定有助于识别复制风险低的患者,可以安全地阻止针对CMV的预防措施。随着从这些和其他临床场景中积累更多数据,可以预见,这些检测方法可能会成为器官移植常规临床实践的一部分。
    Utilizing assays that assess specific T-cell-mediated immunity against cytomegalovirus (CMV) holds the potential to enhance personalized strategies aimed at preventing and treating CMV in organ transplantation. This includes improved risk stratification during transplantation compared to relying solely on CMV serostatus, as well as determining the optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis, deciding on antiviral therapy when asymptomatic replication occurs, and estimating the risk of recurrence. In this review, we initially provide an overlook of the current concepts into the immune control of CMV after transplantation. We then summarize the existent literature on the clinical experience of the use of immune monitoring in organ transplantation, with a particular interest on the outcomes of interventional trials. Current evidence indicates that cell-mediated immune assays are helpful in identifying patients at low risk for replication for whom preventive measures against CMV can be safely withheld. As more data accumulates from these and other clinical scenarios, it is foreseeable that these assays will likely become part of the routine clinical practice in organ transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:发现Bcr-AblTKI的使用与乙型肝炎(HBV)耀斑有关,在女性身上观察到更严重的风险。本研究旨在描述Bcr-AblTKI使用者中HBV耀斑患者的临床特征,估计HBV耀斑的性别特异性发病率,并评估Bcr-AblTKI的潜在累积效应。
    方法:Bcr-AblTKI慢性HBV感染的用户从台湾的国民健康保险数据库中确定。在队列中确定了HBV耀斑病例。评估男性和女性之间HBV耀斑的发生率。嵌套病例对照分析用于评估Bcr-AblTKI使用对HBV耀斑的累积效应。
    结果:在2005年至2018年接受Bcr-AblTKI治疗的415例慢性HBV感染患者中,发现了45例耀斑病例(28例男性和17例女性)。Bcr-AblTKI起始和HBV耀斑之间的天数为女性319天,而男性为610天。66.7%的耀斑发生在TKI治疗期间。45名患者中有12人死亡,其中一半在乙型肝炎发作后约6个月死亡。HBV耀斑的发病率分别为2.34和3.33每100人年在男性和女性,分别。慢性粒细胞白血病患者的发病率较高。未观察到Bcr-AblTKI对HBV耀斑的累积作用。
    结论:使用Bcr-AblTKI的HBV携带者中约有10%在台湾经历了HBV耀斑。女性和慢性粒细胞白血病患者的风险更高。
    The use of Bcr-Abl TKI was found to be associated with hepatitis B (HBV) flares, with a more profound risk observed in females. This study was conducted to characterize the clinical features of patients with HBV flare among Bcr-Abl TKI users, to estimate sex-specific incidence rates of HBV flare, and to evaluate potential cumulative effect of Bcr-Abl TKI.
    Bcr-Abl TKI users with chronic HBV infection were identified from Taiwan\'s National Health Insurance database. The HBV flare cases were identified within the cohort. Incidence rates of HBV flare between men and women were assessed. Nested case-control analysis was used to evaluate the cumulative effect of Bcr-Abl TKI use on HBV flare.
    Among 415 patients with chronic HBV infection treated with Bcr-Abl TKI from 2005 through 2018, 45 flare cases (28 males and 17 females) were identified. Days between Bcr-Abl TKI initiation and HBV flare was 319 days in women compared to 610 days in men. 66.7% of the flares occurred during TKI therapy. Twelve of the 45 patients died, half of them died around 6 months after hepatitis B flare. Incidence rates of HBV flare were 2.34 and 3.33 per 100 person-years in males and females, respectively. Higher incidence was observed among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Cumulative effect of Bcr-Abl TKI on HBV flare was not observed.
    Approximately 10% of HBV carriers who used Bcr-Abl TKI experienced HBV flare in Taiwan. The risk was higher in women and among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号