antiplatelet drugs

抗血小板药物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肥胖和体重不足是全球范围内日益严重的健康问题,也是临床医生在抗血栓治疗方面面临的挑战。由于血栓形成和/或出血的相关风险。这份临床共识声明更新了2018年发表的一份声明,回顾了根据世界卫生组织分类的基于体型类别的抗血栓药物的最新证据。该文件主要关注极端体重的个体,即需要抗血栓药物的体重过轻和中度至病态肥胖,根据目前的指导方针,用于治疗或预防心血管疾病或静脉血栓栓塞。在这些个体中管理抗血栓治疗或血栓预防是具有挑战性的,由于身体成分的深刻变化,新陈代谢和器官功能,改变药物药代动力学和药效学,以及临床试验的证据薄弱或没有。该文件还包括从计算机药代动力学/药效学模型得出的人工智能模拟,这可以模拟药代动力学变化,并有助于确定针对体重严重不足或严重肥胖个体的抗血栓药物的最佳方案。Further,在全球范围内,病态肥胖受试者的减肥手术经常进行。减肥手术会导致新陈代谢和胃肠道解剖结构的特定和额外变化,根据程序的类型,这也会影响抗血栓药物的药代动力学及其管理。根据现有文献,该文件提供了关于优化体重不足和所有肥胖患者的抗血栓药物管理的共识声明,在强调这些复杂临床环境中当前知识差距的同时,这需要个性化医疗和精准药理学。
    Obesity and underweight are a growing health problem worldwide and a challenge for clinicians concerning antithrombotic therapy, due to the associated risks of thrombosis and/or bleeding. This clinical consensus statement updates a previous one published in 2018, by reviewing the most recent evidence on antithrombotic drugs based on body size categories according to the World Health Organization classification. The document focuses mostly on individuals at the extremes of body weight, i.e. underweight and moderate-to-morbid obesity who require antithrombotic drugs, according to current guidelines, for the treatment or prevention of cardiovascular diseases or venous thromboembolism. Managing antithrombotic therapy or thromboprophylaxis in these individuals is challenging, due to profound changes in body composition, metabolism and organ function, altered drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, as well as weak or no evidence from clinical trials. The document also includes artificial intelligence simulations derived from in silico pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models, which can mimic the pharmacokinetic changes and help identify optimal regimens of antithrombotic drugs for severely underweight or severely obese individuals. Further, bariatric surgery in morbidly obese subjects is frequently performed worldwide. Bariatric surgery causes specific and additional changes in metabolism and gastrointestinal anatomy, depending on the type of the procedure, which can also impact the pharmacokinetics of antithrombotic drugs and their management. Based on existing literature, the document provides consensus statements on optimising antithrombotic drug management for underweight and all classes of obese patients, while highlighting the current gaps in knowledge in these complex clinical settings, which require personalized medicine and precision pharmacology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是评估4周的度他雄胺治疗对减少术中和术后出血的影响,以及接受抗血小板药物(APD)的男性经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)≥50g后清除尿液所需的冲洗量和持续时间。
    这项双盲随机临床试验包括前列腺大小≥50g、已接受TURP治疗且已接受APD的患者。这项研究是在开罗大学泌尿系进行的,为期12个月。对所有患者进行常规术前实验室检查。此外,基线前列腺大小,血清前列腺特异性抗原水平,并估计国际前列腺症状评分。将患者随机分为2组(A组和B组)。A组,度他雄胺组,每天一次接受度他雄胺(0.5mg),共4周。B组,安慰剂组,每天一次服用安慰剂胶囊,共4周。两组均接受双极TURP。15例患者被排除在研究之外;A组9例,B组6例,由于药物不耐受或失去随访。
    术后即刻和术后24小时两组之间的平均失血量微不足道(Δ血红蛋白:1.41±0.63g/dLvs.1.48±0.54g/dL,2.12±0.70g/dLvs.2.31±0.78g/dL,分别,p=0.631,p=0.333;Δ血细胞比容:2.97%±1.51%vs.3.16%±1.36%,4.96%±1.87%vs.5.73%±4.39%,分别,p=0.610,p=0.380)。然而,留置导尿管的持续时间存在显着差异(5.10±0.55天与5.80±1.79天,p=0.048),膀胱冲洗时间(13.60±2.85小时vs.16.33±6.62小时,p=0.044),和用于膀胱冲洗的生理盐水量(11.03±2.30Lvs.13.87±6.13L,分别在A组和B组之间p=0.046)。
    接受APD的男性患者在TURP前使用度他雄胺治疗4周未显著减少TURP后的术中或术后出血,但可显著缩短留置导管的时间。以及盐水灌溉的持续时间和数量。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a 4-week dutasteride treatment on reducing the intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, as well as the amount and duration of irrigation required to clear the urine after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) ≥50 g in men receiving the antiplatelet drug (APD).
    UNASSIGNED: This double-blind randomized clinical trial included patients with a prostate size ≥50 g who were indicated for TURP and were already receiving APD. The study was conducted in the Urology Department of Cairo University over a 12-month period. Routine preoperative laboratory investigations were performed in all patients. Moreover, baseline prostate size, serum prostate-specific antigen level, and International Prostate Symptom Score were estimated. The patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups (groups A and B). Group A, the dutasteride group, received dutasteride (0.5 mg) once daily for 4 weeks. Group B, the placebo group, received a placebo capsule once daily for 4 weeks. Both groups underwent bipolar TURP. Fifteen patients were excluded from the study; 9 patients from group A and 6 patients from group B, either due to drug intolerability or loss follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean blood loss was insignificant between the 2 groups immediately after and 24 hours after surgery (Δ hemoglobin: 1.41 ± 0.63 g/dL vs. 1.48 ± 0.54 g/dL, 2.12 ± 0.70 g/dL vs. 2.31 ± 0.78 g/dL, respectively, p = 0.631, p = 0.333; Δ hematocrit: 2.97% ± 1.51% vs. 3.16% ± 1.36%, 4.96% ± 1.87% vs. 5.73% ± 4.39%, respectively, p = 0.610, p = 0.380). However, there were significant differences in duration of indwelling urethral catheter (5.10 ± 0.55 days vs. 5.80 ± 1.79 days, p = 0.048), duration of bladder irrigation (13.60 ± 2.85 hours vs. 16.33 ± 6.62 hours, p = 0.044), and the amount of saline used for bladder irrigation (11.03 ± 2.30 L vs. 13.87 ± 6.13 L, p = 0.046) between group A and group B. respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment with dutasteride for 4 weeks before TURP in men receiving APD did not significantly reduce intraoperative or postoperative bleeding after TURP but could significantly reduce the duration of indwelling catheter placement, as well as the duration and amount of saline irrigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在双盲中,随机对照试验,对于D-二聚体水平升高且对常规抗组胺剂量反应不足的慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)患者,我们研究了在增加抗组胺药时加入抗血小板药物治疗的有效性.20例荨麻疹活动评分超过7天(UAS7)≥16且D-二聚体>500ng/mL的患者随机接受抗血小板治疗(西洛他唑150mg/天,双嘧达莫50mg/天)和抗组胺药(地氯雷他定20mg/天)或单独抗组胺药,为期4周。与对照组相比,抗血小板组UAS7的下降幅度更大(28.10至8.90vs.22.90至16.40,p<0.001vs.p=0.054)。两组患者的生活质量(DLQI)均得到改善,但抗血小板组的改善更大(p=0.046).D-二聚体水平仅在抗血小板组中降低(1133.67ng/mL至581.89ng/mL,p=0.013),对照组无明显变化。这表明,与单独使用抗组胺药相比,双嘧达莫和西洛他唑与高剂量抗组胺药联合使用可能对具有高D-二聚体水平的CSU患者更有效。这可能是由于血小板活化减少,在抗血小板组中观察到的D-二聚体水平降低证明了这一点。
    In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effectiveness of adding antiplatelet drugs to up-dosing antihistamines for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in patients with elevated D-dimer levels who had an inadequate response to conventional antihistamine doses. Twenty patients with Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) ≥16 and D-dimer >500 ng/mL were randomized to receive either antiplatelet therapy (cilostazol 150 mg/day + dipyridamole 50 mg/day) with antihistamine (desloratadine 20 mg/day) or antihistamine alone for 4 weeks. The antiplatelet group demonstrated a greater decrease in UAS7 compared to the control group (28.10 to 8.90 vs. 22.90 to 16.40, p < 0.001 vs. p = 0.054). Both groups experienced improved quality of life (DLQI), but the improvement was greater in the antiplatelet group (p = 0.046). D-dimer levels decreased only in the antiplatelet group (1133.67 ng/mL to 581.89 ng/mL, p = 0.013) with no significant change observed in the control group. This suggests that combining dipyridamole and cilostazol with up-dosing antihistamines may be more effective for CSU patients with high D-dimer levels compared to up-dosing antihistamines alone. This could be due to a reduction in platelet activation, as evidenced by the decrease in D-dimer levels observed in the antiplatelet group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血小板在止血中起重要作用,在血管损伤部位形成栓塞以限制失血。然而,如果血小板活化得不到控制,会导致血栓形成事件,如心肌梗塞和中风。为了防止这种情况,抗血小板药物在临床中用于限制有动脉血栓事件风险的患者的血小板活化.然而,它们的使用可能与显著的出血风险相关。增强对血小板信号传导机制的理解应有助于识别更安全的抗血小板治疗靶标。在过去的十年里,我们对协调血小板活化的信号通路的广度和复杂性的理解呈指数级扩展.最近的几项研究提供了对血小板信号传导事件调节的进一步见解,并确定了开发新的抗血小板药物的新靶标。抗血小板药物在治疗动脉粥样硬化血栓性血管疾病中至关重要。目前临床实践中的抗血小板治疗在安全性和有效性方面受到限制。已经开发了响应于患者对阿司匹林和/或氯吡格雷的变异性和抗性的新型化合物。最近基于随机对照试验和系统评价的研究明确证明了抗血小板治疗在降低心血管事件风险方面的作用。抗血小板治疗是动脉粥样硬化患者的推荐治疗方案。这些研究比较了P2Y12抑制剂的单药治疗与阿司匹林的二级预防。然而,在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,短期双联抗血小板治疗后,P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗的疗效是否取决于P2Y12抑制剂的类型,目前尚不清楚.本文重点介绍了几种有前途的抗血小板药物的晚期评价。
    Platelets play a significant role in hemostasis, forming plugs at sites of vascular injury to limit blood loss. However, if platelet activation is not controlled, it can lead to thrombotic events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. To prevent this, antiplatelet agents are used in clinical settings to limit platelet activation in patients at risk of arterial thrombotic events. However, their use can be associated with a significant risk of bleeding. An enhanced comprehension of platelet signaling mechanisms should facilitate the identification of safer targets for antiplatelet therapy. Over the past decade, our comprehension of the breadth and intricacy of signaling pathways that orchestrate platelet activation has expanded exponentially. Several recent studies have provided further insight into the regulation of platelet signaling events and identified novel targets against which to develop novel antiplatelet agents. Antiplatelet drugs are essential in managing atherothrombotic vascular disease. The current antiplatelet therapy in clinical practice is limited in terms of safety and efficacy. Novel compounds have been developed in response to patient variability and resistance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Recent studies based on randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have definitively demonstrated the role of antiplatelet therapy in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Antiplatelet therapy is the recommended course of action for patients with established atherosclerosis. These studies compared monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor versus aspirin for secondary prevention. However, in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, it is still unclear whether the efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy depends on the type of P2Y12 inhibitor. This paper focuses on the advanced-stage evaluation of several promising antiplatelet drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Sneddon综合征是一种闭塞性血管病变,临床上表现为皮肤上的全身性Livedoracemosa和短暂性脑缺血发作,笔画,和中枢神经系统的认知或运动缺陷。推荐抗血小板或抗凝治疗。由于治疗效果有限及由此产生的严重并发症,我们建议联合使用前列地尔和卡托普利额外输注周期,并报告初步长期结果.
    方法:我们对1995年至2020年在我们诊所接受联合治疗的所有原发性Sneddon综合征患者进行了系统的回顾性分析。与接受单一疗法的历史对照相比,使用描述性统计来评估治疗结果。我们还分析了停止联合治疗时并发症的事件发生率。
    结果:在99.7患者年的随访中,无短暂性脑缺血发作,卒中发生率降至0.02/患者-年.相比之下,在历史对照中,短暂性脑缺血发作和卒中的发生率为0.08~0.035/患者-年.停止前列地尔治疗后,3例患者发生8例事件.
    结论:联合治疗可降低原发性Sneddon综合征患者缺血事件的长期发生率。
    BACKGROUND: Sneddon syndrome is an occlusive vasculopathy that presents clinically with generalized livedo racemosa on the skin and transient ischemic attacks, strokes, and cognitive or motor deficits in the central nervous system. Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is recommended. Due to the limited therapeutic efficacy and the resulting serious complications, we propose combination therapy with additional infusion cycles of alprostadil and captopril and report initial long-term results.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic retrospective analysis of all patients with primary Sneddon syndrome who received combination therapy in our clinic between 1995 and 2020. Therapeutic outcomes were evaluated using descriptive statistics compared to historical controls receiving monotherapy. We also analyzed the event rate of complications when combination therapy was discontinued.
    RESULTS: During the 99.7 patient-years of follow-up, there were no transient ischemic attacks and the stroke rate dropped to 0.02 per patient-year. In comparison, the rates of transient ischemic attacks and strokes in the historical controls ranged from 0.08 to 0.035 per patient-year. After discontinuation of alprostadil therapy, eight events occurred in three patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy reduces the long-term incidence of ischemic events in patients with primary Sneddon syndrome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在我们的环境中,目前的建议对围手术期和围手术期使用抗血小板治疗的影响几乎没有证据。这项研究的目的是分析在西班牙接受手术或诊断或治疗程序的患者群体中,不适当使用抗血小板治疗的发生率和临床影响。
    方法:对需要干预的抗血小板药物治疗患者进行前瞻性多中心观察性研究。根据抗血小板治疗的围干预措施,分析30天血栓和出血事件的发生率。
    结果:我们包括643例患者(31.9%为女性,75岁以上的39.0%),他们中的大多数(87.7%)接受阿司匹林作为抗血小板治疗,剂量为100mg/天。抗血小板治疗的适应症为缺血性心脏病(44.9%),脑血管疾病(21.7%),和外周血管疾病(23.0%)。缺血风险低74.3%,而51.6%的干预措施出血风险较低.61.7%的病例认为围手术期管理是适当的。在围手术期管理不适当的抗血小板药物的患者中,血栓性事件和大出血的合并主要终点的30天发生率(12.1%对5.0%;p=0.002)和30天死亡率(5.2%对1.5%;p=0.008)明显较高。
    结论:尽管目前建议在围手术期/围手术期使用抗血小板药物,它们在“现实世界”中的实施仍然很低。使用不当会增加不良事件的发生率,血栓性和出血性.
    OBJECTIVE: There is little evidence on the impact of current recommendations on the use of antiplatelet therapy during the perioperative and periprocedural period in our setting. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and clinical impact of inappropriate use of antiplatelet therapy in a population of patients undergoing surgery or a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure in \"real life\" in Spain.
    METHODS: A prospective multicenter observational study of patients treated with antiplatelet agents requiring intervention was conducted. The incidence of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events at 30 days was analyzed according to peri-intervention management of antiplatelet therapy.
    RESULTS: We included 643 patients (31.9% women, 39.0% over 75 years of age), most of them (87.7%) receiving aspirin as antiplatelet therapy at a dose of 100mg/day. Indications for antiplatelet therapy were ischemic heart disease (44.9%), cerebrovascular disease (21.7%), and peripheral vascular disease (23.0%). Ischemic risk was low in 74.3%, while 51.6% had a low bleeding risk of the intervention. Periprocedural management was considered appropriate in 61.7% of cases. 30-day incidence of the combined primary endpoint of thrombotic events and major bleeding (12.1% versus 5.0%; p=0.002) and 30-day mortality (5.2% versus 1.5%; p=0.008) were significantly higher in patients with inappropriate periprocedural management of antiplatelet agents.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite current recommendations for the use of antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative/periprocedural period, their implementation in the \"real world\" remains low. Inappropriate use is associated with an increased incidence of adverse events, both thrombotic and hemorrhagic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨接受冠状动脉血运重建的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者对术后抗血栓管理和预防的知识和态度(KA)。
    这项横断面研究纳入了2023年5月至12月在唐山开联医疗集团的冠心病门诊患者和住院患者。通过自制问卷收集基本人口学特征和KA评分。
    本研究包括523份有效问卷。平均知识和态度得分分别为13.20±6.20(范围:0-26)和43.68±6.01(范围:21-50),分别,表明知识贫乏,态度良好。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,初中文化程度(OR=2.160,P=0.035),高中或技校教育(OR=2.356,P=0.039),月平均收入>5,000元(OR=3.407,P=0.002)与知识独立相关。知识(OR=1.095,P=0.002),BMI≥24.0kg/m2(OR=0.372,P=0.011),初中(OR=3.699,P=0.002),高中或技校(OR=2.903,P=0.028),大专以上学历(OR=6.068,P=0.014),月平均收入3000-5000元(OR=0.296,P=0.005),月平均收入>5000元(OR=0.225,P=0.021),合并高血压(OR=0.333,P=0.003),每2-3周进行一次血液检查(OR=10.811,P=0.011),每月验血(OR=4.221,P=0.024),和每2-3个月的血液检查(OR=3.342,P=0.033)与态度独立相关。
    接受冠状动脉血运重建的CAD患者对术后抗血栓管理和预防的认识不足,但态度良好。这项研究强调了有针对性的教育的必要性,特别是对于教育程度和收入水平较低的个人,最终改善患者的依从性和心血管预后。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to explore the knowledge and attitude (KA) toward postoperative antithrombotic management and prevention among coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who underwent coronary revascularization.
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study enrolled CAD outpatients and inpatients between May and December 2023 at Kailuan Medical Group at Tangshan. Basic demographic characteristics and KA scores were collected through a self-made questionnaire.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 523 valid questionnaires. The mean knowledge and attitude scores were 13.20 ± 6.20 (range: 0-26) and 43.68 ± 6.01 (range: 21-50), respectively, indicating poor knowledge and favorable attitude. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that junior high school education (OR = 2.160, P = 0.035), high school or technical school education (OR = 2.356, P = 0.039), and monthly average income >5,000 RMB (OR = 3.407, P = 0.002) were independently associated with knowledge. Knowledge (OR = 1.095, P = 0.002), BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m2 (OR = 0.372, P = 0.011), junior high school (OR = 3.699, P = 0.002), high school or technical school (OR = 2.903, P = 0.028), high associate degree or above education (OR = 6.068, P = 0.014), monthly average income 3,000-5,000 RMB (OR = 0.296, P = 0.005), monthly average income > 5,000 RMB (OR = 0.225, P = 0.021), with hypertension (OR = 0.333, P = 0.003), blood tests every 2-3 weeks (OR = 10.811, P = 0.011), blood tests every month (OR = 4.221, P = 0.024), and blood tests every 2-3 months (OR = 3.342, P = 0.033) were independently associated with attitude.
    UNASSIGNED: CAD patients who underwent coronary revascularization had poor knowledge but favorable attitudes toward postoperative antithrombotic management and prevention. The study underscores the need for targeted education, especially for individuals with lower education and income levels, ultimately improving patient compliance and cardiovascular outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:1.探讨不同亚型急性脑卒中患者住院期间并发痛风性关节炎(GA)的发生率。2.探讨合并GA的急性脑梗死患者接受各种抗血小板策略的差异。
    方法:广州医科大学附属番禺中心医院收治的急性脑卒中患者资料,从2019年1月到2021年12月,接受了筛查。分析各种亚型急性脑卒中患者中GA的发生率。随后,我们根据不同的抗血小板治疗将脑梗塞病例分为三组:阿司匹林组,双联抗血小板治疗组(DAPT,阿司匹林加氯吡格雷),和氯吡格雷组。研究合并GA的急性脑梗死患者接受各种抗血小板策略的差异。
    结果:本研究共筛选了12,381例急性卒中患者。急性卒中各亚型中GA的发生率如下:脑梗死(3.56%,n=9890),TIA(1.81%,n=443),脑出血(0.64%,n=1713),和SAH(0.30%,n=335)。缺血性卒中患者的GA发生率高于出血性卒中(χ2=49.258,p<0.001)。在三个不同的抗血小板治疗组中,GA的发生率没有显着差异。阿司匹林组与DAPT组的GA发生率差异有统计学意义(P=0.051)。以及氯吡格雷组和DAPT组之间(P=0.059)。
    结论:缺血性卒中患者的GA发生率高于出血性卒中。在各种抗血小板策略中,急性脑梗死中GA的发生率没有显着差异。单一抗血小板组和DAPT组之间GA发生率的边际统计学差异需要进一步研究。
    1.To explore the incidence of concurrent gouty arthritis (GA) during hospitalization in patients with different subtypes of acute stroke. 2.To investigate disparities in acute cerebral infarction patients with coexisting GA undergoing various antiplatelet strategies.
    Data from acute stroke patients admitted to the Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, from January 2019 to December 2021, underwent screening. The incidence of GA in acute stroke patients of various subtypes were analyzed. Subsequently, we divided cerebral infarction cases into three cohorts based on distinct antiplatelet therapies: the aspirin group, the dual antiplatelet therapy group (DAPT,aspirin plus clopidogrel), and the clopidogrel group. Investigate disparities in acute cerebral infarction patients with coexisting GA undergoing various antiplatelet strategies.
    A total of 12,381 patients with acute stroke were screened in this study. The incidence of GA in various subtypes of acute stroke was as follows: cerebral infarction (3.56 %, n = 9890), TIA (1.81 %, n = 443), cerebral hemorrhag (0.64 %, n = 1713), and SAH (0.30 %, n = 335). The incidence of GA in patients with ischemic stroke is higher than that of hemorrhagic stroke (χ2 = 49.258, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of GA among three different antiplatelet therapy groups. But there was marginal statistical difference in the incidence of GA between the aspirin group and the DAPT group (P = 0.051), as well as between the clopidogrel group and the DAPT group (P = 0.059).
    The incidence of GA in patients with ischemic stroke is higher than that of hemorrhagic stroke. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of GA in acute cerebral infarction across various antiplatelet Strategies. The marginal statistical difference in the incidence of GA between the single antiplatelet group and the DAPT group requires further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在健康志愿者中评估血小板功能活性(HV,n=92),稳定型心绞痛患者(SA,n=42)和急性冠脉综合征(ACS,n=73),用乙酰水杨酸(ASA)+氯吡格雷和ASA+替格瑞洛治疗,分别。在所有HV和患者中,我们比较了血小板聚集的参数(最大透光率和速度,Tmax和Vmax)和参数,表征血小板活化标志物的暴露,通过流式细胞术评估。HV血小板被激活10μM,1μMTRAP,和20μM,5μM,2.5μMADP;患者血小板由10μMTRAP和20μM和5μMADP活化。聚集和流式细胞术参数之间的强和显着相关性(r相关系数从0.4到>0.6)最常见的是在1μMTRAP激活期间的HV血小板和在20μM和5μMADP激活期间的SA患者中。然而,在许多其他情况下,这些相关性相当弱(r<0.3),有时在统计学上不显著。在HV中,由10μMTRAP(最强激动剂)激活的血小板与所有ADP浓度之间的PAC-1结合参数差异可忽略不计(≤10%),而CD62P结合(在所有ADP浓度下)和LTA参数(5μM和2.5μMADP)显着降低(40-60%)。与HV相比,患者的抗血小板治疗降低了所有参数,但在不同程度上。对于10μMTRAP,PAC-1结合的MFI指数(降低40-50%)和两种ADP浓度的Tmax值(降低60-85%)与其他降低程度较小的参数相比似乎最敏感。获得的数据表明,在评估血小板活性和抗血小板药物的功效时,不同的LTA和流式细胞术参数之间存在不一致的可能性。
    Platelet functional activity was assessed in healthy volunteers (HV, n=92), patients with stable angina pectoris (SA, n=42) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n=73), treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) + clopidogrel and ASA + ticagrelor, respectively. In all HV and patients we have compared parameters of platelet aggregation (maximum light transmission and velocity, Tmax and Vmax) and parameters, characterizing exposure of platelet activation markers, evaluated by flow cytometry. HV platelets were activated by 10 μM, 1 μM TRAP, and 20 μM, 5 μM, 2.5 μM ADP; patient platelets were activated by 10 μM TRAP and by 20 μM and 5 μM ADP. Strong and significant correlations between the aggregation and flow cytometry parameters (the r correlation coefficient from 0.4 up to >0.6) most frequently were registered in HV platelet during activation by 1 μM TRAP and in SA patients during platelet activation by 20 μM and 5 μM ADP. However, in many other cases these correlations were rather weak (r < 0.3) and sometimes statistically insignificant. In HV the differences in PAC-1 binding parameters between platelets activated by 10 μM TRAP (the strongest agonist) and all ADP concentrations were negligible (≤ 10%), while CD62P binding (at all ADP concentrations) and LTA parameters for (5 μM and 2.5 μM ADP) were significantly lower (by 40-60%). Antiplatelet therapy in patients decreased all parameters as compared to HV, but to varying extents. For 10 μM TRAP the MFI index for PAC-1 binding (40-50% decrease) and for both ADP concentrations the Tmax values (60-85% decrease) appeared to be the most sensitive in comparison with the other parameters that decreased to a lesser extent. The data obtained indicate a possibility of inconsistency between different LTA and flow cytometry parameters in assessing platelet activity and efficacy of antiplatelet drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与氯吡格雷相比,血小板P2Y12拮抗剂替格瑞洛可降低急性心肌梗死(AMI)后的心血管死亡率,但潜在的机制是未知的。因为活化的血小板释放促动脉粥样硬化和促炎的microRNAs,包括miR-125a,miR-125b和miR-223,我们假设这些miRNA的表达在替格瑞洛上较低,与氯吡格雷相比。
    目的:我们比较了miR-125a,接受替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷治疗的AMI患者血浆中miR-125b和miR-223的表达。
    方法:乙酰水杨酸和氯吡格雷经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,60例首次AMI患者随机转用替格瑞洛或继续服用氯吡格雷。miR-223、miR-125a-5p的血浆表达,在基线时、替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷治疗72小时和6个月后以及30名健康志愿者中的1人使用定量聚合酶链反应检测miR-125b。使用ADP测试的多电极聚集测定法用于确定响应于P2Y12抑制剂的血小板反应性。
    结果:miR-125b在AMI患者72h和6个月中的表达更高,与健康志愿者相比(p=0.001),而miR-125a-5p和miR-223的表达具有可比性。在随机接受替格瑞洛治疗的患者中,miR-125b的表达在72h时降低(p=0.007),在6个月时升高回到基线(p=0.005)。miR-125a-5p和miR-223的表达不受从氯吡格雷转换为替格瑞洛的影响。
    结论:替格瑞洛治疗导致AMI后血浆miR-125b表达降低,与氯吡格雷相比。较高的miR-125b表达可能解释了氯吡格雷治疗患者的复发性血栓事件和较差的临床结果。与替格瑞洛相比。
    BACKGROUND: Platelet P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to clopidogrel, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Because activated platelets release proatherogenic and proinflammatory microRNAs, including miR-125a, miR-125b and miR-223, we hypothesized that the expression of these miRNAs is lower on ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel.
    OBJECTIVE: We compared miR-125a, miR-125b and miR-223 expression in plasma of patients after AMI treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel.
    METHODS: After percutaneous coronary intervention on acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel, 60 patients with first AMI were randomized to switch to ticagrelor or to continue with clopidogrel. Plasma expression of miR-223, miR-125a-5p, miR-125b was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction at baseline and after 72 h and 6 months of treatment with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in patients and one in 30 healthy volunteers. Multiple electrode aggregometry using ADP test was used to determine platelet reactivity in response to P2Y12 inhibitors.
    RESULTS: Expression of miR-125b was higher in patients with AMI 72 h and 6 months, compared to healthy volunteers (p = 0.001), whereas expression of miR-125a-5p and miR-223 were comparable. In patients randomized to ticagrelor, expression of miR-125b decreased at 72 h (p = 0.007) and increased back to baseline at 6 months (p = 0.005). Expression of miR-125a-5p and miR-223 was not affected by the switch from clopidogrel to ticagrelor.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor treatment leads to lower plasma expression of miR-125b after AMI, compared to clopidogrel. Higher expression of miR-125b might explain recurrent thrombotic events and worse clinical outcomes in patients treated with clopidogrel, compared to ticagrelor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号