OBJECTIVE: The current standard of care for Dravet syndrome (DS) includes polytherapy after inadequate seizure control with one or more monotherapy approaches. Treatment guidelines are often based on expert opinions, and finding an optimal balance between seizure control and adverse drug effects can be challenging. This study utilizes the efficacy and pharmacokinetic assessment of a second-line treatment regimen that combines clobazam and sodium valproate with an add-on drug as a proof-of-principle approach to establish an effective therapeutic regimen in a DS mouse model.
METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of add-on therapies stiripentol, cannabidiol, lorcaserin, or fenfluramine added to clobazam and sodium valproate against hyperthermia-induced seizures in Scn1aA1783V/WT mice. Clobazam, N-desmethyl clobazam (an active metabolite of clobazam), sodium valproate, stiripentol, and cannabidiol concentrations were quantified in plasma and brain using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the combinations deemed effective against hyperthermia-induced seizures. The concentration data were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters via noncompartmental analysis in Phoenix WinNonLin.
RESULTS: Higher doses of stiripentol or cannabidiol, in combination with clobazam and sodium valproate, were effective against hyperthermia-induced seizures in Scn1aA1783V/WT mice. In Scn1aWT/WT mice, brain clobazam and N-desmethyl clobazam concentrations were higher in the triple-drug combinations than in the clobazam monotherapy. Stiripentol and cannabidiol brain concentrations were greater in the triple-drug therapy than when given alone.
CONCLUSIONS: A polypharmacy strategy may be a practical preclinical approach to identifying efficacious compounds for DS. The drug-drug interactions between compounds used in this study may explain the potentiated efficacy of some polytherapies.

Cannabidiol (CBD) has been investigated as a pharmacological approach for treating a myriad of neurological and psychiatric disorders, the most successful of them being its use as an antiseizure drug (ASD). Indeed, CBD has reached the clinics for the treatment of certain epileptic syndromes. This chapter aims to overview the pharmacology of CBD and its potential mechanisms of action as an ASD. First, we give an outline of the concepts, mechanisms and pharmacology pertaining to the field of study of epilepsy and epileptic seizures. In the second section, we will summarize the effects of CBD as an ASD. Next, we will discuss its potential mechanisms of action to alleviate epileptic seizures, which seem to entail multiple neurotransmitters, receptors and intracellular pathways. Finally, we will conclude and present some limitations and perspectives for future studies.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of various doses of oral cannabidiol (CBD) in treating refractory epilepsy indications, thus providing more informative evidence for clinical decision-making.
UNASSIGNED: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Web of Science (WoS) was performed to retrieve relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different doses of oral CBD with placebo or each other in refractory epilepsy indications. The search was limited from the inception of each database to January 3, 2023. Relative risk [RR] with a 95% confidence interval [CI] was used to express results. STATA/SE 14 was employed for network meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Six RCTs involving 972 patients were included in the final data analysis. Network meta-analysis showed that, CBD10 (10 mg/kg/day) (RR: 1.77, 95%CI: 1.28 to 2.44), CBD20 (20 mg/kg/day) (RR: 1.91, 95%CI: 1.49 to 2.46), CBD25 (25 mg/kg/day) (RR: 1.61, 95%CI: 0.96 to 2.70), and CBD50 (50 mg/kg/day) (RR: 1.78, 95%CI: 1.07 to 2.94) were associated with higher antiseizure efficacy although the pooled result for CBD25 was only close to significant. In addition, in terms of the risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), the difference between different doses is not significant. However, CBD20 ranked first in terms of antiseizure efficacy, followed by CBD50, CBD10, and CBD25. For TEAEs, CBD25 ranked first, followed by CBD10, CBD50, CBD5, and CBD20.
UNASSIGNED: For refractory indications, CBD20 may be optimal option for antiseizure efficacy; however, CBD25 may be best for TEAEs. Therefore, an appropriate dose of oral CBD should be selected based on the actual situation. Due to the limitations of eligible studies and the limited sample size, more studies are needed in the future to validate our findings.

Epilepsy is a disorder characterized by abnormal brain neuron activity, predisposing individuals to seizures. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) categorizes epilepsy into the following groups: focal, generalized, generalized and focal, and unknown. Infants are the most vulnerable pediatric group to the condition, with the cause of epilepsy development being attributed to congenital brain developmental defects, white matter damage, intraventricular hemorrhage, perinatal hypoxic-ischemic injury, perinatal stroke, or genetic factors such as mutations in the Sodium Channel Protein Type 1 Subunit Alpha (SCN1A) gene. Due to the risks associated with this condition, we have investigated how the latest pharmacological treatments for epilepsy in children impact the reduction or complete elimination of seizures. We reviewed literature from 2018 to 2024, focusing on the age group from 1 month to 18 years old, with some studies including this age group as well as older individuals. The significance of this review is to present and compile research findings on the latest antiseizure drugs (ASDs), their effectiveness, dosing, and adverse effects in the pediatric population, which can contribute to selecting the best drug for a particular patient. The medications described in this review have shown significant efficacy and safety in the studied patient group, outweighing the observed adverse effects. The main aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the current state of knowledge regarding the newest pharmacotherapy for childhood epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting serum concentrations of levetiracetam in dogs are unknown and could affect the efficacy of levetiracetam in controlling seizures in dogs with epilepsy.
OBJECTIVE: Higher PO doses of levetiracetam will be needed in dogs to achieve serum concentrations shown to be effective in humans. Determine factors that could influence serum levetiracetam concentrations and justify dose adjustment in some epileptic dogs.
METHODS: Sixty-nine client-owned dogs with epilepsy treated with levetiracetam alone or in combination, based on 127 trough serum concentration measurements of levetiracetam.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effect of patient signalment and concurrent drug administration on serum concentrations of levetiracetam and the effect of serum concentration of levetiracetam on seizure frequency reduction.
RESULTS: The PO dose of levetiracetam significantly explained changes in serum levetiracetam concentration, and this causal link was stronger with monotherapy (R2 = 0.59, P < .001). Phenobarbital significantly decreased serum levetiracetam concentration in a dose dependent manner (R2 = 0.30, P = .003). Based on our model, a levetiracetam dosage of 99-216 mg/kg/day is necessary to obtain a serum levetiracetam concentration of 20 μg/mL when used alone or concurrently with 7 mg/kg/day of phenobarbital. No other factors were found to influence serum levetiracetam concentrations. No therapeutic range could be identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a dosage of 99-216 mg/kg/day of levetiracetam is needed to achieve a serum concentration known to be therapeutically effective in humans, especially when administered concomitantly with phenobarbital.

UNASSIGNED: Epilepsy, a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder, profoundly impacts the physical and mental well-being of millions globally. Historically, antiseizure drugs (ASDs) have been the primary treatment modality. However, despite the introduction of novel ASDs in recent decades, a significant proportion of patients still experiences uncontrolled seizures.
UNASSIGNED: The rapid advancement of nanomedicine in recent years has enabled precise targeting of the brain, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy for brain diseases, including epilepsy.
UNASSIGNED: Nanomedicine holds immense promise in epilepsy treatment, including but not limited to enhancing drug solubility and stability, improving drug across blood-brain barrier, overcoming resistance, and reducing side effects, potentially revolutionizing clinical management. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of current epilepsy treatment modalities and highlights recent advancements in nanomedicine-based drug delivery systems for epilepsy control. We discuss the diverse strategies used in developing novel nanotherapies, their mechanisms of action, and the potential advantages they offer compared to traditional treatment methods.

A growing body of evidence suggests that adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the healthcare system. Fifteen to twenty-five percent of patients with epilepsy discontinued antiseizure drugs (ASDs) within 6 months of therapy owing to intolerable adverse drug reactions. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of antiseizure adverse drug reactions and associated factors was not extensively conducted in advanced settings like Jimma Medical Centers. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess patterns of adverse drug reactions and associated factors among ambulatory epileptic patients at tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia. A hospital-based prospective observational study was spanned for 1 year. Two hundred ninety patients were consecutively recruited into the study from all epileptic patients attending the ambulatory clinic. Relevant data were collected through patient interviews and medical chart reviews. The causality assessment was done by using the Naranjo Probability Scale. Epi-Data manager version 4.6.0.4 was used for data entry and statistical analysis was performed by Statistical Package for Social Science version 25.0 (SPSS). Stepwise backward logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors that increase the risk of antiseizure adverse drug reactions. The mean (± SD) age of the participants were 29.91(± 11.26) years. The overall prevalence of ADR was 33.8% (95% CI 29.2-39.9%). A total of 110 adverse drug reactions were identified among 98 patients with an average of 1.12 per patient. ADRs were frequently reported with phenobarbital (52.04%) and phenytoin (34.70%). The commonly identified adverse drug reactions were epigastric pain (27.55%) and central nervous system drowsiness (23.46%). Comorbidity (AOR = 5.91, 95% CI (2.14-16.32), seizure-free period of fewer than 2 years (AOR = 1.94, 95% CI (1.18-3.19), and polytherapy (AOR = 1.35, 95% CI (1.80-2.26) were significantly associated with adverse drug reactions. This trial had a comparatively high percentage of adverse medication reactions. Adverse medication reactions were more common in patients with polytherapy, comorbidities, and seizure-free durations less than two years. Therefore, medical practitioners should advise patients who exhibit these traits on how to reduce or avoid bad drug responses or provide comfort in the event of small incidents.

UNASSIGNED: To study the outcome of patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) after their diagnosis in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU).
UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed in our EMU with definite PNES between January 2009 and May 2023 were contacted by phone, and those who agreed to participate were asked a set of predetermined questions. Comparative analyses were carried out on several variables before and after diagnosis: number of participants with daily PNES, number of visits to the emergency department, number of participants who consulted their general practitioner or a neurologist outside of a scheduled follow-up, number of participants who took antiseizure medications (ASMs) or psychotropic drugs, and employment status.
UNASSIGNED: Out of the 103 patients with a definite diagnosis of PNES, 61 patients (79% female) accepted to participate in our study. The median age at PNES onset was 35 years, and the median delay to diagnosis was 3 years. Almost two-thirds (62%) were receiving ASMs and 40% psychotropic drugs. The mean stay at the EMU was 5 days. PNES diagnosis was explained to almost all patients (97%) by the end of their EMU stay and was well-accepted by most (89%). When contacted, 46% of participants no longer had PNES; 32% mentioned that their PNES had ceased immediately upon communication of the diagnosis. The median follow-up duration was 51 months. Fewer patients had daily seizures after the diagnosis (18 vs. 38%; p < 0.0455). Similarly, the median number of emergency department visits was significantly lower (0 vs. 2; p < 0.001). Only 17 patients consulted their general practitioner (vs. 40, p < 0.001) and 20 a neurologist (vs. 55, p < 0.001) after a PNES attack outside of a scheduled follow-up. The use of ASMs was also significantly reduced from 70 to 33% (p < 0.01), with only one still taking an ASM for its antiseizure properties. Significantly more participants were working at last follow-up than at PNES diagnosis (49 vs. 25%; p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Our study revealed a relatively favorable long-term outcome of definite PNES diagnosed in the EMU that translated in significant reductions in PNES frequency, health care utilization and ASM use, as well as a significant increase in employment rate.

Epilepsy, a recurrent neurological disorder involving abnormal neurotransmitter kinetics in the brain, has emerged as a global health concern. The mechanism of epileptic seizures is thought to involve a relative imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters. Despite the recent advances in clinical and basic research on the pathogenesis of epilepsy, the complex relationship between the neurotransmitter changes and behavior with and without antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during seizures remains unclear. To investigate the effects of AEDs such as levetiracetam (LEV), carbamazepine (CBZ), and fenfluramine (FFR) on key neurotransmitters in the pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced seizures in adult zebrafish, we examined the changes in glutamic acid, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), serotonin (5-HT), 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), choline, acetylcholine, norepinephrine, dopamine (DA), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), and adenosine. In this study, we observed that 5-HT and DA levels in the brain increased immediately after PTZ-induced seizures. Behavioral tests clearly showed that all of these AEDs suppressed the PTZ-induced seizures. Upon treatment of PTZ-induced seizures with these AEDs, CBZ decreased the glutamic acid and FFR increased the GABA levels; however, no neurotransmitter changes were observed in the brain after LEV administration. Thus, we demonstrated a series of neurotransmitter changes linked to behavioral changes during PTZ-induced epileptic seizures when LEV, CBZ, or FFR were administered. These findings will lead to a more detailed understanding of the pathogenesis of epilepsy associated with behavioral and neurotransmitter changes under AED treatment.

Biological variation is ubiquitous in nature. Despite highly standardized breeding and husbandry under controlled environmental conditions, phenotypic diversity exists in laboratory mice and rats just as it does in humans. The resulting inter-individual variability affects various characteristics of animal disease models, including the responsiveness to drugs. Thus, the common practice of averaging data within an experimental group can lead to misinterpretations in neuroscience and other research fields. In this commentary, the impact of inter-individual variation in drug responsiveness is illustrated by examples from the testing of antiseizure medications in rodent temporal lobe epilepsy models. Individual mice and rats rendered epileptic by treatment according to standardized protocols fall into groups that either do or do not respond to antiseizure medications, thus mimicking the clinical situation in patients with epilepsy. Population responses are not normally distributed, and divergent responding is concealed in averages subjected to parametric statistical tests. Genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors are believed to contribute to inter-individual variation in drug response but the specific molecular and physiological causes are not well understood. Being aware of inter-individual variability in rodents allows an improved interpretation of both behavioral phenotypes and drug effects in a pharmacological experiment.